:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:鄰避物業設施回饋比例的多準則決策評估
書刊名:物業管理學報
作者:陳王琨林文印林忠銓
作者(外文):Chen, Wang-kunLin, Wen-yinnLin, Chung-chuan
出版日期:2011
卷期:2:2
頁次:頁35-44
主題關鍵詞:鄰避效應物業設施回饋金多準則決策NIMBY effectProperty facilityFeed back fundMultiple criteria decision marking
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:138
  • 點閱點閱:21
本 文嘗詴建立一個鄰避物業設施回饋比例的的多準則決策評估方法。將造成公共設施 鄰避效應的各種影響因子納入土地使用衝突管理的分析當中。研究中以新店焚化廠為 例進行個案分析,利用客觀分析方法所得到的影響因子來計算出迴饋補償的分配係 數。在客觀分析中對於回饋補償分配比例之計算方式,考量了設施周圍的人口分佈、 交通量、污染排放、以及氣象等相關資料,並實際調查污染排放源的數據、垃圾清運 過程之臭味及噪音影響、垃圾清運對交通流量增加影響、景觀所造成之視覺影響,透 過德耳菲法問卷調查法得到各影響項目所佔之權重分配,將此結果納入做為總環境影 響係數計算值之依據。客觀分析法由於處理的過程中運用了大量的客觀統計數據,且 透過了公開的資訊揭露與民眾參與的權重選擇,因此有利於建立鄰避效應中對立雙方 的信任關係,可適度地減輕鄰避效應衝突所造成的社會成本。本研究結果建議其為一 種理想的鄰避糾紛之處理制度。若能有相關的配套環境,並在政治過程中建立此一機 制的合法性,將可大量地降低公共設施規劃中的政治衝突與社會糾紛。
T his paper attempts to establish a multi-criteria decision-making assessment method for the allocation factor of feedback fund for NIMBY facility. Various impacts factors of the NIMBY effects of public facilities were included in the analysis of conflict management for land use. A case study was conducted in Hsintien incineration plant. This study applies the impact factors derived from the objective analysis to calculate the distribution coefficients of feedback compensation fund. The distribution coefficients have considered the following influence factors such as the population distribution around the facility, traffic, pollution, and meteorological information, etc. The other factors were actually surveyed, such as the emission amount of pollution, the influence of odor and noise generated from trash transportation, the traffic impact increased from noise transportation, and the landscape influence caused by visual impact. The final weighting factors were obtained by Delphi method. It is possible for the objective analysis method methods to construct a reliable relationship for the opposing sides because it applies a large number of statistical data and information disclosure through a public process. The social cost resulting from the conflicts of NIMBY effect can be reduced. It is suggested to establish the relevant supporting measures of this system to reduce the political dispute and social conflicts for public facilities planning.
期刊論文
1.蔡宗秀(20040900)。鄰避情結之衝突協商。亞太經濟管理評論,8(1),67-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡宗秀(20030300)。環境鄰避性設施之選址:風險、取捨與選擇。亞太經濟管理評論,6(2),125-126。  延伸查詢new window
3.丘昌泰(20050600)。NIMBY Syndrome and Facility Siting。中國行政評論,14(3),33-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.湯京平、翁偉達(20050300)。解構鄰避運動--國道建設的抗爭與地方政治動員。公共行政學報.政大,14,125-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Halstead, J. M.、Luloff, A. E.、Myers, S. D.(1993)。An Examination of the NIMBY Syndrome: Why Not in My Backyard?。Journal of The Community Development Society,24(1),88-102。  new window
6.Sechrest, D. K.(1992)。Locating Prisons: Open Versus Closed Approaches to Siting。Crime and Delinquency,38(1),88-104。  new window
7.王怡文、蕭新煌(20040300)。環境爭議性公共設施的回饋制度:對核一廠、核二廠及臺中火力發電廠的分析。都市與計劃,31(1),65-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.洪鴻智(20050300)。科技鄰避設施風險知覺之形成與投影:核二廠。人文及社會科學集刊,17(1),33-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.譚鴻仁、王俊隆(20050500)。鄰避與風險社會:新店安坑掩埋場設置的個案分析。地理研究,42,105-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.湯京平、陳金哲(20050300)。新公共管理與鄰避政治:以嘉義縣市跨域合作為例。政治科學論叢,23,101-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.劉阿榮、石慧瑩(20040300)。社群意識與永續發展:鄰避現象及補償金之分析。中國行政評論,13(2),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Oye, K. A.、Maxwell, J. H.(1994)。Self-interest and environmental management。Journal of Theoretical Politics,6(4),593-624。  new window
13.金通(2007)。垃圾處理產業中的鄰避現象探析。當代財經,2007(5),78-80。  延伸查詢new window
14.Ali, S. H.(2002)。Dealing with toxicity in the risk society: the case of the Hamilton, Ontario Plastics recycling fire。Canadian Review of Sociology,39(1),29-48。  new window
15.Flynn, J.、Kasperson, R.、Kunreuther, H.、Slovic, P.(1992)。Time to rethink nuclear waste storage。Issues in Science and Technology,8,42-48。  new window
16.Freudenberg, N.、Steinsapir, C.(1991)。Not in our backyards: the grassroots environmental movement。Society and Natural Resources,4(3),235-245。  new window
17.Freudenburg, William R.(1993)。Risk and recreancy: weber, the division of labor, and the rationality of risk perceptions。Social Forces,71(4),909-932。  new window
18.洪鴻智(20021200)。科技風險知覺與風險消費態度的決定--灰色訊息關聯分析之應用。都市與計劃,29(4),575-593。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.曾明遜、謝潮儀(19950600)。住戶逃避鄰避設施之自我防衛支出--以垃圾處理場為實証對象。都市與計劃,22(2),217-233。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.廖坤榮、陳雅芬(20030900)。後物質主義之地方開發政策--臺南縣濱南工業區開發案探討。中國行政評論,12(4),43-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Barthold, Jim(20000904)。Convergence Faces NIMBY。Cable World,2000(Sep.)。  new window
22.Freudenburg, William R.、Pastor, Susan K.(1992)。NIMBYs and LULUs: stalking the syndromes。Journal of Social Issues,48(4),39-61。  new window
23.顧忠華(19940900)。「風險社會」的概念及其理論意涵。國立政治大學學報,69(下),57-79。  延伸查詢new window
24.丘昌泰(20021200)。從「鄰避情結」到「迎臂效應」--臺灣環保抗爭的問題與出路。政治科學論叢,17,33-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.李永展(19981200)。鄰避設施衝突管理之研究。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,9,33-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.李永展、何紀芳(19960900)。臺北地方生活圈都市服務設施之鄰避效果。都市與計劃,23(1),95-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.李永展(19970300)。鄰避症候群之解析。都市與計劃,24(1),69-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gibson, Clark C.、Mckean, Margaret A.、Ostrom, Elinor(2000)。People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance。Cambridge, MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology。  new window
2.Bryant, B. I.、Mohai, P.(1992)。Race and The Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse。Boulder, CO。  new window
3.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(1995)。User's guide for the industrial source complex (ISC3) dispersion models: volume I: user instructions。  new window
4.Hall, P. G.(1982)。Great planning disasters。Berkeley, CA:University of California。  new window
5.Matchetti, N.(2004)。Face to face negotiation to overcome the NIMBY syndrome: theory and experimental design。  new window
6.English, M.(1992)。Siting low-level radioactive waste disposal facilities: the public policy dilemma。N.Y.:Quorum Books。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE