臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：複雜理論觀點下之創新產業政策：以韓國推動智慧家庭產業為例
書刊名：科技管理學刊
作者：陳意文 引用關係／吳思華 引用關係／王美雅 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Yi-wen／Wu, Se-hwa／Wang, Mei-ya
出版日期：2011
卷期：16:4
頁次：頁77-104
主題關鍵詞：產業政策；新興產業；複雜理論；創新生態系統；韓國智慧家庭產業；Industrial policy；Emerging industry；Complexity theory；Innovation ecosystem；Smart home industry in South Korea
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:30
  • 點閱點閱:52
目前政府擬定產業政策的決策程序，多半遵循企業策略規劃的方式，透過對未來環境的預測，配合國內的相對競爭優劣勢分析，進而決定策略性產業的發展方向。事實上，隨著產業結構的快速變化，形成技術相依 (technological interdependence) 的創新生態系統 (innovation ecosystems)，才是推動新興產業的最大挑戰。不過，過去對產業政策的研究，多半從經濟學的角度，評估政策之競爭力與有效性，卻較少探討產業政策與廠商行為之間的關係，此外，透過產業政策引導廠商建構創新生態系統的動態過程，在過去研究中亦付之闕如。因此，本研究納入複雜理論觀點 (complexity theory)，以韓國政府致力推動的智慧家庭產業為例，分析不同成員的互動關係，探討產業政策的另一種創新規劃模式。研究發現，產業政策應透過編寫未來想像藍圖或劇本，使潛在成員能理解價值承諾、快速尋找利基並形成標準，進而共創未來；其次，國家資源應由集中投入轉而以「分散式與階段性」的實驗性策略評估模式，挹注新興產業，以維持系統能量， 逐步建構創新生態系統。
A national industrial policy usually follows the concept and process of traditional strategic planning, by external environmental scanning, forecasting and the competitive advantage analysis. After deciding promising industries, the government then invests sufficient resources to support related actors. However, when faced with the rapidly changing and unpredictable future, one wrong decision may result in resource rigidity. Actually, building an innovation ecosystem to create value by technological interdependence is the biggest challenge. However, most studies emphasize to evaluate the competitiveness and effectiveness of policies, and neglect the relationship between policies and firms behavior, overlooking how innovative entities interact and grow.This study adopts the complexity theory, using the Korean smart home industry as an example to analyze how entities interact, proposing a new paradigm for promoting emerging industries. This study believes industrial policies should be collective mobilized, not unitary focused; secondly, resources should be invested by stage to keep the momentum, instead of focusing all resources in one direction. The government should therefore be able to create an innovation ecosystem.
期刊論文
1.Christensen, C. M.、Rosenbloom, R. S.(1995)。Explaining Attacker's Advantage: Technological Paradigms, Organizational Dynamics, and the Value Network。Research Policy，24(2)，233-257。  new window
2.Schindehufte, M.、Morris, M. H.(2009)。Advancing Strategic Entrepreneurship Research: the Role of Complexity Science in shifting the Paradigm。Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice，33(1)，241-276。  new window
3.洪世章、林于婷(20030800)。國家創新系統--概念、成因與效果。研考雙月刊，27(4)=236，24-33。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡敦浩、林韶怡、利尚仁(20100200)。行動導向的創業歷程：以複雜調適系統觀點再現創業經驗。管理學報，27(1)，57-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.花佳正(20100800)。中、日、韓、印度之新興產業推動對臺灣的啟示。臺灣經濟研究月刊，33(8)=392，69-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.AIchian, Armen A.(1950)。Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory。Journal of Political Economy，58(3)，211-221。  new window
7.Evans, P.、Wolf , B.(2005)。Collaboration rules。Harvard Business Review，83(7)，96-104。  new window
8.Mintzberg, Henry(1994)。The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning。Harvard Business Review，72(1)，107-114。  new window
9.Anderson, P.(1999)。Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science。Organization science，10(3)，216-232。  new window
10.Normann, Richard、Ramírez, Rafael(1993)。From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy。Harvard Business Review，71(4)，65-77。  new window
11.McKelvey, B.(2004)。Toward a Complexity Science of Entrepreneurship。Journal of Business Venturing，19(3)，313-341。  new window
12.DiMaggio, Paul J.、Powell, Walter W.(1983)。The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields。American Sociological Review，48(2)，147-160。  new window
13.Etzkowitz, Henry、Leydesdorff, Loet(2000)。The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations。Research Policy，29(2)，109-123。  new window
14.蔡敦浩、利尚仁、林韶怡(20080600)。創業研究的新趨向--敘說探究之應用。中山管理評論，16(2)，321-349。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Adner, Ron、Kapoor, Rahul(2010)。Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects firm Performance in New Technology Generations。Strategic Management Journal，31(3)，306-333。  new window
16.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Building Theories from Case Study Research。Academy of Management Review，14(4)，532-550。  new window
17.王健全(2010)。台灣六大新興產業的發展策略探討。經濟前瞻，1月號，35-38。  延伸查詢new window
18.盧智芳(2001)。韓國要追趕兩百年的科技落後。天下雜誌，243，62-63。  延伸查詢new window
19.李修瑩(2004)。韓國用家庭網路力拼IT產業前五強。數位時代，88。  延伸查詢new window
20.侯如珊、蔡燿駿(2003)。手機才是家的中心。e 天下，6月號。  延伸查詢new window
21.Bovaird, T.(2008)。Emergent Strategic Management and Planning Mechanisms in Complex Adaptive Systems。Public Management Review，10(3)，319-340。  new window
22.Crutchfield, J. P.、Packard, N. H.、Farmer, J. D.、Shaw, R. S.(1986)。Chaos。Scientific American，255(6)，46-57。  new window
23.Drazin, R. D.、Sandelands, L. E.(1992)。Autogenesis: A Perspective on the Process of Organizing。Organization Science，3(2)，230-249。  new window
24.Funk, J.(2010)。Complexity, Critical Mass and Industry Formation: A Comparison of Selected Industries。Industry & Innovation，17(5)，511-530。  new window
25.Garud, R.、Kumaraswamy, A.(1993)。Changing Competitive Dynamics in Network Industries: An Exploration of Sun Microsystems' Open Systems Strategy。Strategic Management Journal，14(5)，351-369。  new window
26.Hodler, R.(2009)。Industrial Policy in An Imperfect World。Journal of Development Economics，90(1)，85-93。  new window
27.Herriott, R.E.、Firestone, W.A.(1983)。Multi-site qualitative policy research: optimising description and generalisability。Educational Researcher，12(2)，14-19。  new window
28.Leydesdorff, L.、Zawadi, G.(2010)。The Triple Helix Perspective of Innovation Systems。Technology Analysts & Strategic Management，22(7)，789-804。  new window
29.Klijn, E.(2008)。Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What's New?。Public Management Review，10(3)，299-317。  new window
30.Morel, B.、Ramanujam, R.(1999)。Through the Looking-glass of Complexity: The Dynamics of Organizations as Adaptive and Evolving Systems。Organization Science，10(3)，278-293。  new window
31.Rohrbeck, R.、Holzle. K.、H.G. Gemunden.(2009)。Opening Up for Competitive Advantage--How Deutsche Telekom Creates an Open Innovation Ecosystem。R&D Management，39(4)，420-430。  new window
32.Rodriguez-Clare, Anres(2007)。Clusters and Comparative Advantage: Implications for Industrial Policy。Journal of Development Economics，82(1)，43-57。  new window
33.Simon, A.(1962)。The Architecture of Complexity。Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society，106(6)，467-482。  new window
會議論文
1.溫肇東、吳思華、顏如妙(2002)。從產業政策、科技政策到創新政策--從歷屆全國科技會議及歐盟創新政策的觀察。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡文鈞、吳思華(2003)。新創事業發展與利基創造--以集群屬性事業創新為例。  延伸查詢new window
3.方念萱、鍾蔚文(2006)。如何研究生活脈絡？。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kaiser, R.、Kripp, M.(2010)。Demand-orientation in National Systems of innovation: A Critical Review of Current European Innovation Policy Concepts。London。  new window
研究報告
1.方念萱、鄭宇君、楊淑芬、林文琪(2006)。無所不在夢想展覽館之考察與反思，產業創新能耐平台建置舆推廣三年計畫--韓國產業創新現況研究計畫。  延伸查詢new window
2.溫肇東、劉文綺(2006)。產業協會在韓國智慧家庭網路產業的守門角色--以HNA為例，產業創新能耐平台建置與推廣三年計畫--韓國產業創新現況研究計畫。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳意文(2009)。創新產品的資源拼湊與價值實現之研究：採新資源基礎觀點之定性與定量分析(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡文鈞(2006)。制度性創新事業的動態浮現歷程：複雜科學觀點。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王美雅(2005)。概念型創新的動態擴散過程：複雜理論觀點。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Etzkowitz, H.、Leydesdorff, L.(1997)。Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations。London：Cassell。  new window
2.Lundvall, B.-A.(1992)。National Systems of Innovations: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning。London：Pinter。  new window
3.Hill, C.W.、Jones, G.R.(2001)。Strategic Management Theory。New York：Hought on Mifflin Co.。  new window
4.Nelson, Richard R.(1993)。National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Ormerod, Paul、李華夏(2000)。蝴蝶效應經濟學。台北：聯經。  延伸查詢new window
6.Mintzberg, Henry、Ahlstrand, Bruce、Lampel, Joseph(1998)。Strategy safari: A Guided Tour through the Wilds of Strategic Management。New York：The Free Press。  new window
7.Porter, Michael E.(1990)。The Competitive Advantage of Nations。New York：Free Press。  new window
8.Brown, Shona L.、Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1998)。Competing On the Edge: Strategy As Structured Chaos。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
9.吳思華(1954)。產業政策與科技政策論文集。台灣經濟研究院。  延伸查詢new window
10.Stacey, R. D.(1996)。Complexity and Creativity in Organizations。San Francisco：Berrett-Koehler。  new window
11.Thompson, James D.(1967)。Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory。New York：McGraw-Hill。  new window
12.Yin, Robert K.(1994)。Case study research: Design and methods。Sage Publications。  new window
13.Raynor, M. E.(2007)。The Strategy Paradox: Why Committing to Success Leads to Failure, and What to Do About It。New York。  new window
14.Ozman, M.(2003)。Self Organizing Inter-firm Networks。Research Memoranda, 2003-020。MERIT。  new window
其他
1.Corporate Vision: A Story，http://www.nttdocomo.com/features/corporate_vision_story/index.html， 20110712。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：397（臺灣：386，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67808287
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上