資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.20.206.201)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Institutional Design for a Mildly Divided Society: The Case of Taiwan
書刊名:
Issues & Studies
作者:
謝復生
作者(外文):
Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng
出版日期:
2006
卷期:
42:1
頁次:
頁81-102
主題關鍵詞:
Presidentialism
;
Parliamentarism
;
Single-member district plurality system
;
Proportional representation
;
Single nontransferable vote
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(
1
) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:
16
點閱:27
In designing democratic institutions, it is imperative that we take into consideration both the constitutional form of government and the electoral system. On paper Taiwan's institutional arrangement, essentially parliamentary coupled with a semi-proportional electoral system, resembles that found in many Continental European countries. This is generally sound except that the electoral system (i.e., the single nontransferable vote), albeit with certain merits, contains some truly undesirable features that need to be corrected. Proportional representation with a relatively high threshold to eliminate minuscule parties is preferable. Nonetheless, the actual practice in Taiwan-presidentialism plus a relatively proportional electoral system-looks more like the institutional arrangement seen in Latin America, which is not a good choice. The easiest way of changing it and moving it back to the Continental European type of system is to close the loophole by reinstituting an investiture vote for the premier-designate by the Legislative Yuan. It is important that the constitutional practice should not deviate too much from the logic of the constitutional arrangement.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
謝復生、Niemi, Richard G.(1999)。Can Duverger's Law Be Extended to SNTV? The Case of Taiwan's Legislative Yuan Elections。Electoral Studies,18(1),101-116。
2.
Horowitz, Donald L.(1990)。Comparing Democratic Systems。Journal of Democracy,1(4),73-79。
3.
Lijphart, Arend(1991)。Constitutional Choices for New Democracies。Journal of Democracy,2(1),72-84。
4.
Cox, Gary W.、Niou, Emerson M. S.(1994)。Seat Bonuses Under the Single Nontransferable Vote System: Evidence From Japan and Taiwan。Comparative Politics,26(2),221-236。
5.
Riker, William H.(19821200)。The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science。American Political Science Review,76(4),753-766。
6.
Cox, Gary W.(1991)。SNTV and d'Hondt are 'Equivalent'。Electoral Studies,10(2),348-352。
7.
Linz, Juan J.(1990)。The Perils of Presidentialism。Journal of Democracy,1(1),51-69。
8.
謝復生(19940200)。憲政體制、選舉制度與政黨運作。理論與政策,8(2)=30,5-13。
延伸查詢
9.
謝復生(200112)。Whither the Kuomintang?。The China Quarterly,168,930-943。
會議論文
1.
Hsieh, John Fuh-Sheng(2003)。The Logic of (a Special Type of) Semi-Presidentialism: Loopholes, History, and Political Conflicts。The Conference of Semi-Presidentialism and Nascent Democracies,held by the Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (會議日期: Oct. 24-25, 2003)。Taipei。
2.
Copper, John R.(200409)。Taiwan's Constitution。Conference on Taiwan Issues held by the Center for Asian Studies。Charleston, South Carolina:University of South Carolina。
圖書
1.
Thayer, Nathaniel B.(1969)。How the Conservatives Rule Japan。Princeton. N. J.:Princeton University Press。
2.
張君勤(1997)。Ten Lectures on the Democratic Constitution of the Republic of China。Taipei。
3.
Jacobs, Walter D.、Zink, Harold(1966)。Modern Governments。Princeton, N.J.:D. Van Nostrand。
4.
Katz, Richard S.(1980)。A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems。Baltimore, Maryland:The Johns Hopkins University Press。
5.
Buchanan, James M.、Tullock, Gordon(1962)。The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy。University of Michigan Press。
6.
Lijphard, Arend、Aitkin, Don(1994)。Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies, 1945-1990。Oxford University Press。
7.
Lijphart, Arend(1992)。Parliamentary versus Presidential Government。Oxford University Press。
8.
Sartori, Giovanni(1994)。Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes。New York University Press。
9.
Dahl, Robert A.(1956)。A Preface to Democratic Theory。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。
10.
Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York:Harper and Row。
11.
Nozick, Robert(1974)。Anarchy, State and Utopia。Blackwell。
12.
Sartori, Giovanni(1976)。Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis。Cambridge University Press。
13.
Riker, William H.(1982)。Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice。W. H. Freeman and Company。
14.
Lijphart, Arend(1999)。Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries。Yale University Press。
圖書論文
1.
謝復生(2002)。Continuity and Change in Taiwan’s Electoral Politics。How Asia Votes。New York:Chatham House。
2.
謝復生(1996)。The SNTV System and Its Political Implications。Taiwan's Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave。Armonk, NY:M. E. Sharpe。
3.
Horowitz, Donald L.(1992)。Comparing Democratic Systems。Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
4.
Linz, Juan J.(1992)。The Perils of Presidentialism。Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
從直選總統與民主化談政黨體系變遷:歐洲國家的比較研究
2.
臺灣與南韓「政黨選舉競爭穩定性」的比較分析:「選舉浮動性」的測量
3.
我國族群型代表性行政機關的設置及其意涵
4.
憲政體制與選舉制度的配套思考
5.
The Origins and Consequences of Electoral Reform in Taiwan
6.
我國現行憲政制度下總統與行政權之關係--與法國第五共和憲法為模式比較之
7.
選舉制度與政黨體系關聯性之研究(上)
8.
九七憲改後的憲政運作
9.
從不同選舉制度下政黨競爭之研究--論當前我國中央民代選舉制度及其改革意見
10.
憲政體制、選舉制度與政黨運作
1.
政黨體系與民主鞏固:台灣與南韓的比較分析
2.
中國國民黨的轉型--路徑依賴的觀點
3.
中國國民黨黨政關係之研究
4.
分權制衡之實定法原理研究
5.
我國與法國憲政體制之比較研究
6.
單一選區兩票制政治效果之研究
1.
臺灣政治經濟學
2.
半總統制的理論與實際
3.
臺灣與墨西哥民主化之比較
4.
中華民國的憲政工程 : 以雙首長制為中心的探討
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code