網路中立性原則和言論自由：美國法制的發展__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	網路中立性原則和言論自由：美國法制的發展
書刊名：	國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者：	劉靜怡
作者(外文)：	Liu, Ching-yi
出版日期：	2012
卷期：	41:3
頁次：	頁795-876
主題關鍵詞：	網路中立性原則；網路中介者；編輯裁量權；寬頻服務業者；網路服務業者；言論自由；內容中立；觀點差別待遇；共同載具；Network neutrality；Internet intermediaries；Editorial discretion；Broadband service providers；Internet service providers；Freedom of speech；Content-neutral；Viewpoint discrimination；Common carriers
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:8 共同引用:4 點閱:116

〈摘要〉「網路中立性」（network neutrality）原則近年來成為法學界、科技界和產業界共同關注的議題，其原因在於其不僅牽動科技發展方向和產業利益，也和法學界向來關注的民主和人權問題，無法脫離關係。對網路中立性原則持反對立場者認為，落實網路中立性原則的規範，要求網路服務業者在傳輸任何網路訊息時，都不得進行任何差別待遇，乃是侵犯了網路服務業者裁量自身是否承載特定訊息的「言論自由」權利。相對地，支持網路中立性原則者，則是認為應該在當前的通訊傳播法制中落實此一原則，因為，以網路服務業者所扮演的角色來說，對於不同的網路應用服務和內容予以差別待遇的作法，放在民主社會維護言論自由的基本架構下，是不能容忍的，諸如此類的差別待遇，其實正是侵犯了一般大眾的「資訊取得自由」，而資訊取得自由，也是言論自由裡相當重要的一環，欠缺了資訊取得自由，民主程序即無從健全發展。為了釐清上述爭議，本文將從言論自由的分析出發，探討網路中立性原則的憲法意義。本文首先說明網路中立性原則的意義、重要性及其引發的爭議重點，其次，本文將從歷史發展的角度，說明美國國會及通訊傳播主管機關FCC 為了落實網路中立性原則所採取的行動，以及其司法評價為何，以做為本文以下的分析基礎。本文進而從言論自由的觀點出發，分析寬頻服務業者和網路服務業者在面對網路中立性原則及其相關規範時，提出哪些言論自由的主張來護衛自己的立場，以及這些主張在美國聯邦最高法院判決立場下，究竟應該如何解讀，以便闡明美國聯邦最高法院的判決立場，對於網路中立性原則的落實，會帶來哪些困境。接著，本文進一步從網路發展方向對於資訊自由和民主發展的角度出發，討論網路中立性原則的言論自由意涵，以及上述困境如何解決，最後則是第陸部分的結論。

以文找文

Abstract Much of the policy debate and scholarly literature on the principle of “Network Neutrality” (Net Neutrality) in the United States has addressed whether the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has statutory authority to require Broadband Service Providers (BSPs) or Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to operate in a nondiscriminatory manner. Such analysis largely focuses on questions about jurisdiction, the scope of lawful regulation, and the balance of power between stakeholders without much thought about broader concerns such as First Amendment values. For their part, BSPs and ISPs have aggressively advocated for First Amendment speaker rights when selecting content and applications, packaging them into easily accessible and user-friendly format. This Paper focuses on the constitutional analysis and responds to the First Amendment assertions favoring the position of BSPs and ISPs. First, this Paper explains the definition of Net Neutrality, followed by a review of the regulatory history of the principle of Net Neutrality and the role played by Internet Intermediaries, such as BSPs and ISPs. Second, this Paper examines the legal rationale that supported and opposed the principle of Net Neutrality by examining relevant regulatory efforts of the FCC, legislative initiatives in Congress, and the implications of judicial decisions concerning the implementation of Net Neutrality. Third, this Paper considers what we can learn about Net Neutrality through the lens of Free Speech decisions made by the Supreme Court. This Paper concludes current telecommunication and media regulatory models and Supreme Court decisions provide inconsistent andincomplete direction on the future of Net Neutrality. The paper provides some observations as to how we shall approach the principle of Net Neutrality in the spirit of promoting First Amendment values while imposing reasonable nondiscrimination responsibilities on BSPs and ISPs.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Stone, Geoffrey R.(1983)。Content Regulation and the First Amendment。William & Mary Law Review，25，189-252。
2.	Whitt, Richard S.(2004)。A horizontal leap forward: Formulating a new communications public policy framework based on the network layers model。Federal Communications Law Journal，56(3)，587-672。
3.	Balkin, Jack M.(2004)。Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society。New York University Law Review，79，1-58。
4.	Barron, J. A.(1967)。Access to the press：A new First Amendment right。Harvard Law Review，80，1641-1678。
5.	Wu, Timothy(2004)。Copyright's communications policy。Michigan Law Review，103(2)，278-366。
6.	Benkler, Y.(2001)。Siren songs and Amish children: Autonomy, information, and law。New York University Law Review，76(1)，23-113。
7.	Yemini, M.(2008)。Mandated network neutrality and the first amendment：lessons from turner and a new approach。Virginia Journal of Law & Technology，13(1)，1-38。
8.	Lemley, Mark A.、Lessig, Lawrence(2001)。The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era。UCLA Law Review，48，925-972。
9.	Ammori, M.(2008)。The fairness doctrine：A flawed, failed means to attain a noble goal。Administrative Law Review，60，881-894。
10.	Wu, Timothy(2003)。Network Neutrality,Broadband Discrimination。Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law，2(1)，141-176。
11.	Ginsburg, J. C.(2001)。Copyright and control over new technologies of dissemination。Columbia Law Review，101，1613-3647。
12.	Yoo, Christopher S.(2002)。Vertical Integration and Media Regulation in the New Economy。Yale Journal on Regulation，19(1)，171-297。
13.	Sunstein, Cass R.(1995)。The First Amendment in Cyberspace。Yale Law Journal，104(7)，1757-1804。
14.	Yoo, Christopher S.(2005)。Beyond Network Neutrality。Harvard Journal of Law and Technology，19(1)。
15.	Wang, Yi-Kuo(2010)。網路中立管制在美國與歐盟的新發展。科技法律透析 \= Technology Law Perspectives，22(7)，9-15。延伸查詢
16.	Lin, Ya-Hui(2007)。論寬頻網路管制策: 以「網路中立性」為中心。臺灣科技法律與政策論叢 \= Taiwan Journal of Law and Technology Policy，4(3)，1-43。延伸查詢
17.	Ammori, M.(2005)。Another worthy tradition: How the free speech curriculum ignores electronic media and distorts free speech doctrine。Missouri Law Review，70，59-123。
18.	Ammori, M.(2005)。A shadow government: Private regulation, free speech, and lessons from the Sinclair Blogstorm。Michigan Telecommunication & Technology Law Review，12，1-74。
19.	Ammori, M.(2009)。Beyond content neutrality: Understanding content-based promotion of democratic speech。Federal Communication Law Journal，61，273-324。
20.	Baker, C. E.(1994)。Turner broadcasting: Content-based regulation of persons and Dresses。Supreme Court Review，1994，57-128。
21.	Ammori, M.(1997)。Giving the audience what it wants。Ohio State Law Journal，58，311-417。
22.	Ammori, M.(1998)。The media that citizens need。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，147，317-408。
23.	Ammori, M.(2005)。Media structure, ownership policy, and the First Amendment。Southern California Law Review，78，733-702。
24.	Balkin, J. M.(1996)。Media filters, the V-Chip, and the foundations of broadcast regulation。Duke Law Journal，45，1131-1175。
25.	Balkin, J. M.(2008)。Media access: A question of design。George Washington Law Review，76，933-951。
26.	Balkin, Jack M.(2009)。The future of free expression in a digital age。Pepperdine Law Review，36，427-444。
27.	Barron, J. A.(1989)。On understanding the First Amendment of cable: Some obstacles in the way。George Washington Law Review，57，1495-1512。
28.	Bauer, J. M.(2007)。Dynamic effects of network neutrality。International Journal of Communicatio\url\http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/156/79n，1，531-547。
29.	Beard, T. R.、Ford, G. S.、Koutsky, T.、Spiwak, L. J.(2007)。Network neutrality and industry structure。Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal，29，149-170。
30.	Becker, G. S.、Carlton, D. W.、Sider, Hal. S.(2010)。Net neutrality and consumer welfare。Journal of Competition Law & Economics，497-519。
31.	Benkler, Y.(2000)。From consumers to users: Shifting the deeper structures of regulation toward sustainable commons and user access。Federal Communication Law Journal，52，56l-579。
32.	Berman, J.、Weitzner, D. J.(1995)。Abundance and user control: Renewing the democratic heart of the First Amendment in the age of interactive media。Yale Law Journal，104，1619-1637。
33.	Bhagwat, Ashutosh(2007)。The test that ate everything: Intermediate scrutiny in First Amendment jurisprudence。University of Illinois Law Review，2007，783-838。
34.	Bracha, Oren、Pasquale, Frank(2008)。Federal search commission? Access, fairness, and accountability in the law of search。Cornell Law Review，93，1149-1210。
35.	Burstein, M. J.(2004)。Towards a new standard for First Amendment review of structural media regulation。New York University Law Review，79，1030-1069。
36.	Campbell, A. J.(1992)。Publish or carriage: Approaches to analyzing the First Amendment rights of telephone companies。North Carolina Law Review，70，1071-1153。
37.	Cannon, R.(2003)。The legacy of the Federal Communications Commission's computer inquiries。Federal Communication Law Journal，55，167-205。
38.	Chandler, Jennifer A.(2007)。A right to reach an audience: An approach to intermediary bias on the internet。Hofstra Law Review，35，1095-1137。
39.	Chen, J.(2001)。The authority to regulate broadband internet access over cable。Berkeley Technology Law Journal，16，677-727。
40.	Chin, A.(1997)。Making the world wide web safe for democracy: A Medium-specific First Amendment analysis。Hastings Communication & Entertainment Law Journal，19，309-338。
41.	Cherry, B. A.(2006)。Misusing network neutrality to eliminate common carriage threatens free speech and the postal system。Northern Kentucky Law Review，33，483-511。
42.	Cotter, T. F.(2006)。Some observations on the law and economics of intermediaries。Michigan State Law Review，2006，67-82。
43.	Crandall, R. W.(2005)。The remedy for the 'Bottleneck Monopoly' in telecom: Isolate it, share it, or ignore it?。University of Chicago Law Review，72，3-25。
44.	Elices, E.(2010)。Citizens united and the future of FCC Content Regulation。Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal (COMM/ENT)，33，51-67。
45.	Fiss, O. M.(1986)。Free speech and social structure。Iowa Law Review，71，1405-1425。
46.	Fiss, O. M.(1987)。Why the State?。Harvard Law Review，100，781-794。
47.	Frieden, R.(2008)。Neither fish nor fowl: New strategies for selective regulation of information services。Journal on Telecommunications & high Technology Law，6，373-423。
48.	Goodman, E. P.(2007)。Media policy and free speech: The First Amendment at war with itself。Hofstra Law Review，35，1211-1262。
49.	Hazlett, T. W.(2000)。Digitizing “must-carry” under Turner Broadcasting v. FCC (1997)。Supreme Court Economic Review，8，141-207。
50.	Herman, B. D.(2006)。Opening bottlenecks。On behalf of mandated network neutrality，59，103-155。
51.	Kagan, E.(1996)。Private speech: The role of governmental motive in First Amendment Doctrine。University of Chicago Law Review，63，413-517。
52.	Kreimer, Seth F.(2006)。Censorship by proxy: The First Amendment, internet intermediaries, and the problem of the Weakest Link。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，155，11-101。
53.	Leonhardt, S.(2009)。The future of “fair and balanced”: The fairness doctrine, net neutrality, and the internet。Duke Law & Technology Review，8，1-18。
54.	Lessig, L.(1995)。The path of cyberlaw。Yale Law Journal，104，1743-1755。
55.	Lessig, L.(1998)。What things regulate speech: CDA 2.0 vs. Filtering。Jurimetrics，38，629-670。
56.	Litan, R. E.、Singer, H. J.(2007)。Unintended consequences of net neutrality regulation。Journal on Telecommunication & High Technology Law，5，533-572。
57.	Magarian, G. P.(2003)。Regulating political parties under a “public rights” First Amendment。William & Mary Law Review，44，1939-2061。
58.	Magarian, G. P.(2005)。The First Amendmsnt, the private-public distinction, and nongovernmental suppression of wartime political debate。George Washington Law Review，73，101-173。
59.	May, R. J.(2007)。Net neutrality mandates: Neutering the First Amendment in the digital age。I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society，3，197-210。
60.	Mindel, J. L.、Sicker, D. C.(2006)。Leveraging the EU regulatory framework to improve a layered policy model for US telecommunications markets。Telecommunication Policy，30，136-148。
61.	Nachbar, T. B.(2000)。Paradox and structure: Relying on government regulation to preserve the internet's unregulated character。Minnisoda Law Review，85，215-317。
62.	Keuborne, B.(1994)。Speech, technology, and the emergence of a tricameral media: You can't tell the players without a scorecard。Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal，17，17-40。
63.	Pasquale, F.(2008)。Internet on discrimination principles: Commercial ethics for carriers and search engines。University of Chicago Legal Forum，2008，263-299。
64.	Pasquale, F.(2010)。Beyond innovation and competition: The need for qualified transparency in internet intermediaries。Northwestern University Law Review，104，105-173。
65.	Patterson, M. R.(2010)。The future of the internet: Non-network barriers to network neutrality。Fordham Law Review，78，2843-2872。
66.	Peha, J. M.(2007)。The benefits and risks of mandating network neutrality, and the quest for a balanced policy。International Journal of Communication，1，644-668。
67.	Schauer, F.(1994)。Cable operators as editors: Prerogative, responsibility, and liability。Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal，17，161-178。
68.	Schauer, F.(2004)。The boundaries of the First Amendment: A preliminary exploration of constitutional salience。Harvard Law Review，117(6)，1765-1809。
69.	Schejter, A. M.(1999)。The fairness doctrine is dead and living in Israel。Federal Communication Law Journal，51，281-300。
70.	Shelanski, H. A.(2006)。Antitrust law as mass media regulation: Can merger standards protect the public interest?。California Law Review，94，371-421。
71.	Solum, L. B.、Chung, M.(2004)。The layers principle。Internet architecture and the law，79，815-948。
72.	Spulber, D. F.、Yoo, C. S.(2008)。Rethinking broadband internet access。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology，22，1-74。
73.	Stein, B. J.(1998)。Why wait? A discussion of analogy and judicial standards for the internet in light of the Supreme Court's Reno v. ACLU opinion。Saint Louis University Law Journal，42，1471-1497。
74.	Stone, G. R.(1987)。Content-neutral restrictions。university of Chicago Law Review，54，46-120。
75.	Sullivan, Kathleen M.(1998)。First Amendment intermediaries in the age of cyberspace。University of California Los Angeles Law Review，45(6)，1653-1681。
76.	Sunstein, C. R.(1994)。A new deal for speech。Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal，17，137-160。
77.	Thierer, A. T.(2004)。“Net neutrality” - Digital discrimination or regulatory gamesmanship in cyberspace?。Policy Analysis\url\http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa507.pdf，507，1-28。
78.	Travis, H.(2007)。Of blogs, ebooks, and broadband: Access to digital media as a First-Amendment right。Hofstra Law Review，35，1519-1582。
79.	Travis, H.(2010)。The FCC's new theory of the First Amendment。Santa Clara Law Review，417-513。
80.	Tushnet, R.(2008)。Power without responsibility: Intermediaries and the First Amendment。George Washington Law Review，76，986-1016。
81.	van Schewick, B.(2007)。Towards an economic framework for network neutrality regulation。Journal on Telecommunications High Technology Law，5，329-392。
82.	Volokh, Eugene(1995)。Cheap speech and what it will do。Yale Law Journal，104，1805-1850。
83.	Volokh, Eugene(2005)。Speech as Conduct: Generally Applicable Laws, Illegal Courses of Conduct, "Situation-Altering Utterances," and the Uncharted Zones。Cornell Law Review，90，1277-1348。
84.	Weinberg, J.(1997)。Rating the net。Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal，19，453-482。
85.	Weiser, P.(2003)。Toward a next generation regulatory strategy。Loyola University Chicago Law Journal，35，41-85。
86.	Weiser, P.(2009)。The future of internet regulation。U.C. Davis Law Review，43，529-590。
87.	Werbach, K.(2010)。Off the hook。Cornell Law Review，95，535-598。
88.	Wagner, R. P.(1999)。Filters and the First Amendment。Minnisoda Law Review，83，755-813。
89.	Wliitt, R. S.、Schultze, S. J.(2009)。The new “emergence economics” of innovation and growth, and what it means for communications policy。Journal on Telecommunication & High Technology Law，7，217-315。
90.	Wu, T.(2006)。Why have a telecommunications law? Anti-discrimination norms in communications。Journal on Telecommunication & High Technology Law，5，15-46。
91.	Yen, A. C.(2010)。A preliminary First Amendment analysis of legislation treating news aggregation as copyright infringement。Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law，12(4)，947-975。
92.	Yoo, C. S.(2003)。Rise and demise of the technology-specific approach to the First Amendment。Georgetown Law Journal，91，245-356。
93.	Yoo, C. S.(2004)。Would mandating broadband network neutrality help or hurt competition? A comment on the end-to-end debate。Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law，3，23-68。
94.	Yoo, C. S.(2006)。Network neutrality and the economics of congestion。Georgetown Law Journal，94，1847-1908。
95.	Yoo, C. S.(2008)。Network neutrality, consumers, and innovation。University of Chicago Legal Forum，2008，179-262。

學位論文
1.	Hsia, Chen-Shun(2007)。網路中立性的追求: 以美國網路中立性的立法爭議為例。國立中正大學，嘉義。延伸查詢
2.	Chen, Chi-Yu(2011)。網路中立性原則: 美國與歐盟之比較。元智大學，桃園。延伸查詢
3.	Chen, Jun-Rong(2008)。美國寬頻網路管制政策之研究: 以「網路中立」爭議為中心。清華大學，新竹。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Sunstein, Cass R.(1995)。Democracy and the problem of free speech。New York：Free Press。
2.	Zittrain, Jonathan(2008)。The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。
3.	Post, David G.(2009)。In Search of Jefferson’s Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace。New York：Oxford University Press。
4.	Sunstein, Cass R.(2003)。Why societies need dissent?。Cambridge, Mass.：Harvard University Press。
5.	Fiss, Owen(1996)。Liberalism divided：Freedom of speech and the many uses of state power。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。
6.	MARSDEN, CHRISTOPHER T.(2010)。NET NEUTRALITY: TOWARDS A CO-REGULATORY SOLUTION。New York：Bloomsbury Academic。
7.	Tribe, Lawrence H.(1999)。American Constitutional Law。Foundation Press。
8.	Lessig, Lawrence(1999)。Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace。Basic Books。
9.	Pool, I. S.(1983)。Technologies of Freedom。Cambridge, MA：Belknap Harvard。
10.	van Schewick, B.(2010)。Internet architecture and innovation。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。
11.	Baker, C. E.(2002)。Media, markets, and democracy。Cambridge University Press。
12.	Benkler, Yochai(2006)。The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom。Yale University Press。
13.	Lessig, Lawrence(2001)。The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World。Random House, Inc.。
14.	Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。
15.	Nunziato, D. C.(2009)。Virtual freedom: Net neutrality and free speech in the internet age。Stanford：Stanford Law Books。
16.	Post, Robert C.(1998)。Constitutional domains: Democracy, community, management。Cambridge：Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。
17.	Scott, B.(2007)。A broad, positive view of the First Amendment。The case against media consolidation \\ M. N. Cooper (Ed.)。New York。
18.	Shiffrin, S. H.(1990)。The First Amendment, democracy, and romance。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。
19.	Shiffrin, S. H.(2000)。Dissent, injustice, and the meanings of America。Princeton。
20.	Vaidhyanathan, Siva(2011)。The googlization of everything (and why we should worry)。University of California Press。
21.	Zittrain, J.、Palfrey, J.(2008)。Internet filtering: The politics and mechanisms of control。Access denied: The practice and policy of global internet filtering \\ Ronald D., John P., Rafal R. ; Jonathan Z. (Eds.)。Cambridge。

其他
1.	Eahn, A. E.(2007)。Network neutrality。
2.	Lessig, L.，Resnick, P.(1999)。Zoning speech on the internet: A Legal and technical model。
3.	Szoka, B.，Thierer, A.(2009)。Net neutrality, slippery slopes & high-tech mutually assured destruction, progress snapshot。
4.	Wu, T.(2010)。Network neutrality FAQ。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	政府監管大型社交網路平臺審查言論的合憲性探討--以美國佛羅里達州參議院第7072號法案為核心
2.	AI時代網路政治廣告之揭露義務：以美國誠信廣告法草案為中心
3.	網路假訊息之刑事不法研究
4.	正當平臺程序作為網路中介者的免責要件：德國網路執行法的合憲性評析
5.	競爭秩序下的網路中立性--歐盟與德國的立法發展給予我國之啟示
6.	從網路中立性論「網路業者管理之公平競爭與消費者間之權益平衡」
7.	封鎖外國侵權網站得否為著作權人的救濟手段--從歐洲法院2014年UPC案判決反思
8.	從歐美網路中立性法制發展談網路創新與管制意涵
9.	網路中立性與保護著作權的衝突--以歐盟法院封網處分決判為例
10.	失衡的承諾：著作權法責任避風港規範之立法政策評析
11.	網路中立性與我國寬頻政策之探討--由臺北高等行政法院九十九年度訴字第一六五四號判決談起
12.	網路內容管制與言論自由--以網路中介者的角色為討論重心
13.	論寬頻網路管制政策--以「網路中立性」為中心

1.	歐盟電子通訊法對顯著市場力量企業規範之研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	社群網路時代的隱私困境：以Facebook為討論對象
2.	正當平臺程序作為網路中介者的免責要件：德國網路執行法的合憲性評析
3.	由「法官不語」是否為拉丁法諺的法官守則論法官的言論自由權及界限
4.	商業言論自由與個人資料保護之衝突：以美國電信業與我國金控業個人資料流通之管制為中心
5.	政府效能、公平審判與保密義務：檢察官之言論自由與限制
6.	刑法對誹謗言論的合理規制
7.	第三帝國陰影下的言論自由保障：論德國聯邦憲法法院在政治極右言論案件中的立場演變
8.	媒體所有權、觀點多元化與言論自由保障：美國法制的觀察
9.	從美國法『公眾人物理論』論我國民事侵害名譽權法之『公眾人物概念』
10.	菸品包裝管制與言論自由、財產權限制之違憲審查--美國、加拿大、澳大利亞與臺灣比較
11.	網絡時代言論自由的刑法邊界
12.	美國不實言論之言論自由保障
13.	新興溝通科技與言論自由--可能之定位暨思維
14.	資訊法律的過去、現在與未來
15.	意見表達之證券責任

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫