:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Mosston包含式教學對國小桌球學習效果之研究
書刊名:臺東大學體育學報
作者:洪進益陳玉枝
作者(外文):Hung, Chin-yiChen, Yuh-chih
出版日期:2011
卷期:14
頁次:頁53-86
主題關鍵詞:Mosston教學光譜桌球包含式學習效果Mosston physical education teaching spectrumTable tennisInclusion styleLearning effects
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:7
本研究的目的是在探討包含式教學對國小三年級學生桌球學習效果的影響,並探討學生的思考。研究參與對象為澎湖縣國小三年級學生 22 名(男生 13 位、女生 9 位),實施八節課桌球反手推球的課程。本研究以量化研究為主,兼採質性資料分析,所收到的量化資料包括「認知」、「情意態度」、「客觀技能」、「主觀技能」等前後測資料,以相依樣本 t 考驗、獨立樣本單因子共變數分析進行統計分析;質性資料則藉由「教學日誌」、「上課過程錄影」、「多重標準卡」、「學生訪談資料」等,進行質性資料分析。本研究的結果如下:(一)在包含式教學後,全班(t = -5.91,p<.05)、男生(t = -4.16,p<.05)和女生(t = -4.13,p<.05)在認知學習效果均達顯著差異,而男生和女生之間在認知學習效果無差異;(二)在包含式教學後,全班(t = -4.32,p<.05)、男生(t = -3.42,p<.05)和女生(t = -2.50,p<.05)在情意態度的學習效果均達顯著差異,而男生和女生之間在情意態度學習效果無差異;(三)在包含式教學後,全班(t = -6.07,p<.05)、男生(t = -3.70,p<.05)和女生(t = -5.97,p<.05)在客觀技能的學習效果均達顯著差異,而男生和女生之間在客觀技能學習效果無差異;(四)在包含式教學後,全班(t = -8.61,p<.05)、男生(t = -7.90,p<.05)和女生(t = -5.45,p<.05)在主觀技能的學習效果均達顯著差異,而男生和女生之間在主觀技能學習效果達顯著差異(F=11.986,p<.05),且男生優於女生;(五)大部份學生選擇練習的標準,會從最簡單的開始選起;選擇另外一個關卡時,會提高標準,勇於挑戰;面臨到困難時,也會永不放棄,持續挑戰下去。結論:Mosston 包含式教學是一種有效的教學法,適合男生和女生,注重學生的個別差異,且讓學生都樂於學習。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning effects of inclusion style among the third grade students, and to examine the decision making of the students. The participants were 22 students, with 13 males and 9 females. who were in the third grade in a primary school and took part in 8 lessons of table tennis teaching. The quantitative data were collected by cognitive test, affective test, objective and subjective table tennis backhand block skill and analyzed by paired-samples t-test and ANCOVA. The qualitative data were collected by criteria sheets, teaching journals, videotaping, and semi-structured interviews. The results were as follows:(1) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on cognitive test for all students(t = -5.91,p<.05), male students(t = -4.16,p<.05) and female students(t = -4.13,p<.05), but showed no significant differences between male and female students. (2) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on affective test for all students(t = -4.32, p<.05), male students(t = -3.42,p<.05) and female students(t = -2.50,p<.05), but showed no significant differences between male and female students. (3) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on objective table tennis backhand block skill for all students(t = -6.07,p<.05), male students(t = -3.70,p<.05) and female students(t = -5.97,p<.05), but showed no significant differences between male and female students. (4) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on subjective table tennis backhand block skill for all students(t = -8.61,p<.05), male students(t = -7.90,p<.05) and female students(t = -5.45,p<.05), but showed significant differences between male and female students(F=11.986,p<.05). The male students was superior to the female students. (5) Most of the students chose their tasks according to difficult levels, and they tended to choose the easiest one first. When they were given the opportunity to choose another tasks, the students would change the order of their choices according to the challenge of the tasks. When they faced difficulties, they never gave up and continued to take the challenge. The conclusions were as follows: Mosston's inclusion style was an effective teaching method. It suited both male and female students, focused on the individual differences of students, and students feel interested in learning it.
期刊論文
1.邱仕友(19880600)。桌球運動技術測驗的研究。復興崗學報,39,417-441。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.鄧正忠(19990600)。Mosston's直接教學形式對網球技術教學效果之研究。宜蘭技術學報,2,83-97。  延伸查詢new window
3.Beckett, K. D.(1991)。The effects of two teaching styles on college students' achievement of selected physical education outcomes。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,10(2),153-169。  new window
4.Byra, M.、Jenkins, J.(1998)。The thoughts and behaviors of learners in the inclusion style of teaching。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,18(1),26-42。  new window
5.許義雄(20030200)。遊戲是體育的種子。學校體育,13(1)=74,114-128。  延伸查詢new window
6.張春秀(20000300)。從應用研究成果談未來體育教學改革的方向。中華體育季刊,13(4)=52,9-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林博仁、邱秀貞、黃清雲(20070600)。桌球創意教學--運動教育模式。嘉大體育健康休閒,6(1),26-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Goldberger, M.、Gerny, P.(1982)。The effect of three styles of teaching on the psychomotor performance and social skill development of fifth grade children。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,53(2),116-124。  new window
9.Chatoupis, C.、Emmanuel, C.(2003)。Teaching physical education with the inclusion style--The case of a Greek elementary school。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,74(8),33-38。  new window
10.Byra, M.、Jenkins, J.(2000)。Matching instrucational tasks to learner ability: the inclusion style of teaching。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,71(3),26-30。  new window
11.蔡貞雄(19940900)。體育教學的意義和本質。國民體育季刊,23(3)=102,22-27。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王宗進(1995)。Mosston's 三種教學形式之教學效果比較研究--以羽球反手發短球為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳佳玲(2007)。Mosston互惠式和包含式教學在國小游泳教學效果之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳星如(2008)。Mosston練習式與理解式球類教學在國小籃球教學效果之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉菁華(2008)。Mosston命令式和包含式教學在國小體操教學效果之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳美卿(2006)。Mosston包含式教學對國小五年級學童羽球學習效果之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要--健康與體育學習領域。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Thomas, Jerry R.、Nelson, Jack K.、陳五洲(2003)。運動研究法。臺中:華格納企業。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳萬福(1992)。體育教學的心理。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2007)。學校體育教材教法與評量。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.Mosston, M.、Ashworth, S.(2002)。Teaching physical education。Columbus, OH:Charles E. Merrill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top