臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：英國法有關家務勞動價值之研究
書刊名：東吳法律學報
作者：陳重陽 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Chung-yang
出版日期：2012
卷期：24:2
頁次：頁127-166
主題關鍵詞：家務勞動；婚前協議；夫妻扶養；扶養費；離婚財產分配；性別平等；同居關係；單親父母；Gender equality；Domestic contributions；Non financial contributions；Homemaker；Homemaking；Child caring；Assets redistribution；Maintenance；Cohabitation；Lone parents；Prenuptial agreements
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:96
本文介紹英國法中對於家務勞動價值之法律評價的近代發展，由於英國法對於「家」採取功能性上的定義，家的定義及範圍並不僅侷限在如我國民法規定必須是一夫一妻所成立之婚姻關係家庭。因此目前對於家務勞動價值之法制保護不僅包含婚姻關係裡之家務勞動，在2004年時亦擴及到同性公民伴侶關係（Civil artnership 2004），甚至，目前司法判決對於其他非婚姻關係家庭之家務勞動價值亦有逐漸承認之趨勢，例如異性同居關係。而對於未婚、失婚之單親父母，則透過社會福利政策加以扶持。英國法對於離婚或同性公民伴侶關係解消案件，採用個案處置原則，由法院對個案作通盤考量後，對夫妻所有財產重新加以分配（包含婚前與婚後所有財產），藉以達到公平性（fairness）之要求，並採取有別於一般大陸法系國家採用之夫妻財產制度對家務勞動之價值作評價，英國法目前遵循三大原則：當事人需求原則、平等分配原則以及補償原則，對離婚案件或同性公民伴侶關係解消作個案重新分配夫妻或伴侶間所有財產，藉以突顯家務勞動之價值並補償家務勞動操持者因婚姻關係所受到之不利益（relationship-generated disadvantage）。本文將嘗試分析英國法對於上述婚姻關係家庭以及非婚姻關係家庭之家務勞動之論述，期能從中發現值得我國借鏡之處。
The beginning of the 21st century has seen some radical judicial activism in English Family Law. Apart from pre-nuptial agreements, recently in private family law, the judicial decisions relevant to unpaid non-financial contributions have greatly changed the direction of legal discourse and placed a gradually increasing value on these unpaid works, taken to be the non-financial contributor's ultimate worth in the heterosexual married family context. English Family Law has faced the issue of whether it should adapt to change social norms by better reflecting the equal partnership discourse of marriage in the value that should be given to non-financial contributions typically made by women, such as housework and childcare, on divorce.This paper therefore considers how the English law and social policy assess the value of non-financial (domestic) contributions to the marriage relationship, civil partnership, cohabitation relationship and lone parents. It explores the extent to which they meet the aim of achieving fairness by weighing their achievements against the compensation approach, to see whether there are lessons that Taiwan can learn and draw on.
期刊論文
1.林易典(20090900)。論法定財產制中剩餘財產分配數額之調整：我國民法第1030條之1第2項之調整規範，與瑞士、德國民法相關規範之比較研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，38(3)，1-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李立如(20080300)。司法審查之表述功能與社會變革：以性別平等原則在家庭中的落實為例。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，37(1)，31-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Smart, C.(1984)。The Ties That Bind: Law, Marriage, and the Reproduction of Patriarchal Relations。London：RKP, C.。  new window
2.Beveridge, William(194211)。Social insurance and allied services: report by Sir William Beveridge, presented to Parliament by command of His Majesty。London：HMSO。  new window
3.Fineman, Martha Albertson(1995)。The Neutered Mother, The Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies。Routledge。  new window
4.Folbre, N.、許慧如(2002)。心經濟．愛無價。臺北：新新聞文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Duncan, S.、Edwards, R.(1999)。Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities。London：Macmillam。  new window
其他
1.Archer, J. ; Lloyd, B.著，簡皓瑜譯(2004)。性與性別。  延伸查詢new window
2.W. Dnes, A. ; Rowthorn, R.著，李銘珠譯(2005)。精算婚姻--兩性關係的法律經濟學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王澤鑑(2009)。比較法與法律解釋之適用。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭玲惠(2005)。兩性工作平等--法理與判決之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.Auchmuty, R.(2003)。When Equality Is not Equality: Homosexual Inclusion in Undue Influence Law。  new window
6.Bailey-Harris, R.(2003)。Lambert v Lambert-Towards the recognition of marriageas a partnership of equals。  new window
7.Bailey-Harris, R.(2005)。The Paradoxes of Principle and Pragmatism: Ancillary Relief in England and Wales。  new window
8.Barlow, A.(2007)。Configurations of Unpaid Caregiving within Current Legal Discourse in and around the Family。  new window
9.Barlow, A.(2007)。Community of Property-the Logical Response to Miller and McFarlane?。  new window
10.Barlow, A. ; Duncan, S. ; James, G. ; Park, A.(2005)。Cohabitation, Marriage and the Law, Social Change and Legal Reform in the 21st Century，Oxford：Hart。  new window
11.Barnett, H.(1998)。Introduction to Feminist Jurisprudence，London：Cavendish。  new window
12.Baroness, H.(2004)。Unmarried Couples in Family Law。  new window
13.Barton, C. ; Hibbs, M.(2002)。Ancillary Financial Relief and Fat Cat (tel) divorce。  new window
14.Barton, C. ; Bassett-Johnson, A.(2000)。The Declining Number of Ancillary Relief Orders。  new window
15.Bird, R.(2000)。Ancillary Relief Outcomes。  new window
16.Blackstone, W.(1869)。Commentaries on Laws of England。  new window
17.Bottomley ; Wong(2006)。Shared Households: A New Paradigm for Thinking about the Reform of Domestic Property Relations。  new window
18.Charlies, N.(1993)。Gender Divisions and Social Change，USA：Barnes and Noble。  new window
19.Choudhry, S. ; Herring, J.(2010)。European Human Rights and Family Law，Oxford：Hart。  new window
20.Cooke, E.(2007)。Miller/McFarlane: Law in Search of Discrimination。  new window
21.Cooke, E. ; Barlow, A. ; Akoto, T. ; Callus, T.(2005)。Community of Property: A Regime for England and Wales?。  new window
22.Costley-White, T.(2002)。SERPS- the Forgotten Asset。  new window
23.Cretney, S.(2003)。The Family and the Law: Status or Contract?。  new window
24.Cretney, S.(2003)。A Community of Property System Imposed by Judicial Decision。  new window
25.Cretney, S.(2005)。Family Law in the 20th Century，Oxford：Oxford。  new window
26.Crompton, R ; Lynette, C.(2008)。Who Does the Housework? The Division of Labour within the Home in Park，London：Sage。  new window
27.De Cruz, P.(2010)。Family Law, Sex and Society: a Comparative Study of Family Law，Oxford：Routledge。  new window
28.Deech, R.(1977)。The Principles of Maintenance。  new window
29.Dex, S.(2003)。Families and Work in the Twenty-First Century，New York：Joseph Rowntree Foundation。  new window
30.Diduck, A.(2001)。Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v White [2000] 2 FLR 981。  new window
31.Diduck, A. ; O’Donovan, K.(2006)。Feminist Perspectives on Family Law，Oxon：Routledge-Cavendish。  new window
32.Diduck, A. ; Kaganas, F.(2006)。Family Law, Gender and the State: Text, Cases and Materials，Oxford：Hart。  new window
33.D Morley, J.(2006)。Enforceable Prenuptial Agreements: the World View。  new window
34.Dunne, G.(1999)。A Passion for "Sameness" ? Sexuality and Gender Accountability’，London：Sage。  new window
35.Dunne, G.(2000)。Opting into Motherhood: Lesbians blurring the Boundaries and Transforming the Meaning of Parenthood and Kinship。  new window
36.Eekelaar, J.(2001)。Back to Basics and Forward into the Unknown。  new window
37.Eekelaar, J.(2001)。Asset Distribution on Divorce- The Durational Elemento。  new window
38.Eekelaar, J.(2005)。Miller v Miller: the Descent into Chaos。  new window
39.Francis, N.(2006)。If It’s Broken: Fix It。  new window
40.Freud, D.(2007)。Reducing Dependency, Increasing opportunity: Options for the Future of Welfare to Work: An Independent Report to the Department for Work and Pensions，Leeds：Department for Work and Pensions。  new window
41.Gershuny, J. ; Bittman, M.(2005)。Exit, Voice and Suffering: Do Couples Adapt to Changing Employment Patterns?。  new window
42.Harris-Short, S. ; Miles, J.(2007)。Family Law: Text, Cases and Materials，Oxford：Oxford。  new window
43.Hatten,W. ; Vinter, L. ; Williams, E.(2002)。Dads on Dads, Needs and Expectations at Home and at Work, EOC Research Discussions Series，Manchester：EOC。  new window
44.Herring, J.(2009)。Family Law，Longman：Harlow。  new window
45.Hess, E.(2006)。Assessing the Quantum of Periodical Payments after McFarlane。  new window
46.James, A.(1994)。Women's unwaged work: the Heart of the Informal Sector，London：Sage。  new window
47.Law Commission(1969)。Financial Provision in Matrimonial Proceedings，London：HMSO。  new window
48.Law Commission(1973)。First Report on Family Property: A New Approach，London：HMSO。  new window
49.Law Commission(1971)。Family Property Law Working Paper，London：HMSO。  new window
50.Law Commission(1978)。Third Report on Family Property: The Matrimonial Home Coownership and Occupation Rights and Household Goods，London：HMSO。  new window
51.Law Commission for England and Wales(2006)。Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown- A Consultation Paper，London：The Stationary Office。  new window
52.Lewis, J.(2005)。The Gender Settlement and Social Provision: the Work-Welfare Relationship at the Level of the Household，UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
53.Lewis, J.(2005)。The changing context for the Obligation to Care and to Earn，Oxford：Hart。  new window
54.Lowe, N. ; Douglas, G.(2007)。Bromley's Family Law，Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
55.Lowe, N. ; Kay, R.(2009)。The Status of Prenuptial Agreements in English Law: Eccentricity or Sensible Pragmatism?，Vienna：Jan Sramek Verlag。  new window
56.Miles, J.(2008)。Making sense of need, compensation and equal sharing after Miller; McFarlane。  new window
57.Moor, P. ; LeGrice, V.(2006)。Periodical Payments Orders following Miller and McFarlane: a Series of Unfortunate Events。  new window
58.Morris, A. ; Nott, S.(1995)。All my Worldly Goods: A Feminist Perspective on the Legal Regulation of Wealth，Aldershot：Dartmouth。  new window
59.Moynihan, D. P.(1973)。The Politics of Guaranteed Income，Random House。  new window
60.O'Brien, M. ; Shemilt, I.(2003)。Working Fathers, Equal Opportunities，Manchester：EOC.。  new window
61.O'Donovon, K.(1982)。Should all maintenance of spouses be abolished?。  new window
62.(19790718)。Official Report of House of Lords。  new window
63.Probert, R.(2006)。Cretney's Family Law，London：Sweet and Maxwell。  new window
64.Probert, R.(2006)。Cohabitation: Contributions and Sacrifices。  new window
65.Ryznar, M. ; Stępień-Sporek, A.(2009)。To Have and to Hold, for Richer and Richer: Prenuptial Agreements in the Comparative Contex。  new window
66.Scott, J.(2006)。Family and Gender Roles: How Attitudes Are Changing，University of Cambridge。  new window
67.Sharp, C.(2008)。Prenuptial Agreements: a Rethink Required。  new window
68.Scherpe, J. M.(2007)。A Comparative View of Pre-Nuptial Agreements。  new window
69.Smits, J.(2001)。Mixed legal systems and European Private Law，Cambridge：Intersentia。  new window
70.(1978)。Third Report on Family Property: The Matrimonial Home (Co-ownership and Occupation Rights) and Household Goods，HMSO。  new window
71.Trim, H.(2010)。Radmacher v Granatino: The Wait is Over。  new window
72.Turner, J.(2010)。QC of 1 King's Bench Walk, ‘Radmacher v Granatino: Preliminary Thoughts on the Decision of the Supreme Court。  new window
73.Watson, A.(2000)。Legal Transplants and European Private Law。  new window
74.Week, J.(2002)。Elective Families: Lesbian and Gay Life Experiments，London：Routledge。  new window
75.Welstead, M. ; Edwards, S.(2008)。Family Law，New York：Oxford。  new window
76.Wood, F.(2007)。Prenuptial Agreements-Current Case Law。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：612（臺灣：609，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2178223 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67975480
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上