臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：自由與平等並重：以多元民主為名之若干澄清
書刊名：東海哲學研究集刊
作者：陸品妃
作者(外文)：Lu, Pin-fei
出版日期：2013
卷期：18
頁次：頁37-70
主題關鍵詞：平等；自由；多元民主；Equality；Freedom；Pluralistic democracy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:194
多元民主體制並重自由與平等兩種政治價值，然而自由與平等之間或論存有「衝突」。當衝突只是偶然，而非必然，只是有時，而非隨時，在平等與自由不衝突的情況下，支持民主者應該怎樣理解自由與平等的關係？不同於主流見解，本文企圖闡明與論說，在民主理論架構下，平等理念作為內在性價值，並不與自由衝突；甚至，以內在價值的方式保障平等理念，真正自由才得以成立。論文先澄清平等概念之使用方法，解釋應該如何運用平等概念與看待平等價值，後半則說明平等與自由如何正確地相互影響作用於彼此的方向，結論是，多元民主制度裡，平等的要求是平等自由，而自由的選擇受平等限制。
Freedom may be in conflict with the demand of equality. However, the incompatibility between freedom and equality is accidental, rather than necessary. How should we understand equality and freedom, the two fundamental values which are both embraced and realized in a pluralistic democracy? I first offer an account that suggests how to compatibly take equality as an intrinsic value and sustain freedom for all. I then specify the interplay between equality and freedom. The thesis I argue for here is that in a pluralistic democracy the demand of equality is for equal freedom and free choice must be constrained by equality.
期刊論文
1.Fraser, Nancy(2000)。Rethinking Recognition。New Left Review，3(3)，107-120。  new window
2.Anderson, Elizabeth S.(2001)。Unstrapping the Straitjacket of ‘Preference’: A Comment on Amartya Sen’s Contributions to Philosophy and Economics。Economics and Philosophy，17，21-38。  new window
3.Mason, Andrew(2001)。Egalitarianism and the Levelling Down Objection。Analysis，61(3)，246-254。  new window
4.O’Neill, Martin(2008)。What Should Egalitarians Believe?。Philosophy & Public Affairs，36(2)，119-156。  new window
5.Zimmerman, Michael J.(2007)。Moral Luck: A Partial Map。Canadian Journal of Philosophy，36(4)，585-608。  new window
6.Nussbaum, Martha C.(2003)。Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice。Feminist Economics，9(2/3)，33-59。  new window
7.Scheffler, Samuel(2003)。What is Egalitarianism?。Philosophy and Public Affairs，31(1)，5-39。  new window
8.Fraser, N.(1995)。From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a "Postsocialist" Age。New Left review，212，68-93。  new window
9.Anderson, Elizabeth S.(1999)。What is the Point of Equality?。Ethics，109(2)，287-337。  new window
10.陸品妃(20061200)。「不平等」的平等。政治與社會哲學評論，19，85-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Aristotle、Irwin, Terence(1999)。Nicomachean Ethics。Hackett Publishing Company Inc.。  new window
2.Cudd, Ann E.(2006)。Analyzing Oppression。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper(2007)。The Insignificance of the Distinction Between Telic and Deontic Egalitarianism。Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality。Oxford, UK：Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Miller, David(1998)。Equality and Justice。Ideals of Equality。Oxford, UK：Blackwell Publishing。  new window
5.Parfit, Derek(1995)。Equality or Priority?。Lawrence, KS：Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas。  new window
6.Parfit, Derek(1998)。Equality or Priority?。Ideals of Equality。Oxford, UK：Blackwell Publishing。  new window
7.Parfit, Derek(2000)。Equality or Priority?。The Ideal of Equality。New York, NY：St. Martin’s Press。  new window
8.Scanlon, Thomas M.(1996)。The Diversity of Objections to Inequality。Lindley Lectures。Lawrence, KS：Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas。  new window
9.Scanlon, Thomas M.(2000)。The Diversity of Objections to Inequality。The Ideal of Equality。New York, NY：St. Martin’s Press。  new window
10.Scanlon, Thomas M.(2000)。The Diversity of Objections to Inequality。The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Williams, Bernard(2005)。Conflicts of Liberty and Equality。Beginning Was the Dead: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
12.Sen, Amartya(1980)。Equality of What?。The Tanner Lectures on Human Values。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Nagel, Thomas(1979)。Mortal Questions。Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.Rawls, John(2005)。Political liberalism。Columbia University Press。  new window
15.Nussbaum, Martha Craven(2000)。Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.Scanlon, Thomas M.(2004)。When Does Equality Matter?，http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/ltw-Scanlon.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Elster, Jon(1982)。Sour grapes-Utilitarianism and the genesis of wants。Utilitarianism and Beyond。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Sen, Amartya(1980)。Equality of What?。Choice, Welfare and Measurement。Oxford：Blackwell Publishing。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1323（臺灣：1286，外國：37） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67426358
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上