:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用強化錨式教學改善數學低成就學生文字題解題能力之研究
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:潘文福 引用關係蔡敏潔
作者(外文):Pan, Wen FuTsai, Min Chieh
出版日期:2014
卷期:17:2
頁次:頁141-165
主題關鍵詞:低成就原住民問題解決強化錨式教學數學文字題AboriginalEnhanced anchored instructionLow-achievingMath word problemsProblem-solving
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:161
  • 點閱點閱:110
本研究目的在協助彩虹(化名)國小數學低成就學生,提高他們對3年級數學文字題的解題能力,並比較傳統錨式與強化錨式策略的成效差異。本研究從96-100年度花蓮縣學測題庫抽取3年級數學文字題各20題,編成前測、後測與延宕後測複本試卷,並從前測篩選出30名低成就學生,隨機分派至實驗組與控制組,各20節的補救教學於2013年1月寒假實施,教材針對前測答對率低於60%的6題文字題而設計。本研究利用t考驗和共變數分析,以瞭解實驗的組內與組間效果。結果顯示:(1)傳統錨式與強化錨式策略都有助於改善數學低成就學生的文字題解題能力;(2)包括實物操作、角色扮演和類推練習等的強化錨式策略,比傳統錨式策略有更好的學生解題能力改善效果。
The first purpose of this study is to help improve the abilities of low-achievers in mathematics of a Hualien aboriginal primary school with their third-grade math word problems. It also aims to compare the effects on problem-solving strategies between traditional anchored instruction (AI) and enhanced anchored instruction (EAI). The pretest, posttest, and delayed alternate posttest used in this study contain 20 third-grade math word problems from Academic Competence Test Bank of Hualien County (2007-2011). The participants in this study are 30 low-achievers from the pretest. They are randomly assigned to the experiment and control groups for a 20-session remedial course during the winter vacation in January 2013. The materials designed are based on the items from the pretest where students failed to answer correctly, e.g., with poor performance under 60%. The anchored animations were used, for both groups, as supplement materials to help learners’ comprehension during the instruction. This study employed t-test and one-way ANCOVA to investigate both within-groups and between-groups effects. The results show that: 1) The AI and EAI are effective for improving low-achievers' comprehension of word problems as well as their problem-solving abilities; 2) Applying EAI strategies (e.g., hands-on practices, role play, and analogy exercises) are more effective approaches to improve learners' word-problem solving abilities.
期刊論文
1.曹宗萍(19880500)。高屏地區國小兒童四則問題的解題過程表現及其相關因素之研究。屏東師院學報,1,51-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Silverman, R.(2007)。A comparison of three methods of vocabulary instruction during read-alouds in kindergarten。Elementary School Journal,108(2),97-113。  new window
3.Bottge, B. A.(1999)。Effects of contextualized math instruction on problem solving of average and below-average achieving students。Journal of Special Education,33,81-92。  new window
4.Bottge, B. A.、Heinrichs, M.、Mehta, Z.、Hung, Y.(2002)。Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes。Journal of Special Education,35,186-200。  new window
5.Bottge, B. A.、Rueda, R.、Grant, T. S.、Stephens, A. C.、LaRoque, P. T.(2010)。Anchoring problem-solving and computation instruction in context-rich learning environments。Exceptional Children,76(4),417-437。  new window
6.Bottge, B. A.、Rueda, E.、LaRoque, P. T.、Serlin, R. C.、Kwon, J.(2007)。Integrating reform-oriented math instruction in special education settings。Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,22,96-109。  new window
7.Bottge, B.、Rueda, E.、Skivington, M.(2006)。Situating math instruction in rich problem-solving contexts: Effects on adolescents with challenging behaviors。Behavioral Disorders,31,394-407。  new window
8.Bouck, E. C.、Flanagan, S.(2009)。Assistive technology and mathematics: What is there and where can we go in special education。Journal of Special Education Technology,24(2),17-30。  new window
9.Cho, S.、Bottge, B. A.、Cohen, A. S.、Kim, S.(2011)。Detecting cognitive change in the math skills of low-achieving adolescents。The Journal of Special Education,45(2),67。  new window
10.Duncan, G.、Bamberry, G.(2010)。Anchored instruction: It's potential for teaching introductory management。International Journal of Learning,17(3),163-177。  new window
11.Fuchs, L. S.、Fuchs, D.(2002)。Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without co morbid reading difficulties。Journal of Learning Disabilities,35,563-573。  new window
12.Gagnon, J. C.、Bottge, B. A.(2006)。Mathematics instruction in secondary interim, short- and long-term alternative school placements。Preventing School Failure,51(1),39-47。  new window
13.Hickey, D. T.、Moore, A. L.、Pellegrino, J. W.(2001)。The motivational and academic consequences of elementary mathematics environments: Do constructivist innovations and reforms make a difference?。American Educational Research Journal,38,611-652。  new window
14.Kilpatrick, J.(1967)。Problem solving in mathematics。Review of Educational Research,39,523-524。  new window
15.Kudryashov, N. A.(2009)。Seven common errors in finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations。Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,14(9/10),3507-3529。  new window
16.Lamberg, T. D.、Middleton, J. A.(2009)。Design research perspectives on transitioning from individual micro-genetic interviews to a whole-class teaching experiment。Educational Researcher,38(4),233-245。  new window
17.Lashway, L.(2004)。The mandate: To help low-performing schools。Teacher Librarian,31(5),25-27。  new window
18.Lin, T. C.、Hsu, Y. S.、Cheng, Y. J.(2011)。Emerging innovative teacher education from situated cognition in a web-based environment。Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,10(2),100-112。  new window
19.National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics(1977)。Position paper on basic mathematical skills。Arithmetic Teacher,25,19-22。  new window
20.Prado, M. M.、Gravoso, R. S.(2011)。Improving high school students' statistical reasoning skills: A case of applying anchored instruction。Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,20(1),61-72。  new window
21.Raghubar, K.、Cirino, P.、Barnes, M.、Ewing-Cobbs, L.、Fletcher, J.、Fuchs, L.(2009)。Errors in multi-digit arithmetic and behavioral inattention in children with math difficulties。Journal of Learning Disabilities,42(4),356-371。  new window
22.Rittle-Johnson, B.、Koedinger, K. R.(2005)。Designing knowledge scaffolds to support mathematical problem solving。Cognition and Instruction,23(3),313-349。  new window
23.Sanny, R.、Teale, W. H.(2008)。Using multimedia anchored instruction cases in literacy methods courses: Lessons learned from pre-service teachers。Journal of Literacy & Technology,9(1),2-35。  new window
24.Schweder, W.、Wissick, C. A.(2008)。Using video-based anchored instruction to teach functional behavior analysis。Journal of Special Education Technology,23(2),50-55。  new window
25.Swanson, H. L.、Jerman, O.、Zheng, X.(2009)。Math disabilities and reading disabilities: Can they be separated?。Journal of Psycho-educational Assessment,27(3),175-196。  new window
26.Woodward, J.(2004)。Mathematics education in the United States: Past to present。Journal of Learning Disabilities,37,16-31。  new window
27.王羚如(20020300)。同儕解題溝通對數學障礙學生文字解題影響之分析研究。臺南師院學生學刊,23,61-89。  延伸查詢new window
28.張淑美(20050300)。看到了分數,也看到了孩子。北縣教育,51,85-89。  延伸查詢new window
29.Maccini, P.、Gagnon, J. C.(2006)。Mathematics instructional practices and assessment accommodations by secondary special and general educators。Exceptional Children,72(2),217-234。  new window
30.鍾靜(20050500)。論數學課程近十年之變革。教育研究月刊,133,124-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.張新仁(2002)。當代教學統整新趨勢:建構多元而適配的整體學習環境。教育學刊,18,43-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Fan, X.、Chen, M.、Matsumoto, A. R.(1997)。Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Findings from the national education longitudinal study of 1988。Journal of Experimental Education,65(3),229-242。  new window
33.鍾靜(19990100)。落實小學數學新課程之意圖與學校本位的進修活動。課程與教學,2(1),15-34+148-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Tabbers, H. K.、Martens, R. L.、van Merriënboer, J. J. G.(2004)。Multimedia Instructions and Cognitive Load Theory: Effects of Modality and Cueing。British Journal of Educational Psychology,74(1),71-81。  new window
35.甯自強(19930300)。國小數學科新課程的精神及改革動向--由建構主義的觀點來看。科學教育學刊,1(1),101-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Brown, John Seely、Collins, Allan、Duguid, Paul(1989)。Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning。Educational Researcher,18(1),32-42。  new window
37.Bottge, B. A.、Rueda, E.、Kwon, J.、Grant, T.、LaRoque, P. T.(2009)。Assessing and tracking students, problem solving performances in anchored learning environments。Educational Technology Research & Development,57(4),529-552。  new window
38.Mayer, Richard E.、Moreno, Roxana(2003)。Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning。Educational Psychologist,38(1),43-52。  new window
會議論文
1.梁家輔、邱嘉俞、林素微(2008)。原住民數學低落?原住民與非原住民在不同取向下的數學表現差異探討。2008年原住民學生數理教育學術研討會。臺東:臺東大學。219-226。  延伸查詢new window
2.戴錦秀、柳賢(2006)。原住民數學素養之初探。2006年原住民學生數理科教/學理論與實務學術研討會。臺東:臺東大學。26-34。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林俊元(2011)。臺南地區國中八年級學生在「一元二次方程式」單元之錯誤類型分析(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kneller, M. F.(2009)。The use of comics-based cases in anchored instruction(碩士論文)。  new window
3.Pan, H. M.(1993)。A study of metacognitive behaviors in mathematical problem solving of older elementary school students in Taiwan(博士論文)。University of Northern Colorado。  new window
4.Putt, I. J.(1978)。An exploratory investigation of two methods of instruction in mathematical problem solving at the fifth grade level(博士論文)。Indiana University,Indiana。  new window
5.林明哲(1990)。國中學生數學解題行為之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.李靜瑤(1994)。高雄市國二學生數學解題歷程之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.孟瑛如(1992)。學習障礙與補救教學J師及家長實用手冊。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.譚光鼎(1998)。原住民教育與文化政策規劃之研究。臺北:行政院原住民委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt(1997)。The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development。Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
4.Loveless, T.(2004)。The Brown Center report on American education: How well are American students learning?。Washington, DC:The Brookings Institution。  new window
5.Montgomery, D.(2003)。Gifted & talented children with special educational needs: Double exceptionality。London:David Fulton Publishers。  new window
6.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1980)。An agenda for action, recommendation for school mathematics of the 1980's。Palo Alto, CA:Dale Seymour Publications。  new window
7.Dewey, J.(1933)。How we think: Restatement of the reflective thinking to the educative process。D. C. Health。  new window
8.Pólya, George(1945)。How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
9.教育部(1997)。中華民國原住民教育報告書。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉秋木(1996)。國小數學科教學研究。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Mayer, Richard E.(1987)。Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach。Don Mills:HaperCollins Publisher。  new window
12.Schoenfeld, A. H.(1985)。Mathematical problem solving。Orlando, Florida。  new window
13.Lee, J.、Grigg, W.、Dion, G.(2007)。The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2007。Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education。  new window
14.Lave, Jean、Wenger, Etienne(1991)。Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.Bottge, B. A.(2009)。Anchored instruction,http://www.education.com/reference/article/anchored-instruction/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lave, J.、Smith, S.、Butler, M.(1988)。Problem solving as an everyday practice。The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
2.Lesh, R.、Kelly, A.(2000)。Multi-tiered teaching experiments。Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education。Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
3.Middleton, J. A.、Gorard, S.、Taylor, C.、Bannon-Ritland, B.(2008)。The "Complete" design experiment: From soup to nuts。Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE