:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國高職餐飲科學生實習期間遭受性騷擾問題之探討
書刊名:觀光研究學報
作者:林玥秀
作者(外文):Lin, Yueh-hsiu
出版日期:2005
卷期:11:2
頁次:頁135-163
主題關鍵詞:餐飲教育高職實習性騷擾Hospitality educationVocational high schoolPractical trainingSexual harassment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:59
  • 點閱點閱:61
為瞭解我國高職餐飲科系學生於校外實習期間遭受性騷擾問題之現況,本研究採用問卷調查法,以國內曾參與校外實習課程之八所高職餐飲科學生為研究對象,於民國九十二年四月採團體施測法進行問卷發放。所得之有效問卷共446份,整體可用率為93.7%。本研究冀藉由現象面之探索,瞭解高職餐飲科學生校外實習期間遭受性騷擾的經驗、性騷擾者之性別與受擾者的關係、實習生受擾後之心理感受與情緒反應,以及遭受騷擾時之可能反應、處理方式、求助管道及未求助之原因。研究結果發現,實習生之受擾經驗以性別騷擾(84.8%)及性挑逗(54.5%)為主,另有20.9%的實習生確認自己曾遭受騷擾。騷擾者可分顧客(37.6%)、同事(34.4%),以及主管(18.3%)三大類,並以男性為主。受擾者多有生氣憤怒等負面反應,唯男性較女性易出現感覺高興等正面反應。研究同時發現實習生受擾時除消極抵抗也會積極傳達不滿,並有六成以上會採取自我預防等方式為後續因應。最後,歸納研究限制並提出未來研究方向供後續研究者參考。
The objectives of the current study were to investigate the experiences and frequency of students confronting sexual harassment during their practical training periods, and to explore the possible reactions of victims and methods of handling such situations, channels for help and reasons for not searching for help. A structured questionnaire was developed after a comprehensive review of current related literature and a series of exploratory focus group interviews. Research samples include students from eight vocational high schools majored in Food and Beverage program. A series of self-administrated questionnaire surveys were carried out in April 2003. A total of 446 usable questionnaires were collected. The results indicted that a great majority of respondents had experienced certain forms of gender harassment (84.8%) and seductive behavior (54.5%). These circumstances repeated very frequently, however only 20.9% of respondents confirmed that they had been sexually harassed. The harassers were mainly male, and could be classified as three categories: customers (37.6%), colleagues (34.4%) and superiors (18.3%). The most common responses of the victims were negative reaction such as anger, feeling disgusting and embarrassed. However, on average, more male victims indicated the feeling of happiness compared with female victims. The study was concluded with research limitations and suggestions for future research as well as recommendations for related authorities.
期刊論文
1.張錦麗(19990600)。性騷擾對被害人之傷害及防治之道。社區發展季刊,86,216-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.杜正治(19951200)。國中階段一般與智障學生的性騷擾經驗調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊,13,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Morrow, P. C.、McElory, J. C.、Philips, C. M.(1994)。Sexual harassment behaviors and work related perceptions and attitudes。Journal of vocational behavior,45(3),295-309。  new window
4.林玥秀、黃毓伶(20011200)。學生在餐廳實習時遭受性騷擾問題之研究。觀光研究學報,7(2),55-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃富源(19950600)。工作場所性騷擾與其預防之研究。師說,82,28-36。  延伸查詢new window
6.Gruber, J. E.(1992)。A Typology of Personal and Environmental Sexual Harassment: Research and Policy Implications for the 1990s。Sex Roles,26(11/12),417-464。  new window
7.Yeater, Elizabeth A.、Downs, Kala、O'Donohue, William(1998)。Sexual Harassment: A Review of the Literature。Aggression and Violent Behavior,3(2),111-128。  new window
8.Jensen, I. W.、Gutek, B. A.(1982)。Attributions and assignment of responsibility in sexual harassment。Journal of Social Issues,38(4),121-136。  new window
9.魏英珠(19991100)。校園性騷擾及性侵害事件之辨識及處理。兩性平等教育季刊,9,50-53。  延伸查詢new window
10.李福登(19981000)。三明治教學在技職教育之驗證--國立高雄餐旅專校實施案例。技術及職業教育,47,29-30。  延伸查詢new window
11.高鳳仙(20010400)。性騷擾之法律概念探究。法令月刊,52(4),24-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.楊長苓(19980100)。性、性別、權力。兩性平等教育季刊,1,47-50。  延伸查詢new window
13.焦興鎧(19940600)。工作場所性騷擾問題在美國之最新發展趨勢。勞資關係,13(2)=146,25-32。  延伸查詢new window
14.林玥秀、黃毓伶(20031200)。學生實習期間遭受性騷擾問題之探討--以我國二專餐飲科學生為例。高雄師大學報,15(1),215-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.呂寶靜(19950600)。工作場所性騷擾之研究:臺灣地區案例探討。國立政治大學學報,70(下),131-158。  延伸查詢new window
16.Ormerod, Mimi、Gold, Yael、Swecker, Janice、Richards, Margaret、Bailey, Nancy、Weitzman, Lauren、Fitzgerald, Louise F.、Shullman, Sandra L.(1988)。The Incidence and Dimensions of Sexual Harassment in Academia and the Workplace。Journal of Vocational Behavior,32(2),152-175。  new window
17.王純娟(19980900)。從美國的性騷擾定義談起--為臺灣社會尋找一個性騷擾定義。輔導季刊,34(3),22-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Gruber, James E.(1990)。Methodological Problems and Policy Implications in Sexual Harassment Research。Population Research and Policy Review,9(3),235-254。  new window
19.俞慧君(1993)。工作場所性騷擾之法律問題。勞工研究,61,11-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.胡福森(1994)。正視工作場所的性騷擾問題。中國勞工,930,16-20。  延伸查詢new window
21.焦興鍇(1995)。工作場所性騷擾及其防治之道。勞資關係,14(3),18-30。  延伸查詢new window
22.Aalberts, R. J.、Seidman, L. H.(1996)。Sexual-harassment Policies for the Workplace: A Tale of Two Companies。Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly,37(5),78-85。  new window
23.Anders, K. T.(1993)。Bad Sex: Who's Harassing Whom in Restaurants?。Restaurant Business,92(2),46/ 52-49/ 54。  new window
24.Coeyman, M.(1998)。Trial and Terror。Restaurant Business,97(1),40-42。  new window
25.Drasgow, Fritz、Gelfand, Michelle J.、Fitzgerald, Louise F.(1995)。The Structure of Sexual Harassment: A Confirmatory Analysis across Cultures and Settings。Journal of Vocational Behavior,47(2),164-177。  new window
26.Fitzgerald, Louise F.、DeNardo, Mary、Hulin, Charles L.、Magley, Vicki J.(1999)。Outcomes of Self-labeling Sexual Harassment。Journal of Applied Psychology,84(3),390-402。  new window
27.Levesque, Laurie L.、Shepela, Sharon Toffey(1998)。Poisoned Waters: Sexual Harassment and the College Climate。Sex Roles: A Journal of Research,38(7/ 8),589-611。  new window
28.Woods, R. H.、Kavanaugh, R. R.(1994)。Gender Discrimination and Sexual Harassment as Experienced by Hospitality Industry Managers。Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly,35(1),16-21。  new window
29.Frazier, Patricia A.、Olson, Andrea M.、Cochran, Caroline C.(1997)。Predictors of Responses to Unwanted Sexual Attention。Psychology of Women Quarterly,21(2),207-226。  new window
30.Baker, Douglas D.、Terpstra, David E.(1989)。The Identification and Classification of Reactions to Sexual Harassment。Journal of Organizational Behavior,10(1),1-14。  new window
研究報告
1.陳皎眉、黃富源(1999)。檢視校園性騷擾事件與輔導策略之研究 (計畫編號:F0034918)。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂寶靜(1992)。臺灣地區工作場所性騷擾之調查研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李秀容(1994)。行政組織中性騷擾問題之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林佩怡(1999)。二專餐飲管理科學生學習滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淑芬(2000)。青少年同儕性騷擾:影響性騷擾界定、態度之相關性探討(碩士論文)。國立陽明大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.李峙欣(2003)。餐飲科學生性騷擾知覺、經驗及面對性騷擾時處理方式之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Till, F. J.(1980)。Sexual Harassment. A Report on the Sexual Harassment of Students。Washington, DC:National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs。  new window
2.Lee, Howard B.、Kerlinger, Fred Nichols(2002)。研究方法。臺北市:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.歐素如、Stewart, David W.、Shamdasani, P. N.(1999)。焦點團體:理論與實務。臺北市:弘智文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gutek, B. A.(1985)。Sex and the Workplace: The Impact of Sexual Behavior and Harassment on Women, Men, and Organizations。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
5.王文科(1999)。教育研究法--民族誌研究。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.財團法人臺北市婦女救援基金會(1990)。婦女性暴力調查報告。臺北市:財團法人臺北市婦女救援基金會。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳若璋(1993)。大學生性騷擾、性侵害經驗特性之研究。臺北:教育部訓育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1999)。性屬關係,上冊:性別與社會、建構。性屬關係,上冊:性別與社會、建構。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.李靜姿、藍茜茹(1991)。臺北市高中(職)女生對性騷擾態度之調查研究。臺北市高中(職)女生對性騷擾態度之調查研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
10.行政院婦女權益促進委員會、財團法人婦女權益促進發展基金會(2000)。千禧-牽惜:全國婦女人身安全會議特刊。千禧-牽惜:全國婦女人身安全會議特刊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.潘維剛(1992)。臺北市上班族兩性差異對性騷擾經驗與對性騷擾態度影響之研究。臺北市上班族兩性差異對性騷擾經驗與對性騷擾態度影響之研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.Kilpatrick, Dean G.、Dansky, Bonnie S.(1997)。Effects of Sexual Harassment。Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment。Boston, MA。  new window
13.行政院勞工委員會(1993)。各國處理工作場所性騷擾問題淺介(上)。各國處理工作場所性騷擾問題淺介(上)。臺北市:行政院勞工委員會。  延伸查詢new window
14.Fitzgerald, Louise F.、Swan, Suzanne、Magley, Vicki J.(1997)。But Was It Really Sexual Harassment? Legal, Behavioral, and Psychological Definitions of the Workplace Victimization of Women。Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
其他
1.焦興鎧(2000)。我國建構員工工作場所性騷擾申訴制度之芻議,http://www. wrp .org.tw/Conf/index7b.htm, 2008/03/20。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院勞工委員會(2003)。工作場所性騷擾防治宣導手冊,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE