:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣IC設計產業公司治理、技術效率與利潤結構之攸關性研究
書刊名:臺灣管理學刊
作者:林灼榮 引用關係鄒季博蕭莉芃
作者(外文):Lin, Jwu-RongChou, Charles C. P.Hsiao, Li-Peng
出版日期:2007
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁187-207
主題關鍵詞:公司治理技術效率利潤結構Corporate governanceTechnical efficiencyProfit-structure
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:71
  • 點閱點閱:60
本文旨在探討臺灣IC設計產業, 公司治理對技術效率、市場結構與利潤之影響,並據以檢定X效率結構、結構-行為-績效、相對市場力量等三大假說。茲將實證結果歸納如下:(1)在140個有限樣本下,本文利用因素分析法,將四大構面之95個公司治理變數,萃取出19個關鍵變數;其中有12個會顯著影響技術無效率,而有9個會顯著衝擊IC設計廠商之市場占有率。(2)技術效率之提昇,可以顯著提昇資產報酬率、淨值報酬率及益本比,但市占率之提高僅能顯現在資產報酬率,而產業集中度則與獲利能力無顯著關聯;換言之,臺灣IC設計產業支持X效率結構與相對市場力量假說,但並未支持結構-行為-績效假說。(3)整體而言,臺灣IC設計產業之公司治理機制,在董事會結構、控制權偏離、組織及人事穩定度、公平對待股東等構面,對獲利績效上皆呈正向樂觀表現;但在股權結構與財報透明度等二構面,則有必要再加強。
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationships among corporate governance, technical efficiency and profit-structure in Taiwan IC-design industry, and to test three hypotheses of X-Efficient-Structure, Structure-Conduct-Performance and Relative-Market-Power. Three empirical results are observed as below: (1) Under 140 limited samples, we used factor analysis to drive 19 key variables from 95 variables of corporate governance which included four constructs. There are 12 of 19 key variables will significantly cause technical inefficient. (2) The improvement of technical efficiency can significantly progress in ROA, ROE and EPS/P, but the increase of firm's market share can only progress in ROA. Besides, the concentration of the IC-design industry has no relationship with earnings. (3) In sum, as regards the corporate governance mechanism of Taiwan IC-design industry, the constructs of board structure, the deviation of control power, the stability of organization and personnel, and the equitable treatment of shareholders can improve entrepreneur's earnings, but the constructs of ownership structure and financial transparency must be improved.
期刊論文
1.Sergio, D、Vania,S(2007)。Patterns of Corporate Governance and Technical Efficiency in Italian Manufacturing。Management and Decision Economics,28,27-40。  new window
2.Li, Y.、Hu, J. L.、Chiu, Y. H.(2004)。Ownership and Production Efficiency: Evidence from Taiwanese Banks。The Service Industries Journal,24(4),129-148。  new window
3.林灼榮、徐啓升、陳誌宏(20041200)。臺灣IC產業技術效率與財務績效關係之研究。產業論壇,6(4),177-197。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.馬泰成(20050700)。產業結構與利潤:臺灣銀行市場的實證研究。公平交易季刊,13(3),61-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Berger, Allen N.(1995)。The Profit-structure Relationship in Banking: Tests of Market-power and Efficient-structure Hypotheses。Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,27(2),404-431。  new window
6.周淑卿、吳欽杉、陳安琳(20040900)。電子資訊產業與非電子資訊產業之研究發展支出、股權結構與公司績效之關聯性研究。臺北科技大學學報,37(2),267-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Coles, J. W.、McWilliams, V. B.、Sen, N.(2001)。An Examination of the Relationship of Governance Mechanisms to Performance。Journal of Management,27(1),23-50。  new window
8.Battese, George E.、Coelli, Timothy J.(1995)。A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data。Empirical Economics,20(2),325-332。  new window
9.Sheu, Her-Jiun、Yang, Chi-Yih(2005)。Insider Ownership and Firm Performance in Taiwan's Electronics Industry: A Technical Efficiency Perspective。Management and Decision Economics,26(5),307-318。  new window
10.Aigner, Dennis J.、Lovell, Charles Albert Knox、Schmidt, Peter(1977)。Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models。Journal of Econometrics,6(1),21-37。  new window
11.Meeusen, Wim、Van Den Broeck, Julien(1977)。Efficiency Estimation From Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error。International Economic Review,18(2),435-444。  new window
12.Mehran, Hamid(1995)。Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance。Journal of Financial Economics,38(2),163-184。  new window
13.林靜儀(20040800)。臺灣地區製造業市場集中度、廣告密集度與利潤率關係之探討。臺灣管理學刊,4(2),203-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.周淑卿、吳欽杉與陳安琳(2004)。電子資訊產業與非電子資訊產業之研究發展支出、股權結構與公司績效之關聯性研究。台北科技大學學報,第37卷第2期,267-288。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Demsetz, H.(1973)。The Market Concentration Doctrine。  new window
學位論文
1.李建鋒(2004)。國際化對台灣資訊電子業技術效率與生產力之衝擊效果評估(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.OECD(1999)。OECD Principles of Corporate Governance。Paris:OECD Publications Services。  new window
2.張維迎(2005)。產權、激勵與公司治理。北京:經濟科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Standard、Poor‘s Governance Services(2002)。Standard & Poor‘s Corporate Governance Scores: Criteria Methodology and Definitions。New York:Standard & Poor‘s Governance Services。  new window
4.World Bank Group(1999)。Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation: Overview。World Bank Group。  new window
5.林師模、陳苑欽(2004)。多變量分析--管理上的應用。台北市:雙葉書廊有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Scherer, Frederic M.、Ross, David(1990)。Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance。Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
7.陳正倉、林惠玲、陳忠榮、莊春發(2003)。產業經濟學。台北:雙葉書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.Hirschman, Albert O.(1980)。National power and the structure of foreign trade。University of California Press。  new window
9.Berle, Adolf Augustus Jr.、Means, Gardiner C.(1932)。The Modern Corporation and Private Property。Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
10.林師模與陳苑欽(2004)。多變量析-管理上的應用。台北。  延伸查詢new window
11.Standard、Poor's.(2002)。Standard & Poor Corporate Governance Scores: Criteria, Methodology and Definitions。New York。  new window
12.Panzar, J.C.(1989)。Technological Determinants of Firm and Industry Structure, Ch.1。Handbook of Industrial Organization。  new window
其他
1.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(1999)。OECD Principles of Corporate Governance,沒有紀錄。  new window
2.Demsetz, H.(1973)。The Market Concentration Doctrine。  new window
圖書論文
1.Panzar, J.(1989)。Technological determinants of firm and industry structure。Handbook of Industrial Organization。New York:Amsterdam:North-Holland。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE