:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:股東表決權分配之規範模式
書刊名:國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者:蔡英欣 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsai, Ying-hsin
出版日期:2009
卷期:38:2
頁次:頁71-129
主題關鍵詞:一股一表決權原則差別性表決權股複數表決權股附否決權股無表決權股股東平等原則強行法規任意法規One share one voteDual class stockPlural voting shareGolden shareNonvoting stockEqual protection in shareholders' voting rightsMandatory provisionDefault rule
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:110
  • 點閱點閱:274
我國公司法對於股份有限公司中股東表決權之分配,基於股東平等原則,係採取-股-表決權原則。雖然公司法例外地容許公司得發行表決權特別股,但在同時,主管機關與學說對於其發行類型,均採取限縮性解釋。惟本文對此現狀,參酌美日法制後,提出以下幾點質疑。 首先,本文肯認-股-表決權原則確實有其合理性,但強調僅以股東平等原則作為其具有強行法規性之論據,似乎稍嫌薄弱。再者,從公司與投資人之需求而言,實有必要鬆綁現行法之規範方式。至於,應如何為之?本文建議,可參考日本公司法以公司之屬性而作不同規範之作法,亦即於閉鎖性公司之情形,完全劃歸章程自治之範疇,而非閉鎖性公司之情形,基本上遵守-股-表決權原則,例外得發行表決權特別股。並且,因非閉鎖性公司存在著股東集合行為以及戰略性選擇問題,如對於表決權特別股之發行,未課予任何限制,則有可能侵害原有股東或投資人之利益。因此,本文認為,於非閉鎖性公司之情形,似可透過自律組織,例如台灣證券交易所,於發行之際,對其內容進行實質審查。
As to the issue of the distribution of shareholders' voting rights, Taiwan's law adopts the principle of the ”one share one vote” in regulating stock corporations. Although the current law in Taiwan also allows stock corporations to issue class stocks, which recognizes the unequal voting rights of shareholders, the types of class stocks are limited due to the interpretation of the authorities concerned and the scholars' opinions. This article challenges this mainstream ideas by invoking the experiences of American and Japanese laws in tackling the issue. First of all, this article supports the rationality of ”one share one vote”, but thinks that only the principle of the equal protection in shareholders is not strong enough to be a mandatory provision. Additionally, it needs to deregulate the relevant laws in the light of the needs of corporations and investors. This article proposes that it is worthy of adopting the Japanese model: i.e., using different regulations to deal with different corporations. As to close companies, this matter belongs to the field of autonomy of company. As to public companies, it should maintain the principle of ”one share one vote”, but it also should allow the class stocks of unequal voting rights. However, because of collective action problems and strategic choice problems in public companies, it should impose some limits on the issue of class stocks to protect shareholders and investors. Further, this article also proposes that it should be done by the self-regulating organization, i.e., TWSE.
期刊論文
1.劉渝生(19961200)。論股東平等原則與股東會之決議。東海大學法學研究,11,187-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Seligman, Joel(1986)。Equal protection in shareholder voting rights: The one common share, one vote controversy。George Washington Law Review,54,687-724。  new window
3.DeAngelo, H.、DeAngelo, L.(1985)。Managerial ownership of voting rights: A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock。Journal of Financial Economics,14(1),33-69。  new window
4.曾宛如(2003)。股東與股東會:公司法未來修正方向之芻議。月旦法學雜誌,95,110-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.木村芳彦(2005)。公開会社における議決権コントロールの柔軟化に関する一考察-証券取引所によるコーポレート.ガバナンスの今日の意義。ソフトロー研究,2。  延伸查詢new window
6.加藤貴仁(2006)。議決権.支配権に関する種類株式の規制方法。商事法務,1777。  延伸查詢new window
7.宇都宮純子(2008)。議決権種類株式の上場に関する制度要綱について。商事法務,1834。  延伸查詢new window
8.河村尚志(2005)。定款による支配分配と種類株式の活用(3.完)。法学論叢,157(6)。  延伸查詢new window
9.前田庸(2001)。商法等の一部を改正する法律案要綱の解説(上)-株式制度の見直し.会社関係書類の電子化等。商事法務,1606。  延伸查詢new window
10.相澤哲、岩崎友彦(2005)。株式(総則.株主名簿.株式の譲渡等)。商事法務,1739。  延伸查詢new window
11.郡谷大輔(2003)。平成一三年改正商法(一一月改正)の解説(VII)-株式制度の改善.会社関係書類の電子化等。商事法務,1660。  延伸查詢new window
12.(2006)。新会社法の検討-ファイナンス関係の改正。別冊商事法務,298。  延伸查詢new window
13.鈴木隆元(2002)。種類株式の多様化。ジュリスト,1220。  延伸查詢new window
14.藤田友敬(1996)。株主の議決権。法学教室,194。  延伸查詢new window
15.黒沼悦郎(1996)。会社法の強行法規性。法学教室,194。  延伸查詢new window
16.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(1991)。The Short Life and Resurrection of SEC Rule 19c-4。Washington University Law Quarterly,69,565-565。  new window
17.Bebchuk, Lucian A.(2003)。Why Firms Adopt Antitakeover Arrangements。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,152,713-713。  new window
18.Bergerman, Milton M.(1928)。Voting Trusts and Non-voting Stock。Yale Law Journal,37,445-445。  new window
19.Dimitrova, Valentin、Jain, Prem C.(2006)。Recapitalization of One Class of Common Stock into Dual-Class: Growth and Long-Run Stock Returns。Journal of Corporate Finance,12(2),342-366。  new window
20.Fischel, Daniel R.(1987)。Organized Exchanges and the Regulation of Dual Class Common Stock。University of Chicago Law Review,54,119-152。  new window
21.Flocos, Peter N.(1990)。Toward a Liability Rule Approach to the "One Share, One Vote" Controversy: An Epitaph for the Rule 19c-4?。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,138,1761-1761。  new window
22.Gilson, Ronald J.、Gordon, Jeffrey N.(2003)。Doctrines and Markets: Controlling Shareholders。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,152,785/ 791。  new window
23.Gordon, Jeffrey N.(1988)。Ties that Bond: Dual Class Common Stock and the Problem of Shareholder Choice。California Law Review,76,1-3。  new window
24.Kerbel, Jeffrey(1987)。An Examination of Nonvoting and Limited Common Shares - Their History, Legality, and Validity。Securities Regulation Law Journal,15,35-35。  new window
25.Lowenstein, Louis(1989)。Shareholder Voting Rights: A Response to SEC Rule 19c-4 and to Professor Gilson。Columbia Law Review,89,979-1014。  new window
26.Stevens, W. H. S.(1926)。Stockholders, Voting Rights and the Centralization of Voting Control。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,40(3),353-392。  new window
圖書
1.黃銘傑(200609)。公司治理與企業金融法制之挑戰與興革。臺北:元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.王文宇(2006)。公司法論。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Berle, A.、Means, G.(1968)。The Modern Corporation and Private Property。New Brunswick, New Jersey:Transaction Publishers。  new window
4.劉連煜(2008)。現代公司法。臺北:新學林。  延伸查詢new window
5.Easterbrook, Frank H.、Fischel, Daniel R.(1991)。The Economic Structure of Corporate Law。Harvard University Press。  new window
6.廖大穎(2006)。公司法原論。臺北:三民。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.柯芳枝(2008)。公司法論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.大森忠夫(1961)。議決権。株式会社法講座,第三巻。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
9.出口正義(1991)。株主権法理の展開。株主権法理の展開。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
10.加藤貴仁(2007)。株主間の議決権配分。株主間の議決権配分。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
11.矢沢惇(1981)。企業法の諸問題。東京:商事法務研究会。  延伸查詢new window
12.洲崎博史(2003)。平成一三年.一四年商法改正と一株一議決権原則。比較会社法研究-二一世紀の会社法制を模索して。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
13.相澤哲、葉玉匤美、郡谷大輔(2006)。論点解説新.会社法。東京:商事法務。  延伸查詢new window
14.神田秀樹(1990)。株式と社債。現代企業法の展開:竹内昭夫先生還暦紀念。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
15.神田秀樹(2007)。会社法。東京:弘文堂。  延伸查詢new window
16.森本滋(1995)。会社法。会社法。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
17.畠中薫里(1998)。企業の資金調達と議決権および利益の配分。会社法の経済学。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
18.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2002)。Corporate Law and Economics。Corporate Law and Economics。New York, NY。  new window
19.Booth, Richard A.(2003)。Financing the Corporation。Financing the Corporation。  new window
20.Cox, James D.、Hazen, Thomas Lee(2003)。Cox & Hazen on Corporations。Cox & Hazen on Corporations。  new window
21.Dewing, Arthur S.(1953)。The Financial Policy of Corporation。The Financial Policy of Corporation。  new window
22.Gower, L.(1979)。Gower's Principles of Modern Company Law。Gower's Principles of Modern Company Law。  new window
23.Ripley, William Z.(1927)。Main Street and Wall Street。Little, Brown, and Company。  new window
24.Ward, Rodman, Jr.、Welch, Edward P.、Turezyn, Andrew J.(2005)。Folk on the Delaware General Corporation Law。Folk on the Delaware General Corporation Law。  new window
其他
1.東京証券取引所(2008)。議決権種類株式の上場制度に関する報告書。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bebchuk, Lucian Arye、Kraakman, Reinier、Triantis, George G.(2000)。Stock Pyramids, Cross-Ownership and Dual Class Equity: The Mechanisms and Agency Costs of Separating Control From Cash-Flow Rights。Concentrated Corporate Ownership。University of Chicago Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE