:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兩漢博士師法、家法探析
書刊名:華梵人文學報
作者:姜龍翔 引用關係
作者(外文):Jiang, Long-xiang
出版日期:2010
卷期:13
頁次:頁123-155
主題關鍵詞:經學博士師法家法ScriptureBo ShiShi FaJia Fa
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:68
兩漢博士學官有著所謂師法、家法的傳承系統,當代學者多認為此乃漢代經學最大的特色,但也是限制經學發展的規範。此文透過對《漢書》及《後漢書》中關於師法、家法傳承的各項記載,發現師法及家法本質上是很相近的概念,都是一家之學的內化規範,只是在語意的使用上有所差別。另外亦針對師法、家法在漢代對經學發展的限制作出分析,發現師法及家法對漢代經學的束縛程度並不如皮錫瑞等人所認為的那麼重要,大概師法、家法分別在西漢及東漢各表現出一次由講究到鬆綁的發展階段,並沒有所謂「西漢重師法,東漢重家法」的情形。而影響師法、家法流變的原因可概括為博土學官的廣設、弟子員的增加、書籍的殘缺到完備以及利祿之途的引誘及改變等四項因素。總之,師法、家法的傳承規範本是博士學官內在的要求,但受到諸多因素的干涉,並沒有太大的限制性。
Doctor Officers in Han Dynasties has the pass down system of Shi Fa (the tradition and norm of a academic sect) and Jia Fa (one's own academic sect with its own features). Most of the contemporary scholars believe it is the key feature of the Han scripture, however, it also limits the development of the Han scripture. According to various records in Han Shu and Post-Han Shu that related to Shi Fa and Jia Fa), this article discovers that the nature of Shi Fa and Jia Fa has similar concepts, they all stand for the internal norm of a sect, the only different is way of adopting according to their verbal meanings. This article also analyzes the limitations of Shi Fa and Jia Fa to the development of scripture in Han Dynasties, and discovers that limitations of Shi Fa and Jia Fa to the Han scripture are not as important as those people such as Pi Tin Rui believe. Shi Fa and Jia Fa has experienced the development stage from fastidious about to do not care once in West Han and East Han respectively, and do not have the situation that "West Han emphasis on Shi Fa while East Han focuses Jia Fa." The reasons that influence the changes of Shi Fa and Jia Fa may concluded in four reasons, including the widespread establishment of Bo Shi Xue Guan, the increase of students, from shortage to completion of the books, the changes and seduction of the way to access wealth and position. Generally speaking, passing down of norm of Shi Fa and Jia Fa is the internal requirements of Bo Shi Xue Guan, though it is interrupt by numerous issues, there are not many limitations.
期刊論文
1.羅義俊(19890600)。論兩漢博士家法及其株生原因--兼及兩漢經學運動的基本方式。中國文化月刊,116,30-47。  延伸查詢new window
2.張寶三(20010500)。漢代章句之學論考。臺大中文學報,14,35-37+39-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林濯潾(1990)。西漢博士官考述。孔孟學報。  延伸查詢new window
4.趙茂林(2004)。三家詩的傳承及其師法、家法問題。甘肅社會科學.文學研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.姜維公(2005)。漢代經學教育中的師法與家法。社會科學戰線。  延伸查詢new window
6.于成寶(2007)。孟喜易學改師法公案析論。重慶工學院學報.社會科學版。  延伸查詢new window
7.周丙華(2007)。漢代經學師法淵源蠡測。咸陽師範學院學報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳雁南、秦學頎、李禹階(2001)。中國經學史。福建人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.班固、顏師古(1996)。漢書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.皮錫瑞、周予同(1983)。經學歷史。漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐復觀(1996)。中國經學史的基礎。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.馬宗霍(2000)。中國經學史。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.安井小太郎、林慶彰、連清吉(1996)。經學史。萬卷樓。  延伸查詢new window
7.南朝宋.范曄(2000)。百衲本二十四史.後漢書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.南朝梁.沈約(1988)。百衲本二十四史.宋書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.清.陳喬樅(1995)。續修四庫全書.三家詩詩遺說考。上海。  延伸查詢new window
10.錢穆(1983)。兩漢博士家法考。兩漢經學今古文平議。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.葉國良(2005)。師法家法與守學改學。經學側論。新竹。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top