:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小六年級理解式球類教學實施成效研究
書刊名:運動文化研究
作者:黃月嬋林俐伶
作者(外文):Huang, Yueh-chanLin, Li-ling
出版日期:2008
卷期:4
頁次:頁115-132
主題關鍵詞:運動教育學理解式球類教學Sport pedagogyTGfU
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:103
本研究主要目的在瞭解國小六年級學生實施理解式球類教學之成效。研究以排球及羽球爲教學項目,三十二位六年級國小學生及其體育教師爲研究參與者。蒐集資料的方法爲訪談、學習單及教師省思札記。教師安排每一個教學情境及步驟,協助學生學會運動規則及各項動作技能。本研究獲得的成效有第一、實施TGfU時應掌握之重要教學原則:適時修改規則與增加難度,以符合學生需求;調整器材,充實設備,以利活動之進行;適當地討論有助於學生釐清錯誤動作或概念;適時增加學生活動時間,滿足學生身體活動的需求;第二、在情意方面TGfU可促進學生團隊合作,激發學生自身責任感,並提高學生參與度。
The purpose of this study was to examine the results of Teaching Game for Understanding (TGfU) on a sixth grade class. Volleyball and badminton were the teaching items for this study. Participants were 32 sixth grade students and their physical education teachers. Data was collected by interviews, learning sheets and the reflective journals of the teachers. TGfU involves the teachers arranging every situation and step which then helps students learn the movements, rules, and skills necessary to participate in the activities. Two results from this research are discovered. First, important teaching principles that match with TGfU are as follows: The ability to timely modify rules and increase difficulty in order to conform to the need of students; support sufficient facilities and adjust equipment for the activities to properly proceed; encourage discussion that helps students understand wrong movements or conception, and increase the amount of time designed for the students to participate in the activities. Second, TGfU can encourage student teamwork, stimulate a sense of responsibility for the students, and increase the rate of student participation.
期刊論文
1.吳明吉(20060400)。由九年一貫「健康與體育」課程談理解式教學法(TGFU)。大專體育,83,107-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.曾瑞成(19970900)。樂趣因素在體育教學上之省思。中華體育季刊,11(2)=42,16-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡宗達(20051000)。理解式球類教學法與合作學習模式結合之探討。大專體育,80,109-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Oslin, J. L.(1996)。Tactical approaches to teaching games。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance,67(1),27。  new window
5.外國語文研究。外國語文研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.曾瑞成(1997)。樂趣因素在體育教學上的省思。中華體育,11.2,16-21。  延伸查詢new window
7.Oslin, J. L.(1996)。Tactical approaches to teaching games。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance,67.1,27。  new window
學位論文
1.宋俊穎(2006)。國小五年級體育課互動研究--以理解式籃球教學為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.王愛麟(2006)。理解式球類教學法對國中學生籃球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂秀美(2006)。理解式球類教學法對國中學生巧固球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.游淑霞(2006)。理解式球類教學法對高中生合球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃志成(2004)。理解式球類教學對國小六年級學生羽球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭世德(2000)。理解式教學在國小五年級學生足球學習效果的研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡宗達(2004)。理解式球類教學法與技能取向球類教學法比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bunker, D.、Thorpe, R.(1986)。Landmarks on our way to teaching for understanding。Rethinking games teaching。Loughborough, England:University of Technology。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE