How to adjust domestic laws and regulations to International law such as International Bill of Human Rights is currently momentous subject of debate worldwide。The responsibility for National Human Rights Commission is practicing universal value of human rights。Both “Paris Principles(1992)” and “Vienna Declaration and Program of Action(1993)”paid close attention to “Domestic Execution/ Legislation” of international Human Law。 In order to break through isolation since 1971 between Taiwan and International Human Rights System and connect with various International conventions afresh,our Government proceeded with research which selected way to attempted legislating for Fundamental Human Rights In 2003。Moreover , another feasibility study tended towards proposed revising or interpreting Constitution。 Furthermore,Taiwan kept on giving an impetus to establish National Human Rights Commission according to Paris Principles。Many organizations devoted to inspect domestic legislation or draft of law , and then conformed domestic enactments to international standards。Not only official policies promoted,but civil society participated in assignments of Domestic Execution/ Legislation of international Law。Including both “Taiwan Association of Human Right” and “Amnesty National” took notice of the developments of a burgeoning field - International Criminal Law。 International criminal court(ICC)which set up in 2002 was a permanent and independent international judiciary institution。ICC integrated International Criminal Law into International Human Rights System by means of punishment for international crimes。ICC enabled category of international crimes proclaimed in writing,moreover confirmed that “Genocide” ,”Crimes against humanity “,”War Crimes” and ”Crime of aggression” were accusation which ICC was provided with universal, compulsory and inherent jurisdiction。 Nevertheless, the evolution of International Criminal Law was not restricted within foregoing four crimes。”The International Association of Penal Law” offered to draw up “A Draft of International Criminal Code”,and suggested that there were more than 25 types of international crimes must be augmented。 We drew a conclusion that international crimes could be divided into three categories thereinafter: (1) Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind(Crimes Against International Humanitarian Law and Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court); (2) Crimes Against Fundamental Human Rights(Terroristic means Against International Order)(Except International Humanitarian Law and Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court); (3) Crimes Against International Social Interests(Except International Humanitarian Law、Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court、 Crimes Against Fundamental Human Rights and Terroristic means Against International Order)。 Neither “Vergangenheitsbewaltigung (overcome past)” or “Transitional Justice”,they appeal to achieve international society’s common consensus that concept of Justice need to be finally realized。This article undertook a intention to comprehend what is present situations of International Human Rights / Criminal Law,and analyzed practicable models for Domestic Execution of International norms。We are deliberating whether or not to adopt “Domestic Legislation model” refer to “German Code of Crimes Against International Law in 2002 ”,so that supplying opinions about “Domestic Execution/ Legislation Principle” in Taiwan。