歐盟新一代自由貿易協定政策之研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	歐盟新一代自由貿易協定政策之研究
書刊名：	歐美研究
作者：	洪德欽
作者(外文)：	Horng, Der-chin
出版日期：	2012
卷期：	42:4
頁次：	頁673-752
主題關鍵詞：	歐盟；自由貿易協定；韓國；里斯本條約；世界貿易組織；EU；FTA；South Korea；The Treaty of Lisbon；WTO
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:8 共同引用:59 點閱:164

歐盟自由貿易協定 (FTA) 政策乃其共同貿易政策之一環，歷經長期實踐，已發展出很多種類之 FTA，以及非常複雜的層級式貿易關係。歐盟自 2006年起已選擇性針對韓國、印度、巴西、 ASEAN等對象，優先推動新一代 FTA。新一代 FTA強調服務、投資、競爭、政府採購等領域的市場開放、非關稅障礙排除，以及智產權的保護及公平貿易，以提昇歐洲企業及產品的競爭力，並對歐洲就業及經濟成長有所貢獻。新一代 FTA簽署對象國家很多皆為台灣在歐盟市場的主要競爭對手，更是值得重視。本文將從法律文義解釋及國際政治經濟學政策研究等觀點，分析歐盟 FTA的發展背景、目標與種類，並以歐韓 FTA個案研究，說明歐盟新一代 FTA對非會員國的影響，以及對 WTO帶來的挑戰。

以文找文

The promotion of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) is an active policy among of the Common Commercial Policy (CCP) conducted by the European Union (EU). The EU has developed many different types of FTAs, and maintains a very complicated hierarchy in its external trade relations. The EU introduced a policy on the latest generation of FTAs on 3 October 2006. South Korea, India, Brazil and ASEAN are identified as priorities for new generation FTAs with the EU. The new generation FTAs are very comprehensive with regards to trade liberalization in a number of fields, including the elimination of tariff and non-tariff barriers, further liberalization in services, investment, competition, enforcement of intellectual property rights, and so on. Many of the EU’s potential partners for new generation FTAs are major trade rivals of Taiwan in the EU market. This article takes the EU-Korea FTA as a case study to examine the following core issues: the historical background of the EU’s trade policies, legal bases and decision-making procedures of new generation FTAs, the main contents and special features of the EU-Korea FTA, and the impacts of the EU-Korea FTA on the WTO and third countries. For the future development of EU FTA policy, this article also proposes an open regionalism approach to make the new generation FTAs compatible with the spirit of WTO multilateralism.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Sbragia, A.(2010)。The EU, the US, and Trade Policy: Competitive Interdependence in the Management of Globalization。Journal of European Public Policy，17(3)，368-382。
2.	Brown, A. G.、Stern, R. M.(2011)。Free Trade Agreements and Governance of the Global Trading System。The World Economy，34(3)，331-354。
3.	Horn, H.、Mavroidis, P.C.、Sapir, A.(2010)。Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements。The World Economy，33(11)，1565-1588。
4.	Zielonka, Jan(2008)。Europe as a Global Actor: Empire by Example?。International Affairs，84(3)，471-484。
5.	洪德欽(20000700)。區域經濟整合與GATT／WTO。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，29(4)，209-257。延伸查詢
6.	李貴英(20041200)。歐洲共同體對開發中國家之優惠待遇--法律規範與經濟發展。歐美研究，34(4)，675-735。延伸查詢
7.	洪德欽(20040300)。歐盟對外貿易與發展協定之人權條款--規定與實踐。歐美研究，34(1)，143-202。延伸查詢
8.	Cardwell, Paul James(2010)。Mapping out democracy promotion in the EU's external relations。European Foreign Affairs Review，16(1)，21-40。
9.	Dimopoulos, A.(2010)。The effects of the Lisbon Treaty on the principles and objectives of the common commercial policy。European Foreign Affairs Review，15(2)，153-170。
10.	Missiroli, Antonio(2010)。The new EU ‘foreign policy’ system after Lisbon: A work in progress。European Foreign Affairs Review，15(4)，427-452。

研究報告
1.	Cremona, Marise A.(2006)。A constitutional basis for effective external action? An assessment of the provisions on EU external action in the constitutional treaty。Florence, Italy：EUI。

圖書
1.	Jennings, Robert、Watts, Arthur(1997)。Oppenheim’s International Law, Vol. I, Peace。London：Longman。
2.	Dam, Kenneth W.(1977)。The GATT: Law and the International Economic Organization。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。
3.	Piris, Jean-Claude(2010)。The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis。Cambridge University Press。
4.	張佛泉(1993)。自由與人權。臺灣商務印書館。延伸查詢
5.	王泰銓(20080000)。歐洲聯盟法總論。臺北：財團法人臺灣智庫。延伸查詢

其他
1.	Copenhagen Economics，J.F. Francois.(2007)。Economic impact of a Potential Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Between the European Union and South Korea。
2.	中華經濟研究院 Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research(2008)。韓歐盟 FTA 對我經濟可能之影響及台歐盟FTA 可行性研究 A study on the possible impacts of South Korea-EU FTA on Taiwan and the feasibility of Taiwan-EU FTA，台北：中華經濟研究院。延伸查詢
3.	汪威錞 Wang, W. C.(2010)。歐韓自由貿易協定探微(下)A research on EU-South Korea FTA [part 2]。延伸查詢
4.	吳詩云 Wu, S. Y.(2011)。酒類地理標示多邊通知與註冊制度談判進展之初探 A preliminary study on the development of negotiation on the multilateral system of notification and registration of geographical indications for wines and spirits。
5.	邱政宗 Chiou, J. T.(2002)。杜哈發展議程的運作目標--WTO 新回合談判議題分析 The operative goal of Doha Development Agenda--An analysis on the issues of WTO new round negotiation。延伸查詢
6.	姚鴻成 Yao, H. C.(2010)。韓歐自由貿易協定對韓國經濟之影響及台灣應有之警惕 The impacts of South Korea-EU FTA on South Korean economy and the warnings for Taiwan。延伸查詢
7.	Bendiek, A., & Kramer, H.(2010)。The EU as a ‘strategic’ international actor: Substantial and analytical ambiguities。
8.	Bhagwati, J.(1991)。The world trading system at risk，New York：Harvest Wheatsheaf。
9.	Brown, C. M.(2011)。The European Union and regional trade agreements: A case study of the EU-Korea FTA，Berlin：Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg。
10.	Cooper, W. H., Jurenas, R., Platzer, M. D., & Manyin, M. E.(2011)。The EU-South Korea free trade agreement and its implications for the United States (CRS 7-5700, R41534)，Washington, DC：Congressional Research Service。
11.	Council of the European Union(201012)。Council conclusions on EU relations with EFTA countries，Brussels, Belgium。
12.	Council of the European Union(2010)。Council approves agreement with South Korea on free trade (ST13670/10, Press 242)，Brussels, Belgium：Council of the European Union。
13.	Council of the European Union(2011)。EU-Korea free trade agreement: Implementation of safeguard clause (Press 102, 8889/11)，Luxembourg：Council of the European Union。
14.	Decreux, Y., Milner, C., & Péridy, N.(2010)。The economic impact of the free trade agreement (FTA) between the European Union and Korea (Final Report)，Paris：Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales。
15.	Dür, A., & Zimmermann, H.(2007)。Introduction: The EU in international trade negotiations。
16.	Editorial Board(2010)。Editorial Comments: The Post-Lisbon institutional package: Do old habits die hard?。
17.	Estevadeordal, A., & Suominen, K.(2009)。The sovereign remedy? Trade agreements in a globalizing world，Oxford, UK：OxfordUniversity Press。
18.	European Commission(1998)。Democratization, the role of law, respect for human rights and good governance: The challenges of the partnership between the European Union and the ACP states (COM [98] 146)，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
19.	European Commission(2001)。EU and developing countries: Facts and figures，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
20.	European Commission(2001)。The European Union’s role in promoting human rights and democratization in third countries (COM [2001] 252 final)，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
21.	European Commission(2004)。European neighbourhood policy: Strategy paper (COM [2004] 373 final)，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
22.	European Commission(2004)。Strategy for enforcement of intellectual property rights in third countries，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
23.	European Commission(2006)。Global Europe: Competiting in the world. A contribution to the EU’s growth and jobs strategy(COM [2006] 567 final)，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
24.	European Commission(2007)。Communication global Europe: A stronger partnership to deliver market access for European exporters (COM [2007] 183 final)，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
25.	European Commission(2008)。Communication on the external dimension of the Lisbon Treaty for growth and jobs: Reporting on market access and setting the framework for more effective international regulatory cooperation (COM [2008] 874 final)，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
26.	European Commission(2010)。The trade growth & world affairs: Trade policy as a core component of the EU’s 2020 strategy (COM [2010] 612 final)，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
27.	European Commission(2010)。Communication “towards a comprehensive European international investment policy” (COM [2010] 343 final)，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
28.	European Commission(2010)。Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth (COM [2010] 2020)，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
29.	European Commission(2011)。EU-South Korea free trade agreement: 10 key benefits for the European Union，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
30.	European Commission(2011)。Trade and investment barriers report 2011 (COM [2011] 114)，Brussels, Belgium：European Commission。
31.	European Commission(2011)。The EU Korea free trade agreement in practice，Luxembourg：Publications Office of the European Union。
32.	European Commission(2012)。U-Korea trade agreement: One year on. Press Release。
33.	European Commission (n.d.a)。Trade: Generalised system of preferences (GSP)。
34.	European Commission。Countries: South Korea。
35.	European Commission。Countries: Taiwan。
36.	European Commission。EU-Korea free trade agreement online。
37.	European Parliament(2011)。EU-South Korea free trade agreement: Green light, strasbourg plenary session。
38.	European Parliament(2011)。EU-South Korea free trade accord: MEPs, agree on the safeguard clause。
39.	European Union(2001)。Framework agreement for trade and cooperation between the European Community and its member states, on the one hand, and the Republic of Korea, on the other hand[Electronic Version]。
40.	European Union(2009)。Informal meeting of EU heads of state or government。
41.	European Union(2010)。Consolidated version of the treaty on European Union and the treaty on the functioning of the European Union [Electronic Version]。
42.	European Union(2011)。International agreements: Notice concerning the provisional application of the free trade agreement between the European Union and it member states, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part [Electronic Version]。
43.	European Union(2011)。Council Decision on the signing and provisional application of the Agreement [Electronic Version]。
44.	European Union(2012)。Overview of FTA and other trade negotiations。
45.	European Union(2012)。Overview of EPA。
46.	European Union(2012)。Overview of regional trade agreements。
47.	Fields, A. B.(2003)。Rethinking human rights for the new millennium，New York：Palgrave。
48.	Freund, C.(2010)。Third-country effects of regional trade agreements。
49.	Grant, W.(1993)。Pressure groups and the European Community: An overview，Oxford, UK：Oxford University Press。
50.	Gunning, J. W., Kox, H., Tims, W., & de Wit, Y. (Eds.)(1994)。Trade, aid and development: Essays in honour of Hans Linnemann，London：St. Martin’s Press。
51.	Hayes, J. P.(1993)。Making trade policy in the European community，London：Macmillan。
52.	Heydon, K., & Woolcock, S.(2009)。The rise of bilateralism: Comparing American, European and Asian approaches to preferential trade agreements，Tokyo：United Nations University Press。
53.	House of Commons, Foreign Affairs Committee(2008)。Foreign policy aspects of the Lisbon Treaty (third report of session 2007-08, HC 120-1)，London：The Stationary Office。
54.	Inglis, K.(2000)。The Europe agreements compared in the light of their Pre-accession reorientation。
55.	Jackson, J. H.(1995)。Legal problems of international economic relations: Cases, materials and text (3rd ed.)，St. Paul, MN：West。
56.	Jackson, J. H.(2000)。The jurisprudence of GATT & WTO: Insights on treaty law and economic relations，New York：Cambridge University Press。
57.	Joshi, V.(2011)。Pererential tariff formation: The case of the European Union。
58.	Leal-Arcas, R.(2010)。The European Union’s trade and investment policy after the Treaty of Lisbon。
59.	Louis, J.-V.(2008)。Economic policy under the Lisbon Treaty，Vienna：Springer。
60.	Mandelson, P.(2006)。Bilateral agreements in EU trade policy (Speech/06/574)。
61.	Maur, J.-C.(2005)。Exporting Europe’s trade policy。
62.	Mavroidis, P. C.(2010)。WTO and PTAs: A preference for multilateralism? (or, the dog that tried to stop the bus)。
63.	Mitchell, A. D., & Lockhart, N. J. S.(2009)。Legal requirements for RTAs under the WTO，New York：Cambridge University Press。
64.	Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea(2010)。Facts about the EU-Korea FTA，Seoul, Korea：Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea。
65.	Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea(2010)。FTA status of Korea。
66.	Na, J.-j., & Lee, T.-h.(20110504)。National assembly Korea-EU FTA ratified. Korea Times。
67.	Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(1992)。Integration of developing countries into the international trading system，Paris：Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。
68.	Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2000)。Development cooperation report (table 3.1)，Paris：Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。
69.	Oxfam International(200802)。EU FTA manual, briefing 7: The EU’s approach to FTAs competition，Oxford, UK：Oxfam International。
70.	Pauwelyn, J.(2009)。Legal avenues to 'multilateralizing regionalism': Beyond Article XXIV，Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。
71.	Philippart, E.(2003)。The Euro-Mediterranean partnership: A critical evaluation of an ambitious scheme。
72.	Pollet-Fort, A.(2011)。The EU-Korea FTA and its implications for the future EU-Singapore FTA，Singapore：EU Centre in Singapore。
73.	Raza, W.(2007)。EU trade politics: Pursuit of Neo-Mercantilism in different fora?，Adershot, UK：Ashgate。
74.	Robles Jr., A. C.(2011)。Negotiating services with ASEAN: The EU between the WTO and Japan。
75.	Morgado Dos Santos, A. M.(2010)。How to rebalance the EU-Russia relationship: Potential and limits。
76.	Serra, J., Aguilar, G., Córdoba, J., Grossman, G., Hills, C., & Jackson, J., et al.(1997)。Reflections on regionalism. Report of the study group on international trade，Washington, DC：Carnegie Endowment for International Peace。
77.	Van Elsuwege, P.(2010)。EU external action after the collapse of the pillar structure: In search of a new balance between delimitation and consistency。
78.	Weller, C., & Ulmer, K.(2008)。Does governance matter for trade?，Brussels, Belgium：Aprodev。
79.	World Trade Organization(2001)。Doha WTO ministerial declaration (WT/MIN [01] /DEC/1)，Geneva, Switzerland：World Trade Organization。
80.	World Trade Organization(2008)。Draft modalities for TRIPS related issues (TN/C/W/52)，Geneva, Switzerland：World Trade Organization。
81.	World Trade Organization(2009)。Report to the TPRB from the Director-General on the financial and economic crisis and trade-related development (WT/TPR/OV/W/2)，Geneva, Switzerland：World Trade Organization。
82.	World Trade Organization(2009)。Trade policy review. EuropeanCommunities (WT/TPR/S/214)，Geneva, Switzerland：World Trade Organization。
83.	World Trade Organization(2010)。Understanding the WTO (5th ed.)，Geneva, Switzerland：World Trade Organization。
84.	World Trade Organization(2011)。Trade policy review: European Union (WT/TPR/S/248)，Geneva, Switzerland：World Trade Organization。
85.	World Trade Organization(2011)。Emerging text on geographical indications register: Four down, two to go。
86.	World Trade Organization。Regional trade agreements。
87.	Young, A. R.(2007)。Trade politics ain’t what it used to be: The European Union in the Doha Round。

圖書論文
1.	Wouters, Jan、Coppens, Dominic、Meester, Bart De(2008)。The European Union's external relations after the Lisbon Treaty。The Lisbon Treaty: EU Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty?。Vienna：Springer。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	文在寅時代的南韓與印度政經關係
2.	新區域間主義下的歐盟印太戰略：以歐盟與東協「開路者」協定為例
3.	歐盟執委會的權限擴張與制衡：超國家主義與政府間主義的競合
4.	歐盟與東協區域間合作之研究：以智慧財產權議題為例
5.	不確定時代韓國對外經貿的挑戰與文在寅政府的因應對策
6.	歐盟亞洲策略之研究：以歐盟對東南亞國協政策為例
7.	歐洲聯盟司法體系改革與成效之研究--從尼斯條約到里斯本條約之分析(2005~2011)
8.	英國脫歐對中歐貿易關係之影響
9.	WTO有關區域貿易協定／自由貿易協定(RTA／FTA)地理標示發展趨勢
10.	歐盟「新世代自由貿易協定」新趨勢之研究
11.	剖析英國脫歐及其對區域整合與發展之影響
12.	韓國與中國大陸簽署自由貿易協定之研析
13.	外籍父母居留權相關法律問題研究
14.	朴槿惠時代韓國與越南經貿關係
15.	英國脫歐與英歐貿易關係之未來

1.	FTA非關稅措施規範多邊化之可行性探討－以技術性貿易障礙與服務貿易為例
2.	我國刑事警察局執行跨境犯罪防制政策困境及解決途徑之研究：以4種犯罪類型為例
3.	PAM中個體與群體之事實、價值與人際－以南臺灣民眾對「ECFA」之認知、態度與行為為例
4.	歐洲整合發展與演進：權力、利益、認同與制度建構之整合分析
5.	專屬保險法制之研究─兼論我國境外保險法制之立法芻議
6.	論歐洲審計院及歐盟審計機關在歐洲經濟發展中的功能與影響～以歐洲主權債信危機國家為例
7.	波隆納歷程下英國高等教育制度之變革
8.	《里斯本條約》後歐盟警政合作之變革與挑戰
9.	歐洲聯盟授權立法委員會(Comitology)之研究
10.	歐洲聯盟之政治正當性建構
11.	歐洲整合脈絡下資通訊（ICT）發展之研究
12.	歐洲聯盟對中國經貿外交政策之研究
13.	歐盟電子通訊法對顯著市場力量企業規範之研究
14.	從德國聯邦制度論歐洲聯盟整合趨勢
15.	歐洲的地緣政治:以德意志為中心

1.	中國歐盟發展援助關係研究
2.	兩岸經貿關係：ECFA大解密
3.	德國聯邦制度與歐洲整合
4.	歐洲聯盟對外政策及其柔性權力評估
5.	里斯本條約下歐盟與非加太國家貿易關係與策略的新方向
6.	韓中推動FTA的歷程和策略

無相關著作

1.	美國對外簽署自由貿易協定之研究

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫