:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區農會信用部風險管理與效率評估之研究
書刊名:農業經濟半年刊
作者:劉春初
作者(外文):Liu, Chun-chu
出版日期:2002
卷期:71
頁次:頁1-18
主題關鍵詞:農會信用部風險管理效率評估Credit department of farms' associationsRisk managementEfficiency evaluation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:95
  • 點閱點閱:87
本研究主要是探討國內農會信用部經營效率之評估,透過一連串資料包絡分析法分解影響農會信用部經營風險(呆帳損失)之主要指標為內部及外部因子(環境效果及風險效果)以獲得調整風險後之效率(真正效率值)衡量,以確實顯示農會信用部經營之成效。研究結果顯示,CRS(技術效率)每況愈下,呈現逐年遞減趨勢,由此可看出在金融自由化下,放款競爭壓力下且增加放款風險及收入的減少,這可由SE(規模效果)所引起,而EE(環境效果)則為非常穩定且接近1,顯示出環境因子對於績效之影響,相對於風險效果並不顯著,所以農會信用部經營績效的不彰,其主要歸咎原因將相對來自於組織內部因素所引起。RE(風險效果)在80-85年非常穩定,而自86年後呈現下降趨勢,這代表農會信用部呆帳損失日益擴大,造成經營成本遞增,而EE、RE與SE三者之關係透過Pearson相關係數顯示出SE與RE具有高度相關,所以當一組織規模日趨擴大時,所帶來影響之內部風險也相對於外部環境高。
This is empirical study to examine the effect of risk and efficiency for credit departments of farmers associations in Taiwan. Because of have many financial institutions interaction competition in Taiwan. This greater competition, though driving firms to improve their efficiency, may also encourage them to orient their businesses towards activities, sectors, and or clients of higher risk. However, in spite of the importance of jointly evaluating efficiency and risk, the traditional measurements of efficiency do not take risk into account. Furthermore, the few studies that attempt to include risk do not separate the part of risk that is due to poor management (internal) from that which originates in the economic environment (external). This article apply sequential DEA procedure to break down the main indicator of banking risk provision for loan losses into internal and external components, in order subsequently to obtain measurements of efficiency adjusted for risk. By means of this procedure, not only is it possible to obtain measurements of efficiency appropriately adjusted for risk, but also to determine what proportion is due to bad risk management and what proportion is due to exogenous factors that are not attributable to the firms. Our major empirical findings are as follow: Basically, increase loan competition caused efficiency (CRS) to fall as a consequence of an increase in financial cost and decrease in revenues. This fact can be explained almost completely by a decrease in scale effect. The environment effect is also very stable and close to one. The risk effect is also stable in 1991-1996. But in 1997-2000 risk variables appear to have had more impact on efficiency due to adverse risk management circumstances.
期刊論文
1.Hughes, J. P.、Lang, W.、Mester, L. J.、Moon, C. G.(1996)。Efficient Banking under Interstate Branching。Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,28(4),1045-1071。  new window
2.Hughes, J. P.、Mester, J. L.(1993)。A Quality and Risk-Adjusted Cost Function for Banks: Evidence on the Too-Big-Fail Doctrine。Journal of Productivity Analysis,4(3),293-315。  new window
3.陳木在、陳錦村(20000900)。銀行風險概述。臺灣金融財務季刊,1(1),59-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李青萍(2000)。影響農會信用部經營績效之因素與擠兌前後經營績效變化之研究。農業金融論叢,44,49-93。  延伸查詢new window
5.張靜貞、賴怡君(1999)。農會信用部的效率評估與風險管制。農業金融論叢,42,33-58。  延伸查詢new window
6.Berger, A. N.、DeYoung, R.(1997)。Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks。Journal of Banking and Finance,21,849-870。  new window
7.鄭秀玲、周群新(19980900)。調整風險後之銀行效率分析:臺灣銀行業的實證研究。經濟論文叢刊,26(3),337-366。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.葉彩蓮、陳澤義(19980600)。臺灣地區銀行的總效率與技術效率--資料包絡分析之應用。臺灣銀行季刊,49(2),163-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃介良、陳美菁(19990600)。基層金融機構合併之效益分析。管理學報,16(2),315-348。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃台心(19970300)。臺灣地區本國銀行成本效率之實證研究--隨機邊界模型之應用。人文及社會科學集刊,9(1),85-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.徐守德、廖四郎、王毓敏、葉正乾(19990300)。臺灣地區商業銀行的技術性效率研究。亞太經濟管理評論,2(2),23-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Berger, Allen N.、Humphrey, David B.(1997)。Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research。European Journal of Operational Research,98(2),175-212。  new window
13.劉玉雪(1998)。金融業之風險管理。彰銀資料,47(12),1-13。  延伸查詢new window
14.李正福(2000)。宏觀與微觀銀行風險管理。中國商銀月刊,19(10),1-5。  延伸查詢new window
15.林滿珍(1998)。金融機構的風險管理(上)。高銀行訊,13,4-24。  延伸查詢new window
16.林滿珍(1998)。金融機構的風險管理(下)。高銀行訊,14,39-61。  延伸查詢new window
17.林凱鄉(1997)。銀行經營風險與管理(上)。華南金控,47(6),12-19。  延伸查詢new window
18.林凱鄉(1997)。銀行經營風險與管理(中)。華南金控,47(7),5-13。  延伸查詢new window
19.林凱鄉(1997)。銀行經營風險與管理(下)。華南金控,47(8),10-16。  延伸查詢new window
20.陳土根(2000)。銀行授信業務的經營策略-加強風險管理,降低逾放比率。彰銀資料,49(12),8-16。  延伸查詢new window
21.唐正儀、許振明(1998)。銀行市場風險管理與市場風險值估測。存款保險資訊季刊,12(2),107-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.陳錦村(2000)。銀行之風險管理。存款保險資訊季刊,13(3),82-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.黃仁德、曾令寧(2000)。從我國加入WTO談銀行的風險管理趨勢。臺灣金融財務季刊,1(1),59-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Beston, G. J.(1972)。Economics of Scale of Financial Institution。Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,4,312-341。  new window
25.Humphrey, D. B.(1990)。Why do estimates of bank scale economies differ?。Economic Review,76(5),38-50。  new window
26.Mester, L.(1994)。How efficient are third district banks?。Business Review,January。  new window
27.Murray, J. D.、White, R. W.(1983)。Economies of Scale and Deposit-taking Financial Institutions in Canada: A Study of British Columbia Credit Unions。Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,12(1),58-70。  new window
研究報告
1.陳碧綉(1996)。臺灣地區本國銀行業經營效率之評估。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳錦村(1993)。商業銀行經營績效評估模式之建立:模擬方法。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.Banker, R. D.、Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Swarts, J.、Thomas, D. A.(1989)。An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses。Austin, TX。  new window
4.Mester, Loretta J.(1994)。Efficiency of Banks in the Third Federal Reserve District。Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia。  new window
學位論文
1.鍾秋悅(1998)。臺灣農會信用部生產力影響因素之探討(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李叢禎(1997)。金融自由化對臺灣地區金融業生產力與技術偏向之影響(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Thomas, D. L.,Greffe, R.,Grant, K. G.(1986)。Application of data envelopment analysis to management audits of electric distribution utilities,Austin, TX。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE