臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣與南韓「政黨選舉競爭穩定性」的比較分析：「選舉浮動性」的測量
書刊名：長庚人文社會學報
作者：楊以彬
作者(外文)：Yang, I-pin
出版日期：2016
卷期：9:1
頁次：頁115-150
主題關鍵詞：臺灣；南韓；政黨選舉競爭穩定性；政黨體系制度化；選舉浮動性；Taiwan；South Korea；The stability of party electoral competition；Party system institutionalization；Electoral volatility
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:332
  • 點閱點閱:75
民主轉型後的臺灣與南韓已經逐步邁入民主鞏固階段，一套健全的制度化政黨體系的建立和形成乃是重要條件之一。其中，最優先的分析面向和觀察指標，即是兩國政黨選舉競爭是否已經具備足夠的穩定性和長期的規律性，具體表現在各政黨在換屆選舉中其浮動性高低程度的變化及消長。值此，本文研究主題，旨在比較分析臺灣與南韓政黨選舉競爭穩定性的高低程度及優劣表現，進而評估對政黨體系制度化的影響。為達成預期的研究目標，筆者將引用Pedersen 設計的「選舉浮動性」公式作為操作性測量工具，藉以計算臺灣與南韓政黨席次浮動及政黨得票浮動情況。根據比較分析後的結果，本文發現，臺灣的總體選舉浮動性較南韓為低，顯示臺灣政黨選舉競爭穩定性優於南韓，因此相對有利於政黨體系制度化的健全。
Taiwan and South Korea after democratization have gradually entered the consolidation phase of democratic development. The institutionalization of political parties, that is, to establish a well-developed party system, is one of the most important conditions for this phase. In both countries, the stability of the electoral competition of the political parties and the long-term regularity of the elections are taken as first primordial consideration among all the analysis models and the indicators, which can be measured by the range of the changes in the electoral volatility of the political parties. The purpose of this comparative analysis is to compare the stability and the performance of the electoral competition of political parties in Taiwan and South Korea as well as to evaluate its impact on the political party system institutionalization. In order to achieve the intended goal of the research, I will use the Pedersen Index of electoral volatility as the measuring tool to calculate the changes in voter volatility and seat volatility in Taiwan and South Korea elections. According to the results of the comparative analysis, I found that Taiwan has a lower aggregate volatility than South Korea, which means the stability of Taiwan's political electoral competition is higher than South Korea, thus leads to a better-institutionalized political party system in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Mainwaring, Scott(1998)。Party Systems in the Third Wave。Journal of Democracy，9(3)，67-81。  new window
2.施正鋒(20000600)。亟待尋求共識的中央政府體制。政策月刊，59，26-31。  延伸查詢new window
3.Dix, Robert H.(1992)。Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American Political Parties。Comparative Political Studies，24(4)，488-511。  new window
4.Hicken, Allen、Kuhonta, Erik Martinez(2011)。Shadows from the Past: Party System Institutionalization in Asia。Comparative Political Studies，44(5)，572-597。  new window
5.Pedersen, Mogens N.(1980)。On Measuring Party System Change: A Methodological Critique and a Suggestion。Comparative Political Studies，12(4)，387-403。  new window
6.蘇子喬(20020100)。我國當前憲政體制中總統、行政院院長與立法院之三角關係--應然面與實然面之探討。憲政時代，27(3)，84-119。  延伸查詢new window
7.Biezen, Ingrid van(2004)。Political Parties as Public Utilities。Party Politics，10(6)，701-722。  new window
8.Brady, David W.、Mo, Jongryn(1992)。Electoral Systems and Institutional Choice: A Case Study of the 1988 Korean Elections。Comparative Political Studies，24(4)，405-430。  new window
9.Chan, Kenneth Ka-lok(2001)。Structuralism Versus Intentionalism in Post-Communist Party System Evolution。Party Politics，7(5)，605-619。  new window
10.Völkel, Philip、Croissant, Aurel(2012)。Party system types and party system institutionalization: Comparing new democracies in East and Southeast Asia。Party Politics，18(2)，235-265。  new window
11.Coppedge, Michael(20071200)。Continuity and Change in Latin American Party Systems。Taiwan Journal of Democracy，3(2)，119-149。new window  new window
12.Diamond, Larry(1997)。Consolidating Democracy in the Americas。Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science，550(34)，12-41。  new window
13.Gallagher, Michael(1991)。Proportionality, Dispropertionality and Electoral Systems。Electoral Studies，10(1)，33-51。  new window
14.Hicken, Allen、Kasuya, Yuko(2003)。A guide to the constitutional structures and electoral systems of east, south and southeast Asia。Electoral Studies，22(1)，121-151。  new window
15.Kitschelt, Herbert、Dimitrov, Dimitar、Kanev, Assen(1995)。The Structure of the Vote in Post Communist Party Systems: The Bulgarian Example。European Journal of Political Research，2，143-160。  new window
16.Korosteleva, Elena A.(2000)。Electoral volatility in post-communist Belarus: Explaining the paradox。Party Politics，6(3)，343-358。  new window
17.Lupu, Noam、Stokes, Susan(2010)。Democracy, Interrupted: Regime Change and Partisanship in Twentieth-Century Argentina。Electoral Studies，29(1)，91-104。  new window
18.Madrid, Raúl(2005)。Ethnic Cleavages and Electoral Volatility in Latin America。Comparative Politics，38(1)，1-20。  new window
19.Przeworski, Adam(1975)。Institutionalization of Voting Patters, or is Mobilization the Source of Decay?。American Political Science Review，69(1)，49-67。  new window
20.Shugart, Matthew S.(2005)。Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns。French Politics，3，323-351。  new window
21.Sikk, Allan(2005)。How Unstable? Volatility and the Genuinely New Parties in Eastern Europe。European Journal of Political Research，44，391-412。  new window
22.Annus, Taavi、Tavits, Margit(2006)。Learning to Make Votes Count: The Role of Democratic Experience。Electoral Studies，25(1)，72-90。  new window
23.林繼文(20061100)。政府體制、選舉制度與政黨體系：一個配套論的分析。選舉研究，13(2)，1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Dunleavy, Patrick、Margetts, Helen(1995)。Understanding the Dynamics of Electoral Reform。International Political Science Review，16(1)，9-29。  new window
25.沈有忠(20121200)。半總統制「權力總統化」之比較研究。臺灣民主季刊，9(4)，1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.林永芳(20061200)。俄羅斯的政黨體系與民主化。俄羅斯學報，5，25-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Chung, J. M.(2013)。The Impact of Electoral Environment and Political Institutions on Post-Democratization Party Change in South Korea and Taiwan。Korea Observer，44(1)，1-30。  new window
28.Lee, Sangmook(20070700)。Democratic Transition and the Consolidation of Democracy in South Korea。Taiwan Journal of Democracy，3(1)，99-125。new window  new window
29.Mainwaring, S.、Zoco, E.(2007)。Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Inter-Party Competition。Party Politics，13(2)，155-178。  new window
30.Pedersen, M. N.(1982)。Towards a New Typology of Party Life Spans and Minor Parties。European Journal of Political Research，7(1)，1-26。  new window
31.Shamir, M.(1984)。Are Western Party Systems ‘Frozen’?. A Comparative Dynamic Analysis。Comparative Political Studies，17(1)，35-79。  new window
32.謝復生(19940200)。憲政體制、選舉制度與政黨運作。理論與政策，8(2)=30，5-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Diamond, Larry(1996)。Is The Third Wave Over?。Journal of Democracy，7(3)，20-37。  new window
34.Duverger, Maurice(1980)。A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government。European Journal of Political Research，8(2)，165-187。  new window
35.蘇子喬、王業立(20100900)。為何廢棄混合式選舉制度？--義大利、俄羅斯與泰國選制改革之研究。東吳政治學報，28(3)，1-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.吳重禮(20000300)。美國「分立性政府」研究文獻之評析：兼論臺灣地區的政治發展。問題與研究，39(3)，75-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Mainwaring, Scott(1993)。Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination。Comparative Political Studies，26(2)，198-228。  new window
38.王業立(19950500)。單記非讓渡投票制的政治影響：我國民意代表選舉制度的探討。選舉研究，2(1)，147-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.Pedersen, Mogens N.(1979)。The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility。European Journal of Political Research，7(1)，1-26。  new window
40.湯德宗(19980100)。論九七修憲後的權力分立--憲改工程的另類選擇。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，27(2)，135-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Jones, M. P.(2007)。Political Parties and Party Systems in Latin America。The conference on Prospects for Democracy in Latin America。Denton, Texas：Department of Political Science, University of North Texas。  new window
2.Park, C. W.(2009)。Adopation of the Two-Vote Mixed-Member Majoritarian System and Its Effects on Citizens' Voting Behavior in the Korean National Assembly Election。The conference on “Elections in Taiwan, Japan, and Korea under the Mixed-Member Electoral Systems"。Taipei：National Chengchi University。  new window
研究報告
1.Shin, D. C.、Chu, Y. H.(2004)。The Quality of Democracy in South Korea and Taiwan: Subjective Assessment from the Perspectives of Ordinary Citizens。  new window
圖書
1.Mainwaring, Scott P.(1999)。Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil。Palo Alto, CA。  new window
2.Ágh, Attila(1998)。The politics of Central Europe。London：Sage Publications Ltd.。  new window
3.Rose, Richard、Munroand, Neil、Mackie, Tom(1998)。Elections in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990。Glasgow, UK：University of Strathclyde, Studies in Public Policy。  new window
4.Tóka, Gábor(1997)。Political parties and democratic consolidation in East Central Europe。Glasgow, UK：University of Strathclyde, Studies in Public Policy。  new window
5.雷競旋(1989)。選舉制度概論。臺北：洞察出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.王業立(2006)。比較選舉制度。臺北：五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃德福(19920000)。民主進步黨與臺灣地區政治民主化。臺北：時英出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Huntington, S. P.(1991)。The Third Waves: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century。Norman, O.K.：University of Oklahoma Press。  new window
9.Birch, S.(2003)。Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe。Basingstoke, UK：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
10.Bartoliniand, S.、Mair, P.(1990)。Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of the European Electorate, 1885-1985。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Diamond, L.、Linz, J. J.、Lipset, S. M.(1989)。Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America。Boulder, CO：Lynne Rienner。  new window
12.陳寧寧、劉德海(2001)。韓國研究導論。臺北：中國文化大學出版部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Mainwaring, Scott、Torcal, Mariano(2006)。Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization。Handbook of Party Politics。Sage Publications。  new window
2.Mainwaring, Scott、Scully, Timothy R.(1995)。Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America。Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America。Santa Clara, CA：Stanford University Press。  new window
3.王業立(2001)。選舉制度對政黨合作的影響：一個制度面的分析。政黨重組--台灣民主政治的再出發？。臺北：新台灣人文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
4.林俊佑、王志良(2011)。韓國國會議員選舉。各國選舉制度。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.倪炎元(2002)。製造多數：南韓第六共和憲法下的總統與國會關係(1987-2001)。憲政體制與總統權力。臺北：國家政策研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
6.隋杜卿(2003)。立法委員選舉制度的改革：雙首長制的思考。兩岸立法制度與立法運作。臺北：韋伯文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Basedau, Matthias(2007)。Do Party Systems Matter for Democracy?。Votes, Money and Violenc。Uppsala：Nordiska Afrikainstitutet。  new window
8.Croissant, Aurel(2002)。Electoral Politics in South Korea。Politics in Southeast and East Asia。Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung。  new window
9.Ersson, Svante、Lane, Jan-Erik(1998)。Electoral Instability and Party System Change in Western Europe。Comparing party system change。Routledge。  new window
10.Gallagher, Michael、Mitchell, Paul(2005)。Indices of Fragmentation and Disproportionality。The Politics of Electoral System。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
11.Mair, Peter(2000)。Volatility, electoral。International Encyclopedia of Elections。Washington, DC：Congressional Quarterly Press。  new window
12.Pedersen, Mogen N.(1983)。Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party System, 1948-1977: Explorations in Explanations。Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change。Beverly Hill, CA：Sage。  new window
13.Geddes, Barbara(1996)。Initiation of New Democratic Institutions in Eastern Europe and Latin America。Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin American。Boulder, Co：Westview Press。  new window
14.Rothstein, Bo(1996)。Political Institutions: An Overview。A New Handbook of Political Science。Oxford University Press。  new window
15.林俊佑、王志良(2011)。韓國總統選舉。各國選舉制度。臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃德福(1997)。政黨體系與民主政治之鞏固：以臺灣和南韓為例。鞏固第三波民主。臺北：業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.Gunther, R.(1995)。Politics of Democratic。The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective。Baltimore M.D.：The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
18.Gunther, R.、Diamond, L.(2003)。Types and Functions of Parties。Political Parties and Democracy。Baltimore, MD：Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
19.Katz, R. S.、Crotty, W.(2006)。[Handbook of Party Politics] Introduction。Handbook of Party Politics。London：Sage。  new window
20.Elgie, Robert(1999)。The Politics of Semi-Presidentialism。Semi-Presidentialism in Europe。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：770（臺灣：768，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67383431
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上