:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:In Search of Confirmation: Li Kung (1659-1733) in the Ch'ing Intellectual History
書刊名:輔仁歷史學報
作者:楊瑞松 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Jui-sung
出版日期:2003
卷期:14
頁次:頁17-19+21-52
主題關鍵詞:李塨顏元考証儒學南中國北中國Li KungYen Yuank'ao-chengConfucianismNorth ChinaSouth China
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:27
本文以新的研究視角來探索李塨在清代思想史上的意義。根據許多當代的研究,李塨往往被視爲是顏元思想的繼承者和推擴者,因此李塨在日後轉向考証學的傾向,也就被理解爲背離師門之舉和顏李學派發展的重大挫敗。上述的詮釋固然有其可取之處,卻忽略了李塨對其自我成就所懷有的期待。我的研究仔細地分析李塨如何在早期就已經對學問之道和顏元的看法有所出入,而他多次走訪江南大城,汲汲於和當時享有盛名的南方學者如毛西河和萬斯同等人交流的行爲,不但和顏元的作風大不相同,更顯示了李塨以一來自北方的儒者,企圖在人文薈萃的江南知識文化界中,得到肯定並佔有一席之地的積極用心。因此,以此新的角度理解李塨的知識動向,不僅可以對其知識取向的自主性有一新的理解,更有助於進一步了解清初南北儒學間的不對等關係。
This study aims to interpret Li Kung's intellectual, significance in: the Ch'ing intellectual, history from, an alternative perspective. In the modern scholarship, Li has often been depicted as the major disciple of Yen Yüan. Accordingly, Li's later intellectual efforts in the k'ao-cheng scholarship has therefore been interpreted as a betrayal of his mentor and a major failure of the development of the so-called Yen Li School. However, I have argued that if we pay mare attention to Li'own intellectual agenda, we can discern that Li had embraced an intellectual ambition, which is very different from Yen Yüan's and which deserves a serious evaluation for its own sake. My investigation shows that in order to gain wider recognition from the other Confucian scholars, Li had been eager to associate himself with a variety of Confucian scholars of various intellectual backgrounds. Li was especially very interested in taking long trips to visit famous Confucian scholars in south China to exchange ideas with them. Indeed, his efforts in the ao-cheng scholarship and his engagement in the k'ao-cheng debates earned him high reputation from the southern Confucian scholars. As a minor figure from a small town in north China, which had long been a peripheral area far away from the intellectual and cultural centers in south China, Li Kung appreciated very much the famous southern scholars' confirmation of his intellectual achievement. By viewing Li Kung's own intellectual development from this alternative perspective, and contextualizing Li Kung's intellectual trajectory in the historical setting which reflected the long term intellectual and cultural imbalance between north and south China, my study shed new light on our understanding of the dynamics of the early Ch'ing Confucian intellectual activities. In conclusion, instead of being viewed as mainly a compromise or Li's own intellectual trajectory, as I have argued, could well be perceived as a successful story of realizing Li's own intellectual ambition.
期刊論文
1.(1983)。The Unraveling of Neo-Confucianism: From Philosophy to Philology in Late Imperial China。清華學報,15(1)/15(2),72-73。  new window
2.Elman, Benjamin A.(1983)。Philosophy (I-Li) versus Philology (k‘ao cheng): The Jen-hsin Tao-hsin Debate。T’oung Pao,69(4/5),175-222。  new window
圖書
1.Hummel, Arthur W.(1991)。Eminent Chinese of the Ch‘ing Period。Taipie。  new window
2.徐世昌(1993)。大清畿輔先哲傳。北京:北京古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.侯外廬(1956)。中國早期啟蒙思想史。人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.錢穆(1972)。中國近三百年學術史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊向奎(1985)。清儒學案新編。齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
6.林慶彰(20020000)。清代經學研究論集。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.高彥頤(1996)。Thinking About Copulating: An Early-Qing Confucian Thinker's Problem with Emotion and Words。Remapping China: Fissures in Historical Terrain。Stanford。  new window
其他
1.馮辰,劉調贊(1988)。李塨年譜,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)李塨(1965)。恕谷後集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.左傳。  延伸查詢new window
4.西河合集。  延伸查詢new window
5.逸講箋。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.余英時(1976)。清代思想史的一個新解釋。歷史與思想。臺北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE