霸權治理的省思：權力消長與權威起伏__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	霸權治理的省思：權力消長與權威起伏
書刊名：	問題與研究
作者：	陳欣之
作者(外文)：	Chen, Hsin-chih
出版日期：	2010
卷期：	49:1
頁次：	頁59-85
主題關鍵詞：	霸權；霸權穩定論；權力轉移；權威；正當性；治理；Hegemony；Hegemonic stability theory；Power shifting；Authority；Legitimacy；Governance
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(1) 排除自我引用:11 共同引用:11 點閱:114

傳統國際關係研究在討論霸權的相關課題時，多是探索霸權相對權力優勢的消長，認為失去權力優勢的霸權，將難逃新興國家的挑戰，霸權交替萌起於無可避免的霸權戰爭。國關學界依順國際政治是一種權力競爭的思路，多是以物質權力作為評量霸權的基準，相對忽視權威暨治理正當性等因素在構成霸業的作用，進而忽略霸權領導的治理權威，霸權如何維繫霸業的討論，更限縮在有限的強制宰制，忽視正當性對強化霸權統御的作用。本文試圖檢驗權威在霸權治理過程中所扮演的角色與作用，以為霸業更迭是國際治理權威的轉換，它不單是涉及相對權力優勢的取得，更需取得被支配國家的服從，以及霸權治理的正當性。本文首先將評析領導視角下的霸權與霸業，其次論述權威在霸權治理的構成，第三部分討論治理權威與權力優勢在維繫霸業的相互作用，最後回顧美國的霸權治理，希冀能勾勒出霸權治理權威消長的完整面貌。

以文找文

IR studies on hegemony have paid much attention on the relative decline and uprising of powers, which has constituted the perspective that the factors of uneven-growth will cause the downfall of hegemony and the rising power will replace the old one after the former poses great challenges to the declining hegemon and wins the hegemonic war. Though the term of hegemony has deeply implied the characters of leadership, IR generally defines the hegemony as an international order within which one state constitute her dominance with power supremacy. Little discussion has ever been engaged to issues about how the hegemon constitute the ruling authority in her way to maintaining her global leadership. This paper tries to demonstrate the role and effects of hegemonic authority. It argues that the shifting of hegemonic power is the transition of international authority of hegemonic governance. It refers not only to the possessing of relative power superiority, but also the consent of subordinated states, as well as the legitimate grounds of hegemonic ruling. The first part of this paper will define the hegemony from the perspective of leadership. The construction of hegemonic authority is the second part. The third part presents the interactive relationships between the power supremacy and the authority in the hegemony. The historical reviews on the US hegemonic governance in the past years will constitute the final part of this paper. It concludes that much research on the hegemonic authority will provide a fresh point to the causes and effects about the rise and fall of hegemony.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Russett, Bruce M.(1985)。The Mysterious Case of Vanishing Hegemony; or, is Mark Twain Really Dead?。International Organization，39(2)，207-232。
2.	Kindleberger, Charles P.(1981)。Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy。International Studies Quarterl，25(2)，242-259。
3.	Layne, Christopher(1993)。The Unipolar Illusion: Why the New Power Will Rise。International Security，17(4)，5-51。
4.	Kirshner, Jonathan(2008)。Dollar Primacy and American Power: What's at Stake?。Review of International Political Economy，15(3)，418-438。
5.	江宜樺(20080300)。《論語》的政治概念及其特色。政治與社會哲學評論，24，191-234。延伸查詢
6.	Ikenberry, G. John(1999)。Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order。International Security，23(3)，43-78。
7.	Kupchan, Charles A.(1998)。After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity。International Security，23(2)，40-79。
8.	Wohlforth, William C.(1999)。The Stability of A Unipolar World。International Security，24(1)，5-41。
9.	Waltz, Kenneth N.(2000)。Structural Realism After the Cold War。International Security，25(1)，5-41。
10.	Levy, Jack S.(1987)。Declining Power and The Preventive Motivation for War。World Politics，40(1)，82-107。
11.	Cox, Robert W.(1983)。Gramsci, Hegemony, and International Relations: An Essay in Method。Millennium: Journal of International Studies，12(2)，162-175。
12.	Ikenberry, G. John(2004)。Liberalism and Empire: Logics of Order in the American Unipolar Age。Review of International Studies，30(4)，609-630。
13.	Ikenberry, G. John、Kupchan, Charles A.(1990)。Socialization and Hegemonic Power。International Organization，44(3)，283-315。
14.	Mastanduno, Michael(1997)。Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War。International Security，21(4)，49-88。
15.	Benvenisti, Eyal,(2004)。The US and the Use of Force: Double-edge Hegemony and the Management of Global Emergencies。European Journal of International Law，Vol. 15, No. 4，677~700。
16.	Bennett, Andrew, Joseph Lepgold, and Danny Unger,(1994)。Burden-sharing in the Persian Gulf War。International Organization，Vol. 48, No. 1，39~75。
17.	Cox, Michael,(2004)。Empire, Imperialism and the Bush Doctrine。Review of International Studies，Vol. 30, No. 4，585~608。
18.	Finnemore, Martha,(2009)。Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, an d The Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn't All it's Cracked Up to Be。World Politics，Vol. 61, No. 1，58~85。
19.	Goh, Evelyn,(2003)。Hegemonic Constraints: the Implications of 11 September for American Power。Australian Journal of International Affairs，Vol. 57, No. 1，77~97。
20.	Grunberg, Isabelle,(1990)。Exploring the ‘Myth’ of Hegemonic Stability。International Organization，Vol. 44, No. 4，431~477。
21.	Haugaard, Mark,(2009)。Power and Habitus。Journal of Power，Vol. 1, No. 2，189~206。
22.	Ikenberry, G. John,(2002)。American Imperial Ambition。Foreign Affairs，Vol. 81, No. 5，44~60。
23.	Ikenberry, G. John、Michael Mastanduno、William C. Wohlforth(2008)。Unipolarity, State Behavior, and Systemic Consequences。World Politics，61(1)，1-27。
24.	Kagan, Robert,(2004)。American's Crisis of Legitimacy。Foreign Affairs，Vol. 83, No. 2，65~87。
25.	Lake, David A.,(1996)。Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations。International Organization，Vol. 50, No. 1，1~33。
26.	Lebow, Richard Ned and Robert Kelly,(2001)。Thucydides and Hegemony: Athens and the United States。Review of International Studies，Vol. 27, No. 4，593~609。
27.	Reus-Smit, Christian,(2003)。The Misleading Mystique of America's Material Power。Australian Journal of International Affairs，Vol. 57, No. 3，423~430。
28.	Steinberg, Richard H.,(2002)。In the Shadow of La w or Power: Consensus-Base Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO。International Organization，Vol. 56, No. 2，339~374。
29.	Tucker, Robert W.,(2004)。The Sources of American Legitimacy。Foreign Affairs，Vol. 83, No. 6，18~32。
30.	Wendt, Alexander and Daniel Friedheim,(1995)。Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State。International Organization，Vol. 49, No. 4，689~721。

圖書
1.	Kaufman, Stuart J.、Little, Richard、Wohlforth, William C.(2007)。The Balance of Power in World History。Palgrave Macmillan。
2.	Zukin, Sharon、DiMaggio, Paul(1990)。Introduction。Structures of capital: the social organization of the economy。Cambridge England：New York：Cambridge University Press。
3.	Barnett, Michael、Finnemore, Martha(2004)。Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics。Cornell University Press。
4.	Kapstein, E. B.、Mastanduno, M.(1999)。Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War。New York：Columbia University Press。
5.	Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politic。Reading, Mass：Addison-Wesley Pub. Co。
6.	Haftendorn, H.、R. O. Keohane、C. Wallander(1999)。Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space。New York：Oxford University Press。
7.	U.S. National Intelligence Council(2008)。Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World。Washington, DC：U.S. National Intelligence Council：Government Printing Office。
8.	Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(2004)。Power in the Global Information Age: From Realism to Globalization。London, UK：New York, NY：Routledge。
9.	Kennedy, Paul(1987)。The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000。New York：Vintage Books：Random House。
10.	Ikenberry, G. John(2001)。After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。
11.	Tammen, Ronald L.、Kugler, Jacek、Lemke, Douglas、Stam, Allan C. III、Abdollahian, Mark A.、Alsharabati, Carole、Efird, Brian、Organski, Abramo Fimo Kenneth(2000)。Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century。Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press。
12.	Fukuyama, Francis(1992)。The End of History and the Last Man。London：New York：Hamish Hamilton：Free Press。
13.	Gilpin, Robert(1975)。U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Direct Foreign Investment。New York：Basic Books。
14.	Kindlebrg, Charles P.(1973)。The World in Depression, 1929-1939。Berkeley, CA：University of California Press。
15.	Bull, Hedley(1977)。The Anarchical society: A Study of Order in World Politics。New York：Columbia University Press。
16.	Hui, Victoria Tin-bor(2005)。War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe。Cambridge University Press。
17.	Gilpin, Robert、Gilpin, Jean M.(1987)。The Political Economy of International Relations。Princeton University Press。
18.	Walt, Stephen M.(1987)。The Origins of Alliances。Cornell University Press。
19.	Gilpin, Robert(1981)。War and Change in World Politics。Cambridge University Press。
20.	Schweller, Randall L.(1998)。Deadly imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's strategy of world conquest。Columbia University Press。
21.	Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1977)。Power and interdependence: world politics in transition。Boston, Massachusetts：Little Brown。
22.	Mearsheimer, John J.、Alterman, G.(2001)。The Tragedy of Great Power Politics。W. W. Norton & Company。
23.	Walt, Stephen M.(2005)。Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy。W. W. Norton & Company。
24.	Lukes, Steven Michael(1974)。Power: A Radical View。Macmillan Press。
25.	Keohane, Robert O.(1984)。After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy。Princeton University Press。
26.	孔丘(1998)。論語。中華諸子寶藏編纂委員會編，諸子集成新編一。成都。延伸查詢
27.	孟軻(1998)。孟子。諸子集成新編三。成都。延伸查詢
28.	康樂等、韋伯Max Weber(1996)。支配的類型：韋伯選集(III)。台北市。延伸查詢
29.	Bobrow, David B.,(2008)。The Implications of Constra ined Hegemony。Hegemony Constrained: Evasion, Modification, and Resistance to American Foreign Policy。Pittsburgh。
30.	Femia Joseph V.(1987)。Gramsci's Political Thought: Hegemony Consciousness and the Revolutionary Process。New York。
31.	Friedman, R. B.,(1990)。On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy。Authority。New York。
32.	Ikenberry G. John and Charles A. Kupcha(1990)。The Legitimating of Hegemonic Power。World Leadership and Hegemony。Boulder。
33.	Katzenstein, Peter J. and Robert O. Koehane,(2007)。Varieties of Anti-Americanism: A Framework for Analysis。Anti-Americanisms in World Politics。Ithaca。
34.	Katzenstein, Peter J. and Robert O. Koehane,(2007)。Conclusion: Anti-Americanisms and the Polyvalence of America。Anti-Americanisms in World Politics。Ithaca。
35.	Keohane, Robert O.,(1986)。Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond。Neorealism and its Critics。New York。
36.	Keohane, Robert O. and Peter J. Katzenstein,(2007)。The Political Consequences of Anti-Americanism。Anti-Americanisms in World Politics。Ithaca。
37.	Lentner, Howard H.,(2006)。Hegemony and Power in International Politics。Hegemony and Power: Consensus and Coercion in Contemporary Politics。New York。
38.	Modelski, George,(1987)。Long Cycles in World Politic。Seattle。
39.	Nau, Henry R.,(1990)。The Myth of American Decline: Leading the World Economy into the 1990s。New York。
40.	O,Connor, Brendon,(2007)。A History of Anti-Americanism: From Buffon to Bush。Anti-Americanism: History, Causes and Themes, Volume 2: Historical Perspectives。Oxford。
41.	O'Connor, Brendon,(2007)。Anti-Americanism: History, Causes and Themes, Volume 1: Causes and Sources。Oxford。
42.	Rapkin, David P.,(1987)。World Leadership”。Exploring Long Cycles。London。
43.	Rapkin, David P.,(1990)。The Contested Concept of Hegemonic Leadership。World Leadership and Hegemony。Boulder。
44.	Wesley, Michael,(2007)。The Consequences of An ti-Americanism: Does it Matter?。Anti-Americanism: History, Causes and Themes, Volume 4: In the 21st Century。Oxford。

圖書論文
1.	Kugler, Jacek、Organski, A. F. K.(1989)。The Power Transition: A Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation。Handbook of War Studies。Boston, MA：Unwin Hyman。
2.	Rosenau, James N.(2002)。Governance in a New Global Order。Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance。Cambridge：Polity。
3.	Paul, Thazha Varkey(2004)。Introduction: The Enduring Axioms of Balance of Power Theory and Their Contemporary Relevance。Balance of Power: Theory and Practice In The 21st Century。Stanford University Press。
4.	Cerny, Philip G.(2006)。Dilemmas of Operationalizing Hegemony。Hegemony and Power: Consensus and Coercion in Contemporary Politics。New York：Lexington Books。
5.	Fontana, Benedetto(2006)。The Concept of Hegemony in Gramsci。Hegemony and Power: Consensus and Coercion in Contemporary Politics。New York：Lexington Books。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	不對稱地位的法制化強固：NPT建制核武國核保防特權的深化與影響
2.	從國際建制主義解析川普挑戰全球貿易建制的原因
3.	大國崛起與絲路烽煙：從隋唐經營西域看權力轉移下崛起國對小國的政策
4.	「權力轉移理論」的演化與反思
5.	書評：《狂想：自由的美夢與世態之炎涼》
6.	中美南海議題之競合--中國追求「新型大國關係」的挑戰
7.	川普主政下的美國霸權角色探討
8.	從海權探討高雄港市的治理--系統動態學與結構化理論之應用
9.	歧異解讀霸權衰落的美中戰略互動--單極體系中權位轉換的認知因素
10.	先秦孔孟德治思想探究
11.	仁者無敵--儒家的戰爭倫理與軍文倫理
12.	霸權穩定論與歐巴馬政府的亞太戰略發展
13.	霸權、戰爭與石油美元機制：「炫耀性利他主義」信息策略
14.	美中經濟軍事競合關係--均勢或權力轉移
15.	崛起、挑戰與承繼霸權--崛起強權參與建構國際制度過程的觀察

1.	債務清理行政法制之研究
2.	勞動犯罪管理行政法制論
3.	在教育機會均等與適足性之間-Amartya Sen 能力取向的觀點
4.	太空軍事化國際法規範之研究
5.	美中臺三角關係發展的國際政治經濟學分析
6.	雍正帝統治術之研究
7.	《先秦儒家哲學諮商論》
8.	老人長期照護之倫理分析:儒家與丹尼爾斯公義照護觀點之探討

1.	儒家與韋伯的五個對話
2.	從五經到新五經
3.	觀察亞太和平與安全的新因素：中國與日本的東南亞柔性權力外交

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫