:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學生在餐廳實習時遭受性騷擾問題之研究
書刊名:觀光研究學報
作者:林玥秀黃毓伶
作者(外文):Lin, Yueh-hsiuHuangm Yu-ling
出版日期:2001
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁55-74
主題關鍵詞:性騷擾餐飲管理科三明治課程焦點團體訪談法Sexual harassmentDepartment of Food and Beverage ManagementSandwich coursesFocus group interviews
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:76
有鑑於國內餐飲教育蓬勃發展,餐飲科系學生實習時之性騷擾問題頗值得探討。本研究採用焦點團體訪談法,針對二專餐飲管理科男女學生,分四組共三十七位進行訪談,試圖瞭解其面對實習時性騷擾問題的實際狀況。研究結果顯示,學生對性騷擾的認知可分為言語騷擾、肢體碰觸、非言語騷擾與開玩笑性質四種類型;曾遭遇的性騷擾狀況可歸納為客人、上司及同事性騷擾三種,遭受性騷擾的情形頗為普遍,但多為言語、眼神、碰觸等騷擾狀況,並未提及猥褻、強暴等性傷害事件。另外,整理出九種學生最可能遭遇性騷擾的情況,及依事前預防、立即反應、事後處理探討受擾學生的反應及處理方式。後續研究建議可針對個案作進一步深度訪談,或透過問卷對全國餐飲科系學生進行較大規模量化之研究,以增進對該議題全面性之瞭解。
In view of the flourishing development of Taiwan's hospitality education, sexual harassment issues confronting students during their practical training at restaurants deserves further investigation. The current study adopts focus group interview technique, aims at two-year junior college students majoring Food and Beverage Management, and attempts to understand the situation confronting them during their practical training period. Four groups of students, a total of 37, were interviewed. The results indicated that the perceptions of students toward sexual harassment could be classified into four categories: verbal harassment, sexual touching, nonverbal displays and harassment of joking nature. Students experienced harassment from guests, superiors and colleagues. It is rather common for students to experience sexual harassment through verbal, eye contact or touching, but no cases of obscenity, rape or sex injury were mentioned during the interviews. The study sorts out nine different conditions that students were most vulnerable for sexual harassment. The reactions and manners that students handled harassment wore further classified into three categories: prevention beforehand, immediate response and action afterwards, and examples wore given for each. For future research, it is suggested that in-depth interviews can be carded out for individual cases identified from the current study, or apply large-scale quantitative study utilizing questionnaire survey to collect data from nation-wide students, so the above mentioned issues can be understood from a comprehensive point of view.
期刊論文
1.張錦麗(19990600)。性騷擾對被害人之傷害及防治之道。社區發展季刊,86,216-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王麗容、李怡青(19990800)。校園性別歧視和性騷擾的檢視。兩性平等教育季刊,8,16-29。  延伸查詢new window
3.曹勝雄、容繼業、劉麗雲(20001200)。專科餐旅教育「三明治教學制度」實施之認知研究--從教師觀點。高雄餐旅學報,3,53-68。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃富源(19950600)。工作場所性騷擾與其預防之研究。師說,82,28-36。  延伸查詢new window
5.Yeater, Elizabeth A.、Downs, Kala、O'Donohue, William(1998)。Sexual Harassment: A Review of the Literature。Aggression and Violent Behavior,3(2),111-128。  new window
6.李福登(19981000)。三明治教學在技職教育之驗證--國立高雄餐旅專校實施案例。技術及職業教育,47,29-30。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳瑞蘭、謝臥龍、楊奕馨、黃慧莉(19970900)。護生在實習場合遭受性騷擾之調查研究。臺灣性學學刊,3(2),36-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.焦興鎧(19940600)。工作場所性騷擾問題在美國之最新發展趨勢。勞資關係,13(2)=146,25-32。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳皎眉、黃富源(1999)。檢視校園性騷擾事件與輔導策略之研究 (計畫編號:F0034918)。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳淑芬(2000)。青少年同儕性騷擾:影響性騷擾界定、態度之相關性探討(碩士論文)。國立陽明大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.簡吉照(1998)。我國性侵害犯罪防治政策之執行評估--以台北市為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Till, F. J.(1980)。Sexual Harassment. A Report on the Sexual Harassment of Students。Washington, DC:National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs。  new window
2.清大小紅帽工作群(1993)。校園反性騷擾行動手冊。臺北:張老師文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳若璋(1993)。大學生性騷擾、性侵害經驗特性之研究。臺北:教育部訓育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.中國國民黨中央婦女工作會(19950920)。婦女政策白皮書。台北:中國國民黨中央婦女工作會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Patton, M. Q.(1980)。Qualitative evaluation and research methods。SAGE PUBLICATIONS。  new window
6.Stewart, D. W.、Shamdasani, P. N.(1990)。Focus Groups: Theory and Practice。London:Sage Publications。  new window
7.Babbie, Earl Robert(1998)。The Practice of Social Research。International Thomson Publishing:Wadsworth。  new window
其他
1.Mackinnon, C. A.(1991)。Sexual Harassment of Working Women。  new window
2.王惠玲(1993)。由勞動法觀點論工作場所性騷擾。  延伸查詢new window
3.王麗容(1999)。當前校園性騷擾和性侵害本質探討:一個質化研究的分析。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院勞工委員會(1994)。兩性工作平等法草案。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳玉釵(1996)。國小學童性騷擾經驗之探討。  延伸查詢new window
6.呂寶靜(1995)。工作場所性騷擾之研究:台灣地區案例探討。  延伸查詢new window
7.李秀容(1994)。行政組織中性騷擾問題之研究。  延伸查詢new window
8.李隆盛(1999)。三明治教學與技職教育水準。  延伸查詢new window
9.林靜媚(1998)。電話性騷擾之研究--以大專院校之女學生為例。  延伸查詢new window
10.俞慧君(1993)。工作場所性騷擾之法律問題。  延伸查詢new window
11.紀麗秋(1998)。從人力資源觀點談工作場所的性騷擾。  延伸查詢new window
12.胡福森(1994)。正視工作場所的性騷擾問題。  延伸查詢new window
13.財團法人婦女新知基金會(2001)。女人玩法:男女工作平等法催生說帖。  延伸查詢new window
14.婦女權益發展基金會(2001)。婦女法律專區:最新公告法令 性騷擾防治法。  延伸查詢new window
15.教育部(2001)。學校通訊錄及各類統計:技職院校。  延伸查詢new window
16.楊茹憶(1999)。職場中的性別歧社與性騷擾。  延伸查詢new window
17.趙守博(1993)。工作場所的性騷擾問題。  延伸查詢new window
18.劉麗雲(2000)。專科餐旅教育三明治教學之效能評估研究。  延伸查詢new window
19.滕春興(1980)。我國教育計畫中建教合作制度之研究。  延伸查詢new window
20.Aalberts, R, J, & Seidman, L. H.(1996)。Sexual-harassment policies for the workplace。  new window
21.Bravo, E. & Cassedy, E(1992)。The 9 to 5 Guide to Combating Sexual Harassment。  new window
22.Fitzgerald L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M. Swecker, J. Gold, Y. Ormerod, M. &. Weitzman, L(1988)。The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academic and the workplace。  new window
23.Gruber, J. E.(1992)。A typology of personal and environmental sexual harassment: research and policy implication for the 1990s。  new window
24.Krueger. R. A.(1988)。Focus Groups. Newbury Park。  new window
25.Lin, Y. H. & Hemmington, N.(1997)。The impact of government environmental policy on the tourism industry in Taiwan。  new window
26.Lin, Y. H(1997)。The Influence of Government Environmental Policy on the Hotel Industry in Taiwan。  new window
27.Luthar, H. K. & Pastille, C(2000)。Modeling subordinate perceptions of sexual harassment: the role of superior-subordinate social-sexual interaction。  new window
28.Mazer D. B. & Percival, E. F.(1989a)。Students’ experiences of sexual harassment at a small university。  new window
29.Mazer, D. B. & Percival, E. F.(1989b)。Ideology or experience? The relationships among perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of sexual harassment in university students。  new window
30.Mckinney, K,(1990)。Sexual harassment of university faculty by colleagues and students。  new window
31.Morgan, D. L.(1993)。Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art。  new window
32.Morrow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., & Philips, C. M.(1994)。Sexual harassment behaviors and work related perceptions and attitudes。  new window
33.Shepela., S. T. & Levesque, L. L.(1998)。Poisoned waters: sexual harassment and the college climate。  new window
34.Smith, J. M.(1972)。Group discussions. Interviewing in Market and Social Research。  new window
35.Terpstra, D. E. &. Baker. D. D(1989)。The identification and. classification of reactions to sexual harassment。  new window
圖書論文
1.胡幼慧(1996)。焦點團體法。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE