:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:王國維「境界說」與戲曲學的形而上學基礎
書刊名:戲劇學刊
作者:林國源
作者(外文):Lin, Kuo-yuan
出版日期:2005
卷期:1
頁次:頁41-51
主題關鍵詞:王國維康德紅樓夢評論人間詞話境界宋元戲曲考姚一葦Wang Kuo-WeiKantComment on Red Chambre Story 1906Comment on the tze of the human world 1909Horizontal theoryGhing GhieYao Yi-WeiShon and Yuan History of singing theatre 1913
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:46
「境界說」美學理論是王國維美學思維自「疲於哲學」轉而「移於文學」的學說抜點。王氏於填詞成功之餘撰寫《人間詞話》,體現批評所依據之普遍性基準,後衍為近半世紀以來中國文學與藝術批評之元理念。此而,「境界說」是王維對中國現代美學與批評最具原創性的貢獻。本文之作,一方面思想就思發生的源頭言王國維美學思想的濫觴,次析論王氏境界說美學的形而上基礎,接著以「洗滌說」略言王氏對亞里斯多德《詩學》學的敕步把握,指出王氏戲曲界說的真正來源,以備日後研討王氏戲曲學理論系統之資。
“Horizontal theory” is the turning point of Wang Kuo-wei’s aesthetic thinking from “tired in philosophy” and thus “being transformed to literal arts”. After the ace in “filing song-tze”, Won Kuo-wei wrote down his critical work Comment on the tze of the human world, the universal criterion for his criticism----Horizontal Theory is not only as the universal criterion for his criticism but also been taken as the metaphysical idea for the modern Chinese literature and art criticism. The main parts of this study is on the first understanding of Wang Kuo-wei to Aristole’s “Poetics”. The begining of Wang’s study on science of theatre art started form the composition of ‘tze for human world’ and its criticism; while we can point out that his science of Chinese theatre art has his roots on Aristotle’s Poetics as: 1.To judge the real drama and the real ‘siging theatre’ according to dialectic discourse between narrative mode and mimesis. 2.Wang’s definition of ‘drama in wholly signification’ is to represent a story with speech, movement and singing medium, this is a definition according to the theatre elements as in the first chapter of Poetics. 3.The citation of Katharsis theory as the telos of tragedy and as the telos of Ethics.
期刊論文
1.劉述先。克羅齊美學概念之澄清與批評。東海學報,5(1)。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wellek, Rene、Warren, Ausin(1966)。Theory of Literature。New York。  new window
2.姚一葦(1996)。藝術批評。臺北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kant, Immanuel(1990)。Kritik der Urteilskraft。Hamburg:Felix Meiner Verlag。  new window
4.Beardsley, Monroe C.(1966)。Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present--A Short History。Macmillan。  new window
5.亞里士多德、姚一葦(1993)。詩學箋註。臺北:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.王國維(1984)。紅樓夢評論。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.余英時(1993)。中國近代思想史上的胡適。台北市:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
8.王國維(1988)。人間詞話。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.王國維(1996)。宋元戲曲考。北京:東方出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.雷邵鋒(1999)。王國維的治學方法。台北:新視野圖書。  延伸查詢new window
11.姚一葦(1968)。論批評。藝術的奧秘。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.(清)王國維(1971)。戲曲考源。論曲五種。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.姚一葦(1969)。論批評家的謙遜。戲劇論集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Dufrenne, Mikel Louis(1967)。phenomenologie de l'Experience Esthetique ( II )。phenomenologie de l'Experience Esthetique ( II )。Paris。  new window
15.Kant, Immanuel(1985)。La Dissertation de 1770。La Dissertation de 1770。Paris。  new window
16.Venturi, Lionello(1938)。L'Histoie de La Critique d'Art。L'Histoie de La Critique d'Art。Bruxelles。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE