期刊論文1. | Janis, Mark D.(1999)。A Tale of the Apocryphal Axe: Repair, Reconstruction, and the Implied License in Intellectual Property Law。Md. L. Rev.,58,423+424。 |
2. | 沈宗倫(20100300)。由權利耗盡原則論合法專利物之使用界限:以專利物組裝與修復為中心。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,39(1),287-352。 延伸查詢 |
3. | Dufresne, Andrew T.(2009)。The Exhaustion Doctrine Revived? Assessing the Scope and Possible Effects of the Supreme Court's Quanta Decision。Berkeley Tech. L. J.,24,11-12。 |
4. | 汪渡村(200706)。專利產品再生利用適法性之探討--以專利侵權為中心。銘傳大學法學論叢,7,53-85。 延伸查詢 |
5. | Sperry, Christina M.(1999)。Building A Mystery: Repair, Reconstruction, Implied Licenses, and Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Repeat-O-Type Stencil,Manufacturing Corp.。B. U. J. SCI. & TECH. L.,5,9。 |
6. | 李森堙(200612)。專利商品收回再利用的侵權問題--談日本墨水匣事件判決。科技法律透析,18(12),9-12。 延伸查詢 |
7. | 葉雪美(200802)。複合式產品售後修理零件之設計保護及免責條款的法制研究--以汽車售後修理零件為例。智慧財產權,110,5-29。 延伸查詢 |
8. | Wanstrath, Kara Y.(2010)。Access To Repair Parts Act: Will It Achieve Its Goal Or Hurt An Already Struggling Industry?。DePaul J. Art Tech. & Intell. Prop. L.,20,409+436。 |
9. | Rinehart, Amelia Smith(2010)。Contracting Patents: A Modern Patent Exhaustion Doctrine。Harv. J. Law & Tec,23,483+492-493。 |
10. | 李森堙(200801)。回歸修理/ 再製造判準?談日本最高裁インクタンク事件判決。科技法律透析,20(1),8-12。 延伸查詢 |
11. | Hashiguchi, Mizuki Sally(2008)。Recycling Efforts and Patent Rights Protection in the United States and Japan33,169+194。 |
12. | Ansari, Mehdi(2007)。LG Electronics, Inc. V. Bizcom Electronics, Inc. : Solving The Foundry Problem In The Semiconductor Industry。Berkeley Tech. L. J.,22,137+139-140。 |
13. | Carrier, Michael A.(2004)。Cabining Intellectual Property through a Property Paradigm。Duke Law Journal,54(1),1-58。 |
14. | Cohen, Julie E.、Lemley, Mark A.(2001)。Patent Scope and Innovation in the Software Industry。California Law Review,89(1),1-57。 |
15. | 陳蕙君(20020200)。論「專利權範圍」、「專利權效力範圍」與「專利權保護範圍」之區辨。智慧財產權,38,3-26。 延伸查詢 |
16. | 陳佳麟(20061000)。美國專利產品的修理與再製之區分與案例類型。科技法學評論,3(2),203-247。 延伸查詢 |
其他1. | About the Right to repair Act,http://www.righttorepair.org/about/default.aspx, 20120219。 |
2. | (200410)。專利侵害鑑定要點,http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ch/MultiMedia_FileDownload.ashx?guid=40cfded3-3fBb-4029-a937-7abf762bl8ab, 2013/03/04。 |
3. | (20100322)。Statement of Jack Gillis, Director of Public Affairs, Consumer Federation of America before the House Judiciary Committee Hearing on Patent Designs and Auto Replacement Parts,http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/pdPGillisl00322.pdf, 20120219。 |
4. | (2012)。Congressional Hearing Held on Automotive Design Patent Repair Clause,http://www.aftermarketnews.com/Item/26274/congressional_hearing_held_on_automotive_design_patent_repair_clause.aspx, 20120219。 |
5. | European Parliament(2012)。European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 December 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/71/EC on the legal protection of designs(COM(2004)0582 - C6-0119/2004 - 2004/0203(COD))。,http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-0609, 20120219。 |
6. | Poland, Industrial Property Law of 30 June 2000,http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=194987, 20120219。 |