:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:電子化政府的價值鏈評估觀點:以數位臺灣e化政府計畫為例
書刊名:公共行政學報
作者:蕭乃沂 引用關係羅晉 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, NaiyiLo, Jin
出版日期:2010
卷期:36
頁次:頁1-37
主題關鍵詞:電子化政府計畫評估價值鏈模式線上服務數位台灣計畫E-governmentProgram evaluationValue chainOnline servicesE-Taiwan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:126
以資訊科技應用與發展為核心的電子化政府計畫影響一國治理的成效甚鉅,惟當前國內外研究與實務皆缺乏全面性衡量整體計畫過程的有效評估分析架構。本研究透過文獻分析建立電子化政府價值鏈評估架構,並透過實際的評估我國重大階段性電子化政府計畫推展過程,包括:初期的規劃、執行過程與最終成效以檢證並確立評估架構,同時,據以探究個別計畫的現況以及整體電子化政府的實務議題。研究過程中兼採電子式自填問卷、以及次級資料蒐集與分析,調查「數位台灣」之「e化政府」分項計畫機關的承辦人員以確保評估資訊的品質。 研究發現,電子化計畫過程中跨組織單位的協調、人力財務的匱乏、以及對計畫影響與效益評估的忽視仍是主要議題,顯示資訊通訊科技並未顯著在政府機關中發揮其溝通協調的價值,主要的阻礙仍來自於傳統公共行政中本位主義文化、職能分化、法規僵化等「政府」之組織、制度設計的問題,而非資訊通訊技術層面的問題。電子化作為政府變革的觸媒與輔助工具,其功效必須鑲嵌在制度環境同步隨之轉化的基礎上,而非憑藉當前各機關所採用的權宜性措施。 另一方面,電子化計畫的影響與效益,必須在考量機關與計畫不同特質與條件基礎上,透過全面性評估架構所提供的視角,並藉由不同計畫過程要素、不同時期、多元利害關係人認知、多元評估途徑的應用與相互比較予以有效的衡量。透過本研究所提議的價值鏈評估架構,並實際評估我國階段性電子化政府計畫,可彌補當前研究不足以及其與實務發展之間的落差。
While e-government is expected to have impact on public governance, few studies have contributed to an evaluative framework and thorough empirical analysis. Based on the value chain perspectives, the study attempts to build up a framework capable of evaluating the performance for e-Taiwan programs, including their planning, implementation, user adoption, output and impact. Secondary data analyses and self-administered questionnaires are conducted to the public managers in charge of the various online services of e-Taiwan programs. Several aspects are evidenced to hamper the performance for the surveyed online services, including cross-agency coordination, inadequate level of human and financial investment, and neglect of performance evaluation. More strikingly are the findings that the obstacles for e-government programs to achieve their expected values for citizens are mainly administrative rather than technical. The conventional issues such as turf protection, division of labor, burden of responsibility, and legal constraints remain influential for the success of the online services. The current evidence implies that the expected value of e-government depends heavily on how the public managers resolve the administrative barriers. The long-standing challenges remain sabotage for making the modern information as empowerment for public governance. The illusion of e-government success without reforming the administrative systems should be abandoned.
期刊論文
1.林裕權(20070200)。政府e化十年的回顧與展望。研考雙月刊,31(1)=257,13-22。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳敦源、黃東益、蕭乃沂(20010900)。資訊與民主--臺灣立法機關網站政治溝通功能之評估。理論與政策,15(3)=59,19-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃東益、黃佳珊(20030300)。地方政府「數位民主」機制--以臺灣省二十一縣市政府網站為例。法政學報,16,179-202。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.何全德(20060900)。電子化政府對社會發展的影響。國家菁英,2(3),97-114。  延伸查詢new window
5.West, Darrell M.(2004)。E-government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes。Public Administration Review,64(1),15-27。  new window
6.Wimmer, M. A.(2002)。A European perspective towards online one-stop government: The e-gov project。Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,1(1),92-103。  new window
7.羅晉(20080700)。電子化參與的效益與風險:民眾對政府網站的認知與使用行為之初探。資訊社會研究,15,181-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Layne, K.、Lee, J.(2001)。Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model。Government Information Quarterly,18(2),122-136。  new window
9.Montagna, J. M.(2005)。A framework for the assessment and analysis of electronic government proposals。Commerce Research and Application,4(3),204-219。  new window
10.羅晉(20080300)。邁向電子化民主新階段?--政府網站民主化指標建立與評估調查。東吳政治學報,26(1),143-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.李仲彬、黃朝盟(20010300)。電子化政府的網站設計:臺灣省二十一縣市政府WWW網站內容評估。中國行政,69,47-73。  延伸查詢new window
12.Moon, M. Jae(2002)。The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?。Public Administration Review,62(4),424-433。  new window
13.Gil-Garcia, J. R.、Martinez-Moyano, I. J.(2007)。Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics。Government Information Quarterly,24(2),266-290。  new window
14.項靖(2002)。理想與現實,民主行政之實踐與地方政府網路公共論壇。行政管理論文選輯,14,151-183。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃朝盟、余雅瑛(2004)。以使用者為中心之電子化政府〈人事行政網〉好用度評估。中國行政,74,1-48。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳啟光、鄭傑升、王國明(2002)。電子化政府推動成效評估量表之建構—民眾主觀認知構面之探討。中國工業工程學刊,19(2),39-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.楊明璧、詹淑文(2005)。電子化政府服務品質及民眾滿意程度分析—以台北市電子化政府入口網站為研究對象。顧客滿意學刊,1(1),117-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Boyer, K. K., R. Hallowell,、A. V. Roth(2002)。E-services, operating strategy – A case study and a method for analyzing operational benefits。Journal of Operations Management,20,175-188。  new window
19.Dawes, S. S., T. A. Pardo,、A. M. Cresswell(2004)。Designing electronic government information access programs: A holistic approach。Government Information Quarterly,21,3-23。  new window
20.Denhardt, R.(1999)。The future of public administration。Public Administration and Management,4(2),279-292。  new window
21.Esteves, J.,、R. C. Joseph(2007)。A comprehensive framework for the assessment of eGovernment projects。Government Information Quarterly,25(1),118-132。  new window
22.Fahnbulleh, N.(2005)。The future of electronic government。Futurics,29(1/2),7-12。  new window
23.Grant, G.,、D. Chau(2005)。Developing a generic framework for e-government。Journal of Global Information Management,13(1),1-30。  new window
24.Kraemer, K., J. Danziger, D. Dunkle,、J. King(1993)。The usefulness of computerbased information to public managers。MIS Quarterly,17(2),129-148。  new window
25.Kunstelj, M.,、M. Vintar(2004)。Evaluating the progress of eGovernment development: A critical analysis。Information Polity,9(3-4),131-148。  new window
26.Lee, J.,、J. Kim(2007)。Grounded theory analysis of E-government initiatives: Explor-ing perceptions of government authorities。Government Information Quarterly,24(1),135-147。  new window
會議論文
1.楊明璧、謝培仁、陳世徫(2002)。電子化政府便民應用服務民眾滿意度之研究:以電子化政府入口網站為例。服務、創新與績效--21世紀電子化政府的願景研討會。台北:台北大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lenk K.、R. Traunmüller(2002)。Electronic government: Where are we heading?。Aix-en-Provence, France。  new window
研究報告
1.Heeks, Richard(2001)。Building eGovernance for development: A framework for national donor action。Manchester:University of Manchester Press。  new window
2.Heeks, R.(2006)。Benchmarking e-Government - Improving the national and international measurement, evaluation and comparison of e-Government。Manchester。  new window
3.UNPAN United Nations Public Administration Network(2005)。UN global e-government readiness report 2005 - From e-government to einclusion。New York。  new window
圖書
1.United Nations and American Society for Public Administration(2002)。Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective。New York, NY:U. N. Publications。  new window
2.Schumpeter, J. A.(1976)。Capitalism, socialism, and democracy。New York:Harper and Brothers。  new window
3.Rogers, Everett M.(1995)。Diffusion of Innovations。New York, NY:Simon & Schuster。  new window
4.Porter, Michael E.(1980)。Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors。Free Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE