書籍
1.陳文吟，我國專利制度之研究，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，民國九十三年九月四版。
2.郭華仁，原住民的植物遺傳資源權與傳統知識權，生物多樣性與台灣原住民發展研討會論文集(蔡中涵編)，民國八十九年。
3.楊崇森，專利法理論與應用，三民書局股份有限公司，民國九十二年七月一版。
4.謝瑞智，法學緒論精義(表解)，文笙書局，民國八十五年一月增定六版。

期刊
1.伊守信，淺析美國專利法上之新穎性要件，智慧財產權月刊七十八期，第128頁至第146頁，民國九十四年六月。
2.陳文吟，由美國楝樹發明專利探討新穎性相關規定之合理性，台大法學論叢第三十一卷第一期，第249頁至第282頁，民國九十一年一月。
3.陳文吟，探討傳統知識受專利制度保護之可行性，政大法學評論第七十八期，第149頁至第199頁，民國九十三年四月。
4.郭華仁、陳昭華等著，傳統知識之保護初探，清華科技法律與政策論叢，第二卷第一期，民國九十四年三月。

網路資料
1.王順文，生物多樣性典則的建立與執行之分析，請參見http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/092/IA-R-092-011.htm (上網日期：民國九十七年二月四日)。
2.台邦.撒沙勒，停止生物探勘!原住民在墨西哥的勝利，請參見http://wildmic.npust.edu.tw/sasala/910311-06.doc (上網日期：民國九十七年三月二十四日)。
3.台灣生物多樣性國家報告(草案)，請參見http://bc.zo.ntu.edu.tw/PDF/%E7%94%9F%E7%89%A9%E5%A4%9A%E6%A8%A3%E6%80%A7%E5%9C%8B%E5%AE%B6%E7%AD%96%E7%95%A5%E8%8D%89%E6%A1%88-1999-11-23%E7%89%88.PDF (上網日期：九十五年十二月二日)。
4.生物倫理學，請參見http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%94%9F%E7%89%A9%E5%80%AB%E7%90%86%E5%AD%B8 (上網日期：民國九十七年三月四日)。
5.世界醫學大會赫爾辛基宣言人體醫學研究的倫理準則，請參見http://twlaw.myftp.org/data/2006/0225/article_3849.php (上網日期：民國九十七年六月十日)。
6.胡育誠，複製人的迷思，請參見http://web1.nsc.gov.tw/ct.aspx?xItem=7798&ctNode=40&mp=1 (上網日期：民國九十七年三月二十五日)。
7.陳怡欣，歐盟開始施行基因改造食品法，請參見http://www.itri.de/index.php?rubrik=archive&artikel=300 (上網日期：民國九十七年三月二十日)。
8.郭華仁，加入WTO對農業生物多樣性的影響，請參見http://seed.agron.ntu.edu.tw/agdiversity/wtocbd.htm (上網日期：九十五年十二月二日)。
9.郭華仁，傳統知識的特性及其保護的國際現狀，請參見http://seed.agron.ntu.edu.tw/publication/TK2004.pdf (上網日期：民國九十七年二月三日)。
10.閻啟泰，轉殖基因動物專利，請參見http://ibme.mc.ntu.edu.tw/brcweb/Research/Biomed10/%E8%BD%89%E6%AE%96%E5%9F%BA%E5%9B%A0%E5%8B%95%E7%89%A9%E5%B0%88%E5%88%A91.htm (上網日期：民國九十七年九月二十九日)。
11.瀕危野生動植物種國際貿易公約，請參見http://www.afcd.gov.hk/tc_chi/conservation/con_end/con_end_cites/con_end_cites.html(上網日期：九十五年十二月二日)。

英文
Books
1.ACHARYA, ROHINI, THE EMERGENCE AND GROWTH OF BIOTECHNOLOGY: EXPERIENCES IN INDUSTRIALISED AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, EDWARD ELGAR PUBLISHING (1999).
2.ANAYA, S. JAMES, INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS (2004).
3.BIRNIE, W. PATRICIA & BOYLE E. ALAN, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE ENVIRONMENT, OXFORD (1992).
4.BRIAN, TOKAR, RESISTING THE ENGINEERING OF LIFE, IN REDESIGNING LIFE? THE WORLDWIDE CHALLENGE TO GENETIC ENGINEERING, ZED BOOKS (2001).
5.BRYAN, NORTON, COMMODITY, AMENITY, AND MORALITY: THE LIMITS OF QUANITFICATION IN VALUING BIODIVERSITY, NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS (1988).
6.CASSESE, ANTONIO, INTERNATIONAL LAW, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, (2ND ED. 2005).
7.CHEN, JIM & KERSHEN, DREW, LAW, AGRICULTURE, AND BIOTECHNOLOGY (2005).
8.CORN, LYNNE M., THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES: ITS PAST AND FUTURE (1994).
9.DAN, PERLMAN L. & GLENN, ADELSON, BIODIVERSITY: EXPLORING VALUES AND PRIORITIES IN CONSERVATION, WILEY-BLACKWELL (1997).
10.EARTHSCAN & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY: RECONCILING TRADE IN BIOTECHNOLOGY WITH ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT?, EARTHSCAN (2002)
11.EDWARD, O. WILSON, THE DIVERSITY OF LIFE , HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS (1992).
12.G. TANSEY, FOOD SECURITY, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, QUAKER UNITED NATIONS OFFICE (2002).
13.GRANT, ISSAC E. & WILLIAM, KERR A, THE BIOSAFETY PROTOCOL AND THE WTO: CONCERT OR CONFLICT?, IN THE INTERNATIONAL POLMCS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD (2007).
14.HEYWOOD V.H., & BASTE, I. GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT: SUMMARY FOR POLICY MAKERS (1995).
15.IRVIN, J., MARTIN, B., AND ISARD P., INVESTING IN THE FUTURE: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF GOVERNMENT FUNDING OF ACADEMIC AND RELATED RESEARCH. EDWARD ELGAR PUBLISHING LTD (1990).
16.JIM, MCLEAN, STEM CELL BOOST FOR CANCER TREATMENT, THE HERALD (2000).
17.JOHNSON, MARTHA, RESEARCH ON TRADITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE: ITS DEVELOPMENT AND ITS ROLE, IN LORE: CAPTURING TRADITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE, DENE CULTURE INSTITUTE (1992).
18.KENT, DONALD M., DEFINITION, CLASSIFICATION, AND U.S. REGULATION, IN APPLIED WETLANDS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (DONALD M. KENT ED., 2ND ED. 2001).
19.KEYSTONE, CENTER, BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ON FEDERAL LANDS: REPORT OF A KEYSTONE POLICY DIALOGUE (1991).
20.LAIRD, SARAH A., CONTRACTS FOR BIODIVERSITY PROSPECTING, IN BIODIVERSITY PROSPECTING WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE (1993).
21.MENELL, PETER, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE NEW TECHNOLOGICAL AGE, ASPEN LAW & BUSINESS (2003).
22.MICHAEL, NOVACEK J., PREFACE TO THE BIODIVERSITY CRISIS (2001).
23.NATHALIE, BERNASCONI-OSTERWALDER & MARIA JULIA OLIVA, EC-BIOTECH: OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF THE PANEL''S INTERIM REPORT (2006).
24.PAUL, R. EHRLICH AND SIMON A. LEVIN, BIODIVERSITY: WHAT IT IS AND WHY WE NEED IT, AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY (1998).
25.PARRY, SIMON, ENVIRONMENT: FOOD FOR THOUGHT BY SAYING NO TO SHARK FIN SOUP, INTER-PRESS NEWS SERVICE AGENCY (2004).
26.PETER, R. WILSHUSEN, STEVEN R. BRECHIN, CRYSTAL L. FORTWANGLER & PATRICK C. WEST, CONTESTED NATURE, CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AT THE TURN OF THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, IN CONTESTED NATURE, PROMOTING INTERNATIONAL BIODIVERSITY WITH SOCLAL JUSTICE IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY (2003).
27.PINSTRUP-ANDERSEN, P., THE WORLD FOOD SITUATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, EMERGING ISSUES, AND LONG-TERM PROSPECTS, 2020 VISION FOOD POLICY REPORT (1997).
28.RAGAVAN, SRIVIDYHA, OF PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION, AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES AND THE WTO, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & INFORMATION WEALTH VOI. 4 (2007).
29.RAGAVAN, SRIVIDHYA, TO SOW OR NOT TO SOW: DILEMMAS IN CREATING NEW RIGHTS IN FOOD, AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: SEEDS OF CHANGE (2007).
30.SHOEMAKER, ROBBIN, ECONOMIC ISSUES IN AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, AGRICULTURE INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. AIB762 (2001).
31.SILKE VON LEWINSKI, ANJA VON HAHN, MICHAEL (CON) HASSEMER, INDIGENOUS HERITAGE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: GENETIC RESOURCES, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE, KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL (2004).
32.THE OXFORD DICTIONARY AND THESAURUS, OXFORD (2003).
33.WENDLAND, WE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS ND, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE: WIPO''S EXPLORATORY PROGRAM (2002).

Periodicals
1.Abbott, Frederick M., The Not So Surprising Failure and the Future of the TRIPs Agenda, 18 BERK. J. INT''L LAW 165 (1999).
2.Adair, John, The Bioprospecting Question: Should the United States Charge Biotechnology Companies for the Commercial Use of Public Wild Genetic Resources, 24 ECOLOGY L.Q. 131 (1997).
3.Adam, Rachelle, Water birds, The 2010 Biodiversity Target, and Beyond: AEWA''S Contribution to Global Biodiversity Governance, 38 ENVTL. L. 87 (2008).
4.Anderson, Scott D., Comment, A Right Without a Remedy: The Unenforceable Medical Procedure Patent, 3 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 117 (1999).
5.Aoki, Keith, Distributive And Syncretic Motives In Intellectual Property Law (With Special Reference To Coercion, Agency, And Development), 40 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 720 (2007).
6.Aoki, Ketih, Neocolonialism, Anticommons Property, and Biopiracy in the (Not-So-Brave) New World Order of International Intellectual Property Protection, 6 IND. J. GLOBAL LEGAL STUD. 11 (1998).
7.Arewa, Olufunmilayo B., The First Ten Years of the TRIPS Agreement: TRIPS and Traditional knowledge: Local Communities, Local Knowledge, and Global Intellectual Property Frameworks, 10 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 155 (2006).
8.Asebey, Edgar & Kempenaar Jill, The Intellectual Property Perspective on Biodiversity: Biodiversity Prospecting: Fulfilling the Mandate of the Biodiversity Convention, 28 VAND. J. TRANNAT''L L. 703 (1995).
9.Bacon, Brad L., Enforcement Mechanisms in International Wildlife Agreements and the United States: Wading Through the Murk, 12 GEO. INT’L ENVTL. L. REV. 331 (1999).
10.Bagley, Margo A., Patently Unconstitutional: The Geographical Limitations on Prior Art in a Small World, 87 MINN. L. REV. 679 (2003).
11.Bar-Gill, Oren & Parchomovsky Gideon, The Value of Giving Away Secrets, 89 VA. L. REV. 1857 (2003).
12.Barrett, Christopher B. & Lybbert Travis J., Is Bioprospecting a Viable Strategy for Conserving Tropical Ecosystems?, 34 ECOLOGICAL ECON. 293 (2000).
13.Bernau, Bradley M., Help For Hotspots: NGO Participation in The Preservation Of Worldwide Biodiversity, 13 IND. J. GLOBAL LEG. STUD. 617 (2007).
14.Binswanger, Hans P., Brazilian Policies that Encourage Deforestation in the Amazon, 19 WORLD DEV. 821 (1991).
15.Biven, Miranda, Administrative Developments: NIH Backs Federal Funding for Stem Cell Research, 27 J. L. MED. & ETHICS 95 (1999).
16.Blakeney, Michael, Bioprospecting and the Protection of Traditional Medical Knowledge of Indigenous Peoples: An Australian Perspective, 19 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 298 (1997).
17.Blakeney, Michael, The Protection of Traditional Knowledge under Intellectual Property Law, 22 EUR.INTELL. PROP. REV. 251 (2000).
18.Blunt, Paul, Selective Breeding and the Patenting of Living Organisms, 48 SYRACUSE L. REV. 1365 (1998).
19.Borg, Starla L., Note, Waiting for the River: The United States and European Union, Heads Up and High Stakes in the WTO - Genetically Modified Organisms in International Trade, 43 WASHBURN L.J. 681 (2004).
20.Bouchard, Ron A., Balancing Public And Private Interests In The Commercialization Of Publicly Funded Medical Research: Is There A Role For Compulsory Government Royalty Fees?, 13 B.U. J. SCI. & TECH. L. 129 (2007).
21.Boyle, Bryan J., Comment, Fishing for Utility with Expressed Sequence Tags After In re Fisher, 23 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 589 (2007).
22.Burns, William C., The International Convention to Combat Desertification: Drawing a Line in the Sand? 16 MICH. J. INT''L L. 831 (1995).
23.Bratspies, Rebecca M., Bridging the Genetic Divide: Confidence-Building Measures for Genetically Modified Crops, 44 JURIMETRICS J. 63 (2003).
24.Buechle, Kurt, The Great, Global Promise Of Genetically Modified Organisms: Overcoming Fear, Misconceptions, And The Cartagena Protocol On Biosafety, 9 IND. J. GLOBAL LEGAL STUD. 283 (2001).
25.Burk, Dan L. & Lemley Mark A., Policy Levers in Patent Law, 89 VA. L. REV. 1575 (2003).
26.Chan, Jeremiah & Fawcett Matthew, Footsteps of the Patent Troll, 10 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL. 1 (2005).
27.Chander, Anupam & Sunder, Madhavi, The Romance of the Public Domain, 92 CAL. L. REV. 1331 (2004).
28.Charnovitz, Steve, A World Environment Organization, 27 COLUM. J. ENVTL. L. 328 (2002).
29.Charnovitz, Steve, The Supervision of Health and Biosafety by World Trade Rules, 13 TUL.ENVTL . L.J. 271 (2000).
30.Chiang, Tun-Jen, A Cost-Benefit Approach to Patent Obviousness, 82 ST. JOHN''S L. REV. 39 (2008).
31.Chon, Margaret, Intellectual Property and the Development Divide, 27 CARDOZO L. REV. 2821 (2006).
32.Chen, Jim, Webs of Life: Biodiversity Conservation as a Species of Information Policy, 89 IOWA L. REV. 495 (2004).
33.Conforto, David, Traditional and Modern-Day Biopiracy: Redefining the Biopiracy Debate, 19 J. ENVTL. L. & LITIG 357 (2004).
34.Coombe, Rosemary J., Protecting Traditional Environmental Knowledge and New Social Movements in the Americas: Intellectual Property, Human Right, or Claims to an Alternative form of Sustainable Development?, 17 FLA J. INT''L L. 115 (2005).
35.Cornish, William R., Experimental Use of Patented Inventions in European Community States, 29 INT’L. REV. INTELL. PROP. & COPYRIGHT L. 735 (1998).
36.Costello, Christopher & Ward, Michael, Search, Bioprospecting, and Biodiversity Conservation, 52 J. ENVTL. ECON. & MGMT. 615 (2006).
37.Cotropia, Christopher A., Nonobviousness and the Federal Circuit: An Empirical Analysis of Recent Case Law, 82 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 911 (2007).
38.Crozier, R.H., Perserving The Information Content Of Species: Genetic Diversity Phylogeny, And Conservation Worth, 28 ANN. REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS 243 (1997).
39.Cullet, Philippe, Climate Change Liability And The Allocation Of Risk: Liability And Redress For Human-Induced Global Warming: Towards An International Regime, 26 STAN. ENVTL. L.J. 99 (2007).
40.Cullet, Philippe, Plant Variety Protection in Africa: Towards Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement, 45 J.AFRICAN L. 97 (2001).
41.Curci, Jonathan, The New Challenges to the International Patentability of Bio-technology: Legal Relations Between the WTO Treaty on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2 INT''L L. & MGMT. REV. 1 (2006).
42.Danish, Kyle W., International Environmental Law and the "Bottom-Up" Approach: A Review of the Desertification Convention, 3 IND. J. GLOBAL LEGAL STUD. 133 (1995).
43.DaSilva, Baydoun E. J. & Badran, A., Biotechnology and the Developing World, 5 ELECTRONIC J. OF BIOTECHNOLOGY 66 (2002).
44.Davis, Michael H., Some Realism About Indigenism, 11 CARDOZO J. INT''L & COMP. L. 815 (2003).
45.Day-Rubenstein, Kelly & Frisvold B. George, Genetic Prospecting and Biodiversity Development Agreements, 18 LAND USE POL''Y 205 (2001).
46.Downes, David, How Intellectual Property Could Be a Tool to Protect Traditional Knowledge, 25 COLUM. J. ENVTL. L. 253 (2000).
47.Downes, David R., The Convention on Biological Diversity: Seeds of Green Trade?, 8 TUL. ENVTL. L.J. 163 (1994).
48.Drahos, Peter, Indigenous Knowledge, Intellectual Property and Biopiracy: Is a Global Bio-Collecting Society the Answer?, 6 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 245 (2000).
49.Duall, Elizabeth, A Liability and Redress Regime for Genetically Modified Organisms Under the Cartagena Protocol, 36 GEO. WASH. INT’LL. REV. 173 (2004).
50.Duffy, John F., Inventing Invention: A Case Study of Legal Innovation, 86 TEX. L. REV. 1 (2007).
51.Duffy, John F., Rethinking the Prospect Theory of Patents, 71 U. CHI. L. REV. 439 (2004).
52.Duffy, John F. & Merges, Robert P., The Story of Graham v. John Deere Company: Patent Law''s Evolving Standard of Creativity, IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STORIES 109 (2006).
53.Dutfield, Graham, TRIPS-Related Aspects of Traditional Knowledge, 33 CASE W. RRS. J. INT’LL. 233 (2001).
54.Dwyer, Lorna, Biopiracy, Trade, and Sustainable Development, 19 COLO. J. INT''L ENVTL. L. & POL''Y 219 (2008).
55.Echols, Marsha A., Food Safety Regulation in the European Union and the United States: Different Cultures, Different Laws, 4 COLUM. J. EUR. L. 525 (1998).
56.Eshanov, Dinmukhamed, The Role of multinational Corporations From The Neoinstitutionalist and International law Perspectives: The Concept of The Three-Level Game, 16 N.Y.U. ENVTL. L.L. 110 (2008).
57.Feldman, Maryann, Where Science comes to Life: University Bioscience, Commercial Spin-Offs, and Regional Economic Development, 2 J. COMP. POL’Y ANALYSIS: RESEARCH & PRACTICE 352 (2000).
58.Fernandes, Sean, Annual Review 2008: Intellectual Property: Patent: Note: Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T: A Welcome Return to Patent Law’s Tradition of Territoriality, 23 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 75 (2008).
59.Flournoy, Alyson C., Beyond the Balance of Nature: Environmental Law Faces the New Ecology: Preserving Dynamic Systems: Wetlands, Ecology and Law, 7 DUKE ENVTL. L. & POL’Y F. 105 (1996).
60.Flynn, Julia, Europe Catches Biotech Fever, BUS. WEEK (INT''L ED.), 46 (1996).
61.Fowler, Cary, By Policy or Law? The Challenge of Determining the Status and Future of Agro-Biodiversity, 3 J. TECH. L. & POL''Y 1, PP 36 (1997).
62.Frischmann, Brett M. & Lemley, Mark A., Spillovers, 107 COLUM.L. REV. 257 (2007).
63.Gaston, Gretchen L. & Abate, Randall S., The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization: Can the Two Coexist? 12 PACE INT''LL. REV. 107 (2000).
64.Gatto, Marino & Leo, Giulio A., Pricing Biodiversity And Ecosystem Services: The Never-Ending Story, 50 BIOSCIENCE 347 (2000).
65.Gervais, Daniel J., Spiritual but not Intellectual? The Protection of Sacred Intangible Traditional Knowledge, 11 CARDOZO J. INT’L & COMP L. 467 (2003).
66.Ghosh, Shubha, Globalization, Patents, and Traditional Knowledge, 17 COLUM. J. ASIAN LAW 73 (2003).
67.Glowka, Lyle, Bioprospecting, Alien Invasive Species, and Hydrothermal Vents: Three Emerging Legal Issues in the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity, 13 TUL. ENVTL. L.J. 329 (2000).
68.Goeschl, Timo, The Law And Economics Of Development And Environment: Incentivizing Ecological Destruction? The Global Joint Regulation Of The Conservation And Use Of Genetic Resources, 38 IND. L. REV. 625 (2005).
69.Goldman, Karen A., Compensation for Use of Biological Resources Under The Convention on Biological Diversity: Compatibility of Conservation Measures and Competitiveness of the Biotechnology Industry, 25 LAW & POL''Y INT''L BUS. 695 (1994).
70.Gollin, Michael A., Answering the Call: Public Interest Intellectual Property Advisors, 17 WASH. U. J.L. & POL''Y 187 (2005).
71.Gollin, Michael & Laird, Sarah, Global Policies, Local Actions: The Role of National Legislation in Sustainable Biodiversity Prospecting, 2 B.U. J. SCI. & TECH. L. 16 (1996).
72.Gowdy, John M., The Value Of Biodiversity: Markets, Society, And Ecosystems, 73 LAND ECON. 25 (1997).
73.Guruswamy, Lakshman D., Sustainable Agriculture: Do GMOs Imperil Biosafety?, 9 IND. J. GLOBAL LEGAL STUD. 461 (2002).
74.Guzman, Andrew T., International Antitrust and the WTO: The Lesson from Intellectual Property, 43 VA. J. INT''L L. 933 (2003).
75.Haapala, John E., Jr., Farmers'' Rights, 19 J. ENVTL. L. & LITIG. 467 (2004).
76.Hamilton, Neil D., Legal Issues Shaping Society''s Acceptance of Biotechnology and Genetically Modified Organisms, 6 DRAKE J. AGRIC. L. 81 (2001).
77.Halewood, Peter, On Commodification and Self-Ownership, 20 YALE J.L. & HYUMAN. 131 (2008).
78.Hamilton, Neil D., Plowing New Ground: Emerging Policy Issues in a Changing Agriculture, 2 DRAKEJ. AGRIC. L. 181 (1997).
79.Harper, John L. & Hawksworth, L. D., Biodiversity: Measurement and Estimation, 345 PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY LONDON SERIES B, 5 (1994).
80.Heald, Paul J., The Rhetoric of Biopiracy, 11 CARDOZO J. INT''L & COMP. L. 51 (2003).
81.Helfer, Laurence R., Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking, 29 YALE J. INT''L L. 1 (2004).
82.Heller, Michael A., The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets, 111 HARV. L. REV. 621 (1998).
83.Heifer, Laurence R., Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking, 29 YALE J. INT''L L. 3 (2004).
84.Ho, Cynthia M., Biopiracy and Beyond: A Consideration of Socio-Cultural Conflicts with Global Patent Policies, 39 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 433 (2006).
85.Horton, Curtis M., Protecting Biodiversity and Cultural Diversity Under Intellectual Property Law: Toward a New International System, 10 J. ENVTL. L. & LITIG. 1 (1995).
86.Hubbard, Amanda, Comment, The Convention on Biological Diversity''s Fifth Anniversary: A General Overview of the Convention - Where Has It Been and Where Is It Going?, 10 TUL. ENVTL. L.J. 415 (1997).
87.Hughes, Justin, The Personality Interest of Artists and Inventors in Intellectual Property, 16 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 81 (1998).
88.Hunter, Christopher J., Comment, Sustainable Bioprospecting: Using Private Contracts and International Legal Principles and Policies to Conserve Raw Medicinal Materials, 25 B.C. ENVTL. AFF. L. REV. 129 (1997).
89.Jacoby, Craig D. & Weiss, Charles, Recognizing Property Rights in Traditional Biocultural Contributions, 16 STAN. ENV. L.J. 74 (1997).
90.Jacquemont, Frederic & Caparros, Alejandro, The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Climate Change Convention 10 Years After Rio: Towards a Synergy of the Two Regimes?, 11 REV. EUR. COMMUNITY AND INT''L ENVTL L. 169 (2002).
91.Jahn, Richard, Comment: Experimental Use Exceptions: Changes In Research Tool Patent Protection In The United States And A Comparison To Japan, 30 DEL. J. CORP. L. 925 (2005).
92.Jain, Meetali, Global Trade and the New Millennium: Defining the Scope of Intellectual Property Protection of Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge in India, 22 HASTINGS INT''L & COMP. L. REV. 777 (1999).
93.Jamal, Alia, The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa; Implementing Agenda 21, 6 REV. EUR. CMTY. & INT''L ENVTL. L. 1 (1997).
94.Jameson, Samantha, A Comparison of the Patentability and Patent Scope of Biotechnological Inventions in the United States and the European Union, 35 AIPLA Q.J. 193 (2007).
95.Jones, Owen D. & Goldsmith, Timothy H., Law and Behavioral Biology, 105 COLUM. L. REV. 405 (2005).
96.Karjala, Dennis S., Biotech Patents and Indigenous People, 7 MINN. J. L. SCI. & TECH. 483 (2006).
97.Kennedy, Kevin C., Resolving International Sanitary and Phytosanitary Disputes in the WTO: Lessons and Future Directions, 55 FOOD & DRUG L.J. 81 (2000).
98.Kohls, Maggie, Blackbeard or Albert Schweitzer: Reconciling Biopiracy, 6 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 108 (2007).
99.Koo, Bonwoo, Carol Nottenburg & Philip G. Pardey, Plants and Intellectual Property: An International Appraisal, 306 SCIENCE 1295 (2004).
100.Koss, Cara, Oysters & Oligonucleotides: Concerns And Proposals For Patenting Research Tools, 25 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT L.J. 747 (2007).
101.Kruger, Muria, Harmonising TRIPS and the CBD: A Proposal from India, 10 MIN. J. GLOBAL TRADE 169 (2001).
102.Krumenacher, Thomas J., Comment, Protection for Indigenous Peoples and Their Traditional Knowledge: Would a Registry System Reduce the Misappropriation of Traditional Knowledge?, 8 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 143 (2004).
103.Kuhn, Jeffrey M., Patentable Subject Matter Matters: New Uses For An Old Doctrine, 22 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 92 (2007).
104.Kumar, Sapna & Rai, Arti, Synthetic Biology: The Intellectual Property Puzzle, 85 TEX. L. REV. 1745 (2007).
105.Kusler, Jon, Wetlands Delineation: An Issue of Science or Politics?, 34 ENV''T 7 (1992).
106.Landes, William M. & Posner, Richard A., Indefinitely Renewable Copyright, 70 U. CHI. L. REV. 471 (2003).
107.Lemley, Mark A., Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding, 83 TEX. L. REV. 1031 (2005).
108.Lesko, Lawrence J. & Woodcock, Janet, Translation of Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacogenetics: A Regulatory Perspective, 3 NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY 763 (2004).
109.Levy, Charles S., Implementing TRIPs -- A Test of Political Will, 31 LAW & POL''Y INT''L BUS. 789 (2000).
110.Liang, Bryan A., Regulating Follow-On Biologics, 44 HARV. J. ON LEGIS. 363 (2007).
111.Lively, Sarah, Comment, The ABCs and NTBs of GMOs: The Great European Union-United States Trade Debate--Do European Restrictions on the Trade of Genetically Modified Organisms Violate International Trade Law?, 23 NW. J. INT''L L. & BUS. 239 (2002).
112.Lubar, Steven, The Transformation of Antebellum Patent Law, 32 TECH. & CULTURE 932 (1991).
113.Mandel, Gregory N., Patently Non-Obvious: Empirical Demonstration That the Hindsight Bias Renders Patent Decisions Irrational, 67 OHIO ST. L.J. 1391 (2006).
114.Mandel, Gregory N., Patently Non-Obvious II: Experimental Study on the Hindsight Issue Before the Supreme Court in KSR v. Teleflex, 9 YALE J.L. & TECH. 1 (2007).
115.Mandel, Gregory N., The Non-Obvious Problem: How the Indeterminate Non-Obvious Standard Produces Excessive Patent Grants, 42 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 57 (2008).
116.Mandel, Gregory N., The Generic Biologics Debate: Industry''s Unintended Admission that Biotech Patents Fail Enablement, 11 VA. J.L. & TECH. 8 (2006).
117.Marden, Emily, The Neem Tree Patent: International Conflict over the Commodification of Life, 22 B.C. INT''L & COMP. L. REV. 279 (1999).
118.Mark, Harming, An Examination of the Possibility to Secure Intellectual Property Rights for Plant Genetic Resources Developed by Indigenous Peoples of the NAFTA States: Domestic Legislation Under the International Convention for the Protection of New Plant Varieties, 13 ARIZ. J. INT''L & COMP. L. 175 (2004).
119.McCabe, Kevin W., The January 1999 Review of Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement: Diverging Views of Developed and Developing Countries Toward the Patentability of Biotechnology, 6 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 41 (1998).
120.McClelland, Lynn, Bioprospecting: Market Based Solutions to Biopiracy, 2004 UCLA J.L. & TECH 8 at 1 (2004).
121.McGarrigle, Philip & Norviel, Vern, Laws of Nature and the Business of Biotechnology, 24 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 275 (2008).
122.McManis, Charles, Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Protection: Thinking Globally, Acting Locally, 11 CARDOZO J. INT''L & COMP. L. 547 (2004).
123.McManis, Charles R., The Interface Between International Intellectual Property and Environmental Protection: Biodiversity and Biotechnology, 76 WASH. U. L.Q. 255 (1998).
124.McNeeley, A. Jeffrey et al., The Convention on Biological Diversity: Promise and Frustration, 4 J. ENV''T & DEV. 33 (1995).
125.Merges, Robert P., Commercial Success and Patent Standards: Economic Perspectives on Innovation, 76 CAL. L. REV. 803 (1988).
126.Mgbeoji, Ikechi, Patents and Traditional Knowledge of the Uses of Plants: Is a Communal Patent Regime Part of the Solution to the Scourge of Bio Piracy?, 9 IND. J. GLOBAL LEGAL STUD. 163 (2001).
127.Michaels, Dennis, Bioprospecting Agreements: Forging a Comprehensive Strategy for Managing Genetic Resources on Public Lands, 22 SPG-ENVIRONS ENVTL. L. & POL''Y J. 3 (1999).
128.Moyer, Thomas J., Biotechnology And The Bar: A Response To The Growing Divide Between Science And The Legal Environment, 22 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 675 (2007).
129.Mueller, Janice M., Patent Misuse Through the Capture of Industry Standards, 17 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 623 (2002).
130.Mueller, Janice M., The Evolving Application of the Written Description Requirement to Biotechnological Inventions, 13 BERKELEY TECH L.J. 615 (1998).
131.Mullins, Meredith, Stemming the Tide of Research and Constitutional Challenges: Embryonic Stem Cell Legislation, 85 U. DET. MERCY L. REV. 227 (2008).
132.Murphy, Sean D., Biotechnology and International Law, 42 HARV. INT''L L. J. 47 (2001).
133.Myers, Norman et al., Biodiversity Hotspots For Conservations Priorities, 403 NATURE 853 (2000).
134.Naomi, Roht-Arriaza, Of Seeds and Shamans: The Appropriation of the Scientific and Technical Knowledge of Indigenous and Local Communities, 17 MICH. J. INT''L L. 919 (1996).
135.Nelson, Amy, Is There an International Solution to Intellectual Property Protection for Plants?, 37 GEO. WASH. INT''L L. REV. 997 (2005).
136.Nicholson, David R., Agricultural Biotechnology and Genetically-Modified Foods: Will the Developing World Bite?, 8 VA. J.L. & TECH. 7 (2003).
137.Nowierski, Lauren M., A Defense of Patenting Human Gene Sequences Und Er U.S. Law: Support for The Patenting of Isolated and Purified Substances, 26 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT L.J. 473 (2008).
138.Nwabueze, N. Remigius, Ethnopharmacology, Patents and the Politics of Plants'' Genetic Resources, 11 CARDOZO J. INT''L & COMP. L. 585 (2003).
139.Oddi, Samuel, TRIPS-Natural Rights and a "Polite Form of Economic Imperialism", 29 VAND. J. TRANSNAT''L L. 415 (1996).
140.Ong, Burton T., Patenting the Biological Bounty of Nature: Re-examining the Status of Organic Inventions as Patentable Subject Matter, 8 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 1 (2004).
141.Ott, Robyn, Protection of Plant Varieties and the Farmer''s Rights Act, 2 OKLA. J. L. & TECH. 14 (2004).
142.Overwalle, Van Gertrui, Protecting and Sharing Biodiversity and Traditional knowledge: Holder and User Tools, 53 ECOLOGICAL ECON. 585 (2005).
143.Parenteau, Patrick A., Rearranging The Deck Chairs: Endangered Species Act Reforms In An Era Of Mass Extinction, 22 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL''Y REV. 227 (1998).
144.Patel, Shennie, The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species: Enforcement and the Last Unicorn, 18 HOUS. J. INT''L L. 157 (1995).
145.Peel, Jacqueline, A GMO by any other Name... Might be an SPS Risk!, 17 EUR. J. INT''L L. 1009 (2006).
146.Pimentel, David et al., Economic And Environmental Benefits Of Biodiversity, 47 BIOSCIENCE 747 (1997).
147.Petersen, Kirsten, Recent Intellectual Property Trends in Developing Countries, 33 HARV. INT''L L. J. 277 (1992).
148.Polasky, Steven & Solow, Andrew R., On the Value of a Collection of Species, 29 J. ENVTL. ECON. & MGMT. 298 (1995).
149.Ragavan, Srividhya, Protection of Traditional Knowledge, 2 MINN. INTELL. PROP. REV. 1 (2001).
150.Rausser, Gordon C. & Small, Arthur A., Valuing Research Leads: Bioprospecting and the Conservation of Genetic Resources, 108 J. POL. ECON. 173 (2000).
151.Raustiala, Kal & Victor, David G.., The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources, 58 INT''L ORG. 277 (2004).
152.Raven, Peter H., What Have We Lost, What Are We Losing?, IN THE BIODIVERSITY CRISIS 57 (2001).
153.Restaino, et al., Patenting DNA-Related Inventions in the European Union, United States and Japan: A Trilateral Approach or a Study in Contrast?, 2003 UCKA J.L. & TECH. 2 (2003).
154.Riley, Angela R., Straight Stealing: Towards an Indigenous System of Cultural Property Protection, 80 WASH. L. RRV. 87 (2005).
155.Rubin, Steven M. & Fish, Stanwood C., Biodiversity Prospecting: Using Innovative Contractual Provisions to Foster Ethnobotanical Knowledge, TECHNOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 5 COLO. J. INT''L ENVTL. L. & POL''Y, 23 (1994).
156.Safrin, Sabrina, Hyperownership in a Time of Biotechnological Promise: The International Conflict to Control the Building Blocks of Life, 98 AM. J. INT''L L. 641 (2004).
157.Sarma, Akshmi, Note & Comment, Biopiracy: Twentieth Century Imperialism in the Form of International Agreements, 13 TEMP. INT''L & COMP. L.J. 107 (1999).
158.Scafidi, Susan, Intellectual Property and Cultural Products, 81 B.U. L. REV. 793 (2001).
159.Scott, Miller Joseph, Remixing Obviousness, 16 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 237 (2008).
160.Scuro, Alexandra, Are GMOs Good Or Bad Seeds In The Developing World?: A Discussion Of The Growing Role Of Developing Countries In The Debate Over Climate Change And The Loss Of Biodiversity, 18 FORDHAM ENVTL. LAW J. 369 (2007).
161.Sedjo, Roger, Property Rights, Genetic Resources, and Biotechnological Change, 35 J.L. & ECON. 199 (1992).
162.Sell, Susan K., Industry Strategies for Intellectual Property and Trade: The Quest for TRIPS, and Post-TRIPS Strategies, 10 CARDOZO J. INT''L & COMP. L. 79 (2002).
163.Sell, Susan K., Post-TRIPS Developments: The Tension Between Commercial and Social Agendas in the Context of Intellectual Property, 14 FLA. J. INT''L L. 193, 206 (2002).
164.Shands, Henry L., Current Status of Access and Availability of Plant Genetic Resources, 19 J. ENVTL. L. & LITIG. 455 (2004).
165.Simon, Bradford S., Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge: A Psychological Approach to Conflicting Claims of Creativity in International Law, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1613 (2005).
166.Simpson, David R. & Sedjo, Roger A., Commercialization of Indigenous Genetic Resources, CONTEMP. ECON. POL''Y 34 (1994).
167.Smagadi, Aphrodite, Analysis Of The Objectives Of The Convention On Biological Diversity: Their Interrelation And Implementation Guidance For Access And Benefit Sharing, 31 COLUM. L. ENVTL. L. 243(2006).
168.Storrow, Richard F., The Bioethics of Prospective Parenthood: In Pursuit of the Proper Standard for Gatekeeping in Infertility Clinics, 28 CARDOZO L. REV. 2283 (2007).
169.Strandburg, Katherine J., Users as Innovators: Implications for Patent Doctrine, 79 U. COLO. L. REV. 467 (2008).
170.Strauss, Debra M., Feast or Famine: The Impact of the WTO Decision Favoring the U.S. Biotechnology Industry in the EU Ban of Genetically Modified Foods, 45 AM. BUS. L. J. 775 (2008).
171.Streiffer, Robert, At the Edge of Humanity: Human Stem Cells, Chimeras, and Moral Status, 15 KENNEDY INST. ETHICS J. 347 (2005).
172.Sylvia, Davidson, Is British Biotech''s Marimastat A Major Cancer Drug?, 14 NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY 819 (1996).
173.Tal, Alon & Cohen, Jessica A., Bringing "TOP-DOWN" TO "BOTTOM-UP": A New Role For Environmental Legislation In Combating Desertification, 31 HARV. ENVTL. L. REV. 163 (2007).
174.Taylor, R. & Cayford J., American Patent Policy, Biotechnology and African Agriculture: The Case for Policy Change, 17 HARV. J.L. & TECH. 321 (2004).
175.Thomas, John R., Liberty and Property in the Patent Law, 39 HOUS. L. REV. 569(2002).
176.Tilford, David S., Saving the Blueprints: The International Legal Regime for Plant Resources, 30 CASE W. RES. J. INT''L L. 373 (1998).
177.Vertinsky, Liza & Rice, Todd M., Thinking About Thinking Machines: Implications of Machine Inventors for Patent Law, 8 B.U. J. SCI. & TECH. L. 574 (2002).
178.Venbrux, Greg K., When Two Worlds Collide: Ownership of Genetic Resources under the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 U. PITT. J. TECH. L. & POL''Y. 5 (2005).
179.Victor, David G.., The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade Organization: An Assessment After Five Years, 32 NYUJ. INT’LL. & POL. 865 (2000).
180.Vogt, David B., Protecting Indigenous Knowledge in Latin America: Maintaining Biological Diversity, Creating Relationships, and Returning Benefits to Native Communities for Ethno-Botanical Drug Discoveries - Can It Be Done?, 3 OR. REV. INT''L L. 12 (2001).
181.Wagers, Amy J. & Weissman, Irving L., Plasticity of Adult Stem Cells, 116 CELL 639 (2004).
182.Walter, Carrie F., Intellectual Property Law Review 1999, 31 INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 195 (1999).
183.Woods, Michael, Food for Thought: The Biopiracy of Jasmine and Basmati Rice, 12 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 123 (2002).
184.Woessner, Warren D., The Evolution of Patents on Life - Transgenic Animals, Clones and Stem Cells, 83 J. PAT. & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC''Y 830 (2001).
185.Wright, Brian D. & Pardey, Philip G., The Evolving Rights to Intellectual Property Protection in The Agricultural Biosciences, 2 INT''L J. TECH. & GLOBALISATION 12, 3 (2006).
186.Wu, Jun, Rewinding Time: Advances in Mitigating Hindsight Bias in Patent Obviousness Analysis, 97 KY. L.J. 565, 565 (2008).
187.Wu, Annie O., Note, Surpassing the Material: The Human Rights Implications of Informed Consent in Bioprospecting Cells Derived from Indigenous People Groups, 78 WASH. U. L.Q. 979 (2000).

Internet
1.A Brief Introduction to the Convention on Biological Diversity, at http://www.iisd.ca/biodiv/cbdintro.html (last visited Feb. 18, 2008).
2.Aaron Cosbey & Stas Burgil, International Institute For Sustainable Development, The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: An Analysis of Results: An Iisd Briefing Note (2000), at http://iisd1.iisd.ca/pdf/biosafety.pdf (last visited Mar. 2, 2008).
3.About BIO, at http://bio.org/aboutbio/ (last visited Dec. 02, 2006).
4.Captain Hook Awards for Biopiracy 2006, ETC Group, at http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/18/01/etccom.2006hookfinal.pdf (last visited Nov. 29, 2006).
5.Carol Lewis, A New Kind of Fish Story: The Coming of Biotech Animals, 2001 FDA CONSUMER MAGAZINE, Jan.-Feb. (2001), at http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2001/101_fish.html (last visited Mar. 2, 2008).
6.CITES, Mar. 3, 1973, 27 U.S.T. 1087, 993 U.N.T.S. 243, Appendices I, II, and III (June 26, 2006), at http://www.cites.org/eng/app/appendices.pdf (last visited Feb. 25, 2008).
7.Convention on Biological Diversity art. 2, June 5, 1992, 31 I.L.M. 818, at http://www.biodiv.org/convention/convention.shtml (last visited Feb. 2, 2008)
8.Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, How CITES works, at http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/how.shtml (last visited Feb. 25, 2008).
9.David Olson, Patentable Subject Matter: The Problem of the Absent Gatekeeper 3-4 (Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society 2006), at http://ssrn.com/abstract=933167 (last visited May. 23, 2008).
10.Embryonic Stem Cell Research at UW-Madison, at http://www.news.wisc.edu/packages/stemcells/, 2001 (last visited May. 8, 2006).
11.European Patent Office, Biotechnology in European Patents - Threat or Promise? (Mar. 25, 2008), at http://www.epo.org/topics/issues/biotechnology.html.(last visited Dec. 23, 2008).
12.Global Biotechnology Report 2008, at http://www.eycom.ch/media/mediareleases/releases/20080520/en.aspx (last visited Jul. 01, 2009).
13.Harvard Onco-Mouse Not Patentable in Canada, Barristers & Solicitors, Dec. 5, 2002 (Special Report), at http://www.barrigar.com/harvard0212.pdf.(last visited Dec. 25, 2008).
14.Harvard College v. Canada (Comm''r of Patents), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 45 (Can.); Case T315/03, Harvard/Transgenic Animal, [2005] E.P.O.R. 271 (Technical Bd. App. 2004), at http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/pdf/t030315ex1.pdf.(last visited Oct. 19, 2008).
15.Karolinska Institutet, World Class Source of Knowledge, at http://ki.se/ki/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=7121&a=14493&l=en (last visited Feb. 17, 2008).
16.Kevin Keener, et al., Biotechnology and its Applications, at http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/foodsci/ext/pubs/bioapp.pdf (last visited Oct. 27, 2008).
17.Kilburn & Strode, May 17, 2005, at http://www.kstrode.co.uk/news/NewsDet.asp?RID=174&NewsType=Current.(last visited Mar. 2, 2009).
18.Nat''l. Inst. of Health, Stem Cell Information: Stem Cell Basics (2002), at http://stemcells.nih.gov/staticresources/info/basics/StemCellBasics.pdf.(last visited Aug. 22, 2006).
19.National Health Museum, Tools for Genetic Ingenuity: How Can You Remember These Uses of Biotechnology?, at http://www.accessexcellence.org/RC/AB/BA/aapost/remember.html (last visited Jan. 12, 2008).
20.NIH, Definitions Related to Technology Transfer and Research Tools, at http://www.nih.gov/news/researchtools/appendb.htm (last visited Apr. 13, 2008).
21.Peter Hazell, Strategies for the Sustainable Development of Dryland Areas, The Global Drylands Partnership (Sept. 2001), at http://www.undp.org/seed/unso/globalpartnership/docs%20/Strategies-C.doc (last visited Feb. 26, 2008).
22.Priya Shetty, Biodiverse countries call for tighter patent rules, at http://www.scidev.net/dossiers/index.cfm?fuseaction=dossierReadItem&type=1&itemid=1954&language=5&dossier=11&CFID=6975462&CFTOKEN=28937891(last visited Dec. 20, 2006).
23.Sarah Fowler, The International and National Frameworks for Conservation and Management of Sharks 11 (2005), at http://www.iucn.org/themes/marine/pdf/ecuadornpoa-fowler.pdf. (last visited Feb. 25, 2008).
24.Staff Background Paper, Human Genetic Enhancement (Dec. 2002), at http://www.bioethics.gov/background/humangenetic.html (last visited Apr. 25, 2008).
25.The Ramsar Convention Bureau, Background Papers on Wetland Values and Functions, at http://www.ramsar.org/values_intro_e.htm (last visited Feb. 26, 2008).
26.Tove Iren S. Gerhardsen, UN Meeting Adopts Draft Global Regime on Use Of Genetic Resources, IP-Watch, Feb. 3, 2006, at http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=213&res=1024&print=0 (last visited Feb. 24, 2008).
27.International union for the protection of new varietyof plants, http://www.upov.int/en, (last visited Feb. 24, 2008).
28.USDA, Glossary of Agricultural Biotechnology Terms, at http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/s.70A/701OB? (last visited Jul. 02, 2009).
29.Vandana Shiva, Basmati Biopiracy: Ricetec must withdraw all patent claims for basmati seeds and plants," The Hindustan Times (Nov. 20, 2000) at http://www.vshiva.net/Articles/Basmati/biopiracy.htm (last visited Feb. 18, 2008).
30.Whose importance is underlined by Principle 5 in Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Addis Ababa Principles and Guidelines for the Sustainable Use of Biodiversity 12-13 (2004), at http://www.biodiv.org/doc/publications/addis-gdl-en.pdf (last visited Dec. 5, 2006).
31.WIPO, Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, Document Prepared by the Secretariat: Consolidated Survey of Intellectual Property Protection of Traditional Knowledge, WIPO/GRTKF/IC/5/7 (July 7-15, 2003), at http://www.wipo.int/documents/en/meetings/2003/igc/pdf/grt kf_ic_5_7.pdf.(last visited Feb. 26, 2008).

Cases
1.Lowell v. Lewis, 15 F. Cas. 1018, 1019 (C.C.D. Mass. 1817)
2.Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127 (1948).
3.Brenner v. Manson, 383 U.S. 519, 534-35 (1966).
4.Diamond V. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 318 (1980).
5.Ex Parte Allen, 2 Uspq 2D 1425, 1427 (B.P.A.I.1987).
6.Ex Parte Hibberd, 227 Uspq 443 (B.P.A.I. 1985).
7.Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127 (1948).