:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:環境爭議性公共設施的回饋制度:對核一廠、核二廠及臺中火力發電廠的分析
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:王怡文蕭新煌 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Yi-wenHsiao, Michael Hsin-huang
出版日期:2004
卷期:31:1
頁次:頁65-90
主題關鍵詞:鄰避徵候回饋制度電力設施外溢效果環境影響NIMBY syndromeInstitutional compensationPublic facilityEnvironmental spillover effects
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:47
     臺灣面對環境爭議性公共設施計畫造成的鄰避徵候,是以制度性的回饋方式作為解決策略,設置「電源開發基金委員會」,其政策目標在於增進地方福祉,並彌補所在地居民的損失,但是回饋機制是否合理適切?是否能達成回饋的政策目標?是本文關注的焦點。首先以爭議性公共設施回饋的理論為基礎,提出探討的分析架構,分成兩大部分,其一是以開發業者因公共設施興建導致的負面外溢效果與環境影響,對所在地居民造成的損害有彌補之職責;另一部分,所在地居民因特別犧牲或損害,所接受的補償(含補償方式)是否能符合多數人的期望。 根據此一分析架構,以電力設施為研究對象,選取歷史久遠於七○年代即開始商轉的核能一廠、核能二廠,及九○年代開始商轉的臺中火力發電廠為回饋制度的分析個案,研究設計係根據分析架構以訪談與問卷為主要方式,透過實驗組與對照組的研究設計,根據系統隨機抽樣的1,557份有效問卷的結果,對回饋制度運作影響進行分析、評估與解釋。 由調查資料與田野訪談經驗中,發現許多臺灣執行回饋制度過程中的特殊現象,研究者並嘗試對發現進行可能的理論描述,提出如:傷痕認同等概念,並論述回饋制度與調整的必要性,適逢臺灣的回饋制度面臨變革,九十二年度電力設施回饋的財源「電源開發基金」將由獨立非營業基金的委員會型態,回歸由開發業者之臺電統籌管理,因此,在策略上宜由制度重新討論的角度出發,本研究結果與發現可作為檢討回饋制度之參考根據
     The NIMBY ssyndrome, giving rise to environmental conflicts and disputes, has been considered a dilemma for government to locate public facilities. Facing this dilemma, the Taiwanese government has adopted a strategy of institutional compensation for the local residents as they sacrifice for public interests. Specifically, the Taiwanese government established "The Power Development Foundation (PDF)" in order to enhance the welfare of local communities and promote local economic development. In this paper we will evaluate the processes and impacts of institutional compensation in detail in terms of the public policy goals set forth by the government. First, we base the analytical framework on the compensating theory. The framework looks into the responsibilities of developers who are considered as causing negative environmental spillover effects for the sake of constructing public facilities. These responsibilities often include suitable compensating mechanism, effective information delivery, and satisfactory outcomes of compensating. Also, the framework examines institutional compensation to see if it meets the expectation of the local majority population. Second, we focus the research on power plants since this type of Nimby facilities was extremely diverse in nature. Three power plants are selected, including two nuclear plants in northern Taiwan and one thermal power plant in Taichung. Samples were drawn from local residents near the three power plants as the experimental group and non-residents as the comparison group. Several interesting results are observed in the 1,557 valid responses, such as "scar identity effect" et al. Finally, based on the results of our questionnaires and field studies, we observed that institutional compensation could cause both positive and negative effects by involving interest groups and monetary compensation. On one hand, the subsidy funds could improve local public facilities. On the other hand, vast monetary resource controlled by few local officials not only makes negative impressions on local residents, but also cause corruption from personal interests and profits and therefore turmoil in local government. The unintentional outcomes of institutional compensation prompt us to make needed reforms. The finding of this research could be used as a basis for future evaluation and reforming the system for the policy makers.
期刊論文
1.Ashforth, B. E.、Mael, F. A.(1989)。Social Identity Theory & The Organization。Academy of Management Review,14(1),20-39。  new window
2.Slovic, Paul(1987)。Perception of Risk。Science,236(4799),280-285。  new window
3.Dutton, Jane E.、Dukerich, Janet M.、Harquail, Celia V.(1994)。Organizational Images and Member Identification。Administrative Science Quarterly,39(2),239-263。  new window
4.Albert, Stuart、Whetten, David A.(1985)。Organizational identity。Research in the Sociology of Organizations,7,263-295。  new window
5.蕭新煌(2002)。臺灣的地方環保運動(1980-2000):歷史與空間的比較分析。永續臺灣簡訊,4(2),34-68。  延伸查詢new window
6.Fiske, A. P.(1992)。The four elementary forms of social life: Framework for a unified theory of social relations。Psychological Review,99(4),689-723。  new window
會議論文
1.Tanaka, Y.(1999)。Is the NIMBY syndrome a universal phenomenon: symptoms and remedies。Tokyo, Japan。  new window
學位論文
1.鄭全雄(2001)。論易經風水思想與傳統建築及景觀環境規劃關聯性之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rice, P. L.(1992)。Stress and Health。California:Brooks/ Cole Pub. Co.。  new window
2.Portney, Kent E.(1991)。Siting Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities: The Nimby Syndrome。New York。  new window
3.王俊秀(1994)。環境社會學的出發--讓故鄉的風水有面子。台北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.俞孔堅(1998)。生物與文化基因上的圖式--風水與理想景觀的深層意義。臺北:田園城市文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
5.韓可宗(1995)。景觀風水理論基礎。臺北:地景。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lesbirel, S. Hayden(1998)。NIMBY Politics in Japan: Energy Siting and the Management of Environmental Conflict。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。  new window
7.Brion, Denis J.(1991)。Essential Industry and the NIMBY Phenomenon。New York:Quorum Books。  new window
8.Festinger, Leon(1957)。A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance。Stanford University Press。  new window
9.促進電源開發協助基金管理委員會(1999)。促進電源開發協助基金管理委員會88年度業務報告。促進電源開發協助基金管理委員會88年度業務報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.蕭新煌(1999)。臺灣的地方環保抗爭運動:1980至1996。香港海峽兩岸關係研究中心。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
11.Apter, D. E.、Nagayo, S.(1984)。Against the State: Politics and Social Protest in Japan。Against the State: Politics and Social Protest in Japan。Cambridge。  new window
12.Bruke, P. J.(2002)。Social Identities and Psychology Stress。Social Identities and Psychology Stress。New York, NY。  new window
13.Castells, M.(2000)。The information economy and the process of globalization。The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, 1。MA。  new window
14.Dobbs, D. B.、Hayden, P. T.(2001)。Torts and Compensation: Personal Accountability and Social Responsibility for Injury。Torts and Compensation: Personal Accountability and Social Responsibility for Injury。St. Paul, MN。  new window
15.Gioia, D. A.(1998)。From Individual to Organizational Identity。Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations。London, UK。  new window
16.Lee, C.(1998)。Alternatives to Cognition: A New Look at Explaining Human Social Behavior。Alternatives to Cognition: A New Look at Explaining Human Social Behavior。New Jersey。  new window
17.O'Hare, M.、Sanderson, D.、Bacow, L.(1983)。Facility Sitting and Public Opposition。Facility Sitting and Public Opposition。New York, NY。  new window
18.Pharr, S.(1990)。Losing Face: Status Politics in Japan。Losing Face: Status Politics in Japan。Berkeley。  new window
19.Quah, E.、Tan, K. C.(2002)。Siting Environmentally Unwanted Facilities: Risk, Trade-Offs, and Choice。Siting Environmentally Unwanted Facilities: Risk, Trade-Offs, and Choice。MA。  new window
20.Rabe, B. G.(1994)。Beyond Nnimby: Hazardous Waste Siting in Canada and the United States。Beyond Nnimby: Hazardous Waste Siting in Canada and the United States。Washington, DC。  new window
21.Wright, W. R.(1995)。Right, justice and tort law。Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law。NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.蕭新煌(2001)。台灣民眾環境意識的轉變1986-1999。華人社會的調查研究。香港:牛津大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Pratt, Michael G.(1998)。To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification。Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE