:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Mosston包含式教學融入理解式球類教學法對國小法式滾球學習成效之研究
書刊名:臺東大學體育學報
作者:吳淑慎陳玉枝
作者(外文):Wu, Shue-shenChen, Yuh-chih
出版日期:2016
卷期:24
頁次:頁1-32
主題關鍵詞:包含式教學形式理解式球類教學法學習成效知覺情形Inclusion stylePetanqueLearning outcomesTeaching games for understanding
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:42
  • 點閱點閱:14
本研究的目的是在探討包含式教學融入理解式球類教學法對國小五年級學生法式滾球的學習成效,並探討學生對學習成效的知覺情形。研究對象為澎湖縣國小五年級學生18名,實施12節的法式滾球教學,本研究以量化研究為主,兼採質性資料分析。量化資料包括認知發展、客觀技能、主觀技能及比賽表現等前後測資料,以相依樣本t考驗、獨立樣本單因子共變數分析進行統計分析;質性資料以教學日誌、錄影資料、多重標準卡、學生訪談及學習心得等,進行質性資料分析。研究結果如下:(一)認知發展學習成效:全班、男生、女生(t=-3.24、t=-4.02、t=-3.03,p<.05) 達顯著差異,不同性別間之學生無顯著差異;(二)客觀技能學習成效:全班、男生、女生 (t=-4.10、t=-2.65、t=-3.25,p<.05)達顯著差異,不同性別間之學生無顯著差異;(三)主觀技能學習成效:全班、男生、女生 (t=-8.52、t=-6.98、t=-5.50,p<.05)達顯著差異,而不同性別間之學生無顯著差異;(四)比賽表現學習成效:全班、男生、女生(t=-4.96、t=-3.43、t=-3.25,p<.05)達顯著差異,而不同性別間之學生無顯著差異;(五)在包含式教學融入理解式球類教學後,國小五年級學生對認知發展、技能學習及比賽表現學習成效的知覺情形,有明顯的進步,且喜歡上課的分式。結論:包含式教學融入理解式球類教學法能提升學生的學習興趣,也適合男生和女生,注重學生的個別差異。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning effects of inclusion style into Teaching Games for Understanding among the fifth-grade students' and to examine the perceptual condition of students' learning effects. The participants of this study were 18 students. Twelve lessons of Petanque teaching were conducted, and the research mainly adopted quantitative data; in addition, it also contained qualitative data. The quantitative data were collected by cognitive development test, objective skill, subjective skill and Game Performance Assessment Instrument(GPAI), which were statistically analyzed by paired-samples t-test and one-way analysis of covariance (ANOVA), independent samples. The qualitative data were collected by teaching journals, videotaping, criteria sheets, information of students interview, and learning reflections. The results were as follows: (1) After the inclusion style into Teaching Games for Understanding Petanque teaching, there were significant learning effects on cognitive development test for all students (t=-3.24,p<.05), boys (t=-4.02,p<.05), girls(t=- 3.03,p<.05), but the learning effects were not significantly different between both sexes on cognitive development. (2) After the inclusion style into Teaching Games for Understanding Petanque teaching, there were significant learning effects on objective skill test for all students (t =-4.10,p<.05), boys (t=-2.65,p<.05), girls (t=-3.25,p<.05), but the learning effects were not significantly different between both sexes on objective skill. (3) After the inclusion style into Teaching Games for Understanding Petanque teaching, there were significant learning effects on subjective skill test for all students (t=-8.52,p<.05), boys (t=-6.98,p<.05), girls (t=-5.50,p<.05), but the learning effects were not significantly different between both sexes on subjective skill. (4) After the inclusion style into Teaching Games for Understanding Petanque teaching, there were significant learning effects on game performance for all students (t=-4.96,p<.05), boys (t=-3.43,p<.05), girls (t=-3.25,p<.05), but the learning effects were not significantly different between both sexes on game performance. (5) The students liked the teaching method of the inclusion style into Teaching Games for Understanding. Besides, most of the studuents tended to challenge the easiest one first when they chose difficult levels of the exercise. After the students finished their task which was regarded as the easier one, they would try more difficult one. In conclusion, Mosston's inclusion style into Teaching Games for Understanding could benefit the elementary school students in the cognitive development, objective skills,subjective skills, and game performance. The approach not only enhanced students' learning motivation but also suited both boys and girls. Additionally, it focused on the individual differences of students, and made students become more interested in PE class.
期刊論文
1.Turner, A. P.、Martinek, T. J.(1992)。A comparative analysis of two models for teaching games: Technique approach and game-centered (tactical focus) approach。International Journal of Physical Education,29(4),15-31。  new window
2.Nevett, M.、Rovengo, I.、Babiarz, M.(2001)。Fourth-grade children's knowledge of cutting, passing and tactics in invasion games after a 12-lesson unit of instruction。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,20(4),389-401。  new window
3.Goldberger, M.、Gerny, P.(1982)。The effect of three styles of teaching on the psychomotor performance and social skill development of fifth grade children。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,53(2),116-124。  new window
4.李清偉(20130300)。讓十二年國教邁向成功。臺灣教育評論月刊,2(3),60-62。  延伸查詢new window
5.洪進益、陳玉枝(20110600)。Mosston包含式教學對國小桌球學習效果之研究。臺東大學體育學報,14,53-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Byra, M.、Jenkins, J.(2000)。Matching instructional tasks to learner ability: the inclusion style of teaching。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,71(3),26-30。  new window
學位論文
1.范綱榮(2007)。理解式球類教學法對國小五年級學生巧固球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉人豪(2007)。國小五年級理解式巧固球教學之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉菁華(2008)。Mosston命令式和包含式教學在國小體操教學效果之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.王國海(2010)。理解式球類教學對國小六年級學生躲避球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.尤國津(2010)。理解式球類教學法對國小學生法式滾球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳其達(2007)。理解式球類教學對滾球出手型態與目標設定對滾球擲準成績表現的影響(碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.張簡振豐(2008)。理解式球類教學對國小六年級學生排球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.隋立言(2006)。國小排球選手知覺教練領導行為與訓練滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.曾彥博(2011)。國小體育班應用理解式羽球訓練法之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭永杰(2010)。理解式球類教學法對國小學生樂樂棒球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳美卿(2006)。Mosston包含式教學對國小五年級學童羽球學習效果之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃志成、闕月清(2008)。理解式球類教學法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡貞雄(2001)。體育的理念。高雄市:復文書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.周宏室(2005)。Mosston(摩斯登)體育教學光譜的理論與應用。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.林清和(1996)。運動學習程式學。臺北市:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.國家教育研究院(2014)。十二年國民基本教育願景與藍圖,http//12basic.edu.tw。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE