:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:《易經》與懷德海的感受形上學
書刊名:東海哲學研究集刊
作者:俞懿嫻 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Yih-hsien
出版日期:2010
卷期:15
頁次:頁73-101
主題關鍵詞:易經懷德海形上學感受FeelingMetaphysicsYi JingWhitehead, A. N.
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:60
「感受形上學」或者「感受宇宙論」是一與唯物實體論和唯物機械論對立的哲學思想。不同於後二者將自然視為由特定時空中、不相連屬的、無意識、無意圖的物質質點所構成的大機械,戚受形上學主張宇宙一切存在均具備「感受」的能力;自然是由能感受、有主體性的、彼此相關的生命單元所構成的整體。自十七世紀科學興起之後,科學的宇宙觀造成自然與精神二分的困難。無疑地,感受形上學是為了因應此一困難應運而生。在現代西方哲學裡,感受形上學向為歐陸理性論和唯心論的特徵,經常受到實在論和經驗論的批判。到了十九世紀晚期,新實在論者懷德海提出新的感受形上學,主張有機整體的宇宙觀,企圖避免唯心論和二元論所造成的問題。他特別提出「機體」具有心物二極的理論,認為由機體構成的宇宙是一有目的、有意圖的創化宇宙,並非只受到盲目機械因果法則的支配。懷德海的宇宙觀與中國古哲的宇宙觀極為接近,尤其近乎《易經》的宇宙觀。《易》為六經之首,是中國古代最具哲學意味的寶典。其中含藏了旁通統貫、整體相關的宇宙觀,創化生生、交感和諧的自然觀,參贊化育、止於至善的人生觀,以及涵容賅遍、以人為本的價值觀;總其目的在提供統攝宇宙人生的形上原理。究其理念內容,無不包含前述感受形上學的基本要旨。本文囿於篇幅,僅就《易經》與懷德海俱以宇宙為一「感通系統」之說作一介紹,以期對中西形上學之會通交流有所貢獻。
"Feeling metaphysics" or "feeling cosmology" is the kind of theory that suggests every existence, either mental or physical, inheres in itself a capacity of "feeling" and thereby can interact with one another as part of an organic whole. It gives a different view of the universe from that of the materialistic and causal mechanistic ones which see the universe as a configuration of elementary particles whose motions and relations are purposeless and governed by some definite, causal, mechanical laws. In modern philosophy, feeling metaphysics has long been a characteristic of European rationalism and idealism, and constantly challenged by empiricism and realism as it frequently undermines the foundation of the existence of the external world by making the objective world depend on the subjective or universal mind. In the late nineteenth century, some neorealists and pragmatists gave a new version of feeling metaphysics; they still held an organic view on the universe, but tried to avoid the difficulty caused by idealism. Among them, Alfred North Whitehead has proposed a philosophy of organism founded on the concept of "organism" designated to take the place of "matter" in substantial metaphysics. "Organism" is of a dipolar nature; it has both mental and physical poles and is capable of resolving the long standing problem of body-mind dualism in Western philosophy. This makes Whitehead's philosophy of organism one of the most significant metaphysics in the contemporary world. According to Whitehead, the universe composed of organism is a purposeful, creative, living universe, and it is not solely dominated by the blind force of mechanical, causal laws. Whitehead's cosmological outlook is very close to that of the authors of the Book of Changes (Yi Jing) of ancient China who also saw the universe as an organic whole with its parts extensively interrelated. The Book of Changes, one of the Six Classics, though originally a handbook of divination, is replete with metaphysical notions, such as change, extensive connectedness, creativity, principle, essence, goodness, etc. From the standpoint of comparative philosophy, it will be of great interest to us to understand how the authors of the Book of Changes and Whitehead share the similar views of the universe and whether there is a feeling metaphysics in their philosophies.
期刊論文
1.俞懿嫻(1988)。懷海德與簡單定位。中國文化月刊,109,46-64。  延伸查詢new window
2.俞懿嫻(20020700)。懷海德哲學在「科學與現代世界」中的蟺變。哲學論集,35,67-124+253-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.俞懿嫻(2001)。意義論。懷海德自然哲學。台北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.傅佩榮、Whitehead, A. N.(1987)。Sherburne, corrected edition, Process and Reality。台北:黎明文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂紹綱。咸。周易全解。  延伸查詢new window
4.Whitehead, A. N.(1898)。On Mathematical Concepts of the Material World。A Treatise on Universal Algebra。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.懷德海(1917)。時間、空間與相對論。The Organisation of Thought Educational and Scientific。London:Williams and Norgate。  延伸查詢new window
6.懷德海(1917)。思想的組織。The Organisation of Thought Educational and Scientific。London:Williams and Norgate。  new window
7.(1919)。自然知識原理探究。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1920)。自然的概念。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1922)。相對性原理。  延伸查詢new window
10.Christian, William A.(1959)。An Interpretation of Whitehead's Metaphysics。New Haven。  new window
11.Wallack, F. Bradford(1980)。The Epochal Nature of Process in Whitehead's Metaphysics。Albany:State University of New York Press。  new window
12.Whitehead, Alfred North(1929)。The Function of Reason。The Function of Reason。Princeton。  new window
13.Windelband, Wilhelm(1901)。A History of Philosophy。A History of Philosophy。New York。  new window
14.Whitehead, A. N.(1938)。Modes of thought。NY:Macmillan。  new window
15.Whitehead, Alfred North(1927)。Symbolism: Its Meaning and Effect。New York:Macmillan Company。  new window
16.金景芳、呂紹綱(2005)。周易全解。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.Whitehead, Alfred North(1925)。Science and the Modern World。New York:The Macmillan Company。  new window
18.程石泉(1999)。易學新探。台北:文景書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.湖北省荊沙鐵路考古隊(1991)。包山楚簡。文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.Whitehead, Alfred North、Griffin, David Ray、Sherburne, Donald W.(1978)。Process and Reality。New York, NY:The Free Press。  new window
21.Whitehead, Alfred North(1926)。Religion in the Making: Lowell Lectures。New York:Macmillan Company。  new window
22.Whitehead, A. N.(1961)。Adventures of Ideas。New York:The Free Press。  new window
23.謝幼偉(1974)。懷黑德的哲學。臺北:先知出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.Leibniz, G. W.、Carr, Herbert Wilson(1930)。The Monadology of Leibniz。London:The Favil Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Whitehead, A. N.(1917)。某些科學觀念的剖析。The Organisation of Thought Educational and Scientific。London:Williams and Norgate。  new window
2.方東美(1979)。生命情調與美感。生生之德。臺北:黎明出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Sivin, N.(1986)。On the Limits of Empirical Knowledge in the Traditional Chinese Sciences。Time, Science and Society in China and the West The Study of Time。Amherst:The University of Massachusetts Press。  new window
4.方東美。哲學三慧。生生之德。臺北:黎明出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE