:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:花蓮地區發展健康促進型長宿休閒社區評估指標之研究
書刊名:鄉村旅遊研究
作者:顏建賢黃性男
作者(外文):Yen, Chien-hsienHung, Hsing-nan
出版日期:2009
卷期:3:1
頁次:頁15-31
主題關鍵詞:長宿休閒健康促進花蓮地區評估指標層級程序分析法AHPLong stayHealth promotionEvaluation indicatorsAnalytic hierarchy process
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:74
本研究欲將健康促進概念與長宿休閒發展結合,做為花蓮地區發展獨具特色之長宿休閒社區之參考,其主要目的為建構一套客觀評估花蓮地區發展健康促進型長宿休閒社區評估之指標及探討評估指標相對重要性並對花蓮地區發展健康促進型長宿休閒提出建議。首先透過文獻回顧與探討,瞭解國內外長宿休閒與健康促進之意涵,彙整出具有顯著性之指標因子,初擬各項花蓮地區發展健康促進型長宿休閒社區評估指標內容,再以德爾菲專家問春之測訪,架構出適用於花蓮地區發展健康促進型長宿休閒社區評估指標體系,主要分為三個層級,分別由「生活機能資源」、「休閒遊憩資源」和「健康促進資源」等三個構面加以探討,並列出十四個評估因子和五十個操作性指標。分析結果得知下列重要結論:一、第一層級的各構面中以「生活機能資源」最受重視;在第二層的評估因子中,居住設施選擇與收費、安全維護措拖、食物新鮮安全、交通便利性及自然與人文資源等因子皆屬相對重要。二、健康促進型長宿休閒社區評估指標的健康促進資源構面和其評估指標在相對權重中所佔比重雖不高,但其構面為花蓮地區發展長宿休閒有別其他地區之重要特色,與生活機能資源和休閒道憩資源相比之下,並非亟需注重之項目,但仍相當值得重視。
Awakened of health conscious make human beside of hoping to live a good quality lifestyle also expect that their living environment is including the conditions of health-promote and health-preservation. Long-stay in Taiwan is limited by the least differentiate between geographical, weather and environment conditions. The aim of this study is to combine the concept of health-promote and the development of long stay to construct evaluation indicators for Health-Promote Long Stay community in Hualien. Based on a literature review, this involve analyzing the meaning of long stay and health-Promote, categorized the stimulus factors, imitate the content of the evaluation indicators for health-promote long stay community, using the Delphi Technique to frame out an evaluation indicators for health-promote long stay community which involve three hierarchies: vital function resources, leisure amusement resources, health-promote resources, and listed out 14 evaluation factors and 50 operational indicators. Followed by using questionnaire survey to assemble the perspectives of the professionals in health-promote and Long stay career, the related government officers, and the firms in Hualien which had been accommodated the Long Stay experiencing group, through using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to calculate the significance for all indicators, and get important conclusions as below: The first, the aspects in the first hierarchy place an importance on vital function resources; the evaluation indicators in the second hierarchy make much of the choice and charge for the living facilities, security maintenances, fresh and safety food, convenient of communications, nature and humanism resources. The second, the ration between the significance of health-promote aspects and its evaluation indicators in the evaluation indicators for Health-Promote Long Stay community is not high, but its aspects are an important character for Hualien which differ from other community on the development of Long Stay, when compare with health-promote resources, leisure amusement resources, it is not the item to be starved of but still need to pay attention with.
期刊論文
1.Gilbert, D. C.、Van De Weerdt, M.(1991)。The Health Care Tourism Product in Western Europe。Revue de Tourisme,46(2),5-10。  new window
2.胡忠一、顏建賢、方乃玉、林柏璋(20060500)。Long Stay(長宿休閒)是否可為農田水利會多角化經營之選項。農田水利,53(1),26-41。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃美純(20071000)。整合休閒旅遊及養生醫療產業發展及區域規劃。臺灣經濟論衡,5(10),64-81。  延伸查詢new window
4.Jones, P. H.(2005)。Cancer and Tourism。Annals of Tourism Research,32(1),70-92。  new window
5.Mueller, H.、Kaufmann, E. Lanz(2001)。Wellness tourism: Market analysis of a special health tourism segment and implications for the hotel industry。Journal of Vacation Marketing,7(1),5-17。  new window
會議論文
1.花岡幸盛(2005)。國外長宿休閒計畫。朝陽科技大學中日農業休閒交流研討會。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡忠一(2006)。本會推動Long Stay示範計晝辦理現況與展望。行政院農委鲁會議簡報。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡忠一(2006)。有朋自遠方來〜談Long Stay。行政院農委會會議簡報。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡忠一(2006)。推動Long Stay對發展有機與休閒農業之影響。鄕村社區有機休閒農業發展研討會。花蓮:花蓮區農業改良場。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.宇野一雄、胡忠一(2004)。以年金在國外生活。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡忠一(2005)。海外長宿休閒 Long Stay。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.顏建賢(2005)。日本專家來臺進行Long Stay考察暨演講成果報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.簡玲玲(2005)。民宿評鐵指標之研究(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
2.方乃玉(2006)。建構臺灣發展日本銀髮族國外長宿休閒評估指標之研究(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳冠位(2002)。城市競爭優勢評量系統之研究(博士論文)。國立成功大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林嘉君(2004)。技專校院品牌管理成效評估指標建構之研究(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.胡忠一(2007)。我國推動鄕村長宿休閒的經緯與發展現況。鄉村社會季。臺北:臺灣大學農業推廣學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kokua Integrative Healthcare Solutions, Inc.(2004)。Healing in Paradise- A Strategy for Cultivating Health and Wellness Tourism in Hawaii。Hawaii:Hawaii Tourism Authority。  new window
3.OECD(1994)。Environmental Indicators: A Preliminary Set。Paris:OECD。  new window
4.吳萬益、林清河(2002)。企業研究方法。台北:華泰書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.依寺井融(2005)。亞洲海外長宿論。臺北:中華民國物流協會。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.宇野一雄,片桐光雄,花岡幸盛(2006)。臺灣Long Stay預定示範地區現場調査報告。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Ross, K.(2001)。Health Tourism: An Overview,http://www.hospitality/net.org/news/4010521.html, 2009/10/12。  new window
2.宇野一雄,胡忠一(20051216)。以年金在國外生活。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gupta, Amit Sen(2004)。Medical Tourism and Public Health,http://pd.cpim.org/2004/0509/05092004_snd.htm, 2005/04/09。  new window
4.日本NOP法人Long Stay推進聯絡協議會。2006日本NOP法人Long Stay推進聯絡協議會,http://www.longstav.or.jp/。  延伸查詢new window
5.泰國觀光局(2006)。Long Stay Tourism in Thailand,http://www2.tat.or.th/longstay/eng/back_ground.html。  new window
6.姜淑瑛(2003)。「ヘルスツーリズム(Health Tourism)」の理論と実際Y 韓国と日本の事例分析,http://www.aptec.or.ip/ronbunsvu9.pdf, 2005/04/10。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.顏建賢(2005)。營造鄉村社區作爲日本銀髮族國外長宿休閒之可行性研究。行政院農業委員會提升農漁會會館業務經營活化農村社區示範計。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪永泰(1995)。數量分析與績效評估。行政績效評估專論選輯。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE