:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以最大測驗訊息量決定通過分數之研究
書刊名:測驗學刊
作者:謝進昌余民寧 引用關係
作者(外文):Shieh, Jin-changYu, Min-ning
出版日期:2005
卷期:52:2
頁次:頁149-175
主題關鍵詞:精熟測驗精熟標準設定最大測驗訊息量法試題反應理論Mastery testStandard settingMaximum test information approachItem response theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:58
本研究目的,乃運用試題反應理論中最大測驗訊息量的概念於精熟標準設定上作為探討的主軸,透過其歷史的演進與發展,衍生出詮釋本研究最大測驗訊息量法的三個概念,分別為:元素的搭配組合與調整、廣義測驗建構流程、多元效度等,並以此概念賦予解釋運用最大測驗訊息量於精熟標準設定時的合理性與連性。同時,確立最大測驗訊息量法於公式意涵、試題選擇與統計考驗力面向的合理性,建立其在精熟標準上的理論基礎,接續,再輔以精熟/未精熟者分類一致性度值,以其提供多元效度證據。而在分類的度指標上,顯示由最大測驗訊息量法求得精熟標準,經交叉驗證後,大致可獲得滿意的結果,分有高達九成以上的精確分類水準,時,藉由區間的概念能充分顯現出,以最大測驗訊息量法求得之標準,可作為專家進行精熟標準參考點判斷的優勢。整體而言,而為一種值得參照的精熟標準設定方法。
The purpose of this study is to adopt the concepts of IRF maximum test information to standard setting. At first, we are trying to discover three facets of interpretation in using the maximum test information to standard setting though the historical movement of standard setting. The three facets are component combination and adjustment, generalized test construction processes, and multiple validities. Based on these three concepts, we can easily explain the reasonableness and appropriateness of maximum test information approach. After that, we further investigate the reasonableness from the dimensions of definition of formula, item selections, and statistical power to establish the basic theory of the maximum test information approach in standard setting. In addition, we also examine the effects of exact the effects of exact classification of mastery/non-mastery based on the maximum test information approach, which is expecting to provide multiple evidences for validity. After analysis, the effect of exact classification of mastery/ non-mastery may come to satisfying result. We may have at least 90% exact classification performance. At the same time, we also find that the mastery standard deriving from the maximum test information approach may have some advantages for a reference point on the confidence interval. In sum, the maximum test information approach is a good method for standard setting.
期刊論文
1.鄭明長、余民寧(199401)。各種通過分數設定方法之比較。測驗年刊,41,19-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林惠芬(199301)。通過分數設定方法在護理人員檢覈筆試測驗之研究。測驗年刊,40,253-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Berk, Ronald A.(1996)。Standard Setting: The Next Generation (Where Few Psychometricians Have Gone Before!)。Applied Measurement in Education,9(3),215-235。  new window
4.Kane, M. T.(1994)。Validating the performance standards associated with passing scores。Review of Educational Research,64(3),425-461。  new window
5.Cizek, Gregory J.(1993)。Reconsidering Standards and Criteria。Journal of Educational Measurement,30(2),93-106。  new window
6.Spray, Judith A.、Reckase, Mark D.(1996)。Comparison of SPRT and Sequential Bayes Procedures for Classifying Examinees into Two Categories Using a Computerized Test。Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,21(4),405-414。  new window
7.Weiss, D. J.、Kingsbury, G. G.(1984)。Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems。Journal of Educational Measurement,21,361-375。  new window
8.Cizek, Gregory J.(1996)。Standard-setting guidelines。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,15(1),13-21。  new window
9.余民寧、謝進昌(20060600)。國中基本學力測驗之DIF的實徵分析:以91年度兩次測驗為例。教育學刊,26,241-275。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Cohen, Jacob(1960)。A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales。Educational and Psychological Measurement,20(1),37-46。  new window
11.Berk, R. A.(1986)。A Consumer's Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-referenced Tests。Review of Educational Research,56,138-172。  new window
12.國民中學學生基本學力測驗推動工作委員會(2003)。測驗分數的解釋(下)。飛揚,23。  延伸查詢new window
13.余民寧(1992)。試題反應理論的介紹(7):訊息函數。研習資訊,9(6),5-9。  延伸查詢new window
14.吳璧純(2003)。以自然科實作評量探究學生的認知發展與學習成效。教育與心理研究,26(1),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Hambleton, Ronald K.(1983)。Application of Item Response Models to Criterion-Referenced Assessment。Applied Psychological Measurement,7(1),33-44。  new window
16.Hambleton, Ronald K.、De Gruijter, Dato N. M.(1983)。Application Of Item Response Models To Criterion-Referenced Test Item Selection。Journal of Educational Measurement,20(4),355-367。  new window
17.Mills, Craig N.、Hambleton, Ronald K.、Simon, Robert(1983)。Determining The Lengths For Criterion-Referenced Tests。Journal of Educational Measurement,20(1),27-38。  new window
18.Novick, Melvin R.、Hambleton, Ronald K.(1973)。Toward an Intergration of Theory And Method for Criterion-Referenced Tests。Journal of Educational Measurement,10(3),159-170。  new window
19.Kane, Michael(1998)。Choosing Between Examinee-Centered and Test-Centered Standard-Setting Methods。Educational Assessment,5(3),129-145。  new window
20.Millman, Jason(1973)。Passing Scores and Test Lengths for Domain-referenced Measures。Review of Educational Research,43(2),205-216。  new window
21.Jackson, Paul H.、Novick, Melvin R.、Lewis, Charles(1973)。The Estimation of Proportions in a Groups。Psychometrika,38,19-45。  new window
22.Subkoviak, Michael J.(1988)。A Practitioner's Guide to Computation and Interpretation of Reliability Indices for Mastery Tests。Journal of Educational Measurement,25(1),47-55。  new window
23.Algina, James、Swaminathan, H.、Hambleton, Ronald K.(1974)。Reliabilty of Criterion-Refernced Tests: A Decision-Theoretic Formulation。Journal of Educational Measurement,11(4),263-267。  new window
24.Van Der Linden, Wim J.(1981)。A Latent Trait Look at Pretest-Posttest Validation of Criterion-referenced Test Items。Review of Educational Research,51(3),379-402。  new window
25.Wiberg, Marie(2003)。An Optimal Design Approach to Criterion-referenced Computerized Testing。Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,28(2),97-110。  new window
會議論文
1.Reckase, Mark D.、Spray, Judith A.(1994)。The Selection of Test Items for Decision Making with a Computer Adaptive Test。The Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education。  new window
研究報告
1.Eignor, Daniel R.、Hambleton, Ronald K.(1979)。Effects of Test Length and Advancement Score on Several Criterion Referenced Test Reliability and Validity Indices。Boston, MA。  new window
學位論文
1.吳裕益(1986)。標準參照測驗通過分數設定方法之研究,台北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Pitoniak, M. J.(2003)。Standard setting methods for complex licensure examinations(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts,Amherst, Massachusetts。  new window
3.謝進昌(2005)。以最大測驗訊息量決定通過分數之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Harwell, M. R.(1983)。A Comparison of Two Item Selection Procedures in Criterion Referenced Measurement,0。  new window
圖書
1.Birnbaum, A.(1968)。Some latent trait models and their user in inferring an examinee’s ability。Statistical theories of mental rest scores。Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley。  new window
2.涂柏原、林世華、陳柏熹、章舜雯(2000)。基本學力分數的建立。國民中學學生基本學力測驗推動工作委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lord, Frederic M.、Novick, Melvin R.、Birnbaum, Allan(1968)。Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
4.Lord, Frederic M.(1980)。Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
5.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.Berk, Ronald A.(1984)。A Guide to Criterion-referenced Test Construction。A Guide to Criterion-referenced Test Construction。Baltimore, MD。  new window
7.Cizek, Gregory J.(2001)。Standard Setting: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives。Standard Setting: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
8.Hambleton, Ronald K.(1990)。Criterion Referenced Testing Methods and Practices。The Handbook of School Psychology。New York, NY。  new window
9.Hambleton, R. K.、Mills, C. N.、Jaeger, R. M.、Plake, B. S.(1995)。Handbook for Setting Performance Standards。Handbook for Setting Performance Standards。Washington, DC。  new window
10.Kane, Michael T.(2001)。So Much Remains the Same: Conception and Status of Validation in Setting Standards。Standard Setting: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
11.Nitko, Anthony J.(1983)。Educational Tests and Measurement: An Introduction。Educational Tests and Measurement: An Introduction。New York, NY。  new window
12.Muraki, Eiji、Mislevy, Robert J.、Zimowski, Michele F.、Bock, R. D.(2003)。BILOG-MG for Windows (Version 3)。BILOG-MG for Windows (Version 3)。Chicago, IL。  new window
圖書論文
1.Messick, S.(1988)。The once and future issues of validity: Assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement。Test validity。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Kingsbury, G. G.、Weiss, D. J.(1983)。A Comparison of IRT-based Adaptive Mastery Testing and a Sequential Mastery Testing Procedure。New Horizons in Testing: Latent Trait Test Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
3.Reckase, Mark D.(1983)。A Procedure for Decision Making Using Tailored Testing。New Horizons in Testing: Latent Trait Test Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing。Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE