:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:醫院導入平衡計分卡影響因素之探討
書刊名:商業現代化學刊
作者:李焙偉時台華賴美嬌
作者(外文):Lee, Pe-weShih, Tai-huaLai, Mei-chiao
出版日期:2011
卷期:6:2
頁次:頁213-228
主題關鍵詞:平衡計分卡成功關鍵因素窒礙難行因素Balance scorecardKey successful factorsObstacles
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:39
台灣的醫療市場因全民健保總額制度、論病例計酬、診斷關連群制度之實施,使得各醫院的競爭更加激烈,因此須不斷改善服務品質及經營策略,來增加競爭力,求得永續經營。因此醫療院所紛紛導入企業界之經營管理技術,重視品質與管理策略,以期有良好績效。Grady(1991)認為績效評估制度應作為組織策略與活動的溝通橋樑,使高階管理者的願景轉化成中階管理者的策略與行動計劃,而平衡計分卡剛好滿足這項需求。然而許多企業在推動平衡計分卡時並未成功,最後不但無法衡量績效,反而造成金錢與時間的浪費。緣此,本研究旨在探討醫院員工對於平衡計分卡的認知、推行態度,來分析探討推動平衡計分卡制度在醫院管理的成功關鍵(Key Successful Factors)及窒礙難行因素。本研究之研究工具分為結構式問卷和深度訪談兩大部分。研究問卷是參考義大醫院之平衡計分卡問卷所修訂而成,而深度訪談則由研究者根據文獻探討訂定訪談題綱,經專家修訂而成。研究結果發現一、醫院員工對BSC之認知程度總平均為3.49,表示約70%的員工是了解BSC;而推行態度總平均為3.65,表示約73%員工是對醫院推動BSC持肯定之態度。二、施行平衡計分卡主要成功關鍵因素是醫院要有一定的規模和財務能力;實質公平且公正的評估員工的績效;教育訓練員工,確保平衡計分卡相關知識及技能可平順且完整的移轉至組織平台;建立完整的績效考核管理系統,建立激勵獎酬制度與平衡計分卡之連結。三、在推動平衡計分卡窒礙難行之處的部份為:無充足或適當的人力;績效衡量指標訂定不易;現有資訊系統無法配合;無法與現行績效制度結合;員工抗拒制度的推行;醫院高層單位缺乏興趣與支持,都是實施平衡計分卡之障礙。
The implementation of National Health Insurance in 1995, it has carried out many impacts and problems to our medical industries, and one of them is the determination of hospital performance and criteria. Kaplan and Norton (1996) advocated Balanced Score Card (BSC) as a strategic management instrument and as an appropriate instrument to measure organizational performance. It would clarify and translate vision and strategy; communicate and link strategic objectives and measures; would be able to plan, set targets and align strategic initiatives; and to enhance strategic feedback and learning (p.10). The BSC supplements traditional financial measures with three additional perspectives: the customer, the internal business process, and the learning and growth perspective. It is supposed to be a tool for describing an organization's overall performance across a number of measures on a regular basis. An important characteristic of BSC is that the tool is focused on corporations or organizational units such as strategic business units, not on business processes. It looks at business processes only as far as they have a greater impact on customer satisfaction and achieve an organization's financial objectives (Kaplan & Norton, 1996, p. 27).The aims of this research are described as follows:(1) To investigate employees' perception and attitudes towards the implementation of Balance Scorecard in a hospital.(2) To identify the key successful factors in implementing Balance Scorecard.(3) To understand the Obstacles to implement Balance Scorecard.
期刊論文
1.Maisel, L. S.(1992)。Performance Measurement: the Balanced Scorecard Approach。Journal of Cost Management for the Manufacturing Industry,6(2),47-52。  new window
2.彭雅惠(200203)。醫療產業實施平衡計分卡的問題探討。醫務管理期刊,3(1),26-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Kaplan, R. S.、Norton, D. P.(1993)。Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work。Harvard Businesses Review,71(5),134-142。  new window
4.Lingle, John H.、Schiemann, William A.(1996)。From Balanced Scorecard to Strategic Gauges: Is Measurement Worth It?。Management Review,85(3),56-61。  new window
5.Ingraham, P. Wallace、Selden, S. C.、Moynihan, D. P.(2000)。People and Performance: Challenges for the Future Public Service--the Report from the Wye River Conference。Public Administration Review,60(1),54-60。  new window
6.Ittner, Christopher D.、Larcker, David F.(1998)。Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications。Journal of Management Accounting Research,10,205-238。  new window
7.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1992)。The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance。Harvard Business Review,70(1),71-79。  new window
8.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system。Harvard Business Review,74(1),75-85。  new window
9.吳安妮(20030600)。平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合。會計研究月刊,211,45-54。  延伸查詢new window
10.王森信(2003)。運用平衡計分卡驅動企業價值的成長。品質月刊,2003(2),19-22。  延伸查詢new window
11.伍忠賢(2003)。策略績效指標和衡量--兼論平衡計分卡。品質月刊,2003(2),44-48。  延伸查詢new window
12.吳安妮(2003)。策略才是平衡計分卡的精神所在。會計研究月刊,211,36。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳永生(2003)。平衡計分卡之探討。品質月刊,2003(2),32-35。  延伸查詢new window
14.楊錦洲(2004)。平衡計分卡是企業永續經營的重要工具。品質月刊,67-71。  延伸查詢new window
15.廖志德(1999)。台積電以頂尖人才打造世界級企業的新績效制度。能力雜誌,5,34-39。  延伸查詢new window
16.Harvey, M. G.、Lusch, R. R.(1999)。Balancing the intellectual capital books: Intangible liabilities。European Management Journal,17,85-92。  new window
17.Kaplan、Norton(1996)。Using the balanced scorecard as strategic management system。Harvard Business Review,January/February,75-78。  new window
會議論文
1.吳安妮(2002)。平衡計分卡在公務機關的應用。研發創新與策略運用學術研討會,行政院研究考核委員會 。台北。1-60。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳安妮(2001)。公務機關實施平衡計分卡及績效評估及管理制度之探討:以主計處會計作業小組為對象。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊日融(2003)。咖啡店經營關鍵成功因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳旭倚(2006)。法催公司導入平衡計分卡制度之探討--以個案公司為例。私立大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.許祐寧(2006)。醫療機構導入平衡計分卡過程之研究--以某公立醫院為例。長庚大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳欣怡(2007)。建構醫院之策略地圖與平衡計分卡--以某區域教學醫院為例。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃寓平(2004)。以平衡計分卡觀點建立公務機關績效評估制度--以區公所為例。華梵大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.萬貴然(2004)。運用平衡計分卡架構探討製造業導入ERP系統對經營績效之影響。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.廖美惠(2008)。以平衡計分卡為主軸的醫院管理:以某區域教學醫院為例。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.嚴靜錡(2004)。以平衡計分卡觀念設計智慧資本內部報導之探索性研究--以某個案公司為對象。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Niven, P. R.(2002)。Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining result。New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc。  new window
2.Niven, Paul R.、于泳泓(2002)。平衡計分卡最佳實務--按部就班,成功導入。台北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kaplan, R. S.、Norton, D. P.(2001)。The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment。Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation。  new window
4.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action。Boston:Harvard Business School Press。  new window
5.楊銘欽、董鈺琪、陳進堂、黃莉蓉、顏志展(2008)。醫療健康產業平衡計分卡理論與實務。台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.Olve, Nils-Goran、Roy, Jan、Magnus, Wetter(1999)。A Practical Guid to Using the Balanced Scorecard。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE