:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:婦女無知?清代內府旗婦的法律地位
書刊名:近代中國婦女史研究
作者:賴惠敏 引用關係
作者(外文):Lai, Hui-mim
出版日期:2003
卷期:11
頁次:頁1-45
主題關鍵詞:旗婦法律地位離婚財產權BannerwomenLegal statusDivorceProperty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:106
     在傳統歷史上女性多半沒有聲音,唯一能聽到女性聲音為司法訴訟的口供。在訴訟案中婦女若勝訴,官方依照《大清律例》來處分男 性被告。相反的,若婦女敗訴,遭處分的情況不多,官吏是以「婦女無知,免議」來作判決。法律上認定婦女無知不予以處分,意涵著縱容, 婦女卻利用此特權再三提出控告,不達勝訴決不罷甘休。 內府旗婦是皇帝的奴僕,服務於宮廷,因此清朝的皇帝特別保障她們的法律地位。第一、未婚女子在年滿十三歲時必須參加挑秀女 活動,入選者進皇宮當差,父母將她們隱匿或販賣,依法處以杖責。第二、丈夫欲與妻子離異必須因妻子犯姦或行為不檢點證據確著,否則處 以杖責。其次,夫妻口角,導致妻子自殺,妻方的家屬提出控告,丈夫被處罰杖刑。第三、一般漢人婦女不准上公堂,須由家人代為呈控。但 是內府旗婦遇有任何細故,隨即上公堂呈控,慎刑司官員得馬上辦理。第四、寡婦難以為生時透過訴訟程序,要求親屬養贍,其親屬出具甘結 有法律效力。第五、已婚的婦女入宮當僕役,她們的薪水可以當私產,若有人覬覦她們私產,可透過法律訴訟保障財產。
     Historically the majority of women had no voice, and private lawsuits are the only place where are we hear women's voices. If a woman won a lawsuit against a man, the official would punish the accused male according to the Qing Code (Da Qing luli). On the other hand, when women lost their lawsuits, not many were punished, because officials invoked the principle of “ignorant woman, avoid punishment” to decide the case. Paradoxically, legally maintaining that women's ignorance was grounds for avoiding punishment, women could use this special privilege to repeatedly make accusations; even if they lost in court they were not willing to give up. Bannerwomen in the Imperial Household were bondservants of the emperor who worked in the palace, and because of this the Qing emperors diligently protected their legal status. First, at the age of thirteen unmarried women were required to participate in a “beauty contest” and those who were selected became servants in the palace. If their parents tried to hide them or sell them, they were punished by floggig according to the law. Second, if the husband of a bannerwoman wanted a divorce, he had to present evidence of adultery or improper behavior or be punished by flogging. Also, if a quarrel between a husband and wife led to the wife's suicide, the husband was punished by flogging. Third, the average Han Chinese woman was not permitted to go to court. Only a family member could file a complaint on her behalf. However, Imperial Household Bannerwomen could personally file complaints for and reason, and judicial officials had to handle them immediately. Fourth, widows in financial straits could go to court and demand support from their relatives because their relatives had a legal obligation to support them. Fifth, the salaries of married women who entered the imperial court as servants were their private property. If others coveted their property, they could sue to obtain legal protection of their wealth.
期刊論文
1.賴惠敏、朱慶薇(20000600)。婦女、家庭與社會:雍乾時期拐逃案的分析。近代中國婦女史研究,8,1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.賴惠敏、徐思泠(19960800)。清代旗人婦女財產權之淺析。近代中國婦女史研究,4,3-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.單士元(1960)。關於清宮的秀女和宮女。故宮博物院院刊,1960(2),97-103。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.房兆楹(1948)。清初滿洲家庭裡的分家子與未分家子1-16。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bodde, Derk、Morris, Clarence、朱勇(1993)。中華帝國的法律。南京:江蘇人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Shirokogoroff, S. M.、高丙中(1997)。滿族的社會組織--滿族氏族組織研究。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.遼寧省檔案館(1993)。盛京內務府糧莊檔案匯編。瀋陽。  延伸查詢new window
4.金易、沈義羚(1992)。宮女談往錄。北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.李中清、Campbell, Cameron(1997)。Fate and Fortune in Rural China: Social Organization and Population Behavior in Liaoning, 1774-1873。Cambridge, New York。  new window
6.楊英杰(1991)。清代滿族風俗史。清代滿族風俗史。瀋陽。  延伸查詢new window
7.金啟孮(1989)。北京郊區的滿族。呼和浩特。  延伸查詢new window
8.老舍(1981)。正紅旗下。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.昭槤(1986)。嘯亭雜錄。臺北:弘文館出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.馬建石、楊育棠、呂立人、吳壇(1992)。大清律例通考校注。北京:中國政法大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊珍(1994)。康熙皇帝一家。學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.定宜庄(1999)。滿族的婦女生活與婚姻制度研究。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃宗智(2001)。清代的法律、社會與文化:民法的表達與實踐。上海:上海書店出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.郭松義(2000)。倫理與生活--清代的婚姻關係。北京市:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
15.滋賀秀三(1967)。中國家族法の原理。東京:創文社。  延伸查詢new window
16.四川省檔案館、四川大學歷史系(1996)。清代乾嘉道巴縣檔案選編。成都:四川大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.夏仁虎、駢志騫(1986)。舊京瑣記。北京:北京古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.祁美琴(1998)。清代內務府。中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.Stone, Lawrence、刁曉華(2000)。英國十六至十八世紀的家庭、性與婚姻。臺北:麥田出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.首都圖書館(1991)。清蒙古車王府藏曲本。北京:北京古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.(1984)。《黑圖檔》中有關莊園問題的滿文檔案文件匯編。清史資料。北京。  延伸查詢new window
22.李中清、王豐、康文林(1994)。兩種不同的社會限制機制─皇族人口中的嬰兒和兒童死亡率。清代皇族人口行為和社會環境。北京。  延伸查詢new window
23.卡爾(1999)。慈禧寫照記。清宮秘史(五卷)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
24.遼寧社會科學院歷史研究所(1991)。大連圖書館藏清代內閣大庫散佚滿文檔案選編。大連圖書館藏清代內閣大庫散佚滿文檔案選編。天津。  延伸查詢new window
25.韋慶遠(1982)。清代的奴婢制度。清代的奴婢制度。北京。  延伸查詢new window
26.趙潤齡(1988)。井窩子。北京往事談。北京。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內務府奏銷檔。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1987)。內務府堂人事類,北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.內務府慎刑司呈稿。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1976)。大清會典,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.內務府爵秩全覽。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1999)。內閣題本刑科(婚姻姦情類),北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.(2001)。月務府銀庫月摺檔,北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.崇實(1970)。惕盦年譜,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.內務府來文。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1971)。總管內務府現行條例(廣儲司),臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.(2003)。內務府銀庫用項月摺檔。  延伸查詢new window
12.(清)陳康祺(1971)。郎潜紀聞,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.愛新覺羅.瀛生,于潤琦(1998)。京城舊俗,北京。  延伸查詢new window
14.查燕緒。海寧查氏族譜。  延伸查詢new window
15.八旗嘆,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.宗人府堂稿來文,北京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE