:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:遊戲型態教學對國小學生「自然與生活科技」學習之研究
書刊名:臺北市立師範學院學報. 人文藝術類社會科學類科學教育類
作者:潘怡吟王美芬
作者(外文):Pan, I-yinWang, Mei-fun
出版日期:2003
卷期:34
頁次:頁157-172
主題關鍵詞:遊戲教學國小自然問題解決學習態度Play-based science teachingProblem solvingLearning attitudes science education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:21
     本研究依據遊戲理論及問題解決的理論架構,選取國小五年級自然科三個單元的教材,編擬出遊戲型態的教學方式,包含規則性遊戲、競爭性的團體遊戲、模仿遊戲、紙牌遊戲、角色扮演遊戲以及問題解決遊戲,探討遊戲型態教學對國小學生學習態度、學習成就以及問題解決能力的影響。研究者以準實驗研究法,方便叢集選樣臺北市某國民小學五年級學生作為研究對象。實驗組施以遊戲型態教學方式進行教學,控制組施以一般自然科的教學方式,進行二個月的實驗教學。研究工具包含自然科學學習態度量表、自然科成就測驗、問題解決能力量表、問題解決測驗、問題解決紀錄表、遊戲型態教學意見調查表。進行前後測之資料收集後,進行統計、共變數分析,以考驗實驗組與控制組之(1)自然科的學習態度(2)自然科的學習成就(3)問題解決能力(4)問題解決測驗等之顯著差異;加上(5)問題解決紀錄表及(6)遊戲型態教學意見調查表的資料收集,做質的輔助分析。 研究的主要結果為遊戲型態教學方式有助於學生學習態度、問題解決能力的增進。但是在學習成就方面,實驗組的學生與控制組的學生並無顯著差異。研究者更提出建議,以供教師參考。
     The purpose of the study were to examine the impacts of play-based science teaching/learning upon the students' attitudes, interest of studying, achievement in science learning and ability of problem solving. The researcher designed play-based scientific activities that were based on the theories of play, problem-solving process and learning theories. There were 4 fifth-grade homogeneous classes that were sampled to receive play- and game-based instructions, while the other two classes were control group that received traditional instructions. The instruments developed and used in the study were: (1) the Test of Learning Attitude in Science Learning, that includes sub-instruments of confidence, interest and belief, (2) the Tests of Science Learning Achievement【1】and【2】, (3) the Test of Problem-Solving【1】and【2】, that include sub-instruments of realizing problem, defining problem, identifying factor, providing information and deciding strategy, (4) the Questionnaire of Problem-Solving. The statistical tests were calculated to see if there were significances. The results have shown that the experiment group was significant differences on total attitude, confidence, interest of learning and total problem solving, realizing problem, identifying factors and providing information. However there was no significant difference on sub-instruments of achievement, belief of learning science, defining problem and deciding strategy. In summary, the play-based science teaching/learning were recommended for elementary level. The suggestions for teaching and further study were made at the end of this report.
期刊論文
1.Pepler, D. J.、Ross, H. S.(1981)。The effects of play on convergent and divergent problem-solving。Child Development,52,1202-1210。  new window
2.D'Zurilla, T. J.、Goldfried, M. R.(1971)。Problem Solving and Behavior Modification。Journal of Abnormal Psychology,78(1),107-126。  new window
3.汪榮才(19910600)。資賦優異學生創造性問題解決的教學。臺南師院學報,24,27-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Pantidos, P.、Spathi, K.、Vitoratos, E.(2001)。The use of drama in science education: The case of "Blegdamsvej Faust"。Science & Education,10,107-117。  new window
5.Simon, T.、Smith, P. K.(1983)。The study of play and problem solving in preschool children: Have experimenter effects been responsible for previous results?。British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1,289-297。  new window
6.Krulik, S.、Rudnick, J. A.(1983)。Strategy Game and Problem Solving: An Instructional Pair Whose Time Has Come!。The Arithmetic Teacher,31(4),26-28。  new window
學位論文
1.王克蒂(1999)。數學遊戲教學之效益研究--以國小四年級為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝真華(1999)。概念構圖教學對國小四年級學童在自然科學習成效之研究(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院,臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
3.薛靜婷(1999)。環境教育遊戲化活動中兒童參與之研究(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林麗惠(2000)。原住民與非原住民學童的認知風格、推理表現與問題解決表現之相關研究--以桃園縣平地國小學童為例(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Vygotsky, L. S.(1976)。Play and its role in the mental development of play。New York:Basic Books。  new window
2.Bruner, Jerome S.、邵瑞珍(1997)。教學論。臺北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Groos, K.(1914)。The Play of Man。New York:Appleton Century。  new window
4.郭靜晃、Johnson, James Ewald、Yawkey, Thomas D.、Christie, James F.(1992)。兒童遊戲--遊戲發展的理論與實務。臺北:揚智出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Dewey, John、姜文閔(1992)。我們如何思維。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳龍安(1993)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Mayer, Richard E.、林清山(1990)。教育心理學:認知取向。臺北市:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Eisner, E. W.(1982)。Cognition and Curriculum: A Basis for Deciding What to Teach。New York:Longman。  new window
9.Piaget, J.(1962)。Play, dreams and imitation in childhood。Norton。  new window
10.余柏玉(1980)。幼兒發現學習教學法的實驗。台北:北市師專。  延伸查詢new window
11.董奇(1995)。兒童劁造力發展心理。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.Bowman(1990)。Children's Play and Learning: Perspectives and Policy Implications。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
13.Frobel, F.(1902)。The Education of Man。New York:D. Appleton。  new window
14.Montessori, M.(1917)。The Advance Montessori Method。New York:Dell。  new window
15.王美芬、熊召弟(1995)。國民小學自然科教材教法。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
16.Erikson, Erik H.(1963)。Childhood and Society。W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.。  new window
17.Bruner, Jerome S.(1960)。The Process of Education。Harvard University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Sylva, K.、Bruner, J. S.、Genova, P.(1976)。The role of play in the problem solving of children 3-5 years old。Play-Its role in development and evolution。New York:Basic Books。  new window
2.Rubin, K. H.、Fein, Greta G.、Vandenberg, Brian(1983)。Play。Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top