策略性績效評估系統對銀行債權管理績效影響之探討：以權益公平認知與目標一致性為中介影響變數_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	策略性績效評估系統對銀行債權管理績效影響之探討：以權益公平認知與目標一致性為中介影響變數
書刊名：	當代會計
作者：	盧正宗／祝道松／謝俊吉
作者(外文)：	Lu, Cheng-tsung／Zhu, Dauw-song／Hsien, Chun-chi
出版日期：	2014
卷期：	15:1
頁次：	頁27-62
主題關鍵詞：	策略性績效評估系統；目標一致性；程序公平；分配公平；SPMS；Strategic performance measurement systems；Goal alignment；Procedural justice；Distributive justice
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:149 點閱:82

為了進行內部管理制度的革新與調整，越來越多的銀行相繼執行策略性績效評估系統（strategic performance measurement systems, SPMS）來強化其競爭力。然而以往研究發現SPMS與工作績效間並非呈現絕對的直接影響，管理會計學者認為兩變數間可能存在其他變數的間接影響。故本研究目的在於探討銀行SPMS特質，對其員工權益公平認知（程序公平與分配公平）、目標一致性與債權管理績效之影響，研究樣本包括個案銀行的108位債權管理部門人員。研究結果發現：（1）SPMS特質會正向影響員工的權益公平認知與目標一致性，進而對債權管理績效產生間接的影響效果。（2）權益公平與目標一致性認知變數之間，彼此亦存在因果關連性，其中程序公平與分配公平會正向影響員工的目標一致性認知。本研究之貢獻為建構一SPMS特質與工作績效之配適模型，俾作為銀行在實務管理上之參考。

以文找文

Banks have increasingly employed an innovative mechanism-strategic performance measurement systems (SPMS)-to reform their internal management system and to further competitiveness. Previous studies have found that an ambiguous relationship exists between SPMS and job performance; however, management accounting scholars have proposed that other variables may indirectly affect this relationship. This study aims, thus, to explore bank's SPMS characteristics which affect goal alignment, loan management performance and equity fairness perceptions (procedural justice, distributive justice) of banks employees. Using as a sample of 108 employees from the case bank's loan management department, this study finds that SPMS characteristics are positively related to equity fairness perceptions and goal alignment, and are related to loan management performance through such mediatingvariables as goal alignment, procedural justice, and distributive justice. Furthermore, a significant causal relationship exists between equity fairness perception and goal alignment. Finally, this study finds procedural justice and distributive justice have a positive effect on goal alignment. The study's contribution consists in establishing a fitted model of SPMS characteristics and job performance, thereby providing banks practical references for loan management.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Aurier, P.、Siadou-Martin, B. A.(2007)。Perceived justice and consumption experience evaluations: A qualitative and experimental investigation。International Journal of Service Industry Management，18(5)，450-471。
2.	Burney, Laurie L.、Widener, Sally K.(2007)。Strategic Performance Measurement Systems, Job Relevant Information and Managerial Behavioral Responses: Role Stress and Performance。Behavioral Research in Accounting，19(1)，43-69。
3.	Govindarajan, V.(1984)。Appropriateness of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation: An Empirical Examination of Environmental Uncertainty as an Intervening Variable。Accounting, Organizations and Society，9(2)，125-135。
4.	江淑貞、吳桂燕(2008)。決定民營化企業績效提昇因素之分析。輔仁管理評論，15(2)，1-22。延伸查詢
5.	李佳玲、史雅男、邱筠淇(20120700)。不確定性、協同合作與管理控制系統之關聯性。會計評論，55，77-117。延伸查詢
6.	倪豐裕、莊曜愷、邱炳乾(20060100)。知覺任務不確定性、組織承諾、管理會計資訊系統三者對管理績效交互作用之影響。管理與系統，13(1)，1-14。延伸查詢
7.	陳玉麟(20120100)。企業策略、非財務績效衡量與總經理薪酬：電子業證據。會計評論，54，117-150。延伸查詢
8.	黃劭彥、鍾宇軒、歐建民(20090500)。股權結構、背書保證、會計師核閱與自願性財務預測精準度之關聯性研究。當代會計，10(1)，29-62。延伸查詢
9.	Alles, M. G.、Kogan, A.、Vasarhelyi, M. A.(2008)。Exploiting comparative advantage: A paradigm for value added research in accounting information systems。International Journal of Accounting Information Systems，9(4)，202-215。
10.	Bouillon, M. L.、Ferrier, G. D.、Stuebs, M. T.、West, T. D.(2006)。The economic benefit of goal congruence and implications for management control systems。Journal of Accounting & Public Policy，25(3)，265-298。
11.	Cohen, J. F.、Toleman, M.(2006)。The IS-business relationship and its implications for performance: An empirical study of South African and Australian organisations.International。Journal of Information Management，26(6)，457-468。
12.	Fries, S., D.、Neven, P.、aci, A.(2006)。entry, privatization and bank performance in transition。Economics of Transition，14(4)，579-610。
13.	Gates, S.、Germain, C.(2010)。Integrating sustainability measures into strategic performance measurement systems: An empirical study。Management Accounting Quarterly，11(3)，1-7。
14.	Hall, M.(2008)。The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance。Accounting, Organizations and Society，33，2-3。
15.	Itami, H.(1975)。Evaluation measures and goal congruence under uncertainty。Journal of Accounting Research，13(1)，73-96。
16.	Jap, S. D.、Anderson, E.(2003)。Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism。Management Science，49(12)，1684-1701。
17.	Kelly, K. O.(2007)。Feedback and incentives on nonfinancial value drivers: Effects on managerial decision making。Contemporary Accounting Research，24(2)，523-556。
18.	Kwon, S.、Kim, M. S.、Kang, S. C.、Kim, M. U.(2008)。Employee reactions to gainsharing under seniority pay systems: The mediating effect of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice。Human Resource Management，47(4)，757-775。
19.	Lau, C. M.、Moser, A.(2008)。Behavioral effects of nonfinancial performance measures: The role of procedural fairness。Behavioral Research in Accounting，20(2)，55-71。
20.	Lillis, A. M.(2002)。Managing multiple dimensions of manufacturing performance-an exploratory study。Accounting, Organizations and Society，27(6)，497-529。
21.	Parker, L. D.(1976)。Goal congruence: A misguided accounting concept。Abacus，12(1)，3-13。
22.	Perego, P.、Hartmann, F.(2009)。Aligning performance measurement systems with strategy: The case of environmental strategy。Abacus，45(4)，397-428。
23.	Phillips, P. A.(2007)。The balanced scorecard and strategic control: A hotel case study analysis。The Service Industries Journal，27(6)，731-746。
24.	Sweeney, P. D.、McFarlin, D. B.(1993)。Workers’ evaluation of the "ends" and the "means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes，55(1)，23-40。
25.	Webb, R. A.(2004)。Managersâ commitment to the goals contained in a strategic performance measurement system。Contemporary Accounting Research，21(4)，925-958。
26.	Atkinson, A. A.、Waterhouse, J. H.、Wells, R. B.(1997)。A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement。Sloan Management Review，38(3)，25-37。
27.	Brownell, Peter、McInnes, Morris James(1986)。Budgetary Participation, Motivation, and Managerial Performance。The Accounting Review，61(4)，587-600。
28.	Govindarajan, V.、Gupta, Anil K.(1985)。Linking Control Systems to Business Unit Strategy: Impact on Performance。Accounting, Organizations and Society，10(1)，51-66。
29.	Klein, S. M.(197312)。Pay factors as predictors to satisfaction: A comparison of reinforcement, equity, and expectancy。Academy of Management Journal，16(4)，598-610。
30.	Lam, S. S. K.、Schaubroeck, J.、Aryee, S.(200202)。Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcome: A cross-national study。Journal of Organizational Behavior，23(1)，1-18。
31.	Wentzel, K.(2002)。The influence of fairness perceptions and goal commitment on managers' performance in a budget setting。Behavioral Research in Accounting，14(1)，247-271。
32.	黃劭彥、林有志、林琦珍、施志成(20080200)。智慧資本、智慧資本附加價值與企業績效之整合分析。臺灣管理學刊，8(1)，27-46。延伸查詢
33.	Chenhall, R. H.、Brownell, P.(1988)。The effect of participative budgeting on job satisfaction and performance: Role ambiguity as an intervening variable。Accounting, Organizations and Society，13(3)，225-233。
34.	Noun, H.、Parker, R. J.(199807)。The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment。Accounting, Organizations and Society，23(5/6)，467-483。
35.	Vancouver, J. B.、Schmitt, N. W.(1991)。An Exploratory Examination of Person-organization Fit: Organizational Goal Congruence。Personnel Psychology，44(2)，333-352。
36.	羅新興、戚樹誠、黃國隆(20050600)。受評者對績效評核的程序正義知覺之前因及其影響。管理學報，22(3)，341-358。延伸查詢
37.	Choe, J. M.(1998)。The Effects of User Participation on the Design of Accounting Information Systems。Information and Management，34(3)，185-198。
38.	Abernethy, M. A.、Stoelwinder, J. U.(1991)。Budget use, task uncertainty, system goal orientation and subunit performance: A test of the fit hypothesis in not-for-profit hospitals。Accounting, Organizations and Society，16(2)，105-120。
39.	Burney, L. L.、Henle, C. A.、Widener, S. K.(2009)。A path model examining the relations among strategic performance measurement system characteristics, organizational justice, and extra and in-role performance。Accounting, Organizations and Society，34(3/4)，305-321。
40.	Tang, Thomas Li-Ping、Sarsfield-Baldwin, Linda J.(1996)。Distributive and Procedural Justice as Related to Satisfaction and Commitment。SAM Advanced Management Journal，61(3)，25-31。
41.	Kim, W. Chan、Mauborgne, Renee A.(1997)。Fair Process: Managing in the Knowledge Economy。Harvard Business Review，75(4)，65-75。
42.	Ittner, Christopher D.、Larcker, David F.(1998)。Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications。Journal of Management Accounting Research，10，205-238。
43.	祝道松、倪豐裕、盧正宗(20100100)。預算控制制度對醫院組織效能影響之探討--以角色壓力作為中介變數。會計評論，50，57-87。延伸查詢
44.	郭秀貴、任維廉、鄒育菁(20020400)。應用平衡計分卡的概念設計國道客運公司之策略性績效評估系統。交大管理學報，22(1)，111-140。延伸查詢
45.	林淑姬、樊景立、吳靜吉、司徒達賢(1994)。薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究。管理評論，13(2)，87-108。延伸查詢
46.	O'Reilly, Charles A. III、Chatman, Jennifer A.、Caldwell, David F.(1991)。People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit。Academy of Management Journal，34(3)，487-516。
47.	Grafton, J.、Lillis, A. M.、Widener, S. K.(2010)。The role of performance measurement and evaluation in building organizational capabilities and performance。Accounting, Organizations and Society，35(7)，689-706。
48.	Chenhall, R. H.(2005)。Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: An exploratory study。Accounting, Organizations and Society，30(5)，395-422。
49.	Zohar, D.(1995)。The Justice Perspective of Job Stress。Journal of Organizational Behavior，16(5)，487-495。
50.	Alchian, Armen A.、Demsetz, Harold(1972)。Production Information Costs, and Economic Organization。American Economic Review，62(5)，777-795。
51.	Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，16(1)，74-94。
52.	陳育成(20021000)。臺灣金融業的壞帳管理及相關研究。管理評論，21(4)，1-17。延伸查詢
53.	McDonald, Roderick P.、Ho, Moon-Ho Ringo(2002)。Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses。Psychological Methods，7(1)，64-82。
54.	Preacher, Kristopher J.、Hayes, Andrew F.(2008)。Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models。Behavior Research Methods，40(3)，879-891。
55.	Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1992)。The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance。Harvard Business Review，70(1)，71-79。
56.	Motowidlo, Stephan J.、Van Scotter, James R.(1994)。Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance。Journal of Applied Psychology，79(4)，475-480。
57.	Clarke, George R. G.、Cull, Robert、Shirley, Mary M.(2005)。Bank Privatization in Developing Countries: A Summary of Lessons and Findings。Journal of Banking & Finance，29(8/ 9)，1905-1930。

圖書
1.	Creswell, J. W.(2002)。Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches。Sage Publications, Inc.。
2.	Kaplan, R. S.、Norton, D. P.(2009)。The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage。Boston, MA：Harvard Business School Press。
3.	Leventhal, G. S.(1976)。Equity Theory: Toward a General Theory of Social Interaction。New York：Academic Press。
4.	Sholihin, M.、Pike, R.(200909)。Fairness in performance evaluation and its behavioural consequences。Accounting & Business Research。
5.	Guieford, J. P.(1965)。Fundamental statistics in phychology and education。N.Y：McGramn-Hill。
6.	Daft, Richard L.(2001)。Organization, Theory, and Design。South-Western College Publishing。
7.	Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(2006)。Alignment: Using the balanced scorecard to create corporate synergies。Boston, MA：Harvard Business School Press。
8.	Kaplan, R. S.、Norton, D. P.(2001)。The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment。Boston, MA：Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation。
9.	Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York：John Wiley & Sons。
10.	Campbell, John P.、Dunnette, Marvin D.、Lawler, Edward E. III、Weick, Karl E. Jr.(1970)。Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness。McGraw-Hill。
11.	Lind, E. A.、Tyler, T. R.(1988)。The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice。Plenum Press。
12.	Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action。Boston：Harvard Business School Press。
13.	Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(2004)。Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes。Boston：Harvard Business School Press。
14.	Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。
15.	Hair, J. F.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R.、Black, W. C.、Babin, B. J.(2010)。Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings。Prentice Hall International。

圖書論文
1.	Adams, John Stacey(1965)。Inequity in social exchange。Advances in experimental social psychology。Academic Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	Does Family Business Affect the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Value? A Study in Different Industry Taiwan
2.	經營策略對上市、櫃銀行經營績效的影響
3.	薪酬委員會對績效敏感性與內控缺失關聯性之影響--以臺灣初次上市櫃及首次公開發行公司為例
4.	產業創新條例對企業發展智慧資本及企業績效之影響
5.	審計委員會品質對銀行業盈餘管理的影響
6.	運動領域公平知覺之文獻回顧
7.	中國家族企業及後代接班對研發創新活動之影響
8.	實質盈餘管理、公司治理、高階經理人報酬
9.	董事及高階管理者超額薪酬對員工薪酬之影響︰執行長權力調節效果之探討
10.	智慧資本對公司績效之影響：以臺灣電子公司為例
11.	不同生命週期下核心代理問題對高階經理團隊薪酬之影響
12.	董事會特性和財務主管特質之關聯
13.	國軍地域加給之研究
14.	探討任務屬性、績效量度配適性對醫師工作績效之影響
15.	營銷渠道中的合同治理、公平與角色外利他行為

1.	國民中學教師自我調節學習、驚輸、工作投入與組織公民行為關係之研究-以工作投入為中介變項
2.	應用分量迴歸於營運績效及財務危機與盈餘管理關係之探討–以上市企業為例
3.	企業組織於環境不確定性、訓練品質系統與組織績效關係之研究
4.	國民小學教師組織政治知覺、印象管理動機與組織公民行為之關聯性：多層次模型的分析
5.	組織公平與印象管理對薪酬制度與角色外行為的干擾效果研究
6.	從智慧資本的觀點探討營建產業經營績效之研究
7.	以社會認知理論觀點探討組織知識分享行為
8.	高職校長轉型領導、教師組織承諾與教師組織公民行為關係之研究
9.	線上市集買方認知公平的前置因素與其對信任和再購意願之影響
10.	部屬知覺上下關係對組織公民行為之影響－以權力距離為調節變項
11.	觀光旅館業薪酬制度之公平對工作滿足與離職傾向之影響：第一線員工為實證對象
12.	組織公平對客服員工角色外行為之影響
13.	管理會計系統對知覺決策攸關資訊與效能之影響
14.	銀行風險胃納之衡量與績效評估
15.	大學校院體育行政組織公民行為影響因素模式之研究

1.	校長正向領導：理念、研究與實踐
2.	華人企業組織中的忠誠
3.	組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行為
4.	工作動機
5.	台灣的組織行為研究 : 過去、現在及未來

無相關著作

1.	運用品質機能展開建構產學合作服務品質績效評估模式
2.	臺灣拖網漁業之效率評估--非意欲產出與擁擠投入的影響
3.	中國銀行業女性董事與銀行財務績效之關係
4.	臺灣電子業家族經理人之外部董事會連結與公司創新：論控制家族代理問題之影響
5.	探討臺灣薄膜太陽能電池產業之合作網絡評估模式：以多目標決策之觀點
6.	民用航空運量變化對機場經濟效益與環境成本之影響--以臺北國際航空站為例
7.	服務補救、顧客忠誠度與口碑宣傳關聯性研究
8.	高屏地區國小教師專業發展學習動機與專業表現之研究
9.	無線網通業外包績效評估之研究

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫