:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:起造人於公寓大廈管理維護作用之探討
書刊名:臺灣土地研究
作者:林欣柔彭建文 引用關係曾明遜
作者(外文):Lin, Hsin-jouPeng, Chien-wenTseng, Ming-hsun
出版日期:2004
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁1-26
主題關鍵詞:起造人公寓大廈管理維護公寓大廈管理條例交易成本BuilderCondominium managementCondominium management ordinanceTransaction costs
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:81
公寓大廈管理條例通過至今已近十年,但國內民眾對於公寓大廈管理維護的重要性仍欠缺普遍性的認知,不過相較於條例施行前既有的公寓大慶而言,新興公寓大慶在現行條例對於起造人責任的規範下,其順利進行公寓大廈管理維護之比例較高。本研究發現相較於修訂前之公寓大廈管理條例,該條例修訂後之起造人責任規範,雖可降低住戶的公寓大廈管理維護交易成本,但在管理維護共識之促成、公共基金實質意義之充備、多數決法定門檻限制之達成、管理委員會或管理負責人之盡速成立或推選、住戶管理維護專業能力之加強等五方面,卻仍略顯不足。為使起造人積極介入管理維護工作,本研究建議透過公寓大廈管理條例第18條、第28條、第56條、第57條之修訂、第57-1條之增訂,並搭配優惠融資貸款之提供、優良社區網 站之優良認證、降低籌委會成立門檻、改善優良公寓大廈評選制度以表彰起造人商譽等方式,以鼓勵起造人擬定具管理維護共識之規約、充備公共基金實質意義、協助多元集會方式之建構、協助事先存在組織網絡─籌委會之成立、以及協助前期管理維護之積極引入等工作之進行。
Although the Condominium Management Ordinance (CMO) in Taiwan was passed almost ten years ago, public recognition of this legislation remains low. Yet, in comparison with condominiums built before the Ordinance, households living in newer condominiums that have their builders responsible for management as mandated by the law have a better chance to implement the CMO. This paper compares the builder’s management responsibility of the first and second version of the CMO. We found that the second version of the CMO could diminish transaction costs of condominium management. Yet, it is still not enough to: (1) promote collective actions,(2) create adequate management funds, (3) generate consensus on statutory restrictions, (4) expedite the processes for the formation and election of the management committee, and (5) improve households' professional knowledge about building management. To encourage builders to participate in condominium management, we propose to revise Article 18, Article 28, Article 56, Article 57 of the CMO, and add Article 57-1. Besides, we suggest providing builders with preferential construction loans, reduce restrictions on the formation of management committee, create good community websites and improve the selection of good practices to acknowledge builders’ contributions to building management. Rewarding builders with good reputation would encourage them to (1) establish rules that could nurture common understanding, (2) develop a sufficient management fund, (3) create a pluralistic decision making structure, (4) assist any preexisted organization network and the formation of the preparatory committee, and (5) help introduce the building management system to involved parties at the early stage of its development.
期刊論文
1.陳覺惠(20000700)。臺灣地區集合住宅形態發展趨勢與當前社區經營管理議題。東海學報,41(工學院),97-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王明德、張登傑(19990900)。營建業組織中代理問題之分析。建築學報,30,27-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.洪子茵、張金鶚(20021100)。臺北市集合住宅管理維護模式之研究。都市與計劃,29(3),421-444。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Walters, M.(2002)。Transaction Costs of Collective Action in Hong Kong High Rise Real Estate。International Journal of Social Economics,29(3/4),299-314。  new window
5.Marx, Gary T.、Useem, Michael(1971)。Majority Involvement in Minority Movements: Civil Rights, Abolition, Untouchability。Journal of Social Issues,27,81-104。  new window
6.Dahlman, Carl J.(1979)。The Problem of Externality。Journal of Law and Economics,22(1),141-162。  new window
7.熊秉元(1993)。「市場之尺」和「心中之尺」-論釋寇斯定理和布坎楠對寇斯定理的質疑。經濟論文,21(2),331-356。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.宋念謙、侯錦雄(1999)。臺中市黎明社區居民屬性、居住類型和景觀管理維護態度之關係。東海學報:農學院,40(6),41-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Cohen, Jean L.(1985)。Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigm and Contemporary Social Movements。Social Research,52(4),663-716。  new window
10.鄭育仁(2002)。體驗品、廣告與品質政策:一個賽局理論模型。亞太經濟管理評論,5(2),1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.蘇景輝(1995)。社區發展模式的實務。社區發展季刊,69,75-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.蘇永欽(2000)。從效率觀點看幾個共有關係的爭議。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,10(4),550-562。  延伸查詢new window
13.Chau, K. W.、Ng, F. F.、Hung, Eastman C. T.(2001)。Developer's Good Will as Significant Influence on Apartment Unit Prices。The Appraisal Journal,69(1),26-30。  new window
14.Chau, K. W.、Leung, A. Y. T.、Yiu, C. Y.、Wong, S. K.(2003)。Estimating the Value Enhancement Effects of Refurbishment。Facilities,21,13-19。  new window
學位論文
1.莊美玉(2003)。租稅優惠作為經濟輔助手段之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳瑞榮(2001)。公寓大廈管理維護成效影響因子之分析--以台北市為例(碩士論文)。國立台灣科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.彭康倫(1995)。公寓大廈住戶管理維護共識形成促進因素與其影響之研究--以台北巿天 母地區之個案為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.許景琳(2003)。網際網路輔助社區民眾參與模式之研究:以霧峰鄉太子吉第社區災後重建為例,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
5.蘇國榮(2003)。建設公司商譽對住宅價格影響之研究,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.North, Douglass C.、劉瑞華(1990)。制度、制度變遷與經濟成就。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cooter, Robert、Ulen, Thomas(2000)。Law and Economics。Addison-Wesley。  new window
3.Olson, Mancur(1965)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。New York:Mcgraw-Hill College。  new window
4.Melucci, Alberto(1989)。Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society。Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press。  new window
5.Cohen, Jean L.、Arato, Andrew(1992)。Civil Society and Political Theory。MIT Press。  new window
6.McAdam, Doug(1982)。Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970。University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Melucci, Alberto(1996)。Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Mueller, Dennis C.(1989)。Public Choice II: A Revised Edition of Public Choice。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Oberschall, Anthony(1993)。Social Movements: Ideologies, Interests, and Identities。New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Publishers。  new window
10.文建東(1996)。當代世界十大經濟學派叢書-公共選擇學派。當代世界十大經濟學派叢書-公共選擇學派。武漢。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊冠雄(1994)。建築物設備使用管理計畫與節能效益評估。建築物設備使用管理計畫與節能效益評估。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.McCarthy, J. D.、Zald, M. N.(1979)。Epilogue: an Agenda for Research。The Dynamics of Social Movements: Resource Mobilization, Social Control and Tactics。Cambridge。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fireman, B.、Gamson, W. A.(1979)。Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective。The dynamics of social movement: Resource mobilization, social control and tactics。Cambridge:Winthrop。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE