:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由全球化觀點探討臺灣電子化政府之發展
書刊名:多國籍企業管理評論
作者:崔灝東
作者(外文):Tsui, Hau-dong
出版日期:2008
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁155-168
主題關鍵詞:全球化組織再造國家競爭力電子化政府資訊與通訊技術科技E-governmentGlobalizationInformation communication technologyNational competitive powerOrganization re-engineering
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:44
面對21世紀全球化(Globalization)、全球治理(Global Governance)的風潮,世界各國政治、經濟及社會環境均產生巨大的衝擊,傳統思維下的政府組織與功能設計已無法滿足人民求新求變的需求。政府的失靈(Government Failure)導致創造世界各國電子化政府(e-Government)、組織再造(Organization Re-engineering)的契機。藉由電子化政府的作為將傳統官僚科層體制,轉變為系統功能導向的組織架構,創造國家競爭力的核心職能,已成為現代化國家的新興課題。回顧台灣政府自1998年開始推動電子化政府計畫以來,歷經各階段皆遭遇嚴俊的挑戰。惟截至2007年為止,無論在「世界經濟論壇網路整備度評比」(World Economic Forum Network Readiness Index, WEF NRI)、「美國布朗大學電子化政府評比」(Brown University Global E-Government Report)及日本早稻田大學電子化政府評比(Waseda University Global E -Government Report)等,國際性電子化政府網站評比均取得豐盛之成果。e化已成為全世界的新興競技場,國家e化準備度及應用度已成為衡量現代化國家整體競爭力的重要指標。而M (mobile)化及U(ubiquitous)化更成為未來世界各國全球化潮流下電子化政府的發展主軸。當今許多文獻及研究報告均指出,資訊與通訊技術(ICT)在電子化政府的進程中扮演關鍵性的角色。就如同Intel執行長Andrew Grove在1995年所說的:面對全球化與資訊革命的時代,你只能選擇加入或是淘汰。本文主要研究方法採文獻分析法,除蒐集各主要電子化政府評比機構所出版的年度報告書外,並實際進入相關電子化政府入口網站進行研究,特別是我國行政院研考會(RDEC)及美國白宮預算管理局(OMB)的全球資訊網。最後所提出的結論與建議,希望能對未來臺灣電子化政府的發展有所建樹。
The trend of globalization and global governance of the 21st century, most of countries faced up to politics, economy and social environment impacts. Under the old-fashioned thinking, government organization and function design would not meet people's need for change; and that has accelerating the turning point of creating e-government and organization re-engineering movements. By virtue of e-government fulfillment, transforming traditional bureaucratic hierarchy to system function oriented institutional framework to create competitive power has become the fashionable issues of modern country. Since 1998 the implementation of e-government program in Taiwan has been encountered critical challenges in all stages. However from then to 2007, assessment of major research institutions like: 「World Economic Forum Network Readiness Index, WEF NRI」, 「Brown University Global E-Government Report」or 「Waseda University Global E -Government Report」, were give Taiwan a very positive response. National e-preparation and e-application has become the emerging arena and important indices of weighting e-administration. Beyond question, 「mobile」 and 「ubiquitous」 technologies are two new entrants in the future, information and communications technologies occupied a primary status in the e-government and has been proved as a key enabler too. Just like Andrew Grove Intel former executive chairman said in 1995: "In the face of globalization and era of information revolution, you can only choose to join or eliminate". This paper mainly relies on the literature analysis approach, with comparing major research institutions e-government assessment report and observing some web site, especially focus on 「Research, Development and Evaluation Commission(RDEC), Executive Yuan, Taiwan」 and 「Office of Management and Budget (OMB), U.S.A」, then produce some of the new findings and measures in the final section.
期刊論文
1.林裕權(20070200)。政府e化十年的回顧與展望。研考雙月刊,31(1)=257,13-22。  延伸查詢new window
2.中央研究院計算中心(2007)。漫談網站無障礙化。中央研究院計算中心通訊電子報,2007(2)。  延伸查詢new window
3.李國田(20070200)。電子化政府創新與整合服務。研考雙月刊,31(1)=257,38-48。  延伸查詢new window
4.詹中原(2008)。全球化理論與公共治理發展:峇里島路徑圖之檢視。國家政策研究基金會國政研究報告,97(2)。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.彭錦鵬(2003)。全觀型治理--理論與制度化策略。民主治理與台灣行政改革學術研討會,政治大學 1-32。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.行政院研究發展考核委員會(2007)。優質網路政府計畫(97年至100年)。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院研究發展考核委員會(2006)。我國電子化政府之影響評估專案公開徵求計畫書。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Grove, Andrew S.(1995)。Furtune。  new window
3.Kroenke David M.(2007)。Experiencing MIS。Pearson Education。  new window
4.Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development(2001)。E-Government: Analysis Framework and Methodology。OECD。  new window
5.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2005)。E-Government for Better Government。OECD。  new window
6.Porter, Michael E.(1985)。Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance。New York, NY:Schuster Inc.。  new window
其他
1.World Bank(2008)。A Definition of E-Government, The World Bank,The World Bank。,http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTINFORMATIONANDCOMMUNICATIONANDTECHNOLOGIES/EXTEGOVERNMENT/O,, menuPK:702592〜pagePK: 149018〜piPK: 149093〜theSitePK:702586,00.html。  new window
2.Brown University(2007)。Global E-Government 2007,Brown University。,http://www.insidepolitics.org/policyreports.html。  new window
3.CBO(2007)。E-Government Reauthorization Act of,http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/88xx/doc8873/s2321.pdf。  new window
4.IDC Government Insights(2005)。Western Europe, Government Sector, IT Spending Forecast 2004-2009,http://www.government-insights.com/GI/getdoc.jsp;jsessionid=GAHF0SSEYDXCACQJAFICFGAKBEAUMIWD?containerId=PP01M。  new window
5.IDC Taiwan(2003)。Featured Research,http://www.idc.com.tw/Column/03_0912.htm。  new window
6.NPR(2001)。Reengineering Through Information Technology,http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/library/reports/it03.html。  new window
7.NPR(1993)。Accomplishments, 1993-2000,http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/whoweare/appendixf.html。  new window
8.Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development(2003)。e-government flagship report: The e-government imperative key issues and findings,OECD。  new window
9.WEF NRI(2007)。World Economic Forum Network Readiness Index 2007,http://www.weforum.org/。  new window
10.White House(2002)。E-Government Act of 2002,http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/12/20021217-5。  new window
11.OECD(2006)。Proposed Outline for Assessing E-Government Benefits,OECD。,http://webdomino1.oecd.org/COMNET/PUM/egovproweb.nsf/viewHtml/index/$FILE/GOV.PGC.EGOV.2006.1.doc., 2009/02/18。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE