:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:歐洲共同體創始階段之歷史制度分析:經濟與安全的權衡
書刊名:政治科學論叢
作者:鍾志明
作者(外文):Chung, Chih-ming
出版日期:2010
卷期:46
頁次:頁1-29
主題關鍵詞:歐洲煤鋼共同體歐洲防禦共同體羅馬條約歷史制度主義ECSCEDCTreaty of RomeHistorical institutionalism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:178
一九五○年代初,法國促成西歐六國煤鋼產業聯營,歐洲統合有了成功的開端,然而幾年後卻又經歷了軍事及政治統合計畫的嚴重挫折;接著在六國政治領導人物鍥而不捨的努力下簽署羅馬條約,建立了經濟和原子能共同體。本文重新審視歐洲共同體創始階段的發展,並從歷史制度主義的角度和觀點,對此一統合過程進行再解釋。本文首先說明歷史制度主義途徑及其分析指標,然後敘述五○年代煤鋼共同體到籌建共同市場的歷史發展,特別著重從會員國──尤其是法國和德國──對參與歐洲統合計畫所預期的獲益、國內決策環境、以及政治制度的理念來進行梳理,俾瞭解各國政府進行合作的出發點與制度選擇之間的關連。
The European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) was first proposed by France at the beginning of the 1950s as a way to integrate the coal and steel industries of six countries in Western Europe. After the end of World War II, European integration hence had a good start. However, a few years later, it encountered severe setbacks in the planning of a European army and the political community. Learning from past experiences, political leaders of the six Member States made continual efforts, and the Treaties of Rome on which the European Economic Community (EEC) and Euratom were established, were signed accordingly. In this essay the author intends to provide an overview of this founding period in the history of the European Community. From the perspective of historical institutionalism, the essay tries to reinterpret this integration process. Initially, this article will elaborate the historical-institutionalist approach and its analytical dimensions. It then reviews the integration developments from the ECSC to the Common Market. Focusing inquiry on the linkages between co-operation and institutional structure, the author explores Member States’ --in particular France and Germany ─ expected benefits, domestic constraints, and approaches to institutional building.
期刊論文
1.Parsons, Craig(2002)。Showing Ideas as Causes: The Origins of the European Union。International Organization,56(1),47-84。  new window
2.Pierson, Paul(19960400)。The Path To European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis。Comparative Political Studies,29(2),123-163。  new window
3.Hall, Peter A.、Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1996)。Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms。Political Studies,44(5),936-957。  new window
4.Jachtenfuchs, Markus, Thomas Diez and Sabine Jung.(1998)。“Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Order.”。European Journal of International Relations,4(4),409-445。  new window
5.Lindner, Johannes, and Berthold Rittberger.(2003)。“The Creation, Interpretation and Contestation of Institutions–Revisiting Historical Institutionalism.”。Journal of Common Market Studies,41(3),445-473。  new window
6.Loth, Wilfried.(2007)。“Der Weg Nach Rom - Entstehung und Bedeutungder Römischen Verträge. ”。Integration,30(1):,36-43。  new window
7.Maurhofer, Roland.(2001)。“Revisiting the Creation of EFTA: The Britishand the Swiss Case.”。Journal of European Integration History,7(2),65-82。  new window
8.Rittberger, Berthold.(2001)。“Which Institutions for Post-War Europe? Explaining the Institutional Design of Europe's First Community.”。Journal of European Public Policy,8(5),673-708。  new window
9.Vanberg, Viktor, and James Buchanan.(1989)。“Interests and Theories in Constitutional Choice.”。Journal of Theoretical Politics,1(1),49-62。  new window
圖書
1.Dinan, Desmond(2004)。Europe Recast: A History of European Union。Plagrave Macmillan。  new window
2.張亞中(1999)。德國問題:國際法與憲法的爭讓。臺北:揚智。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gillinggham, J.(2003)。European Integration 1950-2003. Superstate or New Market Economy?。Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Ikenberry, G. John(2001)。After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
5.葉陽明(19990000)。德國問題與兩德統一。臺北:國立編譯館。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Moravcsik, Andrew(1998)。The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht。Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press。  new window
7.吳東野(1994)。「德國問題」與歐洲強權戰略安全關係(1949-1991)。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Haas, Ernst B.(1958)。The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces。Stanford University Press。  new window
9.薛曉源、陳家剛(2007)。全球化與新制度主義。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
10.張維邦(2003)。莫內與法國式經濟計畫的創建。台北:一橋。  延伸查詢new window
11.Haywood, Andrew、蘇子喬(2009)。政治學的關鍵概念。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
12.Marsh, David、Stoker, Gerry、陳義彥(2009)。政治學方法論與途徑。台北:韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
13.Brunn, Gerhard.(2005)。Die Europäische Einigung von 1945 bis heute。Bonn。  new window
14.Cardozo, Rita.(1989)。“The Project for a Political Community (1952-54).”。The Dynamics of European Union。London。  new window
15.Dedman, Martin J.(1996)。The Origins and Development of the EuropeanUnion 1945-95。London:。  new window
16.Fontaine, Pascal.(2000)。A new idea for Europe. The Schuman Declaration -1950-2000 (2nd ed)。Luxembourg。  new window
17.Fursdon, Edward.(1980)。The European Defence Community: A History.。New York。  new window
18.Gerbet, Pierre.(1989)。“The Origins: Early Attempts and the Emergence ofthe Six (1945-52).”。The Dynamics of European Union。London:。  new window
19.Harbrecht, Wolfgang.(1978)。Die Europäische Gemeinschaft。Stuttgart。  new window
20.Jillson, Calvin.(1988)。Constitution Making: Conflict and Consensus in the Federal Convention of 1787。New York:。  new window
21.Küsters Hanns-Jürgen.(1989)。“The Treaties of Rome (1955-57).”。The Dynamics of European Union。London。  new window
22.Lieshout, Robert H.(1999)。The Struggle for the Organization of Europe: The Foundations of the European Union。Glos。  new window
23.Pollack, Mark A.(2004)。“The New Institutionalisms and European Integration.”。European Integration Theory。Oxford:。  new window
24.Schneider, Heinrich.(1977)。Leitbilder der Europapolitik I. Der Weg zurIntegration.。Der Weg zurIntegration。Bonn:。  new window
25.Schukraft, Corina.(2010)。“Die Anfänge deutscher Europapolitik in den 50er und 60er Jahren: Weichenstellungen unter Konrad Adenauer undBewahrung des Status quo unter seinen Nachfolgern Ludwig Erhardund Kurt Georg Kiesinger.”。In Deutsche Europapolitik。Wiesbaden。  new window
26.Schuman, Robert.(1950)。The Schuman Declaration。Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration (2nd ed., 1998),。London。  new window
27.Steinmo, Sven.(2008)。“Historical Institutionalism.”。Approaches and methodologies in the Social Sciences。Cambridge。  new window
28.Stirk, Peter M. R.(1996)。A History of European Integration since 1914。  new window
29.Wegs, J. Robert, and Robert Ladrech.(1996)。Europe since 1945: A Concise History。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.盧倩儀(2007)。〈區域整合理論〉。歐洲聯盟的組織與運作, 增訂二版。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Pierson, Paul、Skocpol, Theda(2002)。Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science。Political Science: State of the Discipline。W. W. Norton and Company。  new window
3.Thelen, Kathleen、Steinmo, Sven(1992)。Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics。Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE