臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：探討互動式電子白板對於不同認知風格國中學生學習效益之影響--以細胞分裂單元為例
書刊名：課程與教學
作者：楊凱悌 引用關係／王子華／邱美虹 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yang, Kai-ti／Wang, Tzu-hua／Chiu, Mei-hung
出版日期：2011
卷期：14:4
頁次：頁187-208
主題關鍵詞：互動式電子白板；認知風格；國中自然與生活科技課程；Interactive whiteboard；IWB；Cognitive style；Junior high school nature and life technology curriculum
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:39
隨著資訊通訊技術（Information Communication Technology, ICT）的快速發展，將互動式電子白板（Interactive Whiteboard, IWB）導入傳統課室教學已成為近年來的新興議題。本研究主要在比較IWB融入教學與傳統資訊融入教學的效益，並從認知風格的角度，來探討不同認知風格之學生在IWB融入教學中的學習情形。本研究將IWB融入國中一年級自然與生活科技課程之「細胞分裂」的主題，並採用準實驗研究設計，有效樣本共111人，以IWB融入教學為實驗組，傳統資訊融入教學為對照組，另採用藏圖測驗（Hidden Figures Test, HFT）區分學生之認知風格。經過一週五節課的教學後發現，相較於傳統資訊融入教學組之學生，採用IWB融入教學的學生，具有顯著較佳之學習效益。此外，本研究亦發現，相較於傳統資訊融入教學，IWB融入教學可以讓不同認知風格之學生獲得較為均等的學習效益。
With the rapid development of information and communication technology (ICT), integrating the Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) into traditional classroom teaching has become an important research issue in recent years. This research aims to compare the effectiveness of IWB-integrated instruction with that of traditional ICT-integrated instruction, and to investigate learning effectiveness of students with different cognitive styles in these two learning environments. The IWB was used in the "Cell Division" course for junior high school seventh graders. This research adopted a quasi-experimental design. One hundred and eleven junior high school seventh graders participated in this research. This research adopted the instrument named "Hidden Figures Test (HFT)" to categorize students' cognitive styles. After one-week instruction (five classes), this research showed that students receiving IWB-integrated instruction had significantly better learning effectiveness than those receiving traditional ICT-integrated instruction. In addition, the results revealed that in comparison with traditional ICT-integrated instruction, IWB-integrated instruction could make students with different cognitive styles had equal learning effectiveness.
期刊論文
1.Chen, S. Y.、Ford, N.(1998)。Modelling user navigation behaviours in a hypermedia-based learning system: an individual differences approach。International Journal of Knowledge Organization，25(3)，67-78。  new window
2.Holmes, K.(2009)。Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers。Australasian Journal of Educational Technology，25(3)，351-365。  new window
3.林紀慧(19980200)。個別差異和學習路徑策略與電腦超本文學習成效研究。新竹師院學報，11，1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Baker, R. M.、Dwyer, F.(2005)。Effects of instructional strategies and individual differences: A meta-analytic assessment。International Journal of Instructional Media，32(1)，69-84。  new window
5.Boersma, F. J.(1968)。Test-retest reliability of the cf-1 Hidden Figures Test。Educational and Psychological Measurement，28(2)，555-559。  new window
6.Campbell, C.、Kent, P.(2010)。Using interactive whiteboards in pre-service teacher education: Examples from two Australian universities。Australasian Journal of Educational Technology，26(4)，447-463。  new window
7.Chen, S. Y.、Paul, R. J.(2003)。Editorial: Individual differences in web-based instruction--an overview。British Journal of Educational Technology，34(4)，385-392。  new window
8.Chen, S. Y.、Macredie, R. D.(2004)。Cognitive modelling of student learning in web-based instructional programmes。International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction，17(3)，375-402。  new window
9.Chen, S. Y.、Magoulas, G. D.、Dimakopoulos, D.(2005)。Aflexible interface design for web directories to accommodate different cognitive styles。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，56(1)，70-83。  new window
10.Clewley, N.、Chen, S. Y.、Liu, X.(2010)。Cognitive Styles and Search Engine Preferences: Field Dependence/Independence vs. Holism/Serialism。Journal of Documentation，66(4)，585-603。  new window
11.Frank, B. M.、Keane, D.(1993)。The Effect of Learners' Field Independence, Cognitive Strategy Instruction, and Inherent Word-List Organization on Free-Recall Memory and Strategy Use。Journal of Experimental Education，62(1)，14-25。  new window
12.Lewis, J、Leach, J、Wood-Robinsoon, C.(2000)。Chromosomes: The missing link – young people’s understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilisation。International Journal of Biological Education，34(4)，189-199。  new window
13.Northcote, M.、Mildenhall, P.、Marshall, L.、Swan, P.(2010)。Interactive whiteboards: Interactive or just whiteboards?。Australasian Journal of Educational Technology，26(4)，494-510。  new window
14.Oztap, H.、Özay, E.、Öztap, F.(2003)。Teaching cell division to secondary school students: An investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers。International Journal of Biological Education，38(1)，13-15。  new window
15.Saracho, O. N.(1998)。Research directions for cognitive style and education。International Journal of Educational Research，29(3)，287-290。  new window
16.Slay, H.、Sieborger, I.、Hodgkinson-Williams, C.(2008)。Interactive whiteboard: Real beauty or just lipstick?。Computers & Education，51(3)，1321-1341。  new window
17.Torff, B.、Tirotta, R.(2010)。Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics。Computers and Education，54(2)，379-383。  new window
18.Witkin, H.、Asch, S. E.(1948)。Studies in space orientation: III. Perception of the upright in the absence of a visual field。Journal of Experimental Psychology，38(5)，603-614。  new window
19.Glover, D.、Miller, D.、Averis, D.、Door, V.(2005)。The interactive whiteboard: a literature survey。Technology, Pedagogy and Education，14(2)，155-170。  new window
20.Chou, Huey-Wen(2001)。Influences of Cognitive Style and Training Method on Training Effectiveness。Computers & Education，37(1)，11-25。  new window
21.Lee, Catherine Hui-Min、Cheng, Yuk-Wing、Rai, Shri、Depickere, Arnold(2005)。What affect student cognitive style in the development of hypermedia learning system?。Computers & Education，45(1)，1-19。  new window
22.Wall, K.、Higgins, S.、Smith, H.(2005)。"The visual helps me understand the complicated things": Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards。British Journal of Educational Technology，36(5)，851-867。  new window
23.Somyurek, S.、Atasoy, B.、Özdemir, S.(2009)。Board's IQ: What makes a board smart?。Computers and Education，53(2)，368-374。  new window
24.Rittschof, K. A.(2010)。Field dependence-independence as visuospatial and executive functioning in working memory: Implications for instructional systems design and research。Educational Technology Research & Development，58(1)，99-114。  new window
25.Harrison, A. W.、Rainer, R. K. J.(1992)。The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-user Computing。Journal of Management of Information Systems，9(1)，93-111。  new window
26.Ford, Nigel、Chen, Sherry Y.(2000)。Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: An empirical study。Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia，9(4)，281-311。  new window
27.楊坤原、張賴妙理(20040900)。遺傳學迷思概念之文獻探討及其在教學上的啟示。科學教育學刊，12(3)，365-398。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Clark, Richard E.(1994)。Media will never influence learning。Educational Technology Research and Development，42(2)，21-29。  new window
29.Kozma, R. B.(1994)。Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate。Educational Technology Research and Development，42(2)，7-19。  new window
30.Smith, H. J.、Higgins, S.、Wall, K.、Miller, J.(2005)。Interactive whiteboards: Boon or Bandwagon? A critical review of the literature。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning，21(2)，91-101。  new window
31.Lewis, J.、Leach, J.、Wood-Robinson, C.(2000)。What's in a Cell? - Young People's Understanding of the Genetic Relationship between Cells, Within an Individual。Journal of Biological Education，34(3)，129-132。  new window
32.DeTure, M.(2004)。Congitive Style and Selfefficacy: Predicting Student Success in Online Distance Education。The American Journal of Distance Education，18(1)，21-38。  new window
33.Wang, T. H.(2007)。What Strategies Are Effective for Formative Assessment in an e-learning Environment?。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning，23(3)，171-186。  new window
學位論文
1.Shapiro, N. P.(1970)。The effects of perceptual isolation on recall for field-independent and field-dependent subjects(博士論文)。New York University，NewYork。  new window
2.Levy, P.(2002)。Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study(-)。University of Sheffield。  new window
圖書
1.南一書局(2009)。國民中學自然與生活科技。台南市：南一書局企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Collis, B. A.、Knezek, G. A.、Lai, K-W.、Miyashita, K. T.、Pelgrum, W. J.、Plomp, T.、Sakamoto, T.(1996)。Children and Computers in School。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Educational Testing Service(1962)。Hidden Figures Test –Cf-1。Princeton, NJ：Educational Testing Service。  new window
4.French, J. W.、Ekstrom, R. B.、Price, L. A.(1963)。Kit of Reference Tests for Cognitive Factors。Princeton, NJ：Educational Testing Service。  new window
5.Campbell, N. A.、Reece, J. B.、Taylor, M. R.、Simon, E., J.、Dickey, J. L.(2008)。Biology, concepts & connections。San Francisco：Benjamin Cummings。  new window
6.Witkin, H. A.、Oltman, P. K.、Raskin, E.、Karp, S. A.(1971)。A manual for the Group Embedded Figures Test。Palo Alto, CA：Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
7.Brown, C. R.(1995)。The effective teaching of biology。New York：Longman publishing。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2006)。「建構縣市e 化學習環境」建置參考說明，http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0089/e-environment.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.Walker, D.(2002)。Meet whiteboard Wendy，http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=371268， 2010/09/27。  new window
3.教育部(2008)。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書，http://Orz.tw/7HmKg.， 2009/10/07。  延伸查詢new window
4.BECTA(2007)。Harnessing Technology schools survey 2007，http://partners.becta.org.uk/index.php?section=rh&&catcode=_re_rp_02&rid=14110， 2010/09/27。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：863（臺灣：859，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2111296 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67908074
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上