臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Development of the Taiwan WAIS-III Two-Subtest Short Forms
書刊名：測驗學刊
作者：陳心怡 引用關係／花茂棽 引用關係／朱建軍
作者(外文)：Chen, Hsin-yi／Hua, Mau-sun／Zhu, Jian-jun
出版日期：2007
卷期：54:2
頁次：頁305-330
主題關鍵詞：臺灣常模；簡式版本；魏氏成人智力量表第三版；Short form；Taiwan norm；WAIS-III
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:71
本研究根據魏氏成人智力量表第三版 (WAIS-III) 臺灣標準化樣本，全體888位年齡介於16至84歲間之成人測驗分數，分析兩個分測驗 (語文及作業分測驗各一) 組合簡式版本之建立方法，以供實務工作者估計全量表智商之使用。文中除考量心理計量特性、臨床意義性，及施測計分之省時便易性等多項因素外，亦比較文獻中常見三種全量表智商估計方法 (比例分配法、線性等化法與迴歸預測法) 之估計確度。主要研究發現如下：(1) 線性等化法能提供相對較為精確之智商估計；(2)「詞彙，矩陣推理」組合提供最佳估計確度，施測時間約在21分鐘上下。倘若施測時間極為有限，則可考慮「類同，矩陣推理」或「常識，矩陣推理」組合，此二版本也具相當之估計正確性，且僅需12分鐘左右的施測時間。本研究發現與國外文獻建議甚為一致，可作為跨文化效度檢驗之誰據。文內同時提供不同組合之智商估計公式供實務界使用，以期達到最大效用。此外，亦對簡式版本之性質、研究重要限制，及未來研究建議提出說明與討論。
Two-subtest short forms of the WAIS-III were investigated with the Taiwan WAIS­III standardization sample of 888 normal adults, ages from16 to 84 years old. Various psychometric characteristics were compared among nine from dyads, as well as qualities of estimation among prorating, linear equating, and regression procedures. The results supported the use of a linear equating procedure to generate two-subtest short­form estimates. Vocabulary-Matrix Reasoning, Similarities-Martix Reasoning, and In­formation-Matrix Reasoning were proposed as the more appropriate two-subtest com­binations for gross FSIQ estimate. Estimation formulas for all possible nine dyads were also presented for references. However, it is recommended that the examiner first evaluate the pros and cons of short forms and be aware of potential estimation errors. This study provides psychometric information for selecting two-subtest abbreviations of FSIQ that match the needs of the clinicians. The results also provide cross-cultural validation evidence for WAIS-III dyads.
期刊論文
1.Calhoun, S. L.、Mayes, S. D.(2005)。Processing Speed in Children with Clinical Disorders。Psychology in the Schools，42(4)，333-343。  new window
2.Iannone, V. N.、Blyler, C. R.、Gold, J. M.、Buchanan, R. W.(2000)。Short form of the WAIS-III for use with patients with schizophrenia。Schizophrenia Research，46，209-215。  new window
3.Thompson, A. P.、Howard, D.、Anderson, J.(1986)。Two- and Four-subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-R: Validity in a Psychiatric Sample。Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science，18，287-293。  new window
4.Ryan, J. J.、Ward, L. C.(1999)。Validity, Reliability, and Standard Errors of Measurement for Two Seven-subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-III。Psychological Assessment，11(2)，207-211。  new window
5.Paolo, A. M.、Ryan, J. J.(1993)。WAIS-R Abbreviated Forms in the Elderly: A Comparison of the Satz-mogel with a Seven-subtest Short Form。Psychological Assessment，5，425-429。  new window
6.Reinecke, M. A.、Beebe, D. W.、Stein, M. A.(1999)。The third factor of the WISC-Ⅲ: It's (probably) not freedom from distractibility。Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry，38(3)，322-328。  new window
7.Tellegen, A.、Briggs, P. F.(1967)。Old wine in new skins: Grouping Wechsler subtests into new scales。Journal of Consulting Psychology，31(5)，499-506。  new window
8.Cyr, J. J.、Brooker, B. H.(1984)。Use of appropriate formulas for selecting WAIS-R short forms。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，52，903-905。  new window
9.Kaufman, A. S.、Ishikuma, T.、Kaufman-Packer, J. L.(1991)。Amazingly short forms of the WAIS-R。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，9，4-15。  new window
10.Satz, P.、Mogel, S.(1962)。Abbreviation of the WAIS for clinical use。Journal of Clinical Psychology，18，77-79。  new window
11.Silverstein, A. B.(1982)。Two- and four-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale。Revised., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，50，415-418。  new window
12.Silverstein, A. B.(1985)。Two- and four-subtest short forms of the WAIS-R: A closer look at validity and reliability。Journal of Clinical Psychology，41，95-97。  new window
13.Silverstein, A. B.(1990)。Short forms of individual intelligence tests。Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，2，3-11。  new window
14.Brooker, B. H.、Cry, J. J.(1986)。Tables for Clinicians to Use to Cnvert WAIS-R Short Forms。Journal of Clinical Psychology，42，982-986。  new window
15.陳心怡(2002)。臺灣魏氏成人智力量表第三版（WAIS-III）施測時間估計及其影響因素研究。測驗年刊，49(1)，39-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Ryan, J. J.、Lopez, S. J.、Werth, T. R.(1998)。A Administration Time Estimates for WAIS-III Subtests, scales, and Short Forms in a Clinical Sample。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，16，315-323。  new window
17.Guilmette, T. J.、Dabrowski, J.、Kennedy, M. L.、Gnys, J.(1999)。A Comparison of Nine WAIS-R Short Forms in Individuals with Mild to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury。Assessment，6(1)，33-41。  new window
18.Silverstein, A. B.(1967)。A Short form of the WISC and WAIS for Screening Purposes。Psychological Reports，21，682-682。  new window
19.Haynes, J. P.(1985)。Comparative Validity of Two WAIS-R Short Forms with Clients of Low IQ。Journal of Clinical Psychology，41，282-284。  new window
20.Engelhart, C. I.、Eisenstein, N.、Johnson, V.、Losonczy, M.(1999)。Comparison of Linear Equating and Prorated Short Forms for Estimating WAIS-R FSIQ in a Neuropsychological Population。The Clinical Neuropsychologist，13(1)，95-99。  new window
21.Kulas, J. F.、Axelrod, B. N.(2002)。Comparison of Seven-subtest and Satz-mogel Short Forms of the WAIS-III。Journal of Clinical Psychology，58(7)，773-782。  new window
22.Iverson, G. I.、Myers, B.、Adams, R. L.(1997)。Comparison of Two Computational Formulas for a WAIS-R Seven-subtest Short Form。Journal of Clinical Psychology，53，465-470。  new window
23.Benedict, R. H. H.、Schretlen, D.、Bobholz, J. H.(1992)。Concurrent Validity of Three WAIS Short Forms in Psychiatric Inpatients。Psychological Assessment，4，322-328。  new window
24.Donders, J.、Tulsky, D. S.、Zhu, J.(2001)。Criterion Validity of New WAIS-III Subtest after Traumatic Brain Injury。Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society，7(7)，892-898。  new window
25.Silverstein, A. B.(1990)。Critique of a Doppelt-type Short Form of the WAIS-R。Journal of Clinical Psychology，46，333-339。  new window
26.Hoffman, R. G.、Nelson, K. S.(1988)。Cross-validation of Six Short Forms of the WAIS-R in a Healthy Geriatric Sample。Journal of Clinical Psychology，44，952-957。  new window
27.Axelrod, B. N.、Ryan, J. J.、Ward, L. C.(2001)。Evaluation of Seven-subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-III in a Refered Sample。Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology，16，1-8。  new window
28.Clara, I. P.、Huynh, C.(2003)。Four Short-form Linear Equation Estimates of WAIS-III Iqs in an Elderly Sample。Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development，35(4)，251-262。  new window
29.Hawkins, K. A.(1998)。Indicators of Brain Dysfunction Derived from Graphic Representations of the WAIS-III/WMS-III Technical Manual Clinical Samples Data: A Preliminary Approach to Clinical Utility。The Clinical Neuropsychologist，12，535-551。  new window
30.Thompson, A. P.、Howard, D.、Anderson, J.(1987)。Methodological Issues in the Clinical Evaluation of Two and Four Subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-R。Journal of Clinical Psychology，43(1)，142-144。  new window
31.Silverstein, A. B.(1990)。Notes on the Reliability of Wechsler Short Forms。Journal of Clinical Psychology，46，194-196。  new window
32.Ryan, J. J.、Carruthers, C. A.、Miller, L. J.、Souheaver, G. T.、Gontkovsky, S. T.、Zehr, M. D.(2005)。The WASI Matrix Reasonins Subtest: Performance in Traumatic Brain Injury, Stroke, and Dementia。The International Journal of Neuroscience，115(1)，129-136。  new window
33.Tam, W. C.(2004)。The Utility of Seven-subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-III in Young Adults。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，22，62-71。  new window
34.Schopp, L. H.、Herrman, T. D.、Johnstone, B.、Callahan, C. D.、Roudebush, I. S.(2001)。Two Abbreviated Versions of the WAIS-III: Validation among Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury。Rehabilitation Psychology，46(3)，279-287。  new window
35.Thompson, A. P.、Plumridge, S.(1999)。Two and Four Subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-R: A Comparative Validity Study with a Normal Sample。Psychological Reports，84，371-380。  new window
36.Donders, J.、Axelrod, B. N.(2002)。Two-subtest Estimates of WAIS-III Factor Index Scores。Psychological Assessment，14(3)，360-364。  new window
37.Robiner, W. N.、Dossa, D. E.、O'Dowd, W. T.(1997)。Use of the Reynolds, Willson, and Clark WAIS-R Short Form in a Brain-injured Population: A Cautionary Note。The Clinical Neuropsychologist，11(1)，91-95。  new window
38.Ward, L. C.、Ryan, J. J.(1996)。Validity and Time Savings in the Selection of Short Forms of the WAIS-R。Psychological Assessment，8，69-72。  new window
39.Ward, L. C.、Ryan, J. J.(1997)。Validity of Quick Short Forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-revised with Brain-damaged Patients。Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology，12(1)，63-69。  new window
40.Ryan, J. J.、Larsen, J.、Prifitera, A.(1983)。Validity of Two and Four Subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-R in a Psychiatric Sample。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，51，460-460。  new window
41.Missar, C. D.、Gold, J. M.、Goldberg, T. E.(1994)。WAIS-R Short Forms in Chronic Schizophrenia。Schizophrenia Research，12，247-250。  new window
42.Watkins, C. E.、Himmell, C. D.、Polk, N. E.、Reinberg, J. A.(1988)。WAIS-R Short Forms with Mentally Retarded Adults: A Note of Caution。Journal of Mental Deficiency Research，32，239-242。  new window
圖書
1.The Psychological Corporation(1999)。Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) Manual。San Antonio, TX：The Psychological Corporation。  new window
2.The Psychological Corporation(1997)。WAIS-III WMS-III Technical Manual。San Antonio, TX：The Psychological Corporation。  new window
3.Sattler, J. M.(2001)。Assessment of Children: Cognitive Applications。San Diego, Calif.：J.M. Sattler。  new window
4.陳榮華、陳心怡(2002)。魏氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)中文版指導手冊。臺北：中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kaufman, A. S.(1994)。Intelligent Testing with the WISC-III。New York, NY：John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
6.Kaufman, Alan S.、Lichtenberger, Elizabeth O.(1999)。Essentials of WAIS-III Assessment。New York, NY：John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
7.Kaufman, A. S.、Lichtenberger, E. O.(2002)。Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence。Boston, MA：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
8.Kaufman, A. S.、Kaufman, N. L.(1990)。Manual for Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT)。Manual for Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT)。Circle Pines, MN。  new window
9.Glutting, J. J.、Adams, W.、Sheslow, D.(2000)。Wild Range Intelligence Test Manual。Wild Range Intelligence Test Manual。Wilmington, DE。  new window
10.Saklofske, D. H.、Schwean-Kowalchuk, V. L.(1992)。Influences on Testing and Test Results。Psychological Testing: An Inside View。Palo Alto, CA。  new window
11.Tulsky, D. S.、Zhu, J.、Prifitera, A.(2000)。Assessment of Adult Intelligence with the WAIS-III。Handbook of Psychological Assessment。Amsterdam, Netherlands。  new window
12.Tulsky, D. S.、Saklofske, D. H.、Zhu, J.(2003)。Revising a Standard: An Evaluation of the Origin and Development of the WAIS-III。Clinical Interpretation of the WAIS-III and WMS-III。San Diego, CA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1219（臺灣：1213，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2071125 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67864978
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上