:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小學童作文自我效能量表之發展
書刊名:高雄師大學報. 教育與社會科學類
作者:黃永和 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Yung-ho
出版日期:2012
卷期:32
頁次:頁1-24
主題關鍵詞:作文寫作自我效能作文自我效能CompositionWritingSelf-efficacyComposition-writing self-efficacy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:47
本研究的目的乃在發展一具有信、效度的國小學童作文自我效能量表,並分析受試樣本的自我效能現況,藉以為國內作文自我效能的教學與研究提供更堅實的基礎。本研究以「作文」寫作任務作為所要測量的特定領域,首先根據好的作文表現特徵與自我效能測量原則,編製出「國小學童作文自我效能量表」,然後選擇 166位國小五年級學童進行量表施測。施測分析結果顯示,本研究所發展的作文自我效能量表具有良好的信、效度品質,包括: (1)各題項具有良好的鑑別度與同質性,高低分組受試者在各題項上的差異均達顯著水準 (t值介於 9~20之間),各題項與量表總分的相關係數均達顯著水準 (積差相關係數介於 .69~.86之間);(2)各題項可測量一共同因素,因素分析結果之因素負荷量均達 .70以上,可解釋變異達 66.52%;(3)信度極佳,Cronbach α信度係數達.95;(4)效標關聯效度良好,與成就表現的積差相關係數為 .48,與作文興趣的積差相關係數為 .60,均達顯著水準; (5)中介變項檢定結果符合自我效能的理論假定與相關研究結果,能顯示作文自我效能在作文興趣與成就表現之間,具有中介變項的特徵。此外,受試樣本的作文自我效能現況分析結果則顯示,國小五年級學童七成具有中程度以上的作文自我效能,而且以語文基本能力的效能較高,並已開始在部份題項上產生明顯性別差異的現象。最後,本研究針對作文教學與自我效能研究提出數點建議。
The purpose of this study was to develop a scale for assessing elementary school students’ composition-writing self-efficacy, and then to describe the profiles of the efficacy of the 166 fifth-grade students. Based on the result of literature review, a draft of the Composition-Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (CWSES) was brought out. The item analysis, factor analysis, criterion-related analysis, and Cronbach’s α were employed to assess its validity and reliability. The results indicated that the CWSES owned its excellent validity and reliability. The cumulative percentage of variance of the scale was 66.52%. The Cronbach’s α was .95. Finally, the profiles of the efficacy of the 166 fifth-grade students were described as follows: (1) most students have above average efficacy; (2) the students had higher efficacy with basic writing skills; (3) the trend of their efficacy was toward gender differentiation.
期刊論文
1.Shell, D. F.、Murphy, C. C.、Bruning, R. H.(1989)。Self-efficacy and Outcome Expectancy Mechanisms in Reading and Writing Achievement。Journal of Educational Psychology,81(1),91-100。  new window
2.Schunk, D. H.、Swartz, C. W.(1993)。Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement。Contemporary Educational Psychology,18(3),337-354。  new window
3.郭生玉、陳鳳如(1995)。整合性過程導向寫作教學法對國小兒童寫作品質及寫作歷程的影響。師大學報,40,1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Pajares, F.(2003)。Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature。Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties,19,139-158。  new window
5.Linnenbrink, Elizabeth A.、Pintrich, Paul R.(2003)。The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom。Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties,19(2),119-137。  new window
6.陳鳳如(2008)。國中學生基本學力測驗之寫作測驗表現及其相關因素探究。教育資料與研究,85,58-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Knudson, R. E.(1995)。Writing experiences, attitudes, and achievement of first to sixth graders。The Journal of Educational Research,89(2),90-97。  new window
8.Lipstein, R. L.、Renninger, K. A.(2007)。Interest for writing: How teachers can make a difference。English Journal,96(4),79-85。  new window
9.Hidi, S.、Berndorff, D.、Ainley, M.(2002)。Children's argument writing, interest and self-efficacy: An intervention study。Learning and Instruction,12(4),429-446。  new window
10.McCarthy, P.、Meier, S.、Rinderer, R.(1985)。Self-efficacy and writing: A different view of self-evaluation。College Composition and Communication,36,465-471。  new window
11.Pajares, F.(2007)。Empirical properties of a scale to assess writing self-efficacy in school contexts。Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,39,239-249。  new window
12.Pajares, F.、Valiante, G.(1997)。Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing。The Journal of Educational Research,90(6),353-360。  new window
13.Pajares, F.、Hartley, J.、Valiante, G.(2000)。Response format in writing self-efficacy assessment: Greater discrimination increases prediction。Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,33,214-221。  new window
14.Pajares, F.、Hartley, J.、Valiante, G.(2001)。Response format in writing self-efficacy assessment: Greater discrimination increases prediction。Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,33,214-221。  new window
學位論文
1.鄭世杰(2006)。國小高年級學生寫作困難之調查研究—以石岡、東勢兩鄉鎮為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉明松(2003)。結構性過程取向寫作教學對國小作文低成就學生寫作學習效果之研究(博士論文)。彰化師範大學,彰化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.方鄒珍(2006)。創作性戲劇寫作教學方案對國中七年級學生寫作能力、寫作興趣之影響。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(1994)。重編國語辭典修訂本。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.陸師成(1984)。辭彙。臺北:文化圖書。  延伸查詢new window
3.杜淑貞(1986)。國小作文教學探究。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bereiter, Carl、Scardamalia, Marlene(1987)。The Psychology of Written Composition。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
5.陳正治(2008)。國語文教材教法。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳弘昌(1999)。國小語文科教學研究。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.張新仁(1992)。寫作教學研究--認知心理學取向。高雄:復文圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York:Freeman。  new window
9.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory。Prentice-Hall。  new window
10.Spandel, V.(2008)。Creating young writers: Using the six traits to enrich writing process in primary classrooms。New York。  new window
11.Culham, R.(2003)。6+1 Traits of writing: The complete guide grades 3 and up。New York。  new window
12.Hayes, J. R.(2000)。A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing。Perspectives on writing: Research, theory, and practice。Newark, DE。  new window
13.Tolchinsky, L.(2006)。The emergence of writing。Handbook of writing research。New York。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域(國語文),臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.李家同(2009)。天啊!小四考這個?可憐可憐孩子吧。  延伸查詢new window
3.張其昀(2006)。中文大辭典,臺北。,http://ap6.pccu.edu.tw/Dictionary, 20110808。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bandura, A.(2006)。Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales。Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents。Information Age。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE