目的：探討棒球投球、網球拍揮拍、傳統高爾夫多球等三種不同教學方法介入對於高爾夫球初學者高爾夫揮桿擊球桿頭瞬間速度之差異。方法：本研究採集群抽樣法，以台北市北台灣科學技術學院高爾夫興趣選課三個班級之學生，共計57人，採抽籤方式分派一班為棒球投球練習組（18人）、一班為網球拍揮拍練習組（21人）、一班為傳統高爾夫多球練習組（18人），各組實施八週不同教學方法介入課程中，以相依樣本t考驗檢定組內在前測及後測是否有顯著差異。以獨立樣本單因子變異數分析(One-way ANOVA)檢定不同教學法高爾夫揮桿桿頭瞬間速度之差異情況。所有考驗的顯著水準均定為α=.05。結果：經過八週不同教學後，結果顯示網球拍揮拍練習組在教學後比教學前進步4.24±8.72 mph、傳統高爾夫多球練習組在教學後比教學前進步5.54±8.63 mph、棒球投球練習組在教學後比教學前進步4.57±8.00 mph，三組測驗成績皆達顯著進步(p<.05)；三組在接受實驗教學後各組間並未達顯著差異。結論：本研究的三組教學法所強調的皆是以身體旋轉為基礎，而結果顯示，本研究針對高爾夫身體轉動揮桿欲使擊球桿頭瞬間速度進步的三種教學法皆屬有效的高爾夫教學法。

Purpose: to explore the difference of instantaneous speed of the golf hitting club head before and after three different interventions (baseball pitching, tennis swinging, and traditional golf hitting) for the golf beginners. Method: A total of 57 subjects participated in the study, the subjects were assigned randomly as baseball pitching practice group (N=18), tennis swinging practice group (N=21), and traditional golf training group (N=18). Paired t test was used to examine the significant difference of the club head instantaneous speed in the groups before and after the intervention. One-way ANOVA was used to assess the difference of the club head instantaneous speed among the groups. The significance level was set as α=.05. Results: After 8 weeks different training approaches, the results showed the club head speed increased 4.24±8.72 mph in tennis swing training (p<.05), 5.54±8.63 mph in traditional golf training (p<.05), and 4.57±8.00 mph in baseball pitching training (p<.05). No differences of the club head speed were found among the groups. Conclusion: Because of the trunk rotation training by these three interventions, the results showed that all the club head speeds were improved after these training. Therefore, the interventions (tennis swing, golf training, and baseball pitching) in this study were effective approaches for the golf beginner to increase the club head speed.