:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:企業成長機會之於融資政策及股利政策影響之多期性研究
書刊名:東吳經濟商學學報
作者:曾昭玲 引用關係周小玲
作者(外文):Tseng, JaulingChao, Hsiao-ling
出版日期:2007
卷期:57
頁次:頁49-77
主題關鍵詞:融資政策股利政策成長機會聯立方程組模型Financing policiesDividends policiesGrowth opportunitySimultaneous equations model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:63
過往論述契約、訊息及賦稅假說的文獻多認為成長機會是造成企業政策差異的主要因素之一,據此,本研究旨在探討企業成長機會之於其長、短期融資政策及現金、股票股利政策的影響,除援引民國80-91年間台灣上市公司之多期混合資料與縱橫資料,並利用因素分析法萃取成長機會的代理變數,續以聯立方程組模型補正企業融資及股利政策間於實務操作上或實證資料上均非相互獨立之內生交互影響關係。實證結果揭示,成長機會愈多的企業其長期或短期負債比均愈低,符合契約假說與累進稅率假說。其次,成長機會對現金股利率與股票股利率皆具顯著負向影響,此揭示台灣投資人一般均預期股票股利具有填權效應,抑或並不充分瞭解股票股利實具稀釋效果,致使現金與股票股利之差異模糊化。再者,長期負債比、短期負債比、現金股利率與股票股利率等比率顯著聯立交互負向影響,易言之,企業之融資比率(股利率)高則股利率(融資比率)低,長期(短期)負債比高則短期(長期)負債比低,現金(股票)股利率高則股票(現金)股利率低,故台灣的企業主多謹慎平衡其長、短期負債比,甚且視現金與股票股利具替代性,支持研究推論,更確立聯立方程組模型有裨於正確反映成長機會之於融資與股利政策的真實影響,進而釐清融資與股利政策的內生交互關係。
Most of the prior studies center ingon the contract incentive, information asymmetry and tax shield proposition point out that growth opportunity is one of the key factor contributing to the differences of businesses policies, thispaper, therefore, examines the effects of enterprises’growth opportunities proxy, derived from the factor analysis, on the long and short-term financing policies as well as cash and stock dividends policies of publicly traded corporations from 1991 to 2002 by the endogenously simultaneous equations model. The results, estimated by pooling and panel data, reveal that the enterprise swith more growth opportunities have alower long-and short-termdebtorleverageratio,consistentwith the contract and progressive tax hypothesis. Besides, the businesses’growth opportunities have significantly negative effects on the cash and stock dividends, those of which are in line with the contract hypothesis rather information hypothesis. These that domestic investors treat stock dividends equally as cash dividends and ignore the dilution effect of stock dividends, different from foreign investors. Furthermore, the short and long-term financing policies as well as cash and stock dividends policies are negatively simultaneously determined, implying that businesses with a higher leverage ratio are inclined to have alower dividends ratio, vice versa, and short- and long-term leverage ratio as well as stock and cash dividends are substitutes to each other. These results, generally supporting the propositions, shedlight on the inter relationship of the financing and dividends policies of Taiwan’s businesses. findings illustrate.
期刊論文
1.Ozkan, A.(2001)。Determinants of Capital Structure and Adjustment to Long Run Target: Evidence from UK Company Panel Data。Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,28,175-198。  new window
2.Barclay, Michael J.、Smith, Clifford W. Jr.(1995)。The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt。Journal of Finance,50(2),609-631。  new window
3.Smith, C. W.、Warner, J.(1979)。On the financial contracting: an analysis of bond covenants。Journal of Financial Economics,7(2),117-161。  new window
4.Baber, William R.、Janakiraman, Surya N.、Kang, Sok-Hyon(1996)。Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation。Journal of Accounting and Economics,21(3),297-318。  new window
5.Rozeff, Michael S.(1982)。Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios。Journal of Financial Research,5(3),249-259。  new window
6.Chung, Kee H.、Charoenwong, Charlie(1991)。Investment Options, Assets in Place, and the Risk of Stocks。Financial Management,20(3),21-33。  new window
7.Gaver, Jennifer J.、Gaver, Kenneth M.(1993)。Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies。Journal of Accounting and Economics,16(1-3),125-160。  new window
8.Myers, Stewart C.(1977)。Determinants of Corporate Borrowing。Journal of Financial Economics,5(2),147-175。  new window
9.Smith, Clifford W. Jr.、Watts, Ross L.(1992)。The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies。Journal of Financial Economics,32(3),263-292。  new window
10.Titman, Sheridan、Wessels, Roberto(1988)。The determinants of capital structure choice。The Journal of Finance,43(1),1-19。  new window
11.Hausman, Jerry A.(1978)。Specification tests in econometrics。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,46(6),1251-1271。  new window
12.Lewellen, Wilbur、Loderer, Claudio、Martin, Kenneth(1987)。Executive compensation contracts and executive incentive problems: An empirical analysis。Journal of Accounting and Economics,9(3),287-310。  new window
13.Jensen, Michael C.(1986)。Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers。The American Economic Review,76(2),323-329。  new window
14.DeAngelo, Harry、Masulis, Ronald W.(1980)。Optimal Capital Structure under Corporate and Personal Taxation。Journal of Financial Economics,8(1),3-29。  new window
15.Lintner, John(1956)。Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes。American Economic Review,46(2),97-113。  new window
16.Miller, Merton H.(1977)。Debt and Taxes。The Journal of Finance,32(2),261-275。  new window
17.Modigliani, Franco、Miller, Merton H.(1963)。Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction。The American Economic Review,53(3),433-443。  new window
18.Myers, Stewart C.(1984)。The Capital Structure Puzzle。Journal of Finance,39(3),574-592。  new window
19.Collins, D. W.、Kothari, S. P.(1989)。An Analysis of Intertemporal and Cross-sectional Determinants of Earnings Response Coefficients。Journal of Accounting and Economics,11(2/3),143-181。  new window
20.Jensen, Michael C.、Meckling, William H.(1976)。Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure。Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360。  new window
21.Bhattacharya, S.(1979)。Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and "The Bird in the Hand" Fallacy。Bell Journal of Economics,10,259-270。  new window
22.吳林(1997)。「對健全股利政策之看法及建議」。證券櫃檯,第八十八期,頁70-81。  延伸查詢new window
23.鍾俊文、林揚舜與彭瑞年(2005)。「員工配股、股利政策與投資報酬率間的關係」。貨幣觀測與信用評等,第五十一期,頁26-37。  延伸查詢new window
24.闕河士與黃旭輝(1997)。「成長機會與股票股利關係之實證研究一代理問題觀點」。管理與資訊學報,第二期,頁133-148。  延伸查詢new window
25.Gay, G. D. and J. Nam(1998)。“The Underinvestment Problem and Corporate Derivatives Use.”。Financial Management,27,no.4,pp.53-69。  new window
26.Long, M. and I. Malitz(1985)。“The Investment-financing Nexus: Some Empirical Evidence.”。Midland Corporate Finance Journal,3,no.1,pp.53-59。  new window
27.Prowse, S. D.(1990)。“Institutional Investment Pattern and Corporate Financial Behavior in the U.S. and Japan.”。Journal of Financial Economics,27,no.1,pp.43-66。  new window
28.Ross, S.(1977)。“The Determinations of Financial Structure: The Incentive-signaling Approach.”。Bell Journal of Economics,8,no.1,pp.23-40。  new window
29.Ryan, J. and E. J. Walsh(1997)。“Agency and Tax Explanations of Security Issuance Decisions.”。Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,24,no.7,pp.943-96 1。  new window
30.Skinner, D. J.(1993)。“The Investment Opportunity Set and Accounting Procedure Choice.”。Journal of Accounting and Economics,16,no.4,pp.407-443。  new window
31.Smith, C. W. and R. Stulz(1985)。“The Determinants of Firm’s Hedging Policy.”。Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,20,no.4,pp.391-405。  new window
32.Woolridge, J.(1983)。“Stock Dividends as Signals.”。Journal of Financial Research,6,no.1,pp. 1-12。  new window
學位論文
1.洪振虔(198906)。台灣地區上市公司股利發放之探討(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.晁群祥(199406)。臺灣上市公司成長機會對融資及股利政策影響之實證研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Belsley, D. A.(1991)。Conditioning diagnostics: Collinearity and weak data in regression。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
2.Greene, William H.(2003)。Econometric analysis。Prentice Education。  new window
3.Barnea, A., R. Haugen, and L. Senbet(1985)。“Agency Problems and Financial Contracting.”。Foundations of Finance Series。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE