:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:潛在分類模式在括號概念的應用
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:謝如山 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Ju-shan
出版日期:2003
卷期:26:2
頁次:頁277-304
主題關鍵詞:潛在分類模式括號概念項目反應論The latent class modelThe concept of parenthesesItem response theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:29
本研究的目的在於應用行列相關模式(the row and column association model by Goodman, 1986, 1991)與潛在分類分析的方法(the latent class analysis, Hagennars,1990),評量學生在多重計分的題目(polytomous items)表現。潛在分類分析與Master’s(1982)部分計分模式(Partial credit model)的聯結也在本文中描述。資料由謝如山(民89)的實證研究來檢視學生在括號概念的使用層次。有關括號概念的題組將被用來分析。使用潛在分類分析有三項優點。第一是學生的學習認知階層可被顯示,如在結合律的題目中,學生在第一層次誤解題意,第二層次只能選出與題意相符的選項,再一層次選擇有括號的題項,最高層次可辨識結合律。不同於項目反應論(Lord, 1980),潛在分類分析假設潛在變項為間斷的,可判定不同層次能力的特徵為何。第二項優點是多重空間的考慮是可行的。如潛在分類分析中可假設兩個以上的潛在變項。第三個優點是無母數估計的分配假設。這在本資料中的假設是相當重要的。因為有部份題項的分配為偏態。研究結果可為認知心理學的統計方法做出些許具體的貢獻。
The aim of the study is to assess children’s performance in the polytomous items via the row and column (RC(M)) association model (Goodman, 1986, 19991) with the latent class analysis approach (Hagenaars, 1990). The connection between latent class analysis and Master’s(1982)partial credit model is described. The empirical example is given by Hsieh’s (1999) study to examine whether children recognize the concept of parentheses. The sets of the parentheses-uses items are discussed. Three advantages were addressed by using the latent class analysis. First is that children’s learning hierarchy can be described such that children in the first latent class misunderstood the problem. The next level is to choose the option which corresponds to the meaning of the questions. And the next, students choose the options that are parentheses related. The highest level is that children are likely to recognize for example, the associative property. Different from the item response theory(Lord,1980), the latent variable in the latent class analysis is assumed to be categorical. The features of the different levels in the latent variable can be discriminated. Second, the multidimensional approach is applicable. For example, the number of the latent variables can be more than one. The third is that a non-parametric estimation method is assumed in the latent class analysis. This hypothesis is vital because the distributions in some items are skewed. The results made some contribution to the cognitive psychology field.
期刊論文
1.Masters, G. N.(1982)。A Rasch model for partical credit scoring。Psychometrika,47,149-174。  new window
2.Gitomer, D. H.、Yamamoto, K.(1991)。Performance modeling that integrates latent trait and class theory。Journal of Educational Measurement,28,173-189。  new window
3.謝如山(20000800)。括號學習的理論模式。藝術學報,66,149-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Tatsuoka, K. K.(1983)。Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory。Journal of Educational Measurement,20(4),345-354。  new window
5.Dempster, Arthur P.、Laird, Nan M.、Rubin, Donald B.(1977)。Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm。Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological),39(1),1-38。  new window
6.Goodman, L. A.(1974)。The Analysis of Systems of Qualitative Variables When Some of the Variables Are Unobservable. Part I: A Modified Latent Structure Approach。American Journal of Sociology,79(5),1179-1259。  new window
7.Goodman, Leo A.(1974)。Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models。Biometrika,61(2),215-231。  new window
8.Raftery, Adrian E.(1986)。Choosing Models for Cross-classifications。American Sociological Review,51,145-146。  new window
9.Goodman, L. A.(1986)。Some useful extensions of the usual correspondence analysis approach and the usual log-linear models approach in the analysis of contingency tables (with discussion)。International Statistical Review,54,243-270。  new window
10.Goodman, L. A.(1991)。Models, measures, and graphical displays in the analysis of contingency tables (with discussion)。Journal of the American Statistical Association,86,1085-1138。  new window
11.Haberman, S. J.(1974)。Log-linear models for frequency tables derived by indirect observation。Annals of Statistics,2,911-924。  new window
12.Marceady, G. B.、Dayton, C. M.(1980)。The nature and use of state recognizey models。Applied Psychological Measurement,5,493-516。  new window
會議論文
1.Haberman, S. J.(1976)。Interative scaling procedures for log-linear models for frequency data derived by indirect observation。沒有紀錄。45-50。  new window
2.Heinen, A.、Croon, M.(1992)。Latent structure measurement models for polychotomous items。Trento, Italy。  new window
研究報告
1.Vermont, J. K.(1997)。LEM: Log-linear and event history analysis with missing data using the EM algorithm。Tilburg:Tilburg University。  new window
2.Yamamoto, K.(1989)。Hybrid model of IRT and latent class model。Princeton, NJ。  new window
圖書
1.Heinen, T.(1996)。Latent Class and Discrete Latent Trait Models: Similarities and Differences。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Clogg, C. C.、Shihadeh, E. S.(1994)。Statistical models for ordinal data。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
3.Hagennars, J. A.(1990)。Categorical Longitudinal Data。Categorical Longitudinal Data。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
4.Haberman, S. J.(1979)。Analysis of qualitative data, vol. 2. New development。Analysis of qualitative data, vol. 2. New development。New York, NY。  new window
5.Lazarsfeld, P. F.(1950)。The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis。Measurement and prediction。Princeton, NJ。  new window
6.Lazarsfeld, P. F.(1950)。The interpretation and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis。Measurement and prediction。Princeton, NJ。  new window
7.Paulson, J. A.(1985)。Latent class representation of systemic patterns in test responses。Latent class representation of systemic patterns in test responses。Portland, OR。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE