:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用平衡計分卡的概念設計國道客運公司之策略性績效評估系統
書刊名:交大管理學報
作者:郭秀貴 引用關係任維廉 引用關係鄒育菁
作者(外文):Kuo, Hsiu-kueiJen, WilliamChou,Yu-jing
出版日期:2002
卷期:22:1
頁次:頁111-140
主題關鍵詞:國道客運平衡計分卡績效評估策略National freeway bus serviceBalanced scorecardPerformance measurementStrategy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:57
國道客運市場的競爭日趨激烈,客運公司在此環境下,不但必須發展自己的策略,更需要一套以策略為起點的績效評估制度,引導員工的行業,在組織之中落實策略。1990年代,Kaplan與Norton鑑於傳統過度依賴財務性績效衡量指標的缺失而發展出的一套適用於未來組織策略性績效評估制度,也就是平衡計分卡,正符合目前國道客運公司之需求。 本研究選擇一國道客運公司為案例,規劃與設計一套以策略為出發點的平衡計分卡。由於該公司並沒有一個明確的策略方向,本個案研究提出一個修正後的平衡計分卡分析架構,以策略擬定為出發點,設計一套連結策略與量度指標的平衡計分卡。研究結果發現,平衡計分卡除了可以提供公司一套由四個構面監控策略成效的績評估方式外,應用本研究所提出的分析架構,對於策略模糊的公司具有顯著的管理意涵。
The market of national freeway bus service has become more and more competitive. In the completive market, these bus service carriers must think over their own strategy, and use the performance measurement system linking to strategy to guide the behavior of the employee. In 1990s, Kaplan and Norton addressed the “balanced scorecard”, a new performance measurement system that fit future organization, in view of defects of the traditional performance measurement system. That just fits the needs of these bus service carries. We took a bus company as a case study, and designed a balanced scorecard for it. Because this company had the ambiguous strategy, we constructed “an adjusted balanced scorecard analytic framwork”. After empirical testing, we found applying balanced scorecard can provide a performance measurement system to monitor the performance to their strategy from four perspectives. And by using the new analytic framework, the company can get significant management implications.
期刊論文
1.Kaplan, R. S.、Norton, D. P.(1993)。Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work。Harvard Businesses Review,71(5),134-142。  new window
2.Drucker, P. F.(1995)。The Information Executives Truly Need。Harvard Business Review,73(1),54-63。  new window
3.任維廉、徐聖智、張傳琳(19970300)。公車駕駛員工作壓力量表之設計與測試--以大有巴士、福和客運為例。運輸學刊,10(1)=35,91-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1992)。The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance。Harvard Business Review,70(1),71-79。  new window
5.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system。Harvard Business Review,74(1),75-85。  new window
研究報告
1.任維廉、高凱、郭秀貴(1999)。國運客運路線開放之效益評估暨審議作業檢討改善之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hope, J.(1997)。Competing in the third wave-the ten key management issues of the information age。Boston, Mass:Harvard Business School Press。  new window
2.Porter, Michael E.(1985)。Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance。New York, NY:Schuster Inc.。  new window
3.Armstrong, Gary、Kotler, Philip、方世榮(1997)。行銷學原理。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Porter, Michael E.(1980)。Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors。Free Press。  new window
5.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action。Boston:Harvard Business School Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE