:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:功能本位介入策略對注意力缺陷過動症學生口語干擾行為之成效研究
書刊名:東臺灣特殊教育學報
作者:楊俊威鈕文英
作者(外文):Yang, Gin-weNiew, Wern-ing
出版日期:2006
卷期:8
頁次:頁21-38
主題關鍵詞:注意力缺陷過動症口語干擾行為Attention deficit hyper activity disorderADHDVerbally disruptive behavior
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:204
本研究的目的,在於透過功能性評量之結果,介入輔導同班級一對注意力缺陷過動症的孿生兄弟,主要結論有下列三點: 一、透過功能性評量,發現個案之行為問題除了本身ADHD 症狀影響外,發生行為問題的前置事件多為:無聊、老師不理他、或是前一節課(包含下課)情緒未被處理、個案才會以行為問題得到任課老師注意或是發洩情緒。 二、兩種策略介入後,兩位個案行為問題的改善趨勢變化雖不穩定,但確實能有效減少發生的次數。 三、包裹式策略介入對於兩位個案之行為問題改善結果並不一致,包裹式介入策略對於個案二之介入效果較單一策略介入為佳,而個案一對於包裹式策略介入的成效相較於單一策略介入並未有顯著差異,參照質性資料的結果可發現,兩位個案雖為孿生兄弟,且在同班級上課,但還是有個別間差異存在。
The purpose of this study was to provide the twin brothers with ADHD an appropriate intervention based on the outcomes of functional assessment. The major findings were as follows: 1.Through the functional assessment, these findings showed that the symptoms of ADHD itself caused verbally disruptive behavior, but the two clients tended to have more verbally disruptive behavior when being bored, being neglected by their teacher or having a to-be-dealt mood from the previous session or during recess in order to obtain the teacher's attention or to vent their emotions. 2.After two strategies being intervened, the problem behaviors of both cases had reduced effectively, yet, it did not show constant tendency toward promising improvement. 3.The intervention named as packaged strategy showed different outcomes of improvement between the two clients. For case II, the intervention of packaged strategy had a better result than that of single strategy. As for case I, there was no significant difference between the two strategies. As contrasted with qualitative data, the results indicated that the brothers with ADHD were twins and studying in the same class, but the individual difference still existed.
期刊論文
1.Gartin, B. C.、Murdick, N. L.(2001)。A new IDEA mandate: The use of functional assessment of behavior and positive behavior supports。Remedial and Special Education,22(6),344-349。  new window
2.林月仙、蘇純瑩、吳裕益(20040600)。國小高攻擊傾向學生行為問題處理之個案研究。高雄師大學報. 教育與社會科學類,16,139-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ryan, A. L.、Halsey, H. N.、Matthews, W. J.(2003)。Using functional assessment to promote desirable student in schools。Teaching Exceptional Children,35(5),8-15。  new window
4.宋明君(20030300)。應用功能性評量於改善工作社會技能之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,24,203-226。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.鍾儀潔、鈕文英(20040300)。自閉症兒童固著行為的功能分析與介入成效之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,26,177-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳郁菁、鈕文英(20040900)。行為支持計畫對國中自閉症學生行為問題處理成效之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,27,183-205。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Sterling-Turner, H. E.、Robinson, S. L.、Wilczynski, S. M.(2001)。Functional assessment of distracting and disruptive behaviors in the school setting。School Psychology Review,30(2),211-226。  new window
8.Dunlap, G.、Newton, J. S.、Fox, L.、Benito, N.、Vaughn, B.(2001)。Family involvement in functional assessment and positive behavior support。Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities,16(4),215-221。  new window
9.黃雅君、張雯婷(20050300)。國中階段自閉症學生融合教育之實施--以一位自閉症學生普通班行為問題之介入為例。特殊教育季刊,94,19-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.曾進興(1999)。專業整合介紹。高雄市八十八學年身心障礙教育專業團隊服務研討會,1-21。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃志強(2005)。單一策略與包裹策略對注意力缺陷過動症學生不適當社會行為處理效果之比較研究。特殊教育發展與創新學術研討會。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡昌原(2002)。國小啟仁班實施專業團隊服務模式之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kerr, M. M.、Nelson, C. M.(1998)。Strategies for managing behavior problems in the classroom。Merrill/Prentice Hall。  new window
2.鈕文英(2001)。身心障礙者行為問題處理:正向行為支持取向。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪儷瑜(1998)。ADHD學生的教育與輔導。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.鈕文英(1998)。身心障礙教育專業團隊設置與實施辦法之制定研究。高雄:高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
5.Barkley, R. A.、Murphy, K. R.、黃惠玲、趙家琛(2001)。注意力缺陷過動症:臨床工作手冊。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
6.王天苗(2004)。特殊教育相關專業服務手冊。台北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
7.賴銘次(2000)。特殊兒童異常行為診斷與治療。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
8.Demchak, M., A.、Bossert, K.(1996)。Assessing problem behaviors。Washington, DC:American Association on Mental Retardation。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dyer, K.、Larsson, E. V.(1997)。Developing functional communication skills: Alternatives to severe behavior problems。Prevention and treatment of severe behavior problems: Models and methods in developing disabilities。Brooks/Cole。  new window
2.吳裕益(2004)。效果量分析在單一受試之應用。屏師特殊教育文集。屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.Meyer, L. H.、Park, H.(1999)。Contemporary, most promising practices for people disabilities。Behavioral intervention: Principles, models, and practices。Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes。  new window
4.Wieseler, N. A.、Hanson, R. H.(2002)。Building an effective team for crisis prevention and response。Crisis: Prevention & response in the community。Washington, DC:American Association on Mental Retardation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE