:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高雄應用科技大學大一新生游泳能力之相關因素探討
書刊名:屏東教大運動科學學刊
作者:鄭憲成 引用關係王武昌陳新福
作者(外文):Cheng, Hsien-chengWang, Wu-chanagChen, Hsin-fu
出版日期:2008
卷期:4
頁次:頁119-130
主題關鍵詞:游泳能力Swimming ability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:23
本研究的目的有四,一、瞭解大一學生的游泳能力與其有關之影響因素。二、比較男女學生之游泳能力。三、游泳能力與安排游泳課是否有關。四、游泳能力與是否曾經請教練指導有所相關,以本校95學年度入學新生1391人(男891人、女500人)為受試者,填答問卷完成調查,結論如下:一、本校大一新生在中小學階段體育課有安排游泳者531人(38.17%),無安排游泳課者860人(61.83%)。二、本校大一新生曾經與教練學習過游泳者455人(32.71%),不曾與教練學習過游泳者936人(67.29%)。三、本校大一新生目前之游泳能力(一)完全不會游泳者208人(14.95%)(二)會一點游泳者726人(52.19%)(三)會游泳者457人(32.86%)。四、本校大一新生完全不會游泳者的主要原因排名(一)個人没有興趣(二)個人對懷有恐懼感(三)没有時間(四)無泳池可供學習。五、本校大一新生只會游一點泳(學不會)的主要原因排名(一)没有時間持續學習(二)學習時間不够(三)個人没興趣(四)個人運動技術不好。六、本校大一新生「會游泳」者達成「會游泳」目標的時期(一)小學(含以前)190人(41.58%)(二)國中142人(31.07%)(三)高中職125人(27.35%) 七、本校大一新生「會游泳」者,是如何學會(或重要影響人物)的排名。(一)訓練班教練(二)體育教師(三)自我摸索(四)家人(五)朋友(六)同學(七)其他八「性別」「中小學階段是否安排游泳課」「是否另外找教練學習游泳」,三者與游泳能力之間,呈顯著性差異(p<0.05)。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the swimming ability and the related factors of the 2006 freshmen of national Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, By questionnaire survey, The available data of 1391 students (male 891, female 500) were collected. The findings were: 1. Freshmen who has swimming course at their earlier school stage were 531(38.17%), no swimming course were 860(61.83%) 2. Freshmen who ever learned swimming skill with professional coaches were 455(32.71%), never were 936(67.29%) 3. The swimming ability of freshmen is classified as follows: (1) Non-swimmers 208(14.95%) (2) Under-level swimmers 726(52.19%) (3) Pass test swimmers 457(32.86%) 4. The major reasons for students to be non-swimmers were: (1) No interest (2)fear of suffocation (3)no time (4)no swimming pool for learning 5. The related factors of under-level students by list orders were: (1) No time to learn continually (2) The time for learning is not enough (3) No interested (4) Sports skill is not good 6. When did the students who reach the goal of "pass-test swimmer"? (1) Elementary school (and before) 190(41.58%) (2) Junior high school 142(31.07%) (3) Senior high school 125(27.35%) 7. For the students who can swim and past the test, the reason why they can did it (or the most influential person) by list orders were: (1) Coach (2) PE teacher (3) self-practice (4) family members (5) friend (6) classmate (7) others 8. Statistic results showed that the swimming ability of students are significantly related to the following factors "gender", "with or without swimming course at earlier school stage", "ever or never learned swimming skill with pro-coach" among the above 3 factors and swimming ability has significant differences (p<0.05).
期刊論文
1.劉兆達、林德隆、陳和睦(20051200)。學生游泳能力調查:以國民中學擁有游泳池學校為例。大專體育學刊,7(4),87-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.余嬪(199804)。國中生之性別、學業成就、遊憩參與型態與自重感知研究。高雄師大學報,9,119-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃金柱、林志成、林素卿、陳春蓮、程春美、連惠卿、行政院體委會(1999)。我國青少年休閒運動現況、需求暨發展對策之研究。臺北市:行政院體育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2001)。提升學生游泳能力中程計畫。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭麗美(2004)。不同游泳教學法對國小學童初學者游泳能力影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊武英(1996)。臺北市國民小學水上安全教育之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.台北市政府教育局(2000)。台北市教育局加強各級學校游泳教學提升學生游泳能力教育計劃。台北:台北市攻府教育局。  延伸查詢new window
2.林雪美(2000)。台灣的自然地理。台北市:行政院文建會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.申慧美(20000909)。國小到高中職游泳課必修。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(20060723)。教育部「推動游泳能力之現況」說明。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(20070623)。教育部「推動學生游泳能力方案」之績效說明。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE