臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：混合法庭：國際刑法制度中追訴嚴重犯罪的新模式
書刊名：人文及社會科學集刊
作者：王保鍵
作者(外文)：Wang, Pao-chien
出版日期：2015
卷期：27:3
頁次：頁507-546
主題關鍵詞：混合法庭；國際刑事法院；國際人道法；轉型正義；Hybrid court；International Criminal Court；International humanitarian law；Transnational justice
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:69
本文透過檢視聯合國相關文本資料，運用個案研究法，討論混合法庭設立的背景及其理論基礎，並對東帝汶重罪特別法庭、科索沃重罪特別法庭、獅子山重罪特別法庭、柬埔寨重罪特別法庭、黎巴嫩問題特別法庭、非洲特別法庭等六個個案加以研析。本文主要研究發現為：（1）混合法庭有助於滿足轉型正義，提升衝突後國家的社會和諧性；（2）混合法庭可作為衝突後國家的重要法治工具，重建衝突後國家的內國司法體系；（3）混合法庭具有整合不同司法系統的功能，促使混合法庭成為國際刑法制度中追訴嚴重犯罪之新模式。
This essay analyzes the background and theory of hybrid courts by reviewing United Nation documents. In addition, the methodology of this essay follows the case study method. The cases under examination in this essay focus on the Special Panels for Serious Crimes in East Timor, Regulation 64 Panels in the Courts of Kosovo, Special Court for Sierra Leone, Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Special Tribunal for Lebanon, and Extraordinary African Chambers. The main findings of this essay are: (1) in post-conflict states, society will be more harmonious by achieving transnational justice, which is a benefit of employing the hybrid court; (2) the hybrid court is a key legal tool to rebuild the domestic judicial system of post-conflict states; (3) by integrating a different judicial system, the hybrid court will allow for new forms of prosecuting serious crimes in international criminal law.
期刊論文
1.陳牧民(20080900)。美國為何承認科索沃獨立。臺灣國際研究季刊，4(3)，19-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.洪茂雄(20060600)。蒙特內哥羅獨立公投的意義。新世紀智庫論壇，34，104-108。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱婉琪(2010)。台灣國際新頁：推動「國際人權五法」立法。新世紀智庫論壇，49，97-100。  延伸查詢new window
4.Arsanjani, Mahnoush H.(1999)。The International Criminal Court and National Amnesty Laws。Proceedings of the Annual Meeting，93，65-68。  new window
5.Baker, Roozbeh(2009)。Universal Jurisdiction and the Case of Belgium: A Critical Assessment。ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law，16(1)，141-167。  new window
6.Bruch, Elizabeth M.(2010)。Hybrid Courts: Examining Hybridity through a Post-colonial Lens。Boston University International Law Journal，28(1)，1-38。  new window
7.Dickinson, Laura A.(2003)。The Relationship between Hybrid Courts and International Courts: The Case of Kosovo。New England Law Review，37(4)，1059-1072。  new window
8.Dickinson, Laura A.(2003)。The Promise of Hybrid Courts。American Journal of International Law，97(2)，295-310。  new window
9.Hamilton, Tomas、Ramsden, Michael(2014)。The Politicisation of Hybrid Courts: Observations from the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia。International Criminal Law Review，14(1)，115-147。  new window
10.Higgins, Gillian(2009)。The Impact of the Size, Scope and Scale of the Miloševic Trial and the Development of Rule 73。Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights，7(2)，240-261。  new window
11.Majzub, Diba(2002)。Peace or Justice? Amnesties and the International Criminal Court。Melbourne Journal of International Law，3(2)，247-280。  new window
12.Nouwen, Sarah M. H.(2006)。'Hybrid Courts': The Hybrid Category of a New Type of International Crimes Courts。Utrecht Law Review，2(2)，190-214。  new window
13.McAuliffe, Padraig(2011)。Hybrid Tribunals at Ten: How International Criminal Justice's Golden Child Became an Orphan。Journal of International Law and International Relations，7(1)，1-65。  new window
14.Miller, Joseph C.(1975)。The Politics of Decolonization in Portuguese Africa。African Affairs，74(295)，135-147。  new window
15.Scharf, Michael(1999)。The Amnesty Exception to the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court。Cornell International Law Journal，32(3)，507-527。  new window
16.Smis, Stefaan、Van der Borght, Kim(1999)。Belgium: Act Concerning the Punishment of Grave Breaches of International Humanitarian Law。International Legal Materials，38(4)，918-925。  new window
17.Vujačić, Veljko(2003)。Why Nationalist Discourse Really Matters: Two Studies of Serbian Nationalism。Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans，5(1)，91-97。  new window
18.Zacklin, Ralph(2004)。The Failings of Ad Hoc International Tribunals。Journal of International Criminal Justice，2(2)，541-545。  new window
19.吳乃德(20060600)。轉型正義和歷史記憶：臺灣民主化的未竟之業。思想，2，1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Skinnider, Eileen(2007)。Experiences and Lessons from 'Hybrid' Tribunals: Sierra Leone, East Timor and Cambodia。The Symposium on the International Criminal Court。China: Beijing。  new window
研究報告
1.嚴震生(2014)。選擇性正義？國際刑事法庭在非洲的爭議與挑戰。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Higonnet, Ethel(2005)。Restructuring Hybrid Courts: Local Empowerment and National Criminal Justice Reform。  new window
圖書
1.Alamuddin, Amal、Jurdi, Nidal Nabil、Tolbert, David(2014)。The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Law and Practice。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.International Crisis Group(2008)。Chad: A New Conflict Resolution Framework。Brussels：International Crisis Group。  new window
3.International Criminal Court(2010)。Review Conference on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Official Records。Netherlands：International Criminal Court。  new window
4.Hughes, Edel、Schabas, William A.、Thakur, Ramesh Chandra(2007)。Atrocities and International Accountability: Beyond Transitional Justice。New York：United Nations University Press。  new window
5.Ivanišević, Bogdan(2008)。The War Crimes Chamber in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From Hybrid to Domestic Court。New York：International Center for Transitional Justice。  new window
6.Jalloh, Charles Chernor(2014)。The Sierra Leone Special Court and Its Legacy: The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights(2008)。Rule-of-law Tools for Post-conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts。Geneva：Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights。  new window
8.Skaar, Elin、Gloppen, Siri、Suhrke, Astri(2005)。Roads to Reconciliation。Maryland：Lexington Books。  new window
9.Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights(2009)。Rule-of-law Tools for Post-conflict States: Amnesties。Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights。  new window
10.Reiger, Caitlin、Wierda, Marieke(2006)。The Serious Crimes Process in Timor-Leste: In Retrospect。New York：International Center for Transitional Justice。  new window
11.Romano, Cesare P. R.、Nollkaemper, André、Kleffner, Jann K.(2004)。Internationalized Criminal Courts: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Williams, Sarah(2012)。Hybrid and Internationalised Criminal Tribunals。Oxford：Hart Publishing。  new window
13.Gerring, John(2007)。Case Study Research: Principles and Practices。Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.George, Alexander L.、Bennett, Andrew(2005)。Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences。MIT Press。  new window
其他
1.British Broadcasting Corporation(2005)。Syrian Troops Leave Lebanese Soil，http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4484325.stm， 2014/12/31。  new window
2.British Broadcasting Corporation(2012)。Profile: Chad's Hissene Habre，http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-18927845， 2014/08/21。  new window
3.British Broadcasting Corporation(2012)。Africa's Fatou Bensouda Is New ICC Chief Prosecutor，http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-16029121， 2014/12/31。  new window
4.British Broadcasting Corporation(2013)。Q&A: Charles Taylor on Trial，http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-10878424， 2014/12/28。  new window
5.Canadian Broadcasting Corporation(2014)。A History of Residential Schools in Canada，http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/a-history-of-residential-schools-in-canada-1.702280， 2014/08/15。  new window
6.Deng, David K.(2014)。Special Court for Serious Crimes (SCSC): A Proposal for Justice and Accountability in South Sudan，http://www.southsudannewsagency.com/news/press-releases/special-court-for-serious-crimes-insouth-sudan， 2014/12/31。  new window
7.East Timor Government(2014)。History of East Timor，http://www.easttimorgovernment.com/history.htm， 2014/08/05。  new window
8.Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia(2014)。Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Crimes against Humanity，http://eccc.gov.kh/en/articles/nuon-chea-and-khieu-samphan-sentenced-life-imprisonment-crimes-againsthumanity， 2014/08/12。  new window
9.Guilfoyle, Douglas(2011)。International Cooperation in the Prosecution of Somali Pirates，http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmfaff/writev/1318/m09.htm， 2015/03/28。  new window
10.International Crimes Database(2013)。Hybrid，http://www.internationalcrimesdata base.org/Courts/Hybrid， 2014/08/08。  new window
11.International Committee of the Red Cross(2004)。What Is International Humanitarian Law?，http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/legal-fact-sheet/humanitarian-lawfactsheet.htm， 2014/08/13。  new window
12.Judah, Tim(2014)。The Kosovo Liberation Army，http://www.kosovo.net/kla8.html， 2014/08/05。  new window
13.Mbaku, John Mukum(2014)。International Justice: The International Criminal Court and Africa，http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Research/Files/Reports/2014/foresight-africa-2014/03-foresight-international-criminal-court-africa-mbaku.pdf?1a=en， 2014/08/11。  new window
14.Neou, Kassie，Gallup, Jeffrey C.(1997)。Human Rights and the Cambodian Past: In Defense of Peace Before Justice，http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/archive/dialogue/1_08/articles/554.html， 2014/12/30。  new window
15.The Economist(2013)。Foday Saybana Sankoh, an African Revolutionary, Died on July 29th, Aged 65，http://www.economist.com/node/1974062， 2014/08/08。  new window
16.Track Impunity Always(2014)。The UNMIK Programme，http://www.trial-ch.org/en/resources/tribunals/hybrid-tribunals/programme-of-international-judges-inkosovo/the-unmik-programme.html， 2014/08/08。  new window
17.United Nations Human Rights(2011)。Cambodia--20 Years on from the Paris Peace Agreements，http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/Cambodia-20yearsonfromtheParisPeace.aspx， 2014/08/11。  new window
18.War Crimes Research Office(2005)。Special Panels for Serious Crimes in East Timor Status Updates，http://www.wcl.american.edu/warcrimes/easttimor_status.cfm， 2014/08/05。  new window
19.United Nations(1998)。To Remedy the Deficiencies of Ad Hoc Tribunals，http://legal.un.org/icc/general/overview.htm， 2014/12/30。  new window
20.United Nations(2006)。Report of the Secretary-General on the Establishment of a Special Tribunal for Lebanon，http://www.stl-tsl.org/en/documents/un-documents/un-secretary-general-reports/256-report-of-the-secretarygeneral-on-the-establishment-of-a-special-tribunal-for-lebanon， 2014/12/30。  new window
21.U.S. Department of State(1999)。Ethnic Cleansing in Kosovo: An Accounting，http://www.state.gov/www/global/human_rights/kosovoii/homepage.html， 2014/08/08。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：898（臺灣：896，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67411191
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上