:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:草悟道景觀改善之使用者景觀偏好與注意力恢復效益評估
書刊名:造園景觀學報
作者:吳振發謝燕芬 引用關係黃宣瑄
作者(外文):Wu, Chen-faHsieh, Yen-fenHuang, Hsuan-hsuan
出版日期:2018
卷期:22:3
頁次:頁33-53
主題關鍵詞:草悟道景觀偏好注意力恢復Calligraphy GreenwayLandscape preferenceAttention restoration
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:8
綠地提供市民休憩,具注意力恢復效用,綠地更是都市中不可或缺的場域。都市綠地景觀於建設後數十年,多會進行改善工程,然而新的風貌是否能夠增加民眾的景觀偏好,提高注意力恢復效果,是值得深入討論的議題。本研究目的在於驗證綠地景觀改善是否能夠增加使用者的景觀偏好及注意力恢復效益。研究方法首先回顧景觀偏好及注意力恢復力相關理論,並以臺中草悟道為研究範圍,採用景觀改善前後照片及問卷調查使用者感受,將調查結果進行多變量分析。研究結果顯示,景觀改善後,使用者對於臺中草悟道的景觀偏好、注意力恢復幾乎都高於景觀改善前,顯示此景觀工程深獲民眾喜愛,且認為有助於其注意力之恢復。本研究為景觀工程效益評估之先驅研究,研究方法具有方便操作之可行性,未來將可提供公部門作為景觀工程建造效益評估之參考。
Green landscapes provide people with outdoor relaxation. And they have attention restoration effect. Urban green landscapes are indispensable field. After the construction of urban green space landscape for decades, it will carry out improvements; however, whether the new style can increase people's preferences, and improve attention restoration is worth discussing. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine green landscape improvements can increase the user's landscape preference and attention restorations or not. This research area is Calligraphy Greenway. First, this study reviews the theory of landscape preference and attention restoration. Then, this study uses photos of before improvement and after improvement and conduct questionnaires survey, and multivariate analysis to investigate the feelings of users. The result shows that after landscape improvement, the user's feelings of overall landscape, landscape preferences, and attention restoration of Calligraphy Greenway are higher than the landscapes, which are before improvement. This study is a pioneer in the study of landscape projects benefit assessment, and the study method is feasibility and easy. It will be able to provide the public sector as a reference to benefit assessment of construction projects in future.
期刊論文
1.李素馨、張淑貞(20060300)。都市街道特性與被搶恐懼感之研究。造園學報,12(1),41-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kaplan, S.、Bardwell, L. V.、Slakter, D. B.(1993)。The museum as a restorative environment。Environment and Behavior,25(6),725-742。  new window
3.李素馨、何英齊(20000700)。應用瞳位追蹤方法建立景觀偏好模式之研究。造園學報,6(1/2),71-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Herzog, T. R.、Black, A. M.、Fountaine, K. A.、Knotts, D. J.(1997)。Reflection and Attentional Recovery as Distinctive Benefits of Restorative Environments。Journal of Environmental Psychology,17(2),165-170。  new window
5.李素馨(20000700)。中山高速公路土地使用景觀偏好探討。造園學報,6(1/2),19-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Kaplan, S.(1987)。Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective。Environment and Behavior,19(1),3-32。  new window
7.黃富瑜、林晏州(19990300)。淡水捷運線使用者對沿線景觀知覺與偏好之探討。中國園藝,45(1),101-116。  延伸查詢new window
8.Weng, P. Y.、Chiang, Y. C.(2014)。Psychological restoration through indoor and outdoor leisure activities。Journal of Leisure Research,46(2),203-217。  new window
9.Hartig, T.、Evans, G. W.(1993)。Psychological foundations of nature experience。Advances in Psychology,96,427-457。  new window
10.Kirshbaum, M. N.、Donbavand, J.(2014)。Making the most out of life: Exploring the contribution of attention restorative theory in developing a non-pharmacological intervention for fatigue。Palliative and Supportive Care,12,473-480。  new window
11.Kroh, D. P.、Gimblett, R. H.(1992)。Comparing live experience with pictures in articulating landscape preference。Landscape Research,17(2),58-69。  new window
12.Lückmann, K.、Lagemann, V.、Menzel, S.(2013)。Landscape Assessment and Evaluation of Young People: Comparing Nature-Orientated Habitat and Engineered Habitat Preferences。Environment and Behavior,45(1),86-112。  new window
13.Petros, A. K.、Georgi, J. N.(2011)。Landscape Preference Evaluation for Hospital Environmental Design。Journal of Environmental Protection,2,639-647。  new window
14.Kaplan, S.(1995)。The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework。Journal of Environmental Psychology,15(3),169-182。  new window
15.Hartig, Terry Alan、Mang, Marlis、Evans, Gary W.(1991)。Restorative effects of natural environment experiences。Environment and Behavior,23(1),3-26。  new window
16.Hartig, T.、Böök, A.、Garvill, J.、Olsson, T.、Gärling, T.(1996)。Environmental influences on psychological restoration。Scandinavian Journal of psychology,37(4),378-393。  new window
17.Laumann, K.、Gärling, T.、Stormark, K. M.(2001)。Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments。Journal of Environmental Psychology,21(1),31-44。  new window
研究報告
1.Hartig, Terry、Kaiser, Florian G.、Bowler, Peter A.(1997)。Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness。Uppsala University, Institute for Housing Research。  new window
學位論文
1.詹智勝(2007)。景觀空間涵構對景觀偏好與注意力恢復之影響(碩士論文)。逢甲大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
2.周先捷(2005)。環境偏好與環境恢復性知覺關係之研究--以山景景觀為例(碩士論文)。靜宜大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張習賓(2006)。鄰里公園綠化環境景觀偏好之研究--以台中市公園為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃韻璇(2009)。自然旅遊環境四項心理效益交互影響關係之探討--以南投縣惠蓀林場為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
5.羅淼文(2012)。校園環境恢復性知覺與心理效益之研究--以逢甲大學為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
6.李麗雪(1998)。台灣傳統庭園的情緒體驗與景觀偏好之研究--以板橋林家花園為例(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rapoport, A.(1977)。Human Aspect of Urban Form。New York:Pergamon Press。  new window
2.邵郊(1993)。生理心理學。臺北:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kaplan, Rachel、Kaplan, Stephen(1989)。The experience of nature: A psychological perspective。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ulrich, R. S.(1983)。Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment。Behavior and the natural environment。Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE