:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教師建構等值分數教學知識的歷程
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:林碧珍 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Pi-jen
出版日期:2007
卷期:30:2
頁次:頁89-123
主題關鍵詞:在職教師等值分數教學知識數學專業成長團體In-service teacherEquivalent fractionPedagogical content knowledgeMathematically professional team
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:71
本研究的目的是分析一位個案教師在數學專業成長團體下建構等值分數教學知識的歷程。資料包括個案教師對等值分數教材的分析、教學及專業成長團體討論會逐字稿、數學日誌及個案教師為學生進行等值分數教學前和教學後的評量。本研究發現在準備階段,個案教師分析各版本教材構思了假設性等值分數教學的雛形。在進入階段,個案教師對使用的版本教材提出了質疑,團體成員的專業對話、閱讀國內外等值分數的相關文獻、分析並比較各版本在等值分數教材的處理、學生在教學前的診斷性評量是個案教師對教材提出質疑的主要來源。在進攻階段,個案教師提出了假設性等值分數教學活動,並且對教學活動設計提出了七個論述。在回顧階段,個案教師針對學生的學習成效進行評估;本研究並提出了個案教師建構等值分數教學的知識套件。
The study was designed to explore how a case teacher participating in a professional team constructed her knowledge of teaching equivalent fraction. The data collected in the study included: The analyses of textbook used by the teacher, the transcription of teaching, the pretest, posttest and follow-up interview of students conducted by the teacher. The process of the case teacher constructed the pedagogical knowledge of equivalent fractions was characterized as four stages: preparing, entry, attacking, and reviewing. In preparation stage, the case teacher initiated the hypothetical structure of teaching equivalent fraction on the basis of analyzing various versions of textbooks. In entry, the teacher criticized the textbook. The professional dialogues of the team, reading the literature of equivalent fraction, comparing and analyzing teaching activities arranged by the different textbooks, students’ performing in the pretest and their responses to interview were the resources of the teacher’s critiques. In the attack stage, the teacher conjectured alternative teaching activities and justified the activities. In the reviewing stage, the teacher evaluated students’ performance of the equivalent fraction based on students’ posttest.
期刊論文
1.Ball, D. L.(1990)。The Mathematical Understandings That Prospective Teachers Bring to Teacher Education。The Elementary School Journal,90(4),449-466。  new window
2.呂玉琴(19960600)。國小教師的分數知識。臺北師院學報,9,427-459。  延伸查詢new window
3.Simon, M. A.(1995)。Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,26(2),114-145。  new window
4.楊瑞智(20000400)。探究師院生之分數基本概念及分數概念的課室教學。臺北市立師範學院學報,31,357-382。  延伸查詢new window
5.林福來、黃敏晃(19930300)。分數啟蒙課程的分析、批判與辯證。科學教育學刊,1(1),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-23。  new window
7.Lin, P. J.(2002)。On Enhancing Teachers' Knowledge by Constructing Cases in Classrooms。Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,5(4),317-349。  new window
8.蕭登仲、謝哲仁、蔡玉花(2004)。國小學生在動態多重表徵視窗環境下學習等值分數成效之研究。南師學報:數理與科學類,38(1),77-106。  延伸查詢new window
9.Simon, M.(1994)。Learning Mathematics and Learning to Teach: Learning Cycles in Mathematics Teacher Education。Educational Studies in Mathematics,26,71-94。  new window
10.Post, T. R.、Wachsmuth, I.、Lesh, R.、Behr, M. J.(1985)。Order and Equivalence of Rational Number: A Cognitive Analysis。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,16(1),18-36。  new window
11.Arnon, I.、Nesher, P.、Nirenburg, R.(2001)。Where Do Fractions Encounter Their Equivalents?: Can This Encounter Take Place in Elementary-school?。International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,6(2),167-214。  new window
會議論文
1.Lin, P. J.(2005)。Supporting Teachers on Learning to Teach Fraction Equivalence by Providing Research Data of Children's Thinking。Melbourne, Australia。1-259。  new window
學位論文
1.黃靖瑩(2003)。國小中年級學童分數概念之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃永和(1996)。國小實習教師數學學科教學知識之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
3.彭海燕(1998)。國小兒童等值分數概念了解之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.詹婉華(2003)。國小高年級學童分數概念之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳姿靜(2004)。一位五年級教師實踐分數教學之行動研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡玉宜(2004)。國小教師對中年級學生分數概念的了解,0。  延伸查詢new window
7.林業泰(2004)。國小教師對高年級學生分數概念的了解,0。  延伸查詢new window
8.林芳玉(2004)。國小學生在等值分數上的表徵轉換表現,0。  延伸查詢new window
9.李慧鳳(2004)。教師之有關兒童分數學習認知的知識之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
10.柯藍婷(2004)。數學成長團體中一位五年級教師的分數專業知識,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Manson, J.、Burton, L.、Stacey, K.(1985)。Thinking Mathematically。Addison-Wesley Publishers。  new window
2.Pólya, George(1945)。How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
3.鄭毓信(1998)。數學教育哲學。臺北市:九章出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000)。Principles and standards for school mathematics。Reston, Virginia:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
5.Behr, M. J.、Lesh, R.、Post, T. R.、Silver, E. A.(1983)。Rational-number Concepts。Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes。London, UK。  new window
6.Jaworski, B.(2001)。Developing Mathematics Teaching: Teachers, Teacher Educators, and Researchers as Co-learners。Making Sense of Mathematics Teacher Education。Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
圖書論文
1.Putnam, R. T.、Lampert, M.、Peterson, P. L.(1990)。Alternative Perspectives on Knowing Mathematics in Elementary Schools。Review of Research in Education。Washington, DC:AERA。  new window
2.Wilson, S. M.、Shulman, L. S.、Richert, A. E.(1987)。"150 different ways" of knowing: Representation of knowledge in teaching。Exploring teachers' thinking。London:Sussex:Cassell:Holt, Rinehart, and Winston。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE