:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:確認貧窮的類別:臺灣低收入家戶的特性
書刊名:社會科學論叢
作者:張嘉玲 引用關係黃素滿
作者(外文):Chang, Chia-linHuang, Su-man
出版日期:2013
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁1-46
主題關鍵詞:第一款貧窮第二款貧窮貧窮變動貧窮惡化貧窮改善貧窮不變多項式羅吉斯模型Low-income familyPoverty changesProvertyMultinomial logit model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:224
  • 點閱點閱:162
本研究之對象為全國平均每人每月總收入低於貧窮線最低生活費水準之下,且接受政府每月生活救助之低收入戶家庭。不同於以往研究,本文涵蓋近十年來內政部三次低收入戶生活狀況調查,包含第一款(重貧)、第二款貧戶、第三款(輕貧)等三款類別之貧戶。本研究除了分析影響這三款貧戶的特性外,也進一步分析貧戶獲得社會救助後,哪些特性會增加其「改善貧窮」的機率,哪些特性反而加重其「貧窮惡化」的機率,而又是那些特性之貧戶會有社會福利依賴的現象。由於本文的被解釋變數分成三款貧窮類別,因此利用多項式羅吉斯模型來分析影響不同貧窮款別與不同貧窮變動程度之特性。本文之實證結果發現,「男性」為戶長之貧戶落入第一款重貧之機率比女性戶長高,同時,男性戶長之貧戶在獲得社會救助後其「貧窮惡化」的機率也比女性戶長之貧戶高,顯示台灣照顧女性貧戶之福利政策發揮了實際的作用。「戶內依賴人數」愈多不僅提高貧戶落入第一款重貧機率,同時,「戶內依賴人數」愈多也是加重貧窮惡化的重要特性之一。「戶內工作人數」愈多,可降低貧戶落入第一款重貧的機率,同時,提高「戶內工作人數」也提高「貧窮改善」的特性之一。此外,戶長教育程度之高低只有對第三款輕貧有顯著影響,但相對的,貧戶在獲得社會救助後,低教育程度戶長之家戶對社會福利依賴的程度比高教育程度戶長之家戶大。當控制時間變數後,年齡只有些微顯著影響第一款重貧發生的機率,顯示「貧窮老人化」的現象在台灣社會並不普遍。最後,貧窮不變的機率似乎有隨著時間逐漸增加的趨勢,顯示台灣貧戶依賴社會福利的現象可能有愈來愈嚴重的情形。
This paper focuses on the total income of low-income households receiving the government's monthly living assistance with the lowest living standards below the poverty line based on monthly per capita income. By drawing from three government surveys conducted within the last decade on the living conditions of low-income households, it distinguishes three categories of poor households, namely, very poor, poor, and slightly poor households. Besides analyzing the specific factors that influence these categories, this study examines which factors increase the probability of both experiencing less poverty and conversely sinking into more poverty. A multinomial logit model is used to analyze the factors affecting the different categories of poor households and the extent of the changes from one poverty category to another. The empirical results indicate that the probability of poor households falling into the very poor group of households and seeing their situation worsen is higher for male-headed households than for female-headed households. Furthermore, the higher the number of household dependents, the more detrimental is the effect of poverty, while the opposite applies when the number of household members in employment increases, thereby increasing the probability of the household's poverty situation improving. The education of the household head only has a significant effect on the slightly poor category. However, after poor households obtain social assistance, those with less-educated household heads rely more on social welfare than their more-educated counterparts. After controlling for time variables, the age of the household head is found to have only a slight impact on households falling into the very poor group, so that poverty does not necessarily increase with age in Taiwanese society. Finally, the probability of poverty not changing over time appears to be gradually increasing, suggesting that the reliance on social welfare is likely to increase among Taiwan's poor households in the future.
期刊論文
1.Pearce, Diane(1978)。The Feminization of Poverty: Women, Work and Welfare。Urban and Social Change Review,11(1/2),28-36。  new window
2.李淑容(20071200)。臺灣新貧現象及其因應對策。東吳社會工作學報,17,193-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bellido, N. P.、Jano, M. D.、López Ortega, F. J.、Martín-Guzmán, M. P.、Toledo, M. I.(199804)。The Measurement and Analysis of Poverty and Inequality: An Application to Spanish Conurbations。International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique,66(1),115-131。  new window
4.王德睦、何華欽、劉一龍(20080800)。所得成長、所得不均與家戶變遷對貧窮率之影響:以臺灣地區1990年至2004年為例。臺灣社會福利學刊,7(1),29-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.張清富(19921200)。臺灣貧窮的結構因素。法商學報,27,171-191。  延伸查詢new window
6.張清富(1992)。貧窮類別差異的決定因素。法商學報,26,147-164。  延伸查詢new window
7.賴秀玲、鄭萬助、梅家瑗(20040100)。貧窮線內涵與我國低收入、中低收入戶標準及人數之探討。主計月刊,577,62-71。  延伸查詢new window
8.Iceland, J.(200308)。Why poverty remains high: The role of income growth, economic inequality, and changes in family structure, 1949-1999。Demography,40(3),1949-1999。  new window
9.張清富(19920500)。區域貧窮與家戶組成: 臺灣省的個案研究。社會學與社會工作,9,6-25。  延伸查詢new window
10.張國偉(20090300)。十年來臺灣貧窮趨勢分析--以1994、2001、2004年低收入戶調查為例。社區發展季刊,124,28-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.張清富(20090300)。從理論觀點談工作與貧窮。社區發展季刊,124,58-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張清富(19920300)。貧窮變遷與家庭結構。婦女與兩性學刊,3,41-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林松齡(19800900)。臺灣中部地區貧窮現象之研究--臺中市低收入戶專案研究。臺灣銀行季刊,31(3),189-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.呂朝賢(20070100)。貧窮動態及其成因--從生命週期到生命歷程。臺大社會工作學刊,14,167+169-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.王永慈(20050100)。臺灣的貧窮問題:相關研究的檢視。臺大社會工作學刊,10,1+3-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.何華欽(20071000)。政府移轉對老人家戶的貧窮減輕效果:以1990至2000年為例。臺大社會工作學刊,15,89-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.薛承泰(20041200)。臺灣地區貧窮女性化現象之探討:以1990年代為例。人口學刊,29,95-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.王德睦、何華欽(20061200)。臺灣貧窮女性化的再檢視。人口學刊,33,103-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Ashford, J. R.、Sowden, R. R.(1970)。Multivariate Probit Analysis。Biometrics,26(3),535-546。  new window
會議論文
1.林金源、朱雲鵬、胡登淵(2007)。台灣家庭貧窮因素之探討及降低貧窮政策之模擬。中國制度經濟學會年會暨兩岸學術研討會,中國制度經濟學會 (會議日期: 10月13日)。中國。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.張清富(1987)。低收入戶的職業結構分析。  延伸查詢new window
2.張清富(1990)。低收入戶人口結構變遷。  延伸查詢new window
3.張清富(1990)。家庭結構與貧窮問題。  延伸查詢new window
4.張清富(1997)。工作貧窮的探討。  延伸查詢new window
5.周麗芳、王正(2003)。貧窮線界定與社會福利政策相關措施之研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.The World Bank(200502)。2005 International Comparison Program: Tables of Final Results。Washington, DC:The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank。  new window
學位論文
1.李立文(2005)。台灣貧窮問題之因素討論:跨縣市資料分析(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭麗珍(2008)。以生命歷程觀點探討老人貧窮經驗(碩士論文)。台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂朝賢(1998)。臺灣的貧窮問題(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Becker, Gary S.、王文娟、李華夏、吳惠林、鄒繼礎(2006)。家庭論。台北:立緒。  延伸查詢new window
2.林師模、陳苑欽(2008)。多變量分析管理上的應用。台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林亮演(1980)。社會救助的理論與實務。台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.林萬億(2009)。台灣的社會福利:歷史經驗與制度分析。台北:五南文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
5.邱振崑(2005)。SPSS統計教學實例應用。台北:文魁資訊股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Brayant, W. Keith、陳秋玫(1998)。家計經濟學。台北:五南文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
7.Becker, G. S.(1994)。Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. with Special Reference to Education。University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Majid, N.(2001)。The Size of the Working Poor Population in Developing Countries。Employment Sector Employment Strategy Department。  new window
9.World Bank(2008)。Global purchasing power parities and real expenditures: 2005 international comparison program。Washington, DC:The World Bank。  new window
10.陳順宇(2009)。迴歸分析:SPSS、STATISTICA軟體操作。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.張清富(1993)。臺灣兒童貧窮之研究。臺北:豪峯。  延伸查詢new window
12.Doeringer, Peter B.、Piore, Michael J.(1971)。Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis。Lexington, MA:Health Lexington Books。  new window
13.蔡明璋(19960000)。臺灣的貧窮:下層階級的結構分析。臺北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Blau, Peter Michael、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967)。The American Occupational Structure。New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
15.Maddala, G. S.(1983)。Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Duncan, Greg J.、Rodgers, Willard(1990)。Lone-parent Families and Their economic Problems: Transitory or Persistent?。Lone-parent Families: The Economic Challenge。Paris:OECD。  new window
17.Kane, Sharon、Kirby, Mark(2003)。Wealth, Poverty and Welfare。New York, NY:Palgrave。  new window
18.Vosler, Nancy R.(1996)。New Approaches to Family Practice: confronting economic stress。Sage。  new window
其他
1.內政部(2001)。低收入戶生活狀況調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部(2004)。低收入戶生活狀況調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
3.內政部(2008)。低收入戶生活狀況調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
4.The Human Development Report Office(2009)。Human Development Report,http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports//, 201110。  new window
圖書論文
1.McFadden, Daniel L.(1973)。Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior。Frontiers in Econometrics。Academic Press。  new window
2.王德睦、呂朝賢(1997)。人口老化與貧窮率。人口老化與老年照護。中華民國人口學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE