:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:電子化政府的公民使用行為:數位資訊能力與資訊素養之影響分析
書刊名:資訊社會研究
作者:李仲彬 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Chung-pin
出版日期:2006
卷期:11
頁次:頁177-218
主題關鍵詞:電子化政府公民使用行為資訊能力資訊素養數位落差E-governmentUse behaviorInformation skillsInformation literacyDigital divide
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:53
  • 點閱點閱:52
在數位民主行政的時代,各國政府都積極投入大批公共資源來發展線上服務,然而在實務上卻很少有研究去探討究竟有多少民眾使用電子化政府相關內容(包含線上申請、線上諮詢以及決策參與),以及什麼因素影響電子化政府的公民使用行為。本文的最主要目的,就是要透過已經「具有網路使用經驗」的資訊使用者分析,探討當民眾已經突破資訊近用障礙之後,是否就會出現樂觀論者所期待之電子化政府使用行為,其中資訊使用者的資訊能力與資訊素養變數,對其公民使用行為的影響又是如何。本文的研究方法為二手資料分析法,資料來源為行政院研考會於2004年八月委託輔仁大學統計資訊學系以及全國意向顧問公司所進行的「九十三年度台閩地區數位落差調查報告」,總研究樣本為8356份。研究發現,即使目前政府已經投入大批資源建構電子化政府,而國內整體上網比例的統計也逐年攀升,幾乎全台灣每個家庭皆有配置電腦,但實際上使用電子化政府相關服務的比例仍相當的低,民眾對於電子化政府的服務似乎不太領情。此外,包含個人基本資料的性別、年齡、教育程度、居住地區,以及其他相關資訊能力變數,如電腦使用歷史、網路使用歷史、個人資訊素養、個人資訊訓練、家戶電腦數量、網路連線方式、以及家戶成員電腦使用比例等,都會影響電子化政府的公民使用行為,而其影響的方向大致如同理論上所預期,資源越高者其獲得且使用電子化政府的機會較會較高,而此結果也加強了政府必須加速偏遠地區資訊建構的的重要性。
In the information age, e-government services have been increasingly utilized due to its low-costs and efficiency. Even if the e-government policy has existed over a decade in which government has spent much money and there are ample literatures discussing the potentials of e-government, little empirical research has been focused on its actual user's behaviors. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to analyze the e-government user's behaviors of citizens who already have information accessibility, and assessing the influences of information skills. This paper uses a secondary survey data collected by the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC), the Executive Yuan. The findings show that even government has spent much money to build up e-government infrastructures in past few years. Just a few people have ever used e-services, e-consulting, and e-decision making participations in e-government. In addition, different personal variables, information skills and information literacy will influence the e-government use behaviors, and there are a gap between the information-rich and the information-poor. Therefore, this paper suggests government should reconsider different priorities of e-government policies in the conclusion. And, in order to broaden usage of e-government, government should pay more attentions on the phenomenon of digital divides.
期刊論文
1.陳祥、林明童(20021000)。我國「電子化政府整合型入口網站」使用者行為分析。圖書館學與資訊科學,28(2),26-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.項靖(20040800)。推動數位化民主之基礎條件。研考雙月刊,28(4)=242,52-66。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉宗道(20020900)。美國電子化政府發展。資訊與電腦雜誌,266,66-70。  延伸查詢new window
4.Reddick, Christopher G.(2005)。Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?。Government Information Quarterly,22(1),38-57。  new window
5.Chadwick, A.、May, A. C.(2003)。Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: "E-government" in the United States。An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions,16(2),271-300。  new window
6.曾淑芬(20020100)。數位落差。資訊社會研究,2,234-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Reinen, I. J.、Plomp, T.(1997)。Information Technology and Gender Equality: A Contradiction in Terminus?。Computers & Education,28(2),65-78。  new window
8.項靖(20030300)。邁向資訊均富:我國數位落差現況之探討。東吳政治學報,16,125-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Snellen, Ignace(2002)。Electronic Governance: Implications for Citizens, Politicians and Public Servants。International Review of Administrative Sciences,68(2),183-198。  new window
10.邱魏頌正、陳嘉駿(20040100)。數位落差現象再探討--多國比較分析。傳播與管理研究,3(2),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.李孟壕、曾淑芬(20050700)。數位落差再定義與衡量指標之研究。資訊社會研究,9,89-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Loges, William E.、Jung, Joo-Young(2001)。Exploring the digital divide: Internet connectedness and age。Communication Research,28(4),536-562。  new window
13.McClure, Charles R.(1994)。Network Literacy: A Role for Libraries?。Information Technology and Libraries,13(2),115-125。  new window
14.蕭乃沂(2003)。政府採購電子化的成效指標。空大行政學報,13,161-184。  延伸查詢new window
15.Ford, Nigel、Miller, Dave(1996)。Gender Differences in Internet Perceptions and Use。Aslib Proceedings,48,183-192。  new window
16.Jennings, M. Kent、Zeitner, Vicki(2003)。Internet Use and Civic Enagement。Public Opinion Quarterly,67(3),311-344。  new window
17.Moon, M. Jae、Welch, Eric W.(2005)。Same Bed, Different Dreams? A Comparative Analysis of Citizen and Bureaucrat Perspective on E-Government。Review of Public Personnel Administration,25(3),243-264。  new window
18.Slate, John R.、Manuel, Mararet、Brinson, Jr., Kenneth H.(2002)。The ‘Digital Divide’: Hispanic college students’ views of educational uses of the Internet。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,27(1),75-93。  new window
19.Thomas, John Clayton、Streib, Gregory(2003)。The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,13(1),83-102。  new window
會議論文
1.Lenk, Klaus、Traunmüller, Roland(2002)。Electronic Government: Where are we Heading?。New York。  new window
2.Rodota, Stefano(1996)。Citizens’ Participation in an Electronic Democracy: Building and Electronic Citizenship?。Stockholm。  new window
研究報告
1.United Nations(2003)。World Public Sector Report 2003: E-government at the Crossroads。  new window
2.江明修、陳敦源、黃東益、莊國榮、蕭乃沂(2004)。運用資訊與通訊科技實現「全民參政理想」之規劃研究。台北:資訊工業策進會。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁德馨(2004)。台閩地區數位落差調查報告。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wilhelm, Anthony(2000)。Democracy in the Digital Age。New York:Routledge。  new window
2.Davis, Richard(1999)。The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Fishbein, M.、Ajzen, I.(1980)。Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research。Addison-Wesley。  new window
4.行政院研考會(2002)。電子化政府推動方案 (90至93年度)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.林嘉誠(2004)。總論。電子化政府 \\ 行政院研考會 (主編)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.曾淑芬(2004)。第十九章:數位落差整體評估指標的建立。電子化政府 \\ 行政院研考會 (主編)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.OECD(2001)。Understanding the digital divide,http://www.oecd.org/data0ecd/38/57/1888451.pdf, 。  new window
2.財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2006)。九十五年度台灣寬頻網路使用狀況調查。  延伸查詢new window
3.Baum, Christopher,Di Maio, Andrea。Gartner's four phases of e-government model。  new window
4.European Commission(2003)。eEurope 2005 Key Figures for Benchmarking EU15。  new window
5.Executive Office of the President of the United States(2003)。Implementing the President’s Management Agenda for E-Government。  new window
6.Horrigan, John B.(2004)。How Americans Get in Touch With Government-Pew Internet and American Life Project Report。  new window
7.World Bank(2005)。A Definition of E*Government。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE